Jade Helm & The Bill Ayers Connection --51JH. B50
Larry Grathwohl was an undercover FBI operative who had infiltrated the infamous "Weather Underground" founded by Obama friend and mentor, Bill Ayers. If you remember, the Weather underground was a radical c*******t group who was responsible for bombing the New York City Police headquarters in 1970, the U.S. Capital building in 1971 and the Pentagon in 1972. Bill Ayers has extensive ties to the Obama administration and it is rumored that he even wrote Obama's book, Dreams from My Father. Obama's political career, as we all know, was launched from the living room of Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn in Chicago. After his known involvement in the c*******t revolutionary group, Bill now enjoys a luxurious career as a professor earning a six figure salary at the University of Chicago, where he trains the next generation of anti-American radicals on the finer points of wealth ine******y. that Ayers and his group had plans to eliminate 25 million Americans who they would not be able to "re-educate." Furthermore, he claims that they also expressed a desire to split the country into several different regions and give it to the Russians, Chinese, Cubans and the Vietnamese; all c*******t countries mind you.
There are many events taking place in America that would give one the impression that this plan is well underway. First, let's discuss the latest Clinton Scandal involving the sale of U.S. uranium to the Russians. They now own twenty percent of America's uranium producing capabilities, mainly in the states of Utah and Wyoming. While many people may think nothing of this, this limits America's ability to produce its own nuclear weapons while giving control of our resources to the Russians.
One of the motivating factors behind the actions of the Weather Underground was the belief that America exercised "imperial power" unfairly across the world. They were, after all, c*******t sympathizers.
Does the sale of this uranium have anything to do with Bill Ayers and his Weather Underground Plan? It's hard to say. However, there other variables that need to be considered.
The United States is suffering from a crushing economic debt of eighteen trillion dollars, of which, at least, a trillion is owed to the Chinese. We have been shipping our jobs to them, and they have been sending us cheap goods for so long, that nobody even cares about the consequences anymore. It was rumored in 2009 that Hillary Clinton had promised the Chinese eminent domain rights over American land if we should ever default on our debt. While there is no confirmation that this deal ever took place, it has been confirmed that Clinton had intended to present the deal to the Chinese. Regardless if this deal took place or not it seems the Chinese think they will take our land anyway. In 2011, it was reported that the Chinese plan to build special economic zones within the United States. These zones would essentially be fifty square mile cities built specifically for Chinese purposes and Chinese purposes only. For those who may not find this shocking enough, let me conclude by reminding you that the Chinese submitted a report to the U.N. demanding American citizens be disarmed because the Second Amendment was a threat to human rights. What they really mean is that they are afraid armed Americans might not be too happy about them taking what's ours. Hang on to your guns America.
In his usual fashion, President Obama ignored the atrocities committed by the Cuban regime of Fidel Castro, and opened up diplomatic relations. He also removed their name from the list of nations sponsoring terrorism after which a group with known ties to Cuba murdered ten people in Columbia. Cuba is a c*******t country that many l*****ts believe is a paradise on earth. Cuba is one of the countries, along with Russia and China, that the Weather Ground believed would want to push into the United States after their c*******t revolution.
Many people are concerned that the upcoming "Jade Helm" exercise is a precursor to martial law in America. It has been rumored for many years now that the global elite have built FEMA concentration camps across the country, and many believe we are on the verge of being rounded up. Bill Ayers and his friends made it perfectly clear that twenty five million Americans would have to be eliminated if they fail to be re-educated. Right now in America, patriots are terrorists, Christians are the bigots and all white people are r****t. Veterans are a threat to national security, radical Muslims are first class citizens, as are militant homosexuals. It should also be noted that much of the Jade Helm exercise is taking place in land where the Russians and the Chinese have staked out their claims. Is all of this just coincidence or is what we are witnessing the same plan that Larry Grathwohl tried to warn us of long ago? Only time will tell I suppose.
Source: david risselada, freedom outpost, larry grathwohl,

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflict White House steps up warnings about jihad terrorism on U.S. soil --1JH. B12

Alarmed about the growing threat from Islamic State, the Obama administration has dramatically stepped up warnings of potential terrorist attacks on American soil after several years of relative calm. Behind the scenes, U.S. authorities have raised defenses at U.S. military bases, put local police forces on alert and increased surveillance at the nation’s airports, railroads, shopping malls, energy plants and other potential targets.
Driving the unease are FBI arrests of at least 30 Americans on terrorism-related charges this year in an array of “lone wolf” plots, none successful, but nearly all purportedly inspired by Islamic State propaganda or appeals.
The group’s leader, Abu Bakr Baghdadi, drove home the danger in a 34-minute audio recording released online Thursday. He urged Muslims everywhere to “migrate to the Islamic State or fight in his land, wherever that may be.”
U.S. officials estimate the Sunni Muslim group has drawn 22,000 foreign fighters to Syria and Iraq, including about 3,700 from Western nations. About 180 Americans have gone, or tried to go.
U.S. counter-terrorism officials initially viewed Islamic State as primarily a regional security threat, focused on expanding and protecting its self-proclaimed Islamist caliph**e in Syria and Iraq, rather than launching attacks abroad.
But the analysis has shifted sharply as gunmen inspired by the group, but not controlled or assisted by them, opened fire at the Parliament in Ottawa; at a cafe in Sydney, Australia; at a kosher grocery in Paris; and, on May 3, in Garland, Texas.
James B. Comey, the FBI director, warned this month that “hundreds, maybe thousands” of Americans are seeing recruitment pitches from Islamic State on Facebook, Twitter and other social media, as well as messages sent to smartphones of “disturbed people” who could be pushed to attack U.S. targets.
“We have to be concerned about the independent actor, and the independent actor who is here in the homeland who may strike with little or no warning,” he said. “The nature of the global terrorist threat has evolved.”…
source--jihad watch, rober spencer, brian bennett, la times

Clinton’s Muslim Brotherhood-Tied Aide’s Emails Now Facing Disclosure Lawsuit --47JH. B43
Huma Abedin, the Muslims Brotherhood-tied aide of Hillary Rodham Clinton, is now facing the same scrutiny as her boss. After the State Department failed to turn them over in response to an open records request, there is now a disclosure lawsuit in the works. Because the FOIA request at issue in this litigation included communications of Secretary Clinton and Ms. Abedin, Judicial Watch seeks to reopen this litigation to remedy the Department's failure to retain, records-manage, and search for these records. The State Department should be required to search the 55,000 pages of records returned by Secretary Clinton, conduct additional, broader searches for responsive records that may not have been captured by earlier searches, and otherwise remedy any spoliation.
The State Department had an obligation under the Federal Records Act to properly preserve, maintain, and make available for retrieval records of its official functions. In fact, it is the obligation of the head of every federal agency to do so. Secretary Clinton plainly violated her own legal obligations. Doing so was misconduct.
Judicial Watch alleges that it is "incomprehensible" that the State Department did not know that its "searches" did not capture emails of Hillary Clinton and other top State officials:
Judicial Watch relied upon the State Department's misrepresentation that it conducted a search of the Office of the Executive Secretariat [which would have included emails of Hillary Clinton's and other top State officials]. It was lead to believe that the State Department's search was proper. It now knows it was not. Had Judicial Watch known that the State Department's search excluded Secretary Clinton's emails and the emails of Ms. Abedin and other high level officials, Judicial Watch would not have stipulated to the dismissal of this case…"Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration concealed records and lied to obstruct a federal court and Judicial Watch from finding out about the secret emails. Time is of the essence. Immediate court action is imperative to retrieve, recover and secure these public records from Mrs. Clinton."
The emails of Huma Abedin, the top personal aide to former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, are now facing a disclosure lawsuit after the State Department failed to turn them over in response to an open-records request.
Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that uses open-records laws to pry information loose, had filed a request to get a look at Ms. Abedin's emails during her four years at the State Department. News outlets have reported that Ms. Abedin also used the private email server Mrs. Clinton set up to handle government business, but the status of her messages is unclear.
"We're churning through these," he said. "The scandal at the State Department is more than about Hillary Clinton. There are others involved."
Both Clinton and Abedin were reported to be in breach of the Federal Records Act. Part of the investigation concerns ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, while others focus on aspects of B******i and foreign contributions to the Clinton Foundation.
source-tim brown. freedom outpost, washington times

