One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Strycker
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 250 next>>
Apr 10, 2024 19:04:12   #
susanjaneblack wrote:
He was found Guilty of raping a woman! Where do you get YOUR news. Or wasn't it newsworthy enough for YOU since she is only a WOMAN!


I'm assuming you're referring to Trump. It's amazing how someone can be so absolutely sure of their wrong facts. Trump was never charged or found guilty of rape. He was accused of rape in a civil suit and was found not guilty of said rape due to lack of evidence. That same jury did find him liable for the claimed sexual assault using the very same lack of evidence which made no sense. Where do you get YOUR news? Or wasn't it worthy enough for YOU to check the facts since she is a WOMAN!
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 17:08:41   #
Proud American Patriot wrote:
Agreed. He has to consult with a local RE Attorney. The legal system is broken as you know. But if the Town gives him a new deed he has some additional third party government juice so to speak. If the neighbor is stubborn and gets an ambulance chaser (a real Attorney wouldn't take the case from his neighbor if the statute is on Archie's side unless unethical and paid in advance, no contingency, so the neighbor would pay, but a lot of money could be spent for a Summary Judgement on Archie's behalf if that pompous, nasty neighbor does have money. I'm sure Archie will do a cost benefit analysis after speaking to the local Attorney. And congrats for finally winning! And hope they get locked up for fraud for defrauding a f**e injury, I am guessing.
Agreed. He has to consult with a local RE Attorney... (show quote)


Wasn't so much a f**e injury as a no longer disabled situation. Somehow the insurance company got videos of him building something on his property next to mine. I can't imagine where that video came from. Lost him 80K/yr in disability insurance payments for the rest of his lifetime.
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 16:06:31   #
American Scene wrote:
Such an obvious choice

Too bad magas can't understand it.


When going forward means getting hit by a train I'll put it in reverse. With progressive ideology I hear the train a coming. It's loaded with toxic chemicals and explosives.
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 14:13:10   #
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
I believe the plan is as h**ed as newsome is they will replace Kamala with him as vp then get bidet out from incompetence then the h**ed one would not have to be v**ed in just like Kamala


They can't dump Kamala for fear of looking r****t and losing even more minority v**es.
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 14:08:29   #
TruePatriot49 wrote:
Strycker, I've heard it called adamant possession here in Rhode Island, but it is the same thing. If you maintain a piece of property for 20 years, it becomes yours. Having it surveyed and changing the title is a great idea.


I am not a RE Attorney so it's best to consult one. Not sure how far Archie's neighbor would take this over 150 sq ft of land. Not far if he is smart because he will lose in the end. Archie has more to lose up front with the cost of 600 feet of fence if it actually turns into a real legal fight.

I got a 300K judgement against an individual awhile back which started over an individual dumping a couple small pickup trucks of trash on my property. The whole conflict for various reasons cost the other side over 4 million in mostly lost disability income. Though it took many court hearings and 20 years to collect my 300k plus interest. Some people are to stubborn and lack common sense for their own good.
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 10:39:55   #
proud republican wrote:
So it's going to be Trump vs biden..


Not sure anymore. I Still think a yet unknown substitute may be put in but it has to be soon, next couple months, so he/she can establish a image by the e******n as a moderate while still being a progressive.
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 01:20:18   #
proud republican wrote:
https://cbs6albany.com/news/nation-world/gavin-newsom-will-replace-biden-in-may-joe-rogan-says-president-joe-biden-trump-nbc-news-jre-experience-democrat-d-california-governor


Newsom polls worse than Biden nationally. No one on their list of current possible candidates polls well in the general population. As sad as it is, Biden is the best they got at the moment.
Go to
Apr 9, 2024 23:17:22   #
proud republican wrote:
President Trump's Hush money trial starts next week starting with the Jury se******n.. Should President Trump's trial be televised??


