The topics that Republicans want to improve upon is: cost of living, border crisis, energy independence, parental rights.

The topic that Democrats may win on is a******n.

Now, it is very pathetic that one political American party believes that murder is justified when it is murder of the unborn.

To all Americans, I want to ask you all, one simple question: Do you think the murder of the unborn child is justifiable?

It is a hard question for anyone with a conscience. Most people who believe in God and Jesus Christ call a******n murder. For we believe that life begins at conception.

But whether or not you believe that life begins at conception, or whether or not you believe in God, or Jesus Christ, you must realize that the reality of the termination of a pregnancy results in death. A woman is a human being that is entrusted by nature, to carry and nurture a baby. That is their function in nature. But that function is not the life of the woman, for it takes a man and a woman to raise a child.

Just as a weapon can end the life of any creature including man, a******n ends the life of a child.

If we go through the bill of rights, otherwise known as human rights, there is no right that results in death. Right to free speech, does not result in death. For a word is but wind, and words can't k**l alone. But when words are heeded to cause action, that action may k**l. Therefore free speech is regulated, for the purpose of saving lives and preventing death.

Right to religion. This right does not result in death, but rather allows the curious human being to believe in wh**ever God they choose. This must be respected, but when that right causes harm to society that causes death to either the believer or the non-believer, then this freedom is restricted. It is restricted to prevent death and harm to society as a whole.

Right to peacefully assemble. Again this right does not result in death. If such an assembly does result in death, that assembly is outlawed, and is disbanded. Thus, if a right results in death, it is to be prohibited.

Right to petition the government for a regress of grievances. This is a method to resolve problems with the government at hand. If this results in death, it causes harm to society therefore the grievances must be negotiated on to achieve an agreement between the petitioner and the people. If no such negotiation is not resolved, then death may occur. Where the government abuses the people, or the people abuses the government. In such a manner death results. So an orderly petition of regress of grievances is too restricted to prevent death.

A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Here too, the M*****a is restricted to prevent murder and death. The right of self defense preserves life. Since it preserves life, therefore, this became a human right. However, wisdom shows that some will be irresponsible, and therefore necessary regulations that cannot be construed to cause death must be implemented. Thus preserving self defense against the government and keeping the peace of the nation.

Now, I can go on and on, but the simple test is "If the action causes death in the form of murder, then it should be restricted."

When this test is applied to the action of a******n, the answer is yes, therefore a******n must be restricted.

Most people who have faith in God, and firmly believe in their convictions as dictated by their religion would agree that a******n is murder.

There is a vast majority of Americans, with in these united States, that believe that a******n is murder. Roe vs. Wade introduced the definition of the origin of Life. Some believe that life begins at birth, while others believe it begins at conception. Science has proven that life begins at conception. And the baby, begins to feel pain at fifteen weeks.

Now, if you believe in a******n and c*****e c****e, why do you believe it is okay to change nature to save your life, yet it ok to k**l your prodigy?

"When you hear a baby cry, you know there is hope for the future", is an old saying that many of the Greatest Generation use to say to one another, as they lived through the threat of Hitler, Mussolini, and Japan during world war II. Why do their children believe that they can k**l off their descendants, holding no responsibility or regret at minimum? For this thought process is dark, bleak, and gloomy, or down right scary.

We call ourselves civilized because we hold each other to a higher human standard. Yet by allowing our mothers to k**l our children, we revert back to that of a cave man. We revert back to the practice of Moloch, and Baal. Thousands of children were k**led in the names of those two gods, as they were sacrificed and boiled in a bronze fixture. It was this sin, that was the worst, and Israel sinned this sin. In the 21st century, we do not follow the ways of Moloch, for some believe we are more humane. "The aborted fetus feels no pain", but the murder still occurs.

Picture a person accused of murder telling the judge, "Well I sedated [the victim], therefore they had no pain, when I k**led them", does that still justify the murder?

Therefore, my advice to my fellow Americans is this: Anyone who thinks murder of the unborn is righteous, then don't v**e for them. V**e for real issues such as Gas prices, food prices, and shelter prices, utility prices and cost of living. These are required for survival. A******n is not an issue that concerns survival, but rather is selfish, and cold hearted.

Sad to say though, a******n is still legal within the borders of the United States, but I for one think it should be illegal. Just like first degree, second degree, third degree, murder is illegal.

But like there are cases of self-defense where the victim k**ls the aggressor, so too, should that be applied to the pregnant woman and her rapist.

But these cases are and ought to be rare in a civilized society that is intelligent.

....Good Day:)!

FBI Panics Over 5 BOMBSHELLS From Durham’s Latest Filing!!!!

We should all be wondering if anything from a legal perspective will be done about these horrific crimes not only against a sitting president but the entire populace of the United States of America! Opposition research is an entirely different animal that paying for illegal manipulations of the t***h by the MSM, but major and massive fraud on the American citizenry. Also, the complete defamation of political rivals deserves at least in my opinion billions of dollrs in restitution to all of those slandered!!!!! Anyone here on OPP care to disagree with me?
Mike

https://youtu.be/RarVuzAArR4