THIS GO ALONG WITH THE MISSING $17 MILLION FROM THE CLINTON FOUNDATION--47JH. B43
PART 2

An elaborate criminal scheme?
Focusing on the t***sition from Old CHAI to New CHAI, Ortel alleges the officers and board of directors ran the Clinton Foundation as “an elaborate criminal scheme” aimed at enriching the Clintons and their close associates, accomplished by failing to file independently audited financial reports as required, filing instead inaccurate, incomplete and intentionally deceptive financial statements.
, all public charities of the size the Clinton Foundation has been since its original authorization as a tax-exempt organization must procure an independent audit of their financial statements by a competent and empowered firm of accounting professionals who have access to all relevant supporting details and independently confirm material amounts directly with third parties,” Ortel argues in his second report on the Clinton Foundation.
“After this extensive confirmatory work is completed in all relevant domestic and foreign jurisdictions, an independent audit must be attached to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filing, as elements of the IRS Form 990 and supporting schedules call for reconciliation of numerous financial figures with information contained in the independent audit, prepared by certified accounting professionals,” he stresses.
Ortel based his second report on the Clinton Foundation on the understanding that directors, executives and employees for any kind of enterprise bear a public responsibility to ensure in delivering financial reports that reliable control systems are in place and functioning effectively. Otherwise, there is no reasonable assurance reported financial statements are accurate or that the reported measures supposedly used in audits designed to assess performance are valid.
Instead, his analysis “reveals that the crucial control function required for responsible financial management was neutered, perhaps by devious design.”
Ortel further argued that without effective financial controls in place and responsible operations, the revenues reported by the Clinton Foundation as a whole, as well as its various components, such as CGI and CHAI, are likely to be recorded incorrectly, missed or diverted.
‘Scheme to mask inurement’
In his second report on the financial management of the Clinton Foundation Report, Ortel argued the Clintons used the organization of the Clinton Foundation and its various subcomponent “initiatives” to manipulate financial statements in “audit reviews” to cover up a criminal inurement scheme aimed at adding tens of millions of dollars Bill’s and Hillary’s net worth after they left the White House.
Ortel charges the irregularities, inconsistencies, errors, and other omissions he has documented in operational management and financial reporting of the Clinton Foundations in general and the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Inc., CHAI, in particular, uncovers how the Clintons played “an elaborate shell game,” manipulating the largest constituent element of the Clinton Foundation for personal gain.
Ortel buttressed his conclusion with a detailed analysis of the Clinton Foundation financial regulatory reporting in the years 2009-2011, as Old CHAI morphed into New CHAI.
“Absent effective controls, it should not be surprising the Clinton administration’s financial reporting of direct and indirect program expenditures, fund-raising charges, and overheads have been repeatedly misallocated, misstated, and misreported since inception,” Ortel reports.
He warns law enforcement authorities and the charitable-giving public in the United States and worldwide that the Clintons’ pattern of mismanaging and improperly reporting the Clinton Foundation was conducted since inception “most likely with fraudulent intent, designed almost certainly to result in a systematic pattern of inurement to the personal benefit of the Clintons and their close associates in direct contravention of the core state and federal laws upon which the theory of tax-exempt charitable giving depends.”
Clinton Foundation financial reporting: 2009
In the Clinton Foundation Annual Report for 2009 on page 50, a financial summary shows the Clinton Health Access Initiative, CHAI, was the single largest portion of the charity. Its stated program service expenses of $173.4 million constituted 73.5 percent of total expenses, stated as $235.8 million. The next largest program was the Clinton Global Initiative, with just $13.2 million in stated expenses, or 5.6 percent of total expenses.
Reconstructing combined statements from the information about the Clinton Foundation for 2009 found on the New York State Charities Bureau website, Ortel confirmed that CHAI in 2009 was the single largest program operated by the Clinton Foundation that year.


“Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation passes off the deceptive work of BKD LLP, a Little Rock-based accounting firm, that itself is ill-equipped to serve its required function, as a legally mandated independent auditor of the Clinton Foundation’s entire, far-flung operations.”
While the 2009 Clinton Foundation financial statements were reviewed by BKD, Ortel argues it is unclear whether the Clinton Foundation officers and board of directors limited BKD’s mandate to performing a review. Nor is it clear how intensively auditors from BKD may have attempted to inform themselves concerning the nature and extent of the Clinton Foundation.
“The BKD audits on the Clinton Foundation website appear to be ‘audit reviews,’ limited to examining financial records provided to BKD by the foundation’s officers and directors,” Ortel explained to WND.
“There is no indication the Clinton Foundation hired an independent auditor to go back to original receipt and expense records and validate the financial statements the officers and the board of directors presented to the charitable-giving public in the United States and around the world as a accurate and complete record of the foundation’s financial record.”
Furthermore, Ortel notes, the Combining Statement of Activities for 2009 and the Combining Statement of Financial Position at 31 December 2009 are referenced in the table of contents to the Financial Report for 2009. But both are omitted from the package of financial information included in the report that the Clinton Foundation website purports to be the complete financial report for the foundation.
source-- image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/05/summary-old-chai.jpg
washington times

Hillary makes play for b****s and Hispanics: 47JH. B43
Hillary Clinton is taking early and aggressive steps to assemble the coalition of v**ers that propelled President Obama to victory in 2008 and 2012. The former secretary of State is reaching out to b****s, Hispanics, women, gays and millennials in an effort to build the support that proved critical for Obama. It’s a prescription that, if successful, would make it exceedingly difficult for a Republican opponent to defeat her, according to political experts.
Last week, Clinton highlighted the nation’s entrenched racial disparities and called for an end to mass incarcerations — a message that resonates with black v**ers, who overwhelmingly backed Obama. And on Tuesday, she was in Nevada marking Cinco de Mayo with calls for a pathway to citizenship for immigrants living in the U.S. illegally — a message targeting Hispanic v**ers, who also supported Obama in high numbers.
The reasons for Clinton’s outreach are clear enough: Of the handful of battleground states where candidates will focus and the race will likely be decided, most have a significant minority population — particularly Hispanic. States including Florida, Colorado, Nevada, Virginia and North Carolina could tip the outcome.
The Clinton coalition will not be identical to Obama’s. For example, it’s unlikely that Clinton can match Obama’s African-American turnout figures, but she could beat the president’s numbers among rural and blue-collar v**ers. A crucial component of Obama’s 2012 strategy was his move, just months before the e******n, to establish a program halting deportations and providing work permits for i*****l i*******ts brought to the country as children. To that point, many Hispanics had soured on Obama, accusing him of not keeping campaign promises to prioritize immigration reforms that included legalization and citizenship benefits.
His deferred deportation program seemed to pay dividends at the polls, where 71 percent of Hispanic v**ers backed the president — up from the already formidable 67 percent he won four years earlier — and helped secure states such as Colorado, Florida and Nevada. Alfonso Aguilar, a Republican who headed the Office of Citizenship under President George W. Bush, said the Hispanic v**e will be “decisive” in 2016, based on the demographics of those same swing states.
But he also argued that Clinton is in no way guaranteed the Hispanic v**e. Aguilar said her record on immigration in the Senate, where she v**ed for comprehensive reforms backed by advocates but also supported a border-fence bill they opposed, creates “a huge problem” that undermines her credibility on the issue.
“For her now to grandstand and say, ‘I’m for a path to citizenship,’ that’s a bit ridiculous. She was silent when she was in the Senate,” America’s Voice, a liberal group advocating for comprehensive immigration reform, gives Clinton a mixed record. The group praised her recent positions but denounced her support for the border fence and her reluctance to back a 2008 New York proposal granting driver’s licenses for immigrants in the country illegally. that the GOP opposes comprehensive immigration reform, ObamaCare, a minimum wage hike and a host of other economic proposals pushed by Democrats.
. And last week, as the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case weighing gay marriage rights, she was quick to enter the fray. “Every loving couple & family deserves to be recognized & treated equally under the law across our nation,” she tweeted.
Obama found great success attracting the same v**ers Clinton is now trying to captivate. Aside from the overwhelming support from Hispanics, Obama also won 55 percent of women, 60 percent of millennials and 93 percent of b****s in 2012.
source--the hill, mike lillis, michael mezey, jim messian , priortites usa action, alfonso aguilar,

What Has Happened To Bill Clinton--Bill's "Gotta Pay The Bills" -- The Ones The Taxpayers Don't Pick Up--47JH. B43
The brilliant, agile, articulate politician we've watched for the past twenty-five years was nowhere to be found. In his place was a slow-speaking, frail-looking, short-tempered elderly man with the voice of Bill Clinton.

What's happened to him?

His responses seemed painfully labored, his thinking muddled. There was an obvious difficulty and frustration in finding the right words. He seemed befuddled -- his free floating stops-and-starts were jarring as he seemed to start to speak of ideas as they darted across his mind and then instantly stop in mid-sentence. He must have been prepped to answer McFadden's question about the appearances of making $500,000 per speech. He had memorized some statistics about the global reach of the Clinton Foundation -- that's always been easy for him. But he fumbled badly when asked unscripted, but easily anticipated questions. At first, he seemed to be groping for the words to say that making money is the American way. Then, sensing how inappropriate that would sound, he shifted to the ridiculous argument: "I gotta pay my bills."
This certainly was not a prepared sound bite. And most likely his claim that everybody makes mistakes on their taxes -- as the Foundation did for seven years -- wasn't polled before he threw it out.

The former president seemed to hide behind the optics of needy children as he justified his massive income. But all the arguments about how giving money to the Foundation helps poor people fall apart when we realize how much of the money goes into his pocket and her pocketbook.

In a bizarre interview with Cynthia McFadden on NBC, Bill Clinton gave a weird variation of Hillary's "we were dead broke" gaffe. In response to a question about whether he would continue his $500,000 speaking fees, even if Hillary was elected President, Bill insisted that he definitely would because "I gotta pay the bills."
But consider what bills he has to pay. Or better yet, start with what he doesn't have to pay. The Clintons like to pretend they're just like the rest of us, but they're not. Here's why:

What Taxpayers Pay For The Clintons

First, eliminate the need for buying any cars, since his and her state-of-the-art SUV's are provided by the tax payers -- along with their secret service protection. (Cross off $75,000 each for those vehicles.) That also means no insurance, no maintenance, no tolls, no parking, no registration and no automobile taxes. That's a big chunk that comes right off the top.

And it extends to family members, too. When Chelsea Clinton left the hospital after the birth of her daughter, shiny twin black SUVs awaited the happy family -- courtesy of the taxpayers.

The round-the-clock Secret Service agents drive the Clintons wherever they want to go -- anywhere, any time. No need to pay for 24/7 chauffeurs.

Parking isn't a problem, either. Charge it to the Secret Service -- it's all on us.

All other travel is either arranged through the Clinton Foundation or paid for by the hosts of their speaking engagements. According to The Washington Post, the Clinton Foundation is always looking for a multimillionaire or billionaire to lend them a plane. Don't expect them to pay for anything. That's out of the question. And after all of the free flights, the Secret Service is there to pick them up -- here and abroad.

Then there's health insurance. No problem. They are eligible for insurance subsidized at 72% by the federal government. Last year, the federal subsidy for Bill Clinton was $12,000, leaving about $4000.00 for him to pay. If the Clintons don't want to pay that minimal amount, they are likely eligible for free coverage from the foundations.