Televised and analyzed. Show it all and let the US citizens decide who or what to believe for themselves. May not change the outcome of a NY trial but it may effect the perception, one way or the another, of the fairness of the process. If the democrats are using lawfare let them do it with p***e and show the world who they really are.
Go to
Apr 8, 2024 23:11:21   #
dtucker300 wrote:
The Golden State exodus continues, though at a slower pace
Another year, another dip in California’s population.

By Ryan Fonseca

As of July, California’s population fell to an estimated 38,965,000, down by 75,400 over 12 months, according to recent data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

This recent map shows more details of the population decline in 2023, presenting county-by-county changes across the U.S.

From July 1, 2022, to July 1, 2023, 17 of California’s 53 counties experienced a population increase while the majority lost residents. Populations fell in every coastal county from Del Norte down to San Diego.

Los Angeles County lost 56,420 residents in 2023, the most of any county across the U.S., census data show. But that’s notably fewer people than the 89,697 the county lost in 2022. And despite a few years of shrinking, L.A. County is still the most populous county in the U.S. by a healthy margin.

Orange and San Diego counties were also among the top 10 U.S. counties that lost the most residents in the July-to-July counts; their populations fell by 14,617 and 7,203 people, respectively.

“Entering this century, when California’s still-growing population was 34 million, we were predicted to reach 45 million by 2020 and almost 60 million by 2040,” Times political columnist George Skelton wrote this week. “So much for that.”

Although a portion of those population changes is attributed to what the Census Bureau refers to as “natural change” — births and deaths — primarily, the numbers are shifting because more people are moving out of California than are moving in, a phenomenon that’s been in the news since the p******c.

Individual circumstances may vary, but the main reasons for leaving are not a mystery. Simply put, California is an expensive place to live compared with nearly every other state. More people have found themselves disillusioned with the California dream amid skyrocketing housing prices and paychecks that don’t go as far as they would across state lines.

Essential California readers told us as much last April, when we asked Californians who’d moved to different counties or out of the state to share their reasons.

Many said they’d moved because of the rising cost of living, especially housing that felt increasingly unaffordable. Some left to be closer to family, a priority during those isolating early p******c years. Others cited growing concerns about public safety or dissatisfaction with the state’s government — officials’ response to homelessness, or inaction on air quality or simply differences in political ideology.

“My quality of life is better than it has ever been,” wrote Alberto E., who moved to New Mexico from Alameda County. “Both because I’ve advanced in my career but also because I can live comfortably, save money and have a mortgage in a place that is more affordable. I do miss California dearly, but not enough to move back.”

California’s population had grown every year since statehood in 1850, but around 2000, that growth started to slow. Skelton offered an explanation: “California just got too big for its carrying capacity.”

“Blame California’s high costs of land and labor plus regulatory quagmires and neighborhood resistance to growth,” he wrote. “[Gov.] Newsom and legislators have been wrestling with these issues for years and enacted new laws, but they haven’t generated much progress in making home buying more affordable.”

Although people moving out of state represent the largest share of the population decline, researchers also cite lower birthrates, plus an increased mortality rate and a sharp drop in people moving to California from other countries — both fueled by the C****-** p******c.

“In the long term, declining birth rates, longer life expectancy, and the aging of the baby boomers all mean that California’s population is getting older, and deaths will likely rise as the population ages,” the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California reported late last year.

Some in the California-is-full camp might be tempted to celebrate. But if the state continues on this trajectory, that could mean less tax revenue and diminished congressional power via fewer House seats (we already lost one after the 2020 census).

