RockKnutne wrote:
Anybody have more on this? I hope like hell it's just a h**x... :shock:
Top US Commander Under Arrest For Refusing To Fire Nukes At Russia
A new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) for the Ministry of Defense (MoD) states that President Barack Obamas nuclear war communication commander has been arrested and relieved of her command after failing to t***smit launch codes authorizing an atomic weapons first-strike attack upon the Federation in coordination with a similar surprise attack planned by the United Kingdom.
According to the SVR, US Navy Captain Heather E. Cole was the commander of the US Navys Strategic Communications Wing 1 located at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma whose E-6B Mercury aircraft provide the communications links allowing President Obama and US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter to directly contact the submarines, bombers and land-based missiles that comprise the United States strategic nuclear force.
On Monday, 16 March, this report states, Captain Cole received from the Pentagon a launch order authorizing a limited nuclear strike against the Federation, but which failed due to a critical Permissive Action Link (PAL) failure thus causing her to abort this planned attack.
http://www.thetotalcollapse.com/top-us-commander-under-arrest-for-refusing-to-fire-nukes-at-russia/
Navy strategic air wing commander fired
WASHINGTON The Navy fired the commander of an organization whose aircraft allow the president and the secretary of defense to directly contact the submarines, bombers and land-based missiles that comprise the nation's strategic nuclear force.
A Navy statement said Capt. Heather E. Cole was relieved of her duties as commander of Strategic Communications Wing 1, based at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, for what it called a "loss of confidence" in her ability to lead.
A spokeswoman, Cmdr. Jeannie Groeneveld, said the firing was based on findings of an investigation into her management of the wing. Details were not released.
Cole's air wing has no role in operating nuclear weapons but is responsible for the Navy squadrons whose E-6B Mercury aircraft provide communications links between the president and the nuclear forces.
http://www.stripes.com/news/us/navy-strategic-air-wing-commander-fired-1.335139
Have at it!
:shock: :shock: :shock: :?: :?: :?:
Anybody have more on this? I hope like hell it's j... (
show quote)
This is REALLY for REAL you guys? Are you KIDDING me?!?
And this, after reading the following pretty much sounds like the **** is about ready to hit the fan here in the States. A nation doesn't dis Israel without repercussions! On top of that, the US has the audacity to order a nuclear attack on a nation who is stocked to the hilt with nukes!? Imbeciles in the white house. Complete imbeciles.
Obama calls Netanyahu after his re-e******n:
President Barack Obamas supposed congratulatory call to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last Thursday, two days after the Likud leader triumphed in Israels e******ns, was actually a bitter 30-minute conversation, Israels two main TV news stations reported Friday night.
Quoting unnamed Israeli sources, they said the president made clear he didnt believe Netanyahu was genuinely supportive of a two-state solution to the Palestinian conflict, and that he indicated that the US would no longer automatically support Israel at the United Nations.
According to a Channel 10 read out on the call, indeed, Obama left Netanyahu with the impression that he intends to abandon Israel at the UN.
The United States has actually been considering a reevaluation of ties with Israel, including its automatic support for the Jewish state at the United Nations Security Council, for at least four months, the Israeli sources also told Channel 2. Although the White House claims the reassessment was prompted by Netanyahus remarks on Monday in which he rejected the establishment of a Palestinian state and which he walked back Thursday that is not the case, according to the officials.
The threat to reassess relations was reported widely this week and, according to the TV reports, was issued directly to Netanyahu on Thursday by Obama in the call.
During the 30-minute conversation, described as difficult by Channel 2, Obama made clear to the prime minister that the US was reconsidering its support for Israel at the UN as well as its approach to Israeli-Palestinian peace in light of Netanyahus pre-e******n comments rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Channel 10 also said Netanyahu was adamant about keeping his ambassador to the US, Ron Dermer, in the job despite heavy American criticism.
Netanyahu backtracked on his Monday no-to-Palestine remark earlier Thursday, saying he still supported a sustainable, peaceful two-state solution, but the White House swiftly dismissed his new, more moderate comments.
Asked Friday why the White House was not taking Netanyahu at his word, White House spokesman Josh Earnest retorted, Well I guess the question is: Which one? Earnest said the Obama administration did take Netanyahu at his word and understood that the prime minister does not envision a Palestinian state being established during his term in office.
The divergent comments of the prime minister legitimately call into question his commitment to this policy principle and his lack of commitment to what has been the foundation of our policy-making in the region, Earnest said. Netanyahu had prompted questions about his true view on the two-state solution, the spokesman added. Words matter.
Asked whether Obama got a better understanding of Netanyahus position on a Palestinian state after talking with him, Earnest also said Friday: That was not the result of the call.
Earnest said the administration has not decided what a reassessment in policy might mean. But he noted that in the past, the US has regularly opposed UN resolutions to create a Palestinian state by arguing that such a two-state arrangement should be negotiated between the parties. What has now changed is that our ally in those conversations, Israel, has indicated that they are not committed to that approach anymore, Earnest said.
The presidents skepticism and criticism were clearly evident during the Obama-Netanyahu conversation, according to Channel 2. Obama told Netanyahu the US was reconsidering its policies because Netanyahu had changed his position on Palestinian statehood. Netanyahu retorted that he hadnt changed his position, still supporting a two state solution, but that the Middle East realities had changed in recent years. Obama responded that his clarification was insufficient, according to Channel 2.
The Channel 2 report said the US, in the least drastic scenario, might now refrain from vetoing resolutions relating to settlement building and Palestinian statehood. In a more drastic scenario, it might engage in drafting and support resolutions setting out the parameters for a Palestinian state, based on the 1967 lines and with a divided Jerusalem. In a still worse scenario, deemed unlikely, it might support sanctions against Israel for failure to comply with such resolutions.
Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/March24/241.html#OUxRU6Fz7H9ZlYfu.99