Again, no sweat.
Most of their staff is paid for by the Foundation or by Bill's $441,996 taxpayer subsidy for office rent. Another $500,000 a year for staff and additional expenses was paid. That's almost a million dollars in subsidies paid by all of us.
Their only daughter is thirty-five and has finally finished her education, so no issue there. She doesn't live at home, of course. So college tuition is one more category to eliminate.
Here's An Estimate Of The Millions They Make
Imagine that your joint family income was between $20 - 30 million last year. That's a modest estimate of what Bill and Hillary Clinton made. Her book deal was estimated to be $14 million and she earned about $3 million in speeches. Bill earned several million from business interests, back royalties and probably his usual $10,000,000 in speeches. Add Bill's 201,000 federal pension, his Arkansas pension that Hillary disclosed as worth $15-$50,000, as well as Hillary's federal pension of about $20,000 per year. Then there's social security for both of them -- another $5,000 a month that they are eligible for.
And then imagine that, with all that income, your only fixed expenses were a mortgage, homeowners insurance, 25% of a health insurance premium, electricity, real estate taxes, food, home maintenance, state and federal taxes, trash pick-up, clothing, and household help.
Not bad, right?
The Clintons own two homes worth a total of almost $10 million. There is one mortgage on the New York home forbetween $1,000,000 and $1,500,000. The D.C. home is owned free and clear. According to their last publicly available tax return in 2006, they paid $158,907 in mortgage interest and $84,501 in real estate taxes. The taxes and $53,00 of the mortgage interest is deductible. That's probably about the same now.
Their major other expenses are associated with the costs of making a lot of money and living a luxurious lifestyle: federal and state taxes, commissions on speeches, etc.

Bill paid about $1 million in commissions and $66,153 for speech related expenses. That's the price of getting the multimillion dollar speeches -- about a 10% fee. It pays for the lifestyle. And Bill also paid about $43,000 in legal expenses -- wonder what that was all about.

One big expense is the reported $100,000 cost of renting a vacation house in the Hamptons. That's a must. You have to keep up appearances and there's no better place than next door to Hollywood's Harvey Weinstein.
The Clintons don't eat home too often, so their food bill isn't going to break them. And they never deduct a dime for entertainment -- that's likely paid for by the Foundation. And, of course, other people also foot the bill in restaurants. That's what friends are for.

Household help is another expense. It goes with the territory.

One other expense seems to be the expensive jewelry that Hillary wears every day. Or were they gifts?

So even assuming that taxes and an expensive lifestyle ate up almost half of their income, that would still leave about $15 million on a $30 million income.

That should cover the bills that Bill's "gotta pay."
SOURCE--dick morris, the hillarydaily.com, cynthia mcfadden, eileen mccann, the washington post,

Don't Believe Hillary's Sudden Support For Curbs On The NSA-- Hillary's A Big Believer In Government And Private Spying: 47JH. B43
"Congress should move ahead now with the USA Freedom Act -- a good step forward in ongoing efforts to protect our security & civil liberties."

Her very belated tweet -- after years of silence -- followed a landmark ruling by a federal appeals court holding that metadata collection by the NSA was illegal. Hillary saw the ruling, knew what was coming, and suddenly jumped on the bandwagon.

But don't be fooled by her. As Secretary of State, she frequently approved cloak and dagger operations and strategically used data from NSA interceptions of our allies.

One of the most blatant instances was her use of NSA intercepted conversations and emails between countries participating in the Copenhagen Climate Summit in 2009. Clinton and Obama wanted advance information about which countries would be opposing them and what their strategy would be. Documents leaked by Edward Snowden revealed the NSA monitoring:
Signals intelligence will undoubtedly play a significant role in keeping our negotiators as well informed as possible throughout the negotiations."

By the way, "Signals Intelligence", referred to as SIGINT, is clandestine intelligence gathering. That's what Hillary loves.

In her book, "Hard Choices," she claimed that she and Obama "learned" that there was a secret meeting with the Chinese and Indian diplomats. Once they "found out" about it, they "crashed" the meeting.

They "found out" about it because of the NSA spying. That's how they "learned." And our allies were not too happy about it.

Later, Hillary attacked Snowden and claimed his leaks helped terrorists. What really upset her was that she was caught and embarrassed when world leaders learned what she was up to.
As president, Hillary would compound scandals like the NSA snooping affair, driven by her own penchant for secrecy, spying, concealment, and paranoia. Her support of the NSA reform legislation is a particularly hypocritical piece of campaign posturing. She believes in private snooping, too.
• In Arkansas, as Bill was running for president in 1992, she hired private detectives to investigate the background and lives of women who were linked to her husband, not to punish them or stop her husband, but to cow them into silence through blackmail.

• In the White House, she directed her lawyers to hire Terry Lenzner, a private detective, to get dirt on Monica Lewinsky and other people involved in the impeachment process Lenzner confirmed his role in his memoir.

• When she became Secretary of State, she issued instructions to department officials to collect "biometric data" including "fingerprints, facial images, DNA, and iris scans" of African leaders." In another cable, she directed American diplomats abroad and at the United Nations to get passwords, personal encryption keys, credit card numbers, frequent flyer account numbers and other data from foreign diplomats

• She specifically sought biometric and other data on U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and permanent Security Council representatives from China, Russia, France and the UK.

• She asked the U.S. Embassy in Buenos Aires to gather information on Argentine president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. Her cable to the embassy asked, "How is Cristina Fernández de Kirchner managing her nerves and anxiety?" It asked them to investigate, "How does stress affect her behavior toward advisors and/or her decision making? What steps does Cristina Fernández de Kirchner or her advisers/handlers, take in helping her deal with stress? Is she taking any medications?"

For this person, who is so taken with spies, hidden secrets, and amassing blackmail material to suddenly support restrictions on NSA activities is absolutely laughable. Are we that gullible?
source--dick morris, eileen mcgann, the hillaryddaily.com,

Hillary Rodham Clinton, A Radical Worse Than Obama --47JH. B43
In continuing with showing Hillary Rodham Clinton's background, the "Travelgate" scandal seems like a good place to start, since it close to what is going on with Hillary right now with the email scandal while she was Secretary of State. It was May of 1993 when Hillary Rodham Clinton got involved with President Clinton and fired a bunch of people in the White House Travel Office.
"In May 1993, Mrs. Clinton became involved in a major controversy when she and President Clinton determined that seven employees of the White House Travel Office should be fired -- an unusual occurrence in an office where employees typically remained in their posts for many years. In turn, the Clintons gave the Travel Office business -- and the commissions that came with it -- to a cousin of President Clinton's, Catherine Cornelius, who had a travel agency of her own.
Because simply handing over government business to a relative would have been politically untenable, so the Clintons concocted a story suggesting that the Travel Office had been rife with corruption, and that the workers there needed to be fired. While an audit of the Travel Office's finances found the record-keeping to have been below par, there was no evidence of corruption or embezzlement. Nonetheless, the FBI was pressured to make arrests, and the local U.S. Attorney was charged with prosecuting the employees for corruption."
Does this sound like what Hillary Rodham Clinton is doing now with her emails? Is she just continuing to practice her lies so as to toss any suspicion away from her? Both of them even came up with the idea that the office was corrupt; this after they placed Bill Clinton's cousin in as a replacement—wonder if that was corruption? But here, one can see the depth of how Hillary Rodham Clinton and Bill Clinton can change their story and make it look like someone else did the dirty deed. Both Clintons are exceptional people, as they are very good at placing the blame on others so that they don't look bad.
"White House denials of any scheme, and leaks by those involved, led to a firestorm of media criticism. Most of the Travel Office employees were eventually given other government jobs or retired. A prosecution for corruption of the head of the Travel Office, Billy Dale, ended in an acquittal. Clinton's cousin was removed as new head of the Travel Office. A later report written by Independent Counsel Robert Ray concluded that, while she did not make any knowingly-false statements under oath, First Lady Hillary Clinton had made a number of inaccurate statements concerning the firings and her role in them."
." But it is shown that they made some "inaccurate" statements concerning Hillary's role in the firings of the Travel Office personnel. Once again, as with today's Hillary, she somehow tosses the blame on others or just makes "inaccurate" statements—not lies, just inaccurate statements.
The Health Care Task Force Scandal
Also during her early years as First Lady, Mrs. Clinton was put in charge of the 500-member Health Care Task Force which tried, in secret meetings and by stealth, to socialize medical care in the United States, a sector that represented approximately one-seventh of the U.S. economy. This modus operandi was in violation of so-called "sunshine laws," which forbid such secret meetings from taking place when non-government employees are present. Mrs. Clinton was sued by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for these violations. The trial judge, U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth, ultimately ruled against her and the Clinton administration. In December 1997 Lamberth issued a 19-page report condemning as "reprehensible" the duplicity exhibited by Mrs. Clinton's Task Force. "The Executive Branch of the government, working in tandem, was dishonest with this court, and the government must now face the consequences of its misconduct," said Lamberth. "It is clear," he added, "that the decisions here were made at the highest levels of government. There were no rogue lawyers here misleading the court."
The linchpin of Mrs. Clinton's healthcare plan was a mandate forcing all Americans to purchase insurance, and imposing a penalty on those who failed to comply. In November 2013, MIT professor John Gruber, who was a chief architect of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), said that Hillary Clinton's 1990s-era plan was "much more interventionist" than Obamacare, "much to the left of Obamacare," and "would have more radically changed our healthcare system."
Here, we see that Hillary Rodham Clinton tried to have "secret" meetings, which was against the law. But law does not matter to Hillary Rodham Clinton, and neither does lying. Hillary Rodham Clinton had people sue her while she was First Lady of the United States because she violated the law; but, once again, as with Travelgate, there was no real injury to her or to Bill Clinton. Does this sound familiar to what Hillary is doing today?
"The trial judge, U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth, ultimately ruled against her and the Clinton administration. In December 1997 Lamberth issued a 19-page report condemning as "reprehensible" the duplicity exhibited by Mrs. Clinton's Task Force. "The Executive Branch of the government, working in tandem, was dishonest with this court, and the government must now face the consequences of its misconduct," said Lamberth. "It is clear," he added, "that the decisions here were made at the highest levels of government. There were no rogue lawyers here misleading the court."
How could Hillary Rodham Clinton not be a part of this? Or how could she just walk away from this without any type of fines or other actions for violating the rule of Law? It is so very strange that Hillary Rodham Clinton could violate the law at will and walk away from it without a single action taken against her. This is due to the fact that Hillary has others do her bidding for her, and they take the heat of her actions and violations of law, leaving her laughing and free to do more law breaking.
Hillary Rodham Clinton is also much like Obama—or maybe Obama is like her, since their backgrounds are much alike in dealing with radicals who do not like the United States the way it is.
Hillary and Radical Clerics : Wogaman had made his political worldview clear in his many writings and sermons over the years. For instance, in 1990, a year after the fall of the Berlin Wall, he wrote that "Christian socialism's critique of the excesses and brutalities and idolatries of the free market still need to be heard." On an earlier occasion, he had lauded the "modest but real economic success" of C*******t Cuba and China. As long ago as 1967, Wogaman had written: "The USSR is characteristic of the more tolerant C*******t arrangements for religion. In Russia there are specific constitutional guarantees of freedom of worship, and some provision has even been made for the upkeep of churches and theological seminaries."
By no means was Wogaman the only radical cleric to be admired by Mrs. Clinton. In her 2004 memoir, Living History, Mrs. Clinton praised Rev. William Sloane Coffin Jr., who had served as Yale's chaplain during Hillary's years at the law school, for his "articulate moral critique of American involvement" in Vietnam. That critique involved his traveling to Hanoi in 1972. Seven years later, he would make a friendly trip to Tehran, capital of the first modern Islamic theocratic state which had just stormed a U.S. embassy and kidnapped dozens of his fellow countrymen.
Much like Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton attended very radical churches, some of which had they been around in the 1950's and they would have been questioned over their love of C*******m—these churches wanted the United States to be changes into a socialist state. It is clear that Hillary Rodham Clinton is involved with very questionable people who do not like the United States.
Then came the Lewinsky scandal, which Hillary Rodham Clinton said was a vast, right-wing conspiracy.
The Monica Lewinsky Scandal
A few days after rumors of Bill Clinton's extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky first made headlines in January 1998, Mrs. Clinton made a January 27 appearance on NBC's Today Show, where she told interviewer Matt Lauer that the allegations had been fabricated by "this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced [that he would run] for President." Mrs. Clinton would echo this theme many times thereafter. Of course, we all know that this went much further and that Bill got brought up on impeachment because he was lying to Congress and to the world. Does this seem to show a pattern of lies by the Clintons where they continually get away with what some call murder, going back to their time in Arkansas where people who spoke against the Clintons died in strange circumstances.
The next article will delve into Hillary Rodham Clinton's time running for Senator of New York where she worked with some people who were directly linked to C*******ts and Socialists to win her seat for the Senate. Stay tuned as we show the real Hillary Rodham Clinton.
source--leon puissegur, discover the network, freedom outpost, robert ray, catherine cornelius, royce lamberth, dr phillip wogaman,rev william sloane coffin jr,