So, what can be done? Skelton offered one suggestion that he said “worked well for generations until the state got greedy” about half a century back:

“Free tuition at public universities for California residents. That would at least help prevent a brain drain.”
The Golden State exodus continues, though at a slo... (show quote)


I guess the Democrats can't import the replacements fast enough. They should beg Abbot to stop sending the i******s to NY and redirect them to California.
Go to
Apr 8, 2024 23:00:05   #
Big dog wrote:
Archie, I assure you that if I had moved in next door and found I was denied 3”x 600’ feet of land that I now owned, I’d force you to buy me a 12 oz beer for every 2’ of land. Now that’s just a start.
My math puts the fee at 300 beers. That’s this years adjustment.
Now we may have to figure out a tax adjustment too, but we can figure that out while we’re working on that 300 ice cold beers, (we can discuss what we put on the grill later).


You have best buy the beer for Archie since the land is now his. The neighbor has already admitted the fence is Archies which makes the issue of the land mute. Trust me. I lost a couple acres of land in the exact scenario except I was on the other side of the fence from Archie.
Go to
Apr 8, 2024 01:08:06   #
archie bunker wrote:
It seems that I have a new neighbor to the West of me. I didn't know it until today. I was outside doing some work when I noticed an orange stake at my back fence, so I went to see what the what. A guy, prolly 200 yards away on the other property is yelling, and waving at me. I waved back, and went about my business.
Long story short, the guy showed up at my front door puffed up like a Banty Rooster, talked smack to my wife (I was out back), and then came to where I was, and came at me with complete attitude because he claims his survey shows that my fence is 3 inches over his property line. He talked funny, so, I asked where he is from, and he said New Hampshire. I tried to be reasonable with him, but, he's DEMANDING that I move a little over 600 feet of fence that's been here for over 40 years.....3 inches.
This guy got so loud, belligerent, and demanding that my wife called the Sheriffs Dept on him because she thought it might get physical. This was a two hour ordeal over 3 inches of fenceline.
Is everyone from that part of the country that way? If so, stay there. Otherwise, you might try to bully someone with less patience than me, and catch a hammer upside the head.
It seems that I have a new neighbor to the West of... (show quote)


If that fence has been there for forty years you have been maintaining the fence and 3" of property on your side of the fence, you now own that 3 inches and have for a long time. Adverse possession. The length of time for adverse possession varies by location. But generally somewhere around 7 to 20 years. If you want to lay claim you should get a survey done to include the 3 inches and file a corrected title. If you want to be neighborly and if he wants the 3 inches back, You could always sell it back to him for the cost of the fence.
Go to
Apr 4, 2024 20:40:40   #
AuntiE wrote:
Anyone who is an appointee can be; however, anyone under OPM has “rights”. It is near on impossible to fire a fed.


If there is a willingness to take on the fight any rules can be changed. The OPM is under the presidents executive responsibilities. Might be more difficult than turning a stalled cargo ship but it can be done.
Go to
Apr 4, 2024 20:26:52   #
proud republican wrote:
What is the difference?? Biden Administration should not throw stones at Glass House since Biden Administration is just as guilty of what happenedin Afghan as what they're accusing Israel of..🙄 It's a war, accidents happen during wars... What happens in Gaza was tragic accident!.....You know who's enjoying all this?? HAMAS!! Let's not forget who started this whole war!! It wasn't Israel!!


This is one of those times that I am ashamed. Not ashamed of my country, but, ashamed of the people leading it. The hypocrisy of our current administration for political expediency is horrific and dangerous.
Go to
Apr 2, 2024 18:16:30   #
proud republican wrote:
https://abc7.com/california-bill-employees-the-right-to-disconnect-during-non-work-hours/14604813/

Good idea?? OR stupid idea??


One can disconnect anytime they want. It's called quitting.
Go to
Apr 2, 2024 16:54:53   #
proud republican wrote:
I'm not!! My point was, is that even Clinton was against i*****l i*********n, something that this today's i***tic president, might, should learn from..


Biden is just a useful fool. He has no clue what his administration is doing or why. He has no input. The only fingerprints on anything he lays claim to is on the pen he used to sign his name. Place the blame on his controllers and enablers. The "progressives" and the rest of the politicians willing to go along. We need to stop a lot more than just Biden to save our Republic.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 250 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.