One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: 1alpha7
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 51 next>>
Nov 17, 2021 07:16:29   #
RandyBrian wrote:
Yep, THAT one I know. What I do not know is if Tom simply got the names reversed (easy to do) or if he has seen something we have not.


The names had to have been reversed, accidentally.
Go to
Nov 17, 2021 07:12:23   #
RandyBrian wrote:
I have not seen any video of "The FBI has video of Kyle chasing Rosenbaum half a block before he shot him and that is when Huber tried to disarm him and was shot." and I was unable to find it through google. Can you provide a link.? And thank you for the clarification about your question.


There were no videos of kyle chasing Rosenbaum because it was Rosenbaum chasing Kyle Rittenhouse:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3cjWj2RmlA
Go to
Nov 16, 2021 08:00:04   #
eagleye13 wrote:
If they had used it, (a choke hold) then one would be up for murder, and the others accessories to murder.


True!
Go to
Nov 16, 2021 07:52:05   #
eagleye13 wrote:
A choke hold renders an adversary helpless.
I know. I used it once. They go limp.
If you do not ease up, they go bye-bye.




It's good for Rittenhouse that his assailants didn't know that!
They had the chance but never took it!
Go to
Nov 16, 2021 07:41:21   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
What you are saying is the r****rs, the ones vandalizing, l**ting, burning, assaulting police and generally raising hell had every right to "show up", but those attempting to quell the violence - the police and those who Back the Blue - had no right at all to be there.

Do you actually believe none of the r****rs were carrying guns? Along with all other sorts of weapons - bricks, glass bottles, Molotov cocktails, pepper spray, skateboards, wasp k**ler.

Seems to me, Tom, there is no question the streets of Kenosha was teeming with perceived threats, both real and imagined, both verbal and physical.

Rittenhouse certainly perceived the r**ting as a threat, otherwise he wouldn't have carried a gun.

In the video of the first attack on Rittenhouse, shots are fired before the attacker even catches up to him, and the shots did not come from Kyle's gun.

A r****r throws a plastic bag loaded with a brick at him and goes after him, Kyle attempts to evade, hears gun fire, what was he supposed to think?

The photos here show the final attacks on Rittenhouse in which Huber was k**led and Grosskreutz, armed with a handgun, is wounded.

That is Rittenhouse on the ground.

The top photo shows an unknown assailant delivering a flying, full body, straight leg boot to Rittenhouse's face that put him on his back. Just left you can see Huber with the skateboard approaching at a run.

Next photo shows Huber smashing his skateboard into Rittenhouse's head and attempting the stupidest move one can imagine. He tries to disarm Kyle who has his finger on the trigger, the muzzle aimed directly at Huber's chest. Kyle pulled the trigger. (Would have been my choice in that situation.)

The bottom photo shows the moment when Grosskreutz approached, aimed his handgun at Rittenhouse's head, and Rittenhouse fired, blowing out the man's elbow. The spray of blood and flesh is clearly visible. To the left, Huber has collapsed and is bleeding out.

Looks like a clear case of self-defense to me.
What you are saying is the r****rs, the ones vanda... (show quote)


Quote: Next photo shows Huber smashing his skateboard into Rittenhouse's head and attempting the stupidest move one can imagine. He tries to disarm Kyle who has his finger on the trigger, the muzzle aimed directly at Huber's chest. Kyle pulled the trigger. (Would have been my choice in that situation.)

What if in reality, the skateboarder pulled the rifle so hard and swiftly that it slid forward while Rittenhouse's hands slid backward due to the force of his pull? With this scenario, the skateboarder pulled the trigger on himself.
Don't even say that it could not have happened. Don't be like the stupid prosecutor who said that 'You can not k**l with your hand(s)'. Most of us know that one properly placed jab can 'K**l'.
Go to
Nov 16, 2021 07:18:57   #
eagleye13 wrote:
A good thing it was all on video.
Good thing the Left had not figured that out.


Go to
Nov 16, 2021 07:02:54   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
imagine this, you are a participant in the melee on the streets, you may be unarmed or have a knife, a brick, or a skateboard, then you see a guy armed with an AR15 loaded with a 30 round mag, and that makes him a target?
A target for what, hand to hand combat? You surely wouldn't attempt to disarm him without first being prepared to use equal force.

Or, would it be prudent to back away, get the hell out of there?

Yeah, none of those thugs who got shot had a freaking brain in their heads when they went after Rittenhouse.
Grosskreutz had a gun, why didn't he use it? A friend of his visiting him in the hospital tweeted Grosskreutz told him he regretted hesitating to shoot, said he should have immediately emptied the magazine into Rittenhouse.

Kyle had no choice but to shoot the damned fool.
imagine this, you are a participant in the melee o... (show quote)


Go to
Nov 16, 2021 07:01:49   #
eagleye13 wrote:
"f Kyle had not shown up with a gun he would not have been perceived as a threat He would not have been attacked by people who felt they had to stop him."

When did you receive your brain damage, Coos?


Looks like he already has...
Go to
Nov 15, 2021 17:58:22   #
proud republican wrote:
Of course crooked DOJ won't do anything because he's L*****t Rat!!!🙄🙄🙄


Go to
Nov 15, 2021 13:16:37   #
eagleye13 wrote:
What about getting a verdict on this case for what Rittenhouse is being tried for?

Which is?
Closing arguments on TV right now.


It's a problem for the prosecuting attorney to stop saying: Murder, Ritterhouse thought, he pointed a rifle at (with no proof), Ritterhousen did this & that because he (the prosecutor must be a mind reader).
Go to
Nov 15, 2021 08:40:25   #
eagleye13 wrote:
Yep.
The subject is Rittenhouse.
The full video shows he used self defense.


I completely agree with you! Rittenhouse, from reported verbal abuse against him, was correct in using life-saving self-defense... the videos prove it!
Go to
Nov 15, 2021 08:24:10   #
Can we return to the subject: Rittenhouse?

I agree with the comments from our Constitutionalist Members... But please... Rittenhouse!

Though there are those who follow, post & deeply believe in the Un-Constitutional Democrat Dictatorship Plan...

The Subject Is Rittenhouse
Go to
Nov 14, 2021 14:57:26   #
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Don't understand you. Do you align with the capitol r****rs trying to overtake the capitol possibly murder senators and congressmen- hang the vice president? were they heroic "freedom fighters" in your opinion? Was that acceptable?


Do you align with c*******t r****rs that are truly trying to overtake the USA, (a greater piece of land than DC) burning & destroying private property & businesses, murdering any or all US Citizens & putting all, but government officials, under strict mandates that take their jobs and causes the c*******tic destruction of a nation's economy, then hides behind a false i**********n (FBI stated it was not an I**********n)?
Don't You Understand? Apparently Not, neither do the weak governmental officials who allow such real destructive i**********ns in their State.
Go to
Nov 13, 2021 14:19:27   #
proud republican wrote:
You're right!...I kept saying Hung jury with Prejudice, I meant mistrial with prejudice...


You stated it correctly in your 1st post!
Go to
Nov 13, 2021 13:53:00   #
Lily wrote:




Good One!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 51 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.