straightUp wrote:
…your exaggerations were giving me the impression that you were talking about a wide-spread curriculum change to allow "d**g q***n hour" as a regular part of education.
Who said this question was confined to part of the the school official “curriculum”? The point is, it is being promoted and done in schools (plural) and you claimed to say so, period, was a “h********c lie.” Now you are trying to cover up your lies by redefining the statement on your terms.
Backdooring (pardon the pun) this program makes it even more despicable. It means they haven’t gone through the proper channels to get it approved. You know, like checking with parents and being upfront about it.
“
D**g Q***n Story Hour is back
in New York City schools and libraries as though it never left— because it hasn't. After outrage from parents who didn't feel that their children needed to be read to about pronouns and non-binary toddlers by men and women costumed as the opposite sex, the City of New York continued funding, and expanding, D**g Q***n Story Hour programs.
“
D**g Q***ns funded with taxpayer dollars dress up and read to children in libraries, schools, parks and green spaces all over townand in every borough. D**g Q***n Story hour is funded by New York City Councilmembers, who are able to use their discretionary funding to pay for the d**g q***ns and kings to come read to children, and help them put on d**g q***n makeup…
“D**g Story Hour NYC
routinely shares images of d**g q***ns reading to students, whether in schools, libraries or elsewhere. They shared images of students at Queens middle school IS 93, where Bella Noche spoke to children.
The post said that Noche was discussing the children's book Melissa, by Alex Gino, with the students. The book is about a boy who wants to be a girl, and so really is a girl. "When people look at George, they see a boy. But George knows she's a girl," the description reads.” https://thepostmillennial.com/d**g-story-hour-continues-taxpayer-funded-programming-in-nyc-schools-libraries
^^^notice the title of the article in the url^^^ “d**g story hour…taxpayer funded…in nyc schools”
Okay, that’s NYC. But, again you were in error when you claimed it was “only one city”…
Then there is Philadelphia…
“Parents of first-graders at a popular Center City Philadelphia public school were outraged after they were sent a notification for a forthcoming d**g q***n story hour with their classroom.
“Fox News obtained an email sent to parents of a first-grade class at the Albert M. Greenfield School near Rittenhouse Square, telling them their child's classroom will be participating in D**g Q***n Story Hour, with the missive going on to highlight the program's attributes and recent awards.” https://www.foxnews.com/media/d**g-queen-story-hour-graders-philadelphia-school-outrages-parents
Then there is Thornton CO…
“THORNTON, Colo. (CBS4) — A school district has apologized to parents after hosting a d**g q***n as part of a career day. A spokesperson for Adams 12 Five Star schools said Rocky Top Middle School staff should have notified parents a d**g q***n would be speaking to their children before allowing the speech to happen…
“The d**g q***n, identified as a woman who goes by "Jessica L'Whor," is a relative of one student. The district confirmed she was invited to attend career day.” https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/adams-county-career-day-d**g-queen/
So, a d**g q***n who goes by the name “Jessica
L’Whor” is invited to speak at “career day”, and you think my concern comes from “homophobia?
Wrong! I don’t personally care if people are homosexuals. I have never had any homosexual tendencies, you’re just wrong in your imaginations in that regard. You’re just grasping at something you can charge me with to make yourself look better.
I care about them indoctrinating children who aren’t mature enough to consider such topics. Just like I would be concerned if prostitutes were to dress up in g-strings and nipple tassels and called it “whore-story-hour”, I’d be just as outraged. Or for that matter, even if a heterosexual couple came into age-inappropriate settings (like schools or libraries) and started flaunting sexually suggestive activities. Nope, not acceptable either. The way these activities and topics are being presented to young school-age children is simply not appropriate, it is downright immoral and amounts to sexual abuse of minors.
That is simple concern for children. Which apparently you and I have different morals about. Fine. You or they can teach your own children in the privacy of your own home. Oh, darn, homosexual relationships don’t make children on their own by which to “model” their “families” by. Surprise, surprise! Maybe there’s a reason for that! Maybe there’s a reason homosexual relationships are sterile and thus do not reproduce. I assure you, there is, whether you like it, accept it, or not.
You claimed…
straightUp wrote:
“I don't see ANY indication in ANY of the articles you linked to that these d**g q***ns are advocating homosexuality.”
You clearly didn’t dig deep enough. But first…
“Q***r - of, relating to, or characterized by sexual or romantic attraction to members of one's own sex : GAY entry 1” Merriam-Webster Webster
When someone calls themselves “q***r” it is generally understood they are referring to their sexual orientation as being “homosexual”.
Now then, if you would have read the “agenda”, the stated mission, of “d**g q***n story hour”, it is specifically to promote a “q***r” lifestyle. This is their own words from their “about” page…
“What is D**g Story Hour?
“It’s just what it sounds like! Storytellers using the art of d**g to read books to kids in libraries, schools, and bookstores.
“DSH captures the imagination and play of the g****r fluidity of childhood and
gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly q***r role models.
“In spaces like this, kids are able to see
people who defy rigid g****r restrictions and imagine a world where everyone can be their authentic selves!”
https://www.d**gstoryhour.org/about
If they truly wanted to be good “role models” how about them simply acting like other adults and not flaunting their sexuality in front of kids, and instead be good role models as parents of stable households? Is that asking too much?
People’s “authentic selves” are who their c********es biologically determine them to be. That is what children should be taught in school. That is biological fact, science.
Show me one L***Q+ wh**ever who was ever able to change their c********es by choice or by thinking about it. They are in denial of who they are, and they are pressing toward demanding we comply with their “choices”. Being in denial of who you are is typically considered a mental health problem, not a “socially acceptable alternative lifestyle.” Such has been the”norm” that has served mankind well for all of man’s past known history. The relationship of one man and one woman is the basic building block of all of human society. If all of mankind converted to homosexuality the whole human race would be extinct in that generation. That is how unfruitful, and deadly, homosexuality is. It is destructive to the continuity of the “circle of life” of human beings, if not destructive to their individual moral being. Are they teaching that at “d**g q***n story hour”? But I digress.
Still not convinced their agenda is to indoctrinate young minds? Here, how about a personal testimony from one of the “storytellers”…
“Self-acceptance and self-love are what lead me to do d**g. Once I learned how to embrace my femininity, I wanted to explore that and express it in a creative way. D**g is the perfect outlet for me to do so. Through DSH,
I hope to be a positive, q***r role model for kids. It’s important kids know that it’s okay to be different. Diversity is part of what makes humanity beautiful, and I’m just one example or facet of what that looks like."
-Cholula Lemon, Storyteller, DSH NYC, https://www.d**gstoryhour.org/press
You and I obviously have different views of morality. And that is why there remains “irreconcilable differences” between us.
You will never convince me that it is socially or morally acceptable to flaunt homosexual lifestyles to children. Don’t change the subject as being about “free speech” in general. Now that would be a strawman!