Mine is a ridiculous statement, I think not, what is ridiculous is allowing any civilian to be able to purchase an automatic k*****g machine. What do you think the shooter used to hit over 500 people in Vegas? An undisclosed number of the weapons at the crime scene were believed to have been modified with technology known as a "bump-stock'' that allows for rapid firing, similar to a machine gun, two people familiar with the matter said. Total the man owned 42 guns. I'm sure you don't believe in allowing a finite number of guns, that would impede your 2nd amendment correct, so tell me where should a line be drawn, or should there just be no holds bar, anything goes.

Let's not make any reasonable measures on gun control, because you folks just despise that word control. So let's fast forward... the right, now has us all carrying and we go to church packing. So what is going to prevent someone walking in during mass when everyone is facing the altar taking out his automatic, maybe two and mowing everyone down before they can even turn around?

I don't know where you live but around here it's not any two thousand dollars, more to the tune of two hundred.

Funny the more you guys argue that it wasn't auto's but semi auto's used, the more it wins favour of no guns, except a single shot shotgun.

In today's day we don't need guns, we need to teach to preserve life, and use other forces to bring down perpetrators, if hunting, use a bow and be a real h****r. The animals have a hard enough time surviving around the egocentric humans.

What the world needs now is love, not more gun crazed h****rs, try fishing.

After Bill Clinton's escapades in the Oval office, this is like revisiting 'ancient history'. Nobody cares, seriously. A big todo about nothing. Most Americans realize that the Left is just out to get him on anything that will "stick to the wall". And they realize the radical Left is overdoing it. It's starting to look like a sense of desperation. Will it hurt them in the long run? We can only hope so. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/march_2018/most_v**ers_aren_t_swayed_by_stormy_daniels_claims

I hear what the left says about a GOP that has control of our system, who has the constitution under attack in every state they have control of their house and senate. In the states where they have supermajorities the democrats who don't have enough v**es to even filibuster might as well go home.

It comes down to this pure and simple philosophical difference, and we hear it on a daily basis...

The right, when they aren't happy about government, actually the government they put in place given that they've had control of for seven years, talks about taking our government back tied in with second amendment rights.

Dems, for all of their faults virtually never think of taking control of government by using second amendment rights, the whole concept of taking government back is 100% about getting out the v**e and taking back control. We talk about gaining control in 2018/2020.

The GOP and the right can't help but notice that the only thing keeping their dwindling minority numbers in control is gerrymandering and v**er suppression. There are red states where the dem registered v**ers have a 10% advantage yet their government has pulled a 60% or better control.

We live in a democracy, and if you lose e******ns to where you lose control, suck it up, them's the rules.