Lucky you!

Beware the Democrat’s E******n De-Form

Suddenly, Democrats are professing concern about e******n integrity. That’s curious as the party has long worked to undermine the principle that only eligible citizens can v**e and just once per e******n.

Notably, Democratic leaders have fought hard to block prudent v**er identification requirements, insisting that there’s no such thing as e*******l f***d. They have facilitated i*****l i*********n, lax b****t registration practices and early, absentee and “get-out-the-v**e” schemes that lend themselves to abuse. Another gambit involves restoring former and even serving felons’ v****g rights.

Now, a supremely partisan Homeland Security Secretary, Jeh Johnson, asserts that – like the electric grid and other “critical infrastructures” – his department should be entrusted with safeguarding the v****g process against cyber attack. Never mind that DHS has done virtually nothing to protect the grid.

Can American democracy stand much more Democratic e******n deform?

Over the Labor Day weekend, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson betrayed the American people. He did so by addressing a conference of the largest U.S.-based Muslim Brotherhood front: the Islamic Society of North America.

That would be the group that has fomented revolutions against American friends across the Mideast. It’s the world’s most influential Islamic s*********t organization, inspiring and making common cause with others like the Islamic State and al-Qaeda. And it has as its stated mission “destroying Western civilization from within.”

That declared goal is what makes Secretary Johnson’s efforts to legitimate and embrace the Brotherhood so alarming. To the extent that he and others in the U.S. government are allowing its operatives to penetrate and exercise influence over our security policies, they are greatly increasing the danger we face from the global jihadists.

Jeh Johnson should resign!

On the eve of the 15th anniversary of the 9/11 jihadist attacks, a conference took place in Washington to examine whether we are safer now, a decade-and-a-half later. Unfortunately, the se******n of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson to be its keynote speaker means it was be an exercise in the (willfully) blind leading the blind.

After all, Secretary Johnson has repeatedly shown himself to be clueless about the Islamic supremacism that’s most immediately endangering us. Just last Sunday, he addressed, legitimated and embraced a front group of the global jihad’s leading edge: the Muslim Brotherhood.

In response, Congressmen Steve King, Louie Gohmert and Randy Weber decried Jeh Johnson’s conduct as “not just willful blindness,” but “malfeasance.” They rightly called on him to renounce the Muslim Brotherhood, and stop dealing with its subversive fronts.

Amen.

Over the 9/11 anniversary weekend, Democratic p**********l candidate Hillary Clinton and others spoke a lot about the “ideology” that brought us that act of jihad. Curiously, it was not generally named.

The more precise one gets about the ideological impetus behind Islamic terrorism, the more difficult it becomes to draw a distinction between the violent jihadists who seek to impose worldwide what they call Sharia, and those who are pursuing the same goal through other means.

And the more evident is that reality, the more exposed are those – like many of the weekend’s talking heads – who have ignored or empowered the stealthy jihadists of the Muslim Brotherhood.

This anniversary – and this e******n – are times for holding accountable those whose willful blindness regarding Sharia and the Brotherhood has done much to deny us victory over the global jihad movement fifteen years on.

The last three attacks have shaken Americans’ complacency.

While officials decline to define the perpetrators as terrorists, most of us have already concluded that we are facing an increasing threat. Unfortunately, Congress is poised to compound the problem.

Despite a knife-wielding, Minnesota-based Somali refugee slashing nine innocent civilians, federal legislators are expected shortly to approve a continuing resolution that would, in part, fund the migration of over 100,000 more “refugees” from places like Somalia, Syria and other nations rife with Islamic supremacism.

If we can’t vet such migrants, we are very likely to face still more jihadists, including those who use violence to terrify us, or perhaps who seek to use stealthy techniques to accomplish the same goal – our submission to Sharia.

Don’t like that prospect? Tell your representatives not to fund Obama’s endangering of public safety.

We now know that two foreign nationals who received refuge in this country – one from Somalia, the other from Afghanistan – are implicated in the jihadist attacks that took place over the weekend in Minnesota, New York and New Jersey.

One might be forgiven for thinking that these timely reminders of the dangers associated with reckless refugee resettlement and immigration policies would induce President Obama to refrain from exacerbating our resulting, parlous position.

That would, of course, require him to put national security and public safety ahead of his ideologically driven desire for a legacy that fundamentally t***sforms America. So, as they say in New York, fuggedaboutit.

We need a national course-correction. If Congress foolishly funds the President’s proposal to import potentially hundreds of thousands more jihadists, Americans will have to seize upon the opportunity to reject it at the polls in November.

Democratic p**********l nominee Hillary Clinton yesterday accused her Republican rival, Donald Trump, of “providing aid and comfort to the enemy.” She thus made it fair game to examine the two candidates’ records with respect to the legal standard for treason.

Mrs. Clinton is suggesting that Mr. Trump’s policies on immigration and radical Islamic terrorism are helping violent jihadists recruit adherents and threaten us.

Presumably, Donald Trump will want to debate in the remaining days of this e******n what, for example, Hillary Clinton has done to: empower the Muslim Brotherhood – a group that explicitly seeks to “destroy Western civilization from within”; her support for giving $150 billion to Iran, the world’s leading terrorist-sponsoring state; and her insistence on bringing in hundreds of thousands of “refugees,” when many of them simply cannot be vetted for jihadist tendencies.

Do you think that maybe the Obama Administration is literally breaking the bank to give your money away before it clears out of DC for good. Just the other day we learned that a Somali 'community' group was given $300,000 to combat sexual abuse in the East African (that's what they call Somalis when they don't want to use the 'S' word) community and now this!

The USDA has awarded a $400,000 grant to help Somalis eat better and reconnect with their roots! No kidding!

From the CTPost: Curbing food insecurity!

LEWISTON, Maine (AP) The United States Department of Agriculture is committing nearly $400,000 to increase food access for the Somali community in Lewiston.

Somali women and their children walk through downtown Lewiston, Maine, Tuesday, in a May 8, 2007, photo. Over the past six years, as many as 3,500 black refugees from the wartorn African country have settled in this nearly all-white, heavily French-Canadian and largely Roman Catholic city of 36,000, giving Lewiston the highest concentration of Somalis anywhere in America."Their children are the only assets they have. They left everything else in Somalia," said Said Mohamud, manager of the Mogadishu Store.
Members of the Somali Bantu community in the city are partnering with the Cumberland County Food Security Council on the project. The funding is expected to support Somalis' agriculture and help them reconnect with their cultural heritage.

The USDA says the objectives of the project include building the capacity of the Somali Bantu community and its farmers to produce food and address the problem of limited food access. The agency describes the Somali Bantu community as the poorest community in the city, which is the second largest city in the state.

Cumberland County Food Security Council will recruit people in the community to help