The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview

New evidence shows that the earth has experienced a devastating, worldwide flood, whose waters violently burst forth from under earth’s crust. Standard “textbook” explanations for many of earth’s major features are scientifically flawed. We can now explain, using well-understood phenomena, how this cataclysmic event rapidly formed so many features. These and other mysteries are best explained by an earthshaking event, far more catastrophic than almost anyone has imagined.

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/HydroplateOverview2.html

You can fill more than entire libraries with evidence of Jesus too..So what's your point?? There is "near universal consensus" among scholars that Jesus existed historically, although biblical scholars differ about the beliefs and teachings of Jesus as well as the accuracy of the details of his life that have been described in the Gospels.... While scholars have sometimes criticized Jesus scholarship for religious bias and lack of methodological soundness, with very few exceptions, such critics do support the historicity of Jesus, and reject the theory that Jesus never existed, known as the Christ myth theory..... Certain scholars, particularly in Europe, have recently made the case that while there are a number of plausible "Jesuses" that could have existed, there can be no certainty as to which Jesus was the historical Jesus, and that there should also be more scholarly research and debate on this topic...

A quick google can help enlighten or give pause for further denial..You will most assuredly opt for number two..Just a couple for your consideration....

http://coldcasechristianity.com/2014/is-there-any-evidence-for-jesus-outside-the-bible/


http://amazingbibletimeline.com/bible_questions/q9_historical_proof_bible/