This is pretty sad! Then one must remember that some of these folks just do not pay attention. Even I misspell words when writing because unlike computers, spell check is not hardwired into some brains. Not making excuses; but one must think of Obama's inability to spell Ohio or perhaps RESPECT (Franklin's hit song), or where does Ms Obama tweets that she is going to eat? Chineese anyone? And did you by chance read the paper she wrote while in college? And these are the most public figures in our nation.... So, poor spelling is not just the average man on the street, but is in residence in every home in America.

I am sorry, I should have said "An individual will not find...." I am sure glad you understood what I was saying.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

I can see that you have to have the last word. So, you have the last word....

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

You will not find it with incorrect spelling of the author's name, best to search on the title.

I rarely respond to people while miffed, however with you I will make an exception. At 52 you should have learned to write a complete sentence that convey a complete thought or concept. Perhaps 99 percent of a discussion is dependent on clear and concise statements. Those who do not pay attention to such details normally lose the interest of readers because you are then considered illiterate. NOTE: I AM NOT CALLING YOU ILLITERATE. Details are important in that they show your ability to form complete thoughts. If the sytext of your composition is awkward, then most people simply will not read your statements or put much weight to your opinions.

As for me being OLD before I realize it. I do not think that will be the case. It is regrettable that you insist on being a judge rather than a communicator.

Further, I did ask nicely. You took the inquiry as a personal affront. I am not a psychologist, but you may want to check with others that you live around to ascertain if you are prone to over reacting or you may appear hypersensitive. If so, it could be a result of hormonal changes. Something that you may want to discuss with your OBGYN provider. Lastly, I have mentors that give me sage advice; and with respect I do not know you, so your advice is not only unwarranted but inappropriate. I do not try to belittle anyone. Your reaction is simply a reflex from your personality complexes.

I hit the button, it posted twice and I could not delete the second posting. I am in high school, I am rather used to seeing people do immature things. However, you are an OLD individual and I would not expect you to be so sophomoric and post a nasty comment regarding me in retaliation of my feedback. You are what you are, and I will not waste time with someone of your caliber. So do show your intellect, and continue to be the pillar of this community. Someone surely will appreciate your topics and comments. I wish you well, and I hope that the remainder of your days are filled with what you earn, deserve, and can appreciate.

Mychal S. Massie is the former National Chairman of the conservative black think tank, Project 21-The National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives; and a member of its’ [sic] parent think tank, the National Center for Public Policy Research. In his official capacity with this free market public policy think tank he has spoken at the U.S. Capitol, CPAC, participated in numerous press conferences on Capitol Hill, the National Press Club and has testified concerning property rights pursuant to the “Endangered Species Act” before the Chairman of the House Committee on Resources. He has been a keynote speaker at colleges and universities nationwide, at Tea Party Rallies, at rallies supporting our troops and conservative presidents; and rally’s [sic] supporting conservative causes across the country. He is an unapologetic supporter of our right to own and carry firearms.

Mychal S. Massie is the former National Chairman of the conservative black think tank, Project 21-The National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives; and a member of its’ [sic] parent think tank, the National Center for Public Policy Research. In his official capacity with this free market public policy think tank he has spoken at the U.S. Capitol, CPAC, participated in numerous press conferences on Capitol Hill, the National Press Club and has testified concerning property rights pursuant to the “Endangered Species Act” before the Chairman of the House Committee on Resources. He has been a keynote speaker at colleges and universities nationwide, at Tea Party Rallies, at rallies supporting our troops and conservative presidents; and rally’s [sic] supporting conservative causes across the country. He is an unapologetic supporter of our right to own and carry firearms.

Sorry, you cut off communications with me. Your feedback tells a big story!

I grabbed the figures for 2011, thank you for the correction.

There is a plan to take even more from this fund because of all the issues with the backside of Obamacare. It was not ready for primetime when it rolled out.

I understand more than what you give me credit. It is the sentence that does not make any kind of sense. Read it as if you did not write it. I was not trying to be insulting, it just seemed that some punctuation was missing, or perhaps some words were omitted. As written, your message is not clear. I said nothing about your intelligence nor imply that you are "stupid." However, you attack me for asking a simple question. I must now consider that perhaps you do not see anything wrong with the syntax of your post. Forget that I asked for you to clarify the confusion. I should have read your feedback before asking you to be clear.....lesson learned!

Was that written in English? What were you trying to say?

Was that written in English? What were you trying to say?

Well then that makes 2 people that have been saved by Obama and his wonderful medicine show. Let's do some math:

112 Million people have preexisting illnesses -- Not likely to pay any or will receive assistance in paying
72 Million under the age of 18; will not pay
11.7 Unemployed; unable to pay

So, with the total of 233 million citizens; who will be paying. Well, it will not be the i******s, but they will still get medical coverage. So may as well add them to the above totals. That is an estimate of 17 million people. People over the age of 65 is now 35 million, but many of them are going or have already gone back to work to afford medical insurance and living expenses. So, say half of that 35 million have enough funds or can physically go back to work, so add 17.5 million to the above figures. What does that leave.....who will pay the bills? The US government? Well, that really means that tax payers (those not included in the first set of numbers). Oh yes, the new taxes, that will cover it, but who are paying the new taxes? Big business? Small business? And how will they make up for the shortfall? Pass the increases on to the consumer.

So you are taken care of, and your sick kid or grandkid is taken care of....who was probably on state aide in the first place and being taken care of by the tax payers... It is a circle, and you do not see it.

In the end, socialized medicine is a burden on people who go to work! Just like paying for their food, it is the few that work. Just like paying for their cell phones, it is the few people that work. And all the social programs, the weight falls on the people that go to work.

Now that the old folks' money they paid into their programs to help then in their old age is been raped. Where will you people get the money for completing the start up of Obamacare? Will you all take the rest of it? 245 billion dollars was stolen by the government from Medicare by the end of 2011. And you sit there and let our old be robbed.

Obama is running an old fashioned shell game and what did PT Barnum say? Oh yes, there is a sucker born every minute.

And you say that my relatives that are over 65, they are paying less. No! It increased an average of 10 percent. Now that I reread your comment, perhaps YOU did see a drop.