How did $17 million disappear from Clinton Foundation? Wall Street analyst's findings call for investigation:
47JH. B43
NEW YORK – Before Hillary Clinton completed her first year as President Obama’s secretary of state, Wall Street analyst and investor Charles Ortel calculates $17 million went missing from Clinton Foundation financial reports.
“The Clinton Foundation and the Obama Administration presented to the public a false narrative, namely that when Hillary became Secretary of State, the Clinton Foundation had to guard against conflicts of interest,” Ortel explained in a second report he made available to WND exclusively before publication.
Ortel says the public record appears to confirm that the Clinton Foundation’s various components were reported as one consolidated entity to the IRS, despite the foundation’s claim that appropriate changes were made when Hillary Clinton became secretary of state.
The Clinton Foundation explained that when Hillary joined the Obama Cabinet, the foundation closed the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc., known also as CHAI, which had been operating as a program of the Clinton Health Foundation. CHAI was then re-opened it as a separate organization responsible for filing its own IRS tax Form 990, which discloses financial information to the public. The reorganization, Ortel says, was an opportunity for the Clintons to t***sition from the financial statements of what he calls “Old CHAI,” ending Dec. 31, 2009, into the financials of the ‘New CHAI,’ beginning Jan. 1, 2010.
Analyzing all available financial statements for the Clinton Foundation and CHAI in the t***sition, including cash flow statements, Ortel has determined that approximately $17 million disappeared from CHAI.
WND reported Thursday Ortel has concluded that while Hillary Clinton was appointed to the board of directors of the Clinton Foundation in 2013, after she had resigned as secretary of state, she is complicit in what he has described as systematic financial fraud warranting a criminal investigation. WND reported Wednesday that Ortel found the Clinton Foundation’s explanation for why it was divided into three, legally separate tax-exempt organizations to be “misleading and false.” As WND reported Tuesday, based on Ortel’s findings, a prominent lawyer and a top government watchdog in the nation’s capital are calling for the Clinton Foundation to be shut down. In his first report, Ortel found what he characterizes as an elaborate system devised by the Clintons to enrich themselves through schemes such as skimming tens of millions of dollars from U.N. levies imposed on airline travelers.
Ortel’s detective work required him to examine financial statements not just for the Clinton Foundation and CHAI at the beginning and end of the relevant years, 2009 and 2010, but also to evaluate cash flow statements that document the financial position of the Clinton Foundation and CHAI during each year.
In reality, Ortel alleges, Old CHAI had never been validly constituted as a tax-exempt organization, “even though it was used for years as a leaky conduit where foreign governments, major donors, and the general public directed hundreds of millions towards seemingly worthwhile causes, that instead were diverted and fraudulently mismanaged.” Ortel further alleges that from July 2002, when the Clinton Foundation formed Old CHAI through March 2010 when New CHAI was formally authorized by the IRS as a tax-exempt organization, “large sums of money went missing – facts that emerge from close review of publicly available filings made by the Clinton Foundation, and theoretically overseen by executives and directors.”
Disappearing funds
Ortel points out that state and federal law put the burden of proof on the Clintons to prove the $17 million was not diverted in a fraud designed to financially benefit the Clintons and their close associates.
In numerous interviews, Schweizer has admitted that without access to documentation of the Clintons’ thinking and actions related to various foreign contributions to the Clinton Foundation and its subgroups, such as Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails, he lacks proof of a quid pro quo.
Instead of bribery, Ortel is accusing the Clintons of “inurement,” an offense that is defined at law as using a charity for personal financial benefit or for the material financial benefit of close associates, including those managing the charity, working at the charity, or affiliated with the charity in some other way, such as being a member of the charity’s board of directors.
State and federal law requires regulators to shut down the organization and typically fire the board of directors. The charity is thrown into receivership once accusers demonstrate a pattern of financial mismanagement that suggests it is being fraudulently operated to commit the crime of inurement.
The disappearance of $17 million, Ortel argues, is reason enough for regulators to shut a foundation down and to throw it into receivership.
He states in his report: “On the specific date between December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2010, approximately $17 million appears to have been diverted out of Old CHAI at a time when New CHAI allegedly had not yet opened a bank account and before New CHAI received its state and federal authorization to operate as a tax-exempt entity, a event that appears to have occurred in March 2010, when New CHAI appears to have received an IRS tax-exempt authorization letter.”
“The crime,” he said, “is an untold number of donors in the United States and around the world, typically giving relatively small sums, placed the money they gifted to the Clinton Foundation into the fiduciary care of the Clintons, only to have their charitable donations be diverted from the charitable purpose for which the funds were given.”
He said the pattern in the $17 million that went missing in the t***sition from the Old CHAI to the New CHAI “seems consistent with the assumption the Clintons were operating the Clinton Foundation and its subgroups in a fraudulent manner in order to mask inurement, the diversion of the funds to the personal benefit of themselves and their associates.”
The IRS defines “inurement” in strict terms: “A section 501(c)(3) organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, such as the creator or the creator’s family, shareholders of the organization, other designated individuals, or persons controlled directly or indirectly by such private interests. No part of the net earnings of a section 501(c)(3) organization may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. A private shareholder or individual is a person having a personal and private interest in the activities of the organization.”
“The regulation places the burden of proof on the organization to demonstrate that it is not organized or operated for the benefit of private interests such as designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or persons controlled directly or indirectly by such private interests,” the IRS memo continues. “The statement that an organization must serve a public rather than a private purpose is a basic tenet of the law of charity.”
Ortel noted that by Aug. 31, 2011, the accounting firm BKD prepared financial statements for New CHAI for 2010 that have been portrayed as independently audited financial information, free from material misstatements and not omitting material facts. Yet, Ortel noted, the Statement of Financial Position for New CHAI as of Dec. 31, 2010 deliberately omits presentation of the opening Statement of Financial Position as of Jan. 1, 2010.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/05/old-chai-balance-sheet.jpg
SOURCE- wnd, charles ortel, was,

