If the right to v**e was in the Bill of Rights, what good would it do us if it was given the same lack of respect that Democrats and RINOs give the current Bill of Rights?

If the right to v**e was equal to the right to the right to petition the government, the right to bear arms, the right to exercise one's religion, the right to due process, and the right of the states and the people to hold all power not specifically given to the feds, what freaking good would that do?

The best way to make rights more available is to limit the power of the only force that can take them away. The government.

How about if we put the right to v**e and the right to life both in the constitution. Would you go along with that?

If the right to v**e was in the Bill of Rights, what good would it do us if it was given the same lack of respect that Democrats and RINOs give the current Bill of Rights?

If the right to v**e was equal to the right to the right to petition the government, the right to bear arms, the right to exercise one's religion, the right to due process, and the right of the states and the people to hold all power not specifically given to the feds, what freaking good would that do?

There is no documented rights that can overcome corrupt leaders.

The best way to make rights more available is to limit the power of the only force that can take them away. The government.

How about if we put the right to v**e and the right to life both in the Constitution. Would you go along with that?

My point in suggesting the reading in totality instead of just some..All examples of the SCOTUS to uphold our " right and priveldge of v****g.."

We did not grant our forming Federalist the right to abrogate our v**e and although not specifically granted in the Constitution it is not denied in it either.. Pain staking measures have always been to protect the right of v**e, not deny it..

There is not a politician around that would move to strip that right unless they wanted immediate ousting...

Suffice it to say the Twenty-third, Twenty-fourth, and Twenty-sixth amendments gave representation to the District of Columbia, forbid poll taxes, and lowered the v****g age to 18, respectively. The passage of each of these Amendments reflected a shift towards making v****g a right of all citizens, and indeed a fundamental part of citizenship....

Four of the fifteen post-Civil War constitutional amendments were ratified to extend v****g rights to different groups of citizens. These extensions state that v****g rights cannot be denied or abridged based on the following: "Race, color, or previous condition of servitude"..

Ratified on August 18, 1920, the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted American women the right to v**e—a right known as woman suffrage...

The US Constitution stated in Amendment XV, which was ratified by the states in 1870: "Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to v**e shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color Etccc..

Let's not forget the Bil of Rights either..
Much has changed since the original writing.. Almost a third of the amendments added to the Constitution after the Bill of Rights was ratified concern the ability to v**e...

My point in suggesting the reading in totality instead of just some..All examples of the SCOTUS to uphold our " right and priveldge of v****g.."

We did not grant our forming Federalist the right to abrogate our v**e and although not specifically granted in the Constitution it is not denied in it either.. Pain staking measures have always been to protect the right of v**e, not deny it..

There is not a politician around that would move to strip that right unless they wanted immediate ousting...

Suffice it to say the Twenty-third, Twenty-fourth, and Twenty-sixth amendments gave representation to the District of Columbia, forbid poll taxes, and lowered the v****g age to 18, respectively. The passage of each of these Amendments reflected a shift towards making v****g a right of all citizens, and indeed a fundamental part of citizenship....

Four of the fifteen post-Civil War constitutional amendments were ratified to extend v****g rights to different groups of citizens. These extensions state that v****g rights cannot be denied or abridged based on the following: "Race, color, or previous condition of servitude"..

Ratified on August 18, 1920, the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted American women the right to v**e—a right known as woman suffrage...

The US Constitution stated in Amendment XV, which was ratified by the states in 1870: "Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to v**e shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color Etccc..

Let's not forget the Bil of Rights either..
Much has changed since the original writing.. Almost a third of the amendments added to the Constitution after the Bill of Rights was ratified concern the ability to v**e...

You learned wrong then~~The article you quote is only a very small partial opinion from a blog site that fails to address the issue in totality..
"There is a state right to v**e regardless of the lacking Federa law to v**e..Our v****g system some 13,000 "separate and unequal" e******n jurisdictions - is based on the legal foundation of states' rights and local control." Each of us has a "state right" to v**e based on that state's laws and those state v**es compromise the eventual e*****rate v**e that places the final v**e represented by the state itself..

An individual citizen may not have a federal right clearly defined in the original writings but does by amendment or decision and they certainly do under state law..
Thus and why we are a Republic and not a democracy... Using the word democracy or democratic principal will not change the fact that' we are a Republic and our v****g system itself confirms such...

Like removing the statues of history will not change history trying to imply we are ruled under a democratic mandate will not change that we are a Republic no matter how much you try.. If our Constitution was to be a democracy it would have so stated instead of stating it is a Republic. It does not say we are a democracy does it??

Just like this controversy over State Ids being at the discretion of the state; it is the state that has jurisdiction not the Feds.."V****g is a right, but it is also a privilege....

Also since v****g is a fundamental part our constitutional Republic, and many died for our rights it is a fundamental right regardless of lacking as a federal mandate..

Finally when looking at the Supreme Court rulings they are conctantly consistent with that " fundamental right of v****g.. ~ think State law requirement of ID and the challenges..
Or better yet think:
"The V****g Rights Act of 1965, a landmark piece of federal legislation in the United States that prohibits racial discrimination in v****g.[7][8] It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson during the height of the Civil Rights Movement on August 6, 1965, and Congress later amended the Act five times to expand its protections.[7] Designed to enforce the v****g rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, the Act secured v****g rights for racial minorities throughout the country, especially in the South. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the Act is considered to be the most effective piece of civil rights legislation ever enacted in the country.[9]

Anyway when you read the entire intent of v****g it does have many implied decisions of constitutional redress that when challenged go before the Supreme Court for opinion and it is always upheld favorably to the citizen(s).

So cheer up you do have and always will have your v**e..A good thing too..

It's the Constitution. Not liking it doesn't change it.

There are a lot of freedoms and rights that I wish were more explicit in Constitution.

They're are also some rights and freedoms that are explicitly in the Constitution that I would like to put in a second time to see if that would keep Democrats from ignoring them.

Currently anyone eligible to v**e that wants to v**e can v**e. That right is not currently being demied while the rights to life, bear arms, and freedom of speech and religion are being trampled on a daily basis.

Where is your sorrow over those rights being destroyed?