Yup, pretty intricate layering. Above my pay grade.

Thank that, you know, God, that I, uh, mentioned before that all that is above my pay grade! And the proper duty of ADMIN and FBI if ADMIN wants help. I've done probably more than absolutely necessary out of an excess of scrupulousness.

Forum guidelines are adult only, but Pennylyn, among others, had allowed her minor daughter to post under supervision, the SWIMBO's old account, NPP, sometimes hosted their "boys" for limited supervised online visits. Lots of hinky seeming stuff can fuel paranoid fantasy till the cows come home.

When you enter a shared world, you don't own the floor by anything more than your grace and presence. If you see something in someone's bathroom closet while looking for a replacement toilet paper roll, it isn't your place to tell your host that his wife is so giddy because there's a positive pregnancy test in her bath room!

You stfu and look surprised at the announcement or shocked when her spouse confides in you three weeks later that she terminated her pregnancy.

Discretion is a social grace.

If you find an abottoir in the basement checking for an Allen wrench? Same.

Excrpt, once safely finished with your duties as a polite guest, get the hell out and report thst s**t to authorities!

There is a line.

It isn't grey or broad.

You and what authority?

Anyone can jump in the forum, join an ongoing conversation and answer a post unexpectedly. That fact is what clears you in that screen shot of the torture porn post from albertk. Not conclusive unless you want to admit there was a connection.

Your attachment was too small to read on my phone screen but I'M OVER IT.

Didn't read, won't worry.

Please stop before you hurt yourself or someone else with your fetishist excesses.

Reported for personal insult. Testing ADMIN's reflexes. Anyone got a pulse!?

Not the biologic mother's womb and life's attention, possible death by complications for the duration of gestation.... A lifetime of not knowing if her subsequent daughter might meet him and fall in love, no one knowing they were half siblings....

Her womb, her choice.

A human can legally shoot an intruder in their home if they fear complications from a home invader.

The McClowsky's of St. Louis!?

Christ on a c*****r!

You endorse torture murder, too!?What's the problem with a******n then?

I support any woman's choice to do so. Or to relieve herself of the burden if she does not have the resources to follow that grace.

Off topic.

Also reported for personal insult.

So did you post this, then edit it from your post, or did I make changes to it in my quote reply?

Of course I did it. But couldn't it have happened the other way?

Couldn't someone else do it to anyone, after the fact? Use this gift of knowlege for good, not evil.

Remember, some people think God's eye is always on you.

No! I'm impressed that you called it! You nailed it. PROFANE!

"Oh my fucking God!" is profane, not insulting nor pornographic.

I believe you might actually have taken an English course or two, on that demonstration of proficiency!

So you are fine with judging and murdering heart beating humans!?

It is illogical to object to a painless a******n, yet promote torture murder. Your opinion on the subject is schizophreniform!

I once told you your concept of Jesus disgusts me.

Now, I tell you that YOU disgust me.

But of course, I still love you.

You may always repent and return to my good graces.

Bub bye!

quote=Singularity
quote=Singularity=
quote=Singularity= quote=Singularity to Bladerunner's earlier post:

Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.

34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.

My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the v****g implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any spouse who has a fertile spouse (lesbian marriages have two!) that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. Even if that number is 1, it matters to that one v**er, and maybe the spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....

I am sure v**ers will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "a******n bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations.

Sorry for that person's interruption, again... and over and over, again.

How ridiculously stupid do they intend to try to make me look, here? It is time for off topic dinner. I've been fixing a big casserole.

Tomato Surprise.

No tomatoes in it.

That's the surprise! Just a bunch of shredded veggies, chopped tofu, legumes and a big protective chunk of plausable deniability by hereafter maintaining my innocent behavior, ignoring the identity games as I'd planned before you decided you somehow needed to frame me with them.

I'd like to think you targeted me as a strong debater you couldn't prevail over without c***ting, but I doubt you possess the perspicacity to carry off the production of that complicated a concept. It's probably that as an atheist and one who frequently tests the boundaries of the ADMIN's compliance with the First Ammendment you could arouse emotions in simple God fearing folks like Radiance3 and others to tar and feather the scapegoat they already distrust.

Like any good story this one and all it's layers has a nugget of t***h and a ton of paranoia. I don't like this game. I'd like to go back to being able to ignore it and talk about politics and current world events. The mesger contents of these collective minds do not interest me further. Please play happily out of my way.

quote=Singularity=
quote=Singularity= quote=Singularity to Bladerunner's earlier post:

Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.

34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.

My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the v****g implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any spouse who has a fertile spouse (lesbian marriages have two!) that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. Even if that number is 1, it matters to that one v**er, and maybe the spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....

I am sure v**ers will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "a******n bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations.

Sorry for that person's interruption, again... and again.

TRIGGER WARNING:

POSSIBLE TORTURE PORN CONTENT: I do not read this person's posts because this previous one already wasted enough groceries.

Sept 15
2021

https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/tpr?p=3862256&t=225764



This one is long and gets interesting re this topic in the last half...

https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/tpr?p=3859167&t=225529