TERM MEANING OR DEFINITION
A; KHALIFAH RASHIDUM RIGHTLY GUIDED CALIPS
AASF AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENTS FOUNDATION
AASF ANSAR AL SHARIA
ABBASID FROM PRIMARLY ARAB TO MUSLIM
ABROGATION METHOD TO RESOLBE CONTRADICTIONS IN THE KORAN
ACMCU ALWALEEDBIN CENTER FOR MUSLIM CHRISTIAN UNDERSTANIDNG
ADAMS ALL DULLES AREA MUSLIM SOCIETY
ADR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
AFDI AM FREEDOM FEF INTIATIVE
AHLU-UL KITAB PEOPLE WITH SACRED SCRIPTURES
AKHLAG ETHICS
AL HARAMAINS SPONSORS OF TERRORISM
AL IBADAT ACTS OF WISDOM
AL MAHDI, JAISH MAHDI ARMY
AL MANARA AL BAIDA MEDIA GROUP
AL MUAMALAT HUMAN INTERACTION
AL MUI'AMALAT UHUMAN INTERACTION
AL QADE FIGHTERS FOR MAGHREB AND ARABIA
AL QAEDA THE BASE
AL SALAF AL SALIH PIOUS FOREFATHER
AL SHABAAB SIGHTERS FOR SOMALIA
AL SHABAAB THE LADS
AL SHAITAN RAMADI THE DEVIL OF RAMADI
AL SULUL SUNNI SUPPORTER OF SUDI
AL TASHAFFI BEATING FOR GRATIFICATION
AL WALAAWA AL BARAA HATRED OR LOVE FOR THE SAKE OF ALLAH
AL-AHRAM EGYPTIAN NEWSPAPER
ALBAMDULLILAB PRAISE TO ALLAH
AL-FARQUE FERDOUS
ALHAMDILILLAH PRAISE TO ALLAH-33
ALIBABA BANK OF CHINA
AL-IDADAT ACTS OF WORSHIP
ALIVILLE NO GO ZONES
ALLAH'S APOSTLE MOHAMMAD
ALLAJU AKBAR ALLAHS GREAT-33
AL-MUHAJIROUN THE EMIGRANTS
ALP AFG LOCAL POLICE
AL-SABI CAPTIVE
AMAC AMERICAN MUSLIM ADVISORY COUNCIL
AMAC-AM MUSLIM ADVISORY COUNCIL
AMBUSH E******N I E CARD CHECK
AMC AMERICAN MUSLIM COUNCIL
AMC AMERICAN MUSLIM COUNCIL
AN-NISA WOMEN IN ISLAM INC
ANSAR AL-ISLAM SALAFIST TERRORIST GROUP
APOSTASY LEAVE ISLAM CAPITAL CRIME DEATH
APOSTASY MUSLIM WHO CONVERT TO OTHER RELIGIONS
AQAIDA FAITH
AQAP AL Q IN ARABIAN PENINSULA
AQAP THE PALESTINE MAGAZINE
AQIM AL QAEDA INTEL ISLAMIC MAGHREB
AQIS OINDIAN SUB CONTINENT
AQL RESAONSING
AQSA MARTYRS BRIDGARE FATHH WING
ARCIC ARMY'S CAPABILITIES INTERGRATION CENTER
ASABIYYA THE TRIBE
ASAF INT'L SECURITY ASS'T FORCE
ASH SHAFIA MUHAMMAD IBN IDRIS MUSLIM JURIST
AS-SABIQUN ISLAMIC ENCLAVES
ATC AMERICAN TEXTBOOK COUNCIL
AULIYA PROTECTORS -FRIENDS
AZL PUT OUT BEFORE COMING
BA'ATHIST PARTY FEDAYEEN SADDAM'S
BACKER OF TIZA ISLAMIC AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY
BANLIELUE NO GO ZONES
BANU BADR ISIS CLAN
BAY'AH PLEADGE OF ALLEGIANCE
BAYATS OATHS
BENEVOLENCE INTERN FOUND ISLAMIC CHARITY
BIERIM, HETA KOSONANS TERROIRST-SUICIDE BOMBERS
BIN MASLAMA CAMPAIGN OF MUHAMMED
BLACK FALG OF JIHAD INDICATE VIOLENT FORCE TO SUBMIT TO ISLAM
BOKO HARAM FIGHTERS FOR NIGERIA
BUDUD EXECRABLE LASW SHARIA
CAIR COUNCIL ON AMERICAN RELATIONS
CALIFP RULERS
CALIPH SUPREME RULER, KING LIKE THE POPE
CALIPH**E MUSLIM RELIGIOUS STATE
CAR CONFLICT ARMAMENT RESEARCH
CCMU CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN MUSLIM UNDERSTANDING
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS NEOC*******T
CFRP CENTER FOR RESPONSIVCE POLITICS
CISADA COMPHRENSIVE IRAN SANCTIONS ACCOUNTABILITY & DEVESTMENT ACT
COCOM COORDINATING COMMON EXPORT CONTROLS
CONUS CONTINENTAL US
DABIQ ISLAMIC MAGAZINE
DACA DEFERRED ACTION FOR CHILDHOOD ARRIVALS
DAIMMIS NON-MUSLIM
DAKKA; ANTI MESSIAH
DAR AL BARB ALL NON ILAMIC LANDS
DAR AL BARB REALM OF WAR
DAR AL DARWA INFIDEL COUNTRY WHER THEY RESIDE
DAR AL DAWA SABOTAGE
DAR AL HARB HOUSE OF WAR
DAR AL HIJRAH LAND OF MIGRATION-MB
DAR ALISLAM HOUSE OF SUBMISSION
DARAL-ISLAM THOSE OUTSIDE THE REALM OF THE MUSLIMS
DARB-A-TAKSEEB BREAKING BEATING
DARBTRA'DEED DISCIPLINARY BEATING
DAR-M-ISLAM THE HOUSE OF ISALM
DARURA NECESSITY
DAW AL LAMI DICTIONARY
DAWA PROSELYTIZATION-CONTOL OF MOSQUES
DEEN ALLAHS RELIGION
DHIKR NAMES OF ALLAH
DHIKR NAMES OF ALLAH
DHIMMIS NON-MUSLIMS
DHIMMMIS VERSE OF THE SWORD-SUBDUED -THIRD CLASS
DHIMUITUDE SUBJUGATION
DISC DUKES ISLAMIC STUDIES CENTER
DUALISM CAPTURE ENS***E A KAFIR BUT NOT A MUSLIM
DUALISTIC ETHICS EARLY KORAN OF MECCA IS CONTRADICED BY THE LATER ONE
E. PLURIBUL UNUM ISLAMIC VISION FOR AMERICAN MANY OUT OF ONE
EDI UL AD HA PRAYERS
EID UL FITR END OF RAMADAM
EID UL FITR PRAYERS
ELIBIARY LONE STAR INTELLIGENCE
ENTEQUAM REVENGE
FAHD KING
FARD 'AYN-INDIVID OBLIGATION OF JIHAD
FARD AYQ DEFENSIVE JIHAD
FARD KIFAYA JIHAD OBLIGATION ON THE COMMUNITY
FAROUK KING
FATHI YAKTUNS TO BE A MUSLIM
FATWAS RELIGIOUS EDICTS-LEGAL OPINIONS
FATWAS SHARIA RULINGS
FAYSAL, ITANI ISIS EXPERT AND ATLANIC COUNCIL
FEDAYEEN BA'ATHIST PARTY
FEREYDOUM PIOUS OR A CLERK
FEREYDOUM PIOUS OR A CLERK
FGM FEMA;E G*****L M********N
FIGH ISLAMIC JURSIPREDENCE
FIGH INTERPRETATION
FIGH ISLAMIC JURSIPREDENCE
FIOE FEDERATION OF ISLAMIC ORG EUROPE
FIQH POSITVE LAW
FIRST FITNA WAR BETEEN SUNNI AND SHIA OF ISLAM
FITNA DEEP CHOITCI RIFT
FOTNAH UPHEAVAL
FOUR ROOTS OF LAWS QUARAN, SUNNAH, IJMA, GIYAS
FSA FREE SYRIAN ARMY
FUGAHA DCOTORS OF LSW
FUQAHRA JURISTS
GHANLMA SPOILS OF WAR
GHIRA SACRED JEALOUSY SELF RESPECT
GOLDEN CHAIN 20 DONORS TO BIN LADEN
GRONINGEN PROTOCOL EUTHANIZED INFANTS
HADD OF ZINA STONING TO DEATH
HADITH PUNISHMENT
HADITH TRADITONS OF THE PROPHET
HADITH WHAT MOHAMMED DID OR SAID—TRADITION
HADITHS RELAYED BY
HAJI PILGRIMAGE
HALAKHA DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SHARIA AND JEWISH RELIGIOUS LAW
HALAL MEANT TO SACRIFICE TO ALLAH
HALAL SPECIAL FOODS
HAMAS ILSLAMIC RESISTANCE MOVEMENT
HARAKAT AL MUQAUAMAB HAMAS
HARAM FORBIDDEN
HARBI INFIDEL
HASHIYAH IBN ABIDEN AUTHORITATIVE TEXT OF THE HANAFI SCHOOL
HASHIYAH IBN ABIDEN AUTHORITATIVE TEXT OF THE HANAFI SCHOOL
HAYTHK, WJEREVER
HAZZM MOVEMENT FREE SYURIAN ARMY
HELM HOWLAND ERADICTION OF LOCKS MILITANTS
HELZBOLLAH FIGHTERS FOR LEBANON
HEZBOLLAH SHIITE FAVORED MUJAHIDEEN
HIJABS WOMENS ISLAMIC CLOTHING—HEAD
HIJAD DAY HEAD COVERING WORN BY MUSLIM WOMEN
HIJRAH MIGRATION TO THE ISLAMIC STTE
HIRABAH TERRIORISM
HIRABAH TERRIORISM
HNAJDI SAUDI
HODGES, DAVE COMMON SENSE SHOW
HOLY ISLAMVILLE NO GO ZONES
HUBUD PUNISHMENT
HUDDOUD KORANIC PUNISHMENT
HUDUD PUNISHMENT DEATH
HUFAAD REMOVING THE CLITORIS
IANA ILAMIC ASSEMBLY OF N. AMERICA
IAP ISLAMIC ASSOCIATON OF PALESTINE
