Posts for: Rose42
Mar 15, 2024 17:46:28 #
(Main)
NotMAGA wrote:
@ Lily - and anyone else who still sees DJ as some sort of white knight...
Just because you disagree does not mean it isn't true. Google the stats. Look at the empty churches getting even emptier. The only ones prospering - sort of - are the ones preaching the Prosperity gospel.
You cannot serve both God and money.
Just because you disagree does not mean it isn't true. Google the stats. Look at the empty churches getting even emptier. The only ones prospering - sort of - are the ones preaching the Prosperity gospel.
You cannot serve both God and money.
That has nothing to do with trump.
It was waning during Obama’s tenure as well.
Mar 15, 2024 17:43:14 #
(Main)
publican wrote:
In case you are wondering what moral failings I am talking about, we can start with tfg's consistently and proudly stiffing the people who he has hired. His business model is to hire people, let them do the work agreed upon, refuse to pay them what was agreed upon, and then dare them to sue him. He has destroyed many small businesses in this way. Even to think that anyone could be this evil makes me sick.
Really? I know native New Yorkers who say that isn’t true. They loved him in NY. But the media doesn’t tell that side of the story
Mar 15, 2024 17:40:48 #
(Main)
publican wrote:
Rose, you are smarter than that. I don't doubt th... (show quote)
They don’t ‘appear’ to be decent people, they are.
I’ve found that many who scream the loudest about trump’s sins have plenty of their own.
Those who support Biden support a man who supports k*****g life at its most innocent, he totally disrespects women and he is presiding over an unprecedented rise in the sexualization of children. Does this mean that Biden supporters can only appear to be decent while supporting a man whose morals are as low as trump’s?
People who don’t just v**e along party lines v**e for policies.
There is no
Mar 15, 2024 17:22:59 #
(Main)
straightUp wrote:
First of all his huge cult is too small to have much power in a democracy. It may have been enough to get him elected in an e*******l system where Americans are not represented equally, but it's not enough to give him the authoritarian power he would need to truly be a dictator.
Yes its big enough and they could have o*******wn the government if they chose to on J** 6th. The group on that day was a bunch of dolts who really had no idea what they were doing. A lot of highly sk**led vets back him
Quote:
Secondly, Trump simply doesn't have what it takes. As I explained earlier, it's not that Trump wants to be a dictator it's that he can't handle democracy. So every time he is confronted with with opposition from multiple parties he shies away from negotiating a consensus and looks for a way to arrive at decisions without considering opposing views.
This is why people see him as an authoritarian. It's not actually a sign of strength but a sign of weakness.
This is why people see him as an authoritarian. It's not actually a sign of strength but a sign of weakness.
No one really knows if he has what it takes. I don’t think its because he can’t handle democracy
Mar 15, 2024 16:46:59 #
(Main)
RascalRiley wrote:
Occasionally, yes.
It was not long ago we were not on speaking terms.
It was not long ago we were not on speaking terms.
I had no problem speaking to you. You just didn’t like what I had to say.
Mar 15, 2024 15:24:18 #
Mar 15, 2024 15:07:55 #
(Main)
Knightlady wrote:
How
You didn’t ‘betray’ TJ. I saw that exchange. He/she plays games.
Mar 15, 2024 15:06:49 #
(Main)
RascalRiley wrote:
During his first term he was restrained by adults in the room.
During his first temp he needed to win a second e******n.
During his second term he will only hire those loyal to him and he will have no concerns about getting re-elected.
Need an example? The RNC today.
During his first temp he needed to win a second e******n.
During his second term he will only hire those loyal to him and he will have no concerns about getting re-elected.
Need an example? The RNC today.
Think. He could have done that in his first term. But he didn’t.
Mar 15, 2024 14:40:55 #
(Main)
publican wrote:
Agreed, Rose. I don't wish anyone dead either. Still, when have you ever known any of Don's "humor" to be actually funny? Personally, I have never noticed that the Magats have any sense of humor, at least not in the way most people understand the term.
I don’t find him to be particularly funny.
How many Magas (no t) do you know? The ones I know are mostly like everyone else just wanting to live their lives and be happy. They’re nothing like so many of you describe. Thats why I have often defended them though am not one. They aren’t stupid despite what some here say, are highly educated and as patriotic as anyone else
Mar 15, 2024 14:36:35 #
(Main)
publican wrote:
Well, I have to agree with you there. It's extremely unfortunate that it took so long that now it appears that tfg will be able to delay even longer to the point of not having to face justice before the e******n, and consequently not having ever to face it at all. What do they say? Justice delayed is justice denied. In this case it is the justice for his victims, which is pretty much all of us, which is being denied.
Often ‘justice’ favors those with the most money or the most connections.
Mar 15, 2024 14:31:32 #
(Main)
NotMAGA wrote:
👍
Yes, yes and yes.
Yes, yes and yes.
If he really wanted to be a dictator and there was this huge cult behind him as many of you claim, then why did he not do far more to get there? He could have but didn’t.
Mar 15, 2024 14:27:06 #
(Main)
publican wrote:
How much actual experience do you have working with the legal system?
Lawyers in the family. If he were really that bad its a failure to not have been indicted long ago. How could it not be? Look how quickly other cases are adjuticated.
Mar 15, 2024 12:37:16 #
(Main)
publican wrote:
What is puzzling is that the Republicans used to be the party of law and order. So here we have the law operating as designed, yet they are complaining bitterly.
The question is timing. Its no coincidence that these indictments are all happening now with an e******n looming. And 91? Does no one give thought to that number? Has the justice system really been so inept all these years if he’s been a criminal all along? Don’t bother with the ‘it takes time to put together’ response. It doesn’t take THAT much time
I would say the law has failed since they took so long.
Mar 15, 2024 12:26:21 #
(Main)
straightUp wrote:
But Trump didn't say that did he? So why are you making accusations about how you imagine people would react to situations that never actually happened? Seems to me like you don't actually have an answer to what TJKMO actually is claiming.
Because it speaks to how some of you people take things and just run with them with no thought. I don’t want trump to run either but I don’t take anything said about him at face value and I remember to take into consideration he has often said things to push people’s buttons. That is something he’s good at
Mar 15, 2024 10:53:57 #
(Main)
DASHY wrote:
Is it time for a third-party p**********l movement NO LABELS to present a "unity ticket" for v**ers to consider as an alternative to the current pair of sometimes forgetful old guys. https://apnews.com/article/no-labels-candidates-se******n-third-party-ea3f28a5e35f0789e873ac42369b0a77
That I agree with. But how do we get v**ers to break free from democrat and republican party allegiance. They worry more about party than who is best to lead.