jelun wrote:
...and then there are the ugly conservative witches, you know the ones...they send their actual description through their avatars.
like your old avatar? you know, the one that someone said looked by a pile of rabbit turds?
KHH1 wrote:
nah...he can't take on Obama...all of congress can't together.........
Never interfere with an enemy while hes in the process of destroying himself.... Napoleon
ginger wrote:
sweetie, that is not her foundation. It was started by her husband. It is a global foundation to help people around the world, so of course the foundation accepts donations from around the world. Get over it.
You have a habit of stretching the t***h when flapping your lips. 'The Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation' hosts annual Clinton Global Summits where affluent business moguls who pay $15,000 apiece to attend, pledge money to CGI programs. Among those who attended in 2007 were high-ranking officials of Wal-Mart, PepsiCo, Duke Energy, Starbucks, the Carnegie Corporation, and the NoVo Foundation. Also on hand were former Vice President Al Gore, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Evangelical Environmental Network president Jim Ball, actors Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Afghan president Hamid Karzai, and media giants Rupert Murdoch and Ted Turner. At this 2007 Summit, Bill Clinton advocated a form of Cap-and-Trade that would raise energy prices... uh huh!
Its buying favor from government officials in high places. Dont give me this BS about helping people around the world. Its influence peddling.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/funderprofile.asp?fndid=5382&category=79
Workinman wrote:
Unlike you...hey were you the husband or the wife??
I thought he might have a thing for convicts........
KHH1 wrote:
figurative big dummy.....gessh you people are sarcastic and slow.....that was an analogy to how you all try to do the group attack in here..i know you know that, but hey you wanted to make yourself look dum dum.......so i obliged you........
If it was my patrol, a dub like you wouldnt get close enough to do any damage. Some of us been there an done that. Your just like obama, telegraphing your moves. But... U be bad.
Workinman wrote:
Hahaha....2014 dems lead by a landslide....dumb azz....
Ha, wernt they predicting netanyahu would lose too?
KHH1 wrote:
Stop flattering yourself..i meantin a Mini-Me kinda way.............you all WISH you could ruffle my feathers but you all are lightweights...that is why you have to attack in groups...still to no avail....i'm that guy walking on the back road alone...baiting you all in...and just when you think you are going to do the group attacK.......KA BOOM!!!!!!!!!!! parts everywhere.....a messy scene indeed.......
So, youre a suicide bomber....... how long you been a muslim?
jelun wrote:
She has spent less time incarcerated than you have, what does that mean?
It means you dont know what youre talking about. But then, most people already know that.
KHH1 wrote:
That is hard to do when you have neither...and that has nothing to do with manhood little person......I was a young man when frying burgers as a teenager.....it is just the antithesis of your r****t righties destitute welfare characterization.....don't say weird s**t if you do not want a reply.....
Ouch...... gettin to ya huh? The RACE card......BOOM!
KHH1 wrote:
I'm not the one who predicted the Romney win in 2012...you righties did. And i'll just respond to your feeble attempt at an insult like THIS:
CNN
6 days ago - Poll: Double-digit lead for Hillary vs. GOP. But none of the top candidates in this field gets within 10 points of Hillary Clinton in a series of hypothetical general e******n matchups. Rand Paul comes closest, with 43% saying they'd be more likely to back him while 54% choose Clinton.
Sorry Charlie, but Im not a fan of the establishment, neither republican nor lawless neo marxists. When is this e******n, did you say? Didnt yo mama teach you about countin yo chickens befo dey eggs hatch?
KHH1 wrote:
I guess that is because she is beating the pants off of all GOP contenders...so you are going to use reverse psychology and get us to not choose Hillary so it would give the GOP a better chance? Not going to happen my little Jr. Mentalist......
Au contraire, you should absolutely anoint the bag lady. You should also give up on your psychological evaluations, you really suck at it.
KHH1 wrote:
No I have never had subsidies, my salary is way too high and i am grateful for that...if i did need subsidies I would not feel like less of a person or do i think others are less if they do...you should try that mindset...it would make you a better human being without that piece of s**t trash mentality..I have Blue Shield Anthem PPO.....and only three degrees.....how many do you have? 9? Do you receive subsidies?
And Ive never felt inclined to prove my manhood by declaring my salary and paper mill degree ad infinitum.
jelun wrote:
YOU, Sir, are the one banking on the circus of losers. And Gruber, you silly old fool, was a person calling other Americans stupid. HE was not the one considered stupid.
So thank you.
Gruber was talking about you . You really ARE thick.