ICFHE ISLAMIC CENTER FOR HUMAN EXCELLENCE
ICLII INT'L COUNCIL OF LOCAL ENVIRN INITATIVES
ICNA ISLAMIC CIRCLE OF N AMERICA
IDO ISLAMIC DA'WA ORGINATION OF SUDAN
IFTIKHAR, ARSALAN ISLAMIC MONTHLY-HAMAS-CAIR
IFTIKHAR, ARSALAN ISLAMIC MONTHLY-HAMAS-CAIR
IGD ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF GERMANY
IHAZAHA RELIGIOUS DEGREES
IHAZAHA RELIGIOUS DEGREES
IICDR INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC COUNCIL FOR DAWAH AND REFLIEF
IIOT INT'L INST OF ISLAMIC THOUGHT
IIRO INT'L ISLAMIC RELIEF ORG
IJAZAHS DEGREES
IJMA COLLECTIVE REASONING
IJMA CONSENSUS OF SCHOOLARS JURIST
IJMA CONSENSUS OF SCHOOLARS JURIST
IJTIBAD PRICINCPLE OF FREE AND IND, INQUIRY TO DISERN ALLAHS WILL
IJTIHAD SECONDARY SOURCES OF INFLUENCE ON WOMEN
IKHWAN/SAUDI N AMERICAN ISLAMIC TRUST
ILAMIC SOCIALISM COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN ISLAMIC AND MARXISM
IMIA ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCATIONS
IMMA INSTITUTE OF MUSLIM MINORITY AFFAIRS
IN TOTO ACCEPTING SHAIRA
IN TOTO ACCEPTING SHAIRA
INBAEC VERBA SELF DESCRIPTION
INJEEL ARABIC
INJEEL GOSPEL
INSHALLAH AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN
INTEFADA PALESTINIAN TERRORIST UPRISING
INTEFADA PALESTINIAN TERRORIST UPRISING
IOIC ORG OF ISLAMIC CONFERENCE
IRA LAPIDUS CONVERTS-ANIMISTS AND POLYTHEISTS
ISA ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF BOSTON
ISA JESUS
ISB ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF BOSTON
ISG IRAQ STUDY GROUP
ISLAM SUBMISSION
ISLAMBERG NO GO ZONES
ISLAMIC BELIEF HUMANITY-AN ESSENTIAL NITY
ISLAMIC COURTS UNION AL Q SHARIA LAW
ISLAMIC DUALISM POETRY ABOUT GOD
ISLAMIC GOLDEN AGE LEGAL CONCEPTS AND INST, DEVELOPEMENT
ISLAMIC JIHAD CONQUEST FORMUAL S***ES, L**T, PLUNDER
ISLAMIC RELIEF WORLDWIDE SUPPORTS HAMAS
ISLAMIC RULE OF NUMBERS MUNLIMEGOW IN NUBERS
ISLAMIC RULE OF NUMBERS MUNLIMEGOW IN NUBERS
ISLAMO -F*****M AWARENESS ISLAMIC FACITS
ISNA ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF N AMERICA
IZZEL DIN AL QASSAM MILITARY FORCE -BRIDGADES
JAFSIR AL-JALALAYNSAYS SLAY THEM
JAHILIYAH IGNORANCE
JAHILIYYA STATE OF IGNORANCE BEFORE MOHAMMED
JAISH AL MAHDI MAHDI ARMY
JAJKIYAH DOCTIRNE OF IGNORANCE
JALLALAH ANIMALS WHOSE MEAT STINKS
JAMATT-UL-FUQRA TERRORIST COMMANDS
JERSUSALEM FORCES QUDS, GHODS, QODS
JEUNES ANGRY PASSANGERS
JIHAD DESTROY NON BELIEVERS
JIHAD POLITICAL ACTION WITH A RELIGIOUS MOTIVATION
JIHAD TO STRUGGLE IN THE PATH OF ALLAH-MARTYRS
JIHAD AL MAL THE MONEY JIHAD
JIHAD AL MAL THE MONEY JIHAD
JIZYA POLL TAX
JOLT JOBS ORIGNIATED THROUGH LAUCNHING TRAVEL
JPOA JOINT PLAN OF ACTION
JPRA JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY
JUNDIS LOYAL IRAQI M*****A
KAAFIR UNBELIEVER
KAFIR NON MIUSLIM
KAFIR INFEDEL
KAFIR NON MIUSLIM
KALMAK PRAYERS
KHANSAEED RESEARCHER
KHUMUS TAXES
KIFR DISBELIEF
KIND HEARTS CHARITABLE HAMAS FRONT
KITMAN TELLS YOU ONLY PART OF THE T***H
KNMG DUTCH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
KORAN CONSTITUTION, JIHAD OUR PATH, DEATH FOR THE
KORAN 2 BOOK—1-RELIGION, 1 POLITICAL
KORAN CONSTITUTION, JIHAD OUR PATH, DEATH FOR THE
KRG KURDISH REGIONAL GOV
KUFFAR NAIVE AMERICANS
KUFRASLI JEWS/CHRISTIANS WOMEN
KURDS SUNNI INFERIOR PEOPLE
LA;,AL PRAYERS
LEASING COST INTEREST
LEGAL DUALISM KAFIRS ARE NOT EQUALS BUT INFERIOR
LORDS RESISTANCE ARMY FUNDED BY SUDANESE JIHADIST
MADHHAB JURISPRRUDENCE
MADRASAS FIRST SCHOOL INSIDE THE EMPIRE
MADRASAS SCHOOLS
MADRASAT MOSQUE
MAGNITSKY ACT LEVYING SANCTIONS OF URSSIA HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
MAHR CONTRACT ON MARRIAGE
MAHR LUMP SUM PAYMENT FROM THE PERSON
MAJALISAL HIKMA SESSIONS OF WISDOM
MALDEF MEXICAN AMERICAL LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION AL Q FUNDED
MANA MUSLIM ALLIANCE ON N AMERICA
MANUMISSION S***E OWNER WHO FREES HIS S***ES
MARSHAL, JOSHUA MICAH TALKING POINTS MEMO
MARWANID CALIPHS
MARZOOK HEAED HAMAS
MAS HOUSE OF DAWA
MASJID MOSQUE
MAVNI MILITARY ACCESSIONS VITAL TO NATIONS INTEREST-I******S
MAWALI ADOPTION OF CLIENT STATUS
MAWALI OMNI PRESENT
MAWALI ADOPTION OF CLIENT STAUTS
MAYA MULSIM ARAB YOUTH ASSCOCAITION
MB MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD--100 MILLION MEMEBERS
MBOYA FOUNDATION
MEMRI MIDEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
MEMRI MIDEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
MICRO ORGANIZING MUST JOINT EVEN IF THEY DON'T WANT TO
MICRO ORGANIZING MUST JOINT EVEN IF THEY DON'T WANT TO
MILF CIGHTERS FOR RUSSIAN AND PHILIPPINES
MILF CIGHTERS FOR RUSSIAN AND PHILIPPINES
MILK AL-YAMIN SEX S***ES
MIRABILE DICTU IRAQI PARLIAMENT
MISHAL HEAED HAMAS
MJN MUHAMMAD IAMAL NETWORK
MLFA MUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA
MOA MUSLLIMS OF AMERICA
MOGAHED, DALIA ISPU
MOHAMMED ISLAMS PERFECT MAN
MPAC MUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL
MSA MUSLIM STUDENT ASSOCIATION
MUFTIS JURISTS
MUHAHEDEEN PEOPLE ON JIHAD
MUHAJIRIN EMIGRATS MOHANNEDS
MUJAHEDEEN PEOPLE ON JIHAD
MUJAHID TERM OF HONOR FOR A WARRIOR IN JIHAD
MUNA MUSLIM UMMAH OF N AMERICA
MUQATILAH FIGHTERS
MURBABA SPECIAL MORTGAGE RATES-NO INTEREST
MURTAD APOSTATE
MURUMA COMPONENT/TACTIC
MURUNA USE FLEXIBILITY TO BLEND IN WITH THEIR ENEMY AND SURROUNDINGS
MURUNAAS DECFTIT
MUSLIMUMMAH COMMUNITY
MUTAWEEN COMMISSION FOR PROMOTION OF VIRTUE AND REVENTION OF VICE
NAHDLATUL ULAMA LARGEST WORLD –MUSLIM ORGANIZATIO
NAIC NATIOANL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL
NAIT N. AMERICAN ISLAMIC TRUST
NAJDI SAUDI FOLLOWER
NASEEF, ABDULLAH OMAR FOUNDED IMMA
NASL, NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO SUPPORT LIEGITMACY
NCT NATIIONAL COMMISSION OF TERROIRSM
NEGHUS KING
NIAC NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL
NIQABS WOMENS ISLAMIC CLOTHING COVERS THE FACE—EYE ONLY SHOW
NIZB AL-IKHWAAN AL-MUSLIMIN BATTLE CRY
NOAH, FELDMAN MUSLIMS STUDENTS ASSOCATION-MB-STUDENTS FOR JUSTICE IN PALESTINE-HAMAS
NOVOROSSIYA SOVIET EMPIRE-OLD SPANNER
NPF NATINAL PARTICPATION FRONT
NUSRA FRONT TERRORIST GROUP
NYSRA FRONT AL Q AFFILIIATE
OCIS OXFORD CENTRE FOR ISLAMIC STUDIES
OIC ORG OF ISLAMIC COOPERATION
OJMA CONSENSUS OF SCHOLARS AND JURISTS
OLC OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL
OPCW ORG FOR THE PROHIBITION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS
OPF OCCUPIED LAND FUND
OXCIS OXFORD CENTER FOR ISLAMIC STUDIES
PADILLA, JOSE AL Q TERRORIST
PARADISE VIRGINS WAITING
PEOPLE OF THE BOOK CHRISTIANS, JEWS, ZOROASTRIANS
PEOPLE OF THE CONENANT REVEALED SCRIPTURE
PESHMERGA KURDISH FIGHTERS
PHILLIPS, JAMES HERTAGE
PIJ PALESTIAIN ISLAMIC JIHAD
PKK JURDISH WORKER PARTY
PKK KUDRISTAN WORKER PARTY
QADIS ISLAMIC JUDGES
QAIS-AL KHAZALI RIGHTEOUS LEAYLEE SHIA
QARADAWI SHIEKH
QAWWAMUN MEN-LORD-MASTER-RULERS-MANAGE-BREAD WINNER
QAWWAMUN G****R OF MEN
QAWWAMUN MEN-LORD-MASTER-RULERS-MANAGE-BREAD WINNER
QAZALI ARG IRAN BACKED JIHADIST
QIYAS/IJTHAD INDIVIDUAL REASONING REFERRED
QIYAS/IJTHAD RESONING BY ANALOGY
QURAYSH DESCENDDE FROM TRIBE OF THE PROPHET
QUTBISM QUTB'S VIOLENT PLAYBOOK
QYAS REASONING BY ANALOGY TO ONE OF HIGHER SOURCES
RAFIDA SHIA
RAMADAN FAST
RAOSPM D'ETAT PERSONAL DRVENGE
RASHIDAM RIGHTLY GUIDED CALIPH
RESSLY, LINDA JIHAD WATCH
RFJ REWARDS FOR JUSTICE
RZEMIJETUAL HAJRIJE BENEVOLENT SOCIETY
SAAR FOUNDATION TRUST FUND BY SULAIMAN ABDUL-AZZIZ RAJHI
SADAGAH CHARITY
SAHABAH MODEL COMPANSION
SALAFI FOLLOWER OF FUNDAMENTAL BRAND OF ISLAM
SALAFISM GUIDING IDEOLOGY OF ALL ISLMIST
SALAFIYYAD RIGHTEOUS ANCESTORS
SALAH PRAYERS
SAMAH HAMAS
SAVAK INVESTIGATOR
SAWN FASTS
SEA JIHAD PRIACY
SECONDARLY SOURCES- 5 YPES-INFLUENCE, OBLIGAROTY, COMMENDABLE, PERKISSIBLE, DESPISED, PROHIBITED
SECONDARLY SOURCES- 5 YEARS-INFLUENCE, OBLIGAROTY, COMMENDABLE, PERKISSIBLE, DESPISED, PROHIBITED
SEYYED DESCENDANT OF MOHAMMAD
SHADADA MARTYDOM
SHAHID MARTYR FOR JIHAD
SHAMMAR CAMEL RAISER
SHARABEEN CATTLE RQAISERS
SHARIA REPRESSES SPEECH, CONSCIENCE, RELIGION,
SHARIA PATH TO BE FOLLWED -PATH TO WATER
SHARIA WAY OR PATH
SHARIA REPRESSES SPEECH, CONSCIENCE, RELIGION,
SHARIA THE BASIS FOR THE RELIGIOUS. POLITCALND CULTURAL LIFE OF ALL MUSLIMS
SHARIA WAY OR PATH
SHARIAH ISLAMIFYYAH DIVINE LAW
SHCOOLS OF SHARIA HANBALI, HANIF, SHAFI, MALIKI
SHHIH AUTHENTIC OR CORRECT
SHIITES TWO MAIN MUSLIM GROUPS
SHIRK POLTHEISM
SIBJAMMALLAH GLORY TO ALLAH-33
SIGEH TEMPORARY MARRIAGE
SIMMAJ FESTIVALS
SIQEH TEMPORARY MARRIAGE
SIRA BIOGRAPHY OF MUHAMMED
SIYASH AVENUE FOR IMPOSING SHARIA FOR DAILY LIFE
SOA SON AO ALLAH
SRF SYRIAN REVOLUTIONARY FRONT
SUBHA ISLAMIC ROSARY BEADS—TO EXALT
SUNNAH PROPER PRACTICE OF THE PROPHET
SUNNAH AFFLOMERATION OF THE KORAN
SUNNAH GUIDED TRADIOTON OF MOHAMMAD
SUNNAH HOLY BOOK
SUNNAH PROPER PRACTICE OF THE PROPHET
SUNNI IMAMS HANIFA, ABU, SHARFI'I, MALIK, HANBAL-IBN
SUNNI MUSLIMS H**E AMERICA
SUNNI MUSLIMS FOLLOWERS OF ORTHODOX ISLAM
SUNNIS TWO MAIN MUSLIM GROUPS
TA;OBAN FIGHTERS FOR AFGHANSITAN
TABA INT'L AID ASSOC ISLAMIC CHARITY
TAFSIR AUTHORIATIVE HORANIC COMMENTARY
TAFSIR, AL-JALALAYNSAYS SLAY THEM
TAGIYYA LIE
TAKBIRS MUZZEINS CALL
TAKBIRS GORLFYING GOD
TAKFIR EXCOMMUNICATION
TAKIYYA LIE, CONCEAL THOUGHTS, FEELINGS OR CHARACTER
TANASUH TV STATION
TASBIH 33 OR 99 BEADS
TASK FORCE BLACK SAS, US, DELTA, SEAL 6
TAWRIYA LIE IN VIRTUALLY ALL CIRCUMSTANCES
TAYSEER LIGHTENING ONES BURDEN MAKING IT EASIER
TCO T***SNATIONAL CRIMINAL ORG
TEARS OF JIHAD DEATHS DUE TO JIHAD
THE AL-QA'IDA-QODS FORCE NEXUS KNOWN UNKNOWN
THE SMILE BASSAMAT AL FARAB
THE SONS OF IRAQ SUNNIS-ANTI AL Q
TILTH VAGINA OR PLOWED FIELD
TIRMIDHI SUNNIS COLLECTORS OF THE HADITH
TORAH OLD TESTAMENT
TOZA TAILEK-IBN ZIYAD ACADEMY
TPFDD TRUE PHASED FORCE DEPLOYYMENT DATA
TRILOGY 3 TEXTS, KORNA-SIRA-HADITH
TRIMMERS, SOFTEN TAE ISLAMIC MESSAGE
UASR UNITED ASSOCATION FOR STUDEIS AND RESEARCH
UIGHURS FIGHTERS FOR CHINA
UJB ABU ABAYDAH IBN JARAH BATTALION
ULAMA TEACHERS
ULAMA TEACHERS
ULEMA ISLAMIC SCHOLARS
UMARIYYA CONVERT OR CONVANT OF ARMAR-RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
UMAYYADS CALIPH OF SHARIA
UMDAT AL SALIK ISLAMIC LEGAL MANUAL
UMDAT, AL- SALIK ISLAMIC LEGAL MANUAL
UMMA ACCUPIERS
UMMA SOLIDARITY OF MANKIND
UMMAH ONE UNIFIED ISLAMIC STATE-UNDER SHARIA LAW
UMMAH COMMUNITY
UMMAH MUSLIMS REGIONS IN US
UQUDS DAYS DAY OF DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL
URDU LANGUAGE OF PAKISTAN
USCMO U S COUNCIL OF MUSLIM ORG
USTADH ISLAMIC SCHOLARS
VAKIL REPRESENTATIVE
WAMY WORLD ASSY OF MUSLIM YOUTH
WAMY WORLD ASSEMBLY OF MUSLIM YOUTH
WASSATIYYA IDELOOGY THAT DOMINATE TODAYS GOBAL ISLAMIS T MOVEMENT
WHITE MINARET MEDIA GROUP
WISE WORKD ISLAMIC STUDY ENTERPRISE
WORD OR PHRASE MEANING---ORGANIZATION ETC
YMAR ISLAMIST JURIST
ZAKAT CHARITIES
ZAKAT PERFORM ONE OF THE 5 PILLARS OF ISLAM-DONATIONS-NOT CHAIRTY
ZAKAT CHARITY
Z*****TS JEWS--UNBELEIVERS--USA
ZONES URBAINES SENSIBLES SENSITIVE URBAN AREAS
ZOROASTRIANISM RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHY
ZUS SENSITIVE URBAN ZONES
BELIEFS OF ISLAM
ABOVE ALL--ALLAH IS OUR GOAL
ACLY
AL MEDINA INSTITUE
ALWAYS OFFENSIVE ALWAYS ATTACKING
ALWAYS OFFENSIVE, ALSWAYS ATTACKING UNTIL NO
AMERICAN MUSLIM COUNCIL
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIOANL RIGHTS
ENDLESS JIHAD--TO OVER THROW INSUFFICIENTLY
EXPEDIENCY COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL
ISLAMIC RULERS AND INSTITUTE SHARIA STATES
IT IS THEIR BELIEFS--RULES THOUGHTS
JERUSALEM---ALLAH WILLING
MUSLIM ADVOCATES
NAACP
NATINAL LAWYERS GUILD
NORTH TEXAS ISLAMIC COUNCIL
NORTH TEXAS ISLAMIC COUNCIL
OPPOSITION REMAINED.
PALESTINE LEGISLATEVE COUNCIL
PRICE ALWALEED BIN TALAL CENTER FOR CHRISITAN MUSLIMS UNDERSTANDING
PRINCE ALLOALEED BIN TALAL CNETER
SAKE OF ALLAH IS OUR ASPRIATION,
SECURITY CIUNCIL
SENSITIVE OPERATIONS REVIEW COMM-FBI
SIRH COALITON
TASNIM NEWS AGENCY-TEHARAN
TERRORIST EXPATRIATION ACT
TERRORIST EXPATRIATION ACT
THE PROJECT 1982 MB 12PT PLAN TO EST ISL GOV
THEN CONQUER THE ENTIRE WORLD FOR ISLAM

you have a point there

HE'S A RAGING PARTISAN--THE BIG LIE OF OBAMA'S PRESIDENCY:-- 15H, B26
President Obama's claim to have disapproved of gay marriage until he changed his 'mind in 2012 has been exposed as: lie.
But he did say he knew how to cleanse Washington of political and ideological polarization, raging partisanship, the frequency of personal attacks, and general dysfunction. This made him unique—and very, very appealing.
We have come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and wornout dogmas that for far too long have Strangled our politics ... the time has come to set a He had promised to side childish things."
He became a highly partisan president, had promise to consult Republicans in Congress and listen to their ideas. Yet he's done that rarely and then usually in a false show of bipartisanship. He insinuates republicans have nothing worthwhile to tell him.
When people are involved and informed and taking the time to a ask questions and let their opinions be known, then ultimately the govern-ment will respond. But if only a third of the people are saying anything, the government doesn't respond, and get the government that we've seen in Washington lately—which is unresponsive and is not doing enough.
In January, he set a record for veto threats by a president in the first month of a new Congress—eight. With his professed distaste for personal attacks, one might suspect Obama would have magnanimously refrained from indulging in such attacks himself,
or at least softened any of his own. But his ree******n campaign unleashed brutal attacks on Republican Mitt Romney amounting to character assassination.
Obama has been a d******e force on racial, economic, and political concern. He spoke out in racially loaded controversies involving the brief arrest in Cambridge, Massachusetts of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates and later the k*****g of Trayvon Martin, saying he saw the Florida teenager as the son he didn't have.
Obama often characterizes Republicans as proponents of no government at all or says they have no proposals or ideas to deal with national problems. None of this is true. When he unveiled a led a plan for free community colleges, he didn't seek advice from Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-Ala.), who had run his state's community college system.
As a candidate in 2008, Obama said questioning "who is—or is not—a patriot all too often poisons our political debates in ways that divide us rather than bring us together." Last year, however, he said he prefers "a patriotic" Republican party to the one that opposes him. He also accused Republicans of favoring "party over country" and declared himself an advocate of "economic patriotism," implying that those who with him are unpatriotic.
There is not a liberal America and a conservative America—there is the United States of America," he said. "There is not a black America and a white America and Latino America and Asian America—there's the United States of America." Great speech. Too bad Obama acts as if he never spoke those inspiring words.
source-weekly standard (2/23/15). fred barnes

MARX AND THE KORAN---THE ROLE OF BELIEFS AND IEDEOLOGIES IN MOTIVATING, JUSTIFYING, AND LEGITIMATING POLITICAL VIOLENCE--42H, B12A
Muslim terrorists in the process of inflicting lethal bodily harm (with ) firearms, explosives, knives, or by running over people with cars) shout "God is Great!" Allahu Akbar. These exclamations appear to be a form of encouragement, intended to vindicate and justify actions that certainly need justification. God is great, the perpetrators seem to say, because he allows, perhaps even demands, that some people—the infidels, deserving to be put to death—be dispatched. On these occasions, God, or the God of Islam, is compulsively invoked to bear witness to make these acts of faith and reassure the perpetrators. The exclamation is intended to make clear and confirm—both for the perpetrators and for those witnessing their actions—that the perpetrators are carrying out divinely sanctioned retribution, rendering the act meaningful and morally justified. They may need even stronger reassurance that they aspire to become "martyrs," suicide bombers, to convince themselves that they are throwing away their lives for a very good cause. In doing so, they also rely on the comforting belief that they will be recipients of generous otherworldly rewards.
As a rule, these commentators aver that Islamic religious beliefs provide no justification or encouragement for such vile acts, that violent Islamic radicals misuse and misinterpret the teachings of their religion. If so We need not pay attention to their assertions and explanations of their motives and behavior. We should dismiss their emphatic insistence that they are carrying out God's will. We are thus instructed that it is Western governments and societies that radicalized the terrorists—bred terror— by the colonialism of the past, the failure to integrate new immigrants, our refusal to allow them to voice their just grievances, and, finally, our demonization of them for no other reason than their disagreements with us. he mentioned the religiously sanctioned mistreatment of women or the sharia law that justifies stoning female adulterers to death, chopping off the hands of thieves, and flogging other criminals. Matters on which we disagree would also include fatwas against the likes of novelist Salman Rushi targeted to be k**led as punishment for blasphemy.
It is also overlooked that blasphemy is my is a religious notion, and if the cartoonists were murdered for blasphemies, then the perpetrators were obviously motivate by very strongly felt religious sentiments, as they themselves made quite clear. The vast majority of deprived people do not become violent criminals, sex offenders, drug traffickers, or suicide bombers. A significant portion of Muslim terrorists, moreover. do not, in fact, come from impoverished, disadvantaged backgrounds. Many of the 9/11 suicide bombers, among others, were well educated, of middle-class background, with decent jobs—their grievances were less tangible. The important question to ask is how, and under what circumstances, do genuine grievances combine with religious beliefs and encouragements to find expression in calculated acts of murderous violence? The N**is undertook the Holocaust because they—at any rate those who planned and organized it—were deeply convinced that it was the right thing to do in order to purify the world of Jews, whom they considered the most diabolical threat to human decency and social justice. Obedience to authority and division of labor and responsibility played a part at the lower echelons, but people like Hitler, Himmler, Eichmann, and others who inspired, designed, and ordered the mass murders were confident that this was the correct and historically justified course to follow. Their beliefs authenticated their behavior.
that building the historically most advanced social system could not be accomplished without eliminating their variously defined and designated enemies who opposed this lofty project. Their beliefs were rooted in Marxism-Leninism and its indigenous modifications. At the same time, many Western intellectuals argued that.
While we cannot blame Marx for the Gulag or the collectivization of agriculture, for one-party "e******ns" or the personality cults, the proposition that his ideas and ideals had nothing to do with Soviet (and other C*******t) systems is quite implausible. The suppression of religion did not make human beings more rational or reasonable. On the other hand, the doctrine of class struggle greatly helped legitimate political violence. Especially consequential was the belief and vision, integral to Marxism, that it was possible to create a morally, materially, and historically superior social system. It motivated the power holders and provided them with justification to purify their society of those perceived as obstacles to the realization of these lofty aspirations.
The perpetrators loudly, clearly, and proudly insist on being motivated by these belief , and we cannot highly dismiss their pronouncements as nothing but delusions, fantasies, aberrations, and false consciousness. The Koran, after all, like the worst of Marx, is a large enough body of writing to allow people of various political or religious dispositions to find in it ideas that will, or seem to, legitimate their impulses and inclinations. Is jihad merely "a holy struggle. a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one's community.
Or does jihad "consist of military action with the object of the expansion of Islam stemming from the ... fundamental principle of the universality of Islam: this religion, along with the temporal power it implies, ought to embrace the whole universe, if necessary by force," as stated in the Encyclopedia of Islam.
There are plenty of imams in many mosques who emphasize the aggressive and conflict-oriented themes of the sacred text. It remains to be determined who is entitled to interpret the Koran, who are the most authoritative and influential interpreters, extremists or moderates. These religious convictions give rise to a sense of moral superiority that helps justify the violent expression of the hatred of the societies they blame for their rootlessness (if living in the West) or their political and economic inferiority (if citizens of Arab nations). Hence the desire to create a "caliph**e," a large theocracy that would replace insufficiently devout Arab societies and possibly some Western ones as well. The perpetrators, portrayed as rudderless, marginalized, angry young men adrift in unfriendly (Western) societies, lacking in agency, are victims of social conditions they cannot control. Such stereotypes are reminiscent of past notions of the banality of evil. The old and well-known version, created by Hannah Arendt, resulted from her attending the war crimes trial of Adolf Eichmann and led to her erroneous theory that he personified this "banality." She perceived him as a mindless instrument of the N**i regime, a bureaucratic "desk murderer" without beliefs or convictions of his own, obeying higher authorities. These circumstances reduced, or limited, his moral culpability and responsibility.
There is also a similarity between the (initially) favorable reception of Arendt's concept of the banality of evil and the current receptivity to the new version personified by radical Muslims in the grip of overwhelming social forces. Both conceptions blunt moral indignation and encourage a less judgmental attitude.
Attributions of moral equivalence to Islamic and Western-Christian atrocities may also enter into the assessment of these matters. President Obama's unfortunate remark at the prayer breakfast on February 5 advising that we get off "our high horse"—that is, constrain our moral indignation about the burning of the Jordanian pilot in light of the atrocities of Christian crusaders—is a case point,

source--weekly standard (2/23/15), paul hollander

CLINTON--102
OBAMA--72.9
GEORGE HW BUSH--65.8
FORD--62.0
LBJ--58
NIXON--50.3

HAPPY---LOL

THE "I" FACTOR---PRESIDENT AND THE FIRST-PERSON PRONOUN:A HISTORICAL SURVEY:-7H. B12A
From almost the moment President Obama Assumed office, observers began calling attention to his unusual proclivity to use "I".34--"I''s in the president's speech federal rescue of General Motors but, of ominously, just one mention of "Congress" and none of "law." Just last week, a report in Grabien charged the president with referencing himself (I )or we) 118 times in 33 minutes in his departure speech from India, which computed to a rate of "3.5 Obama references per minute."
Obama's pronominal binging they assert, bespeaks a dangerous personalism in his view of governance, a boundless narcissism in his psychological disposition, and a peculiar solipsism that demands that his listeners see the world as filtered through his eyes.
A quick survey by BuzzFeed in 2014 purported to show that in press conferences Obama . has been more sparing in his use of personal pronoun-(I); me, my. mine, and myself than most of his predecessors.
A team of researchers at the U of VA prestigious Laputa Institute of Computational Linguistics undertook a detailed analysis of the use of "I" in spoken ''State of the Union addresses delivered before Congress. The list With some minor technical adjustments— counting an incoming president's first speech to Congress as a State of the Union address, and excluding the : lame-duck address of an outgoing president—the institute team was able to construct a data set consisting of 97 speech a respectable N Tiodern social scientific standing. Researchers — were able to determine the average number of I's per speech (41.2), the average for each president, William J. Clinton 102.1 H Barack Obama 72.9,
The most highly ranked presidents, the Democrats Clinton and Obama, stand out for being more than a full standard deviation above the mean.
Clinton and Obama together managed to hold 7 of the top 10 places for individual speeches, It is also worth considering whether Washington's I's lean toward the self-effacing, while Obama's suggest self-absorption.

source--weekly standard (2/16/15), james ceaser, , , cns, buzz feed. terrence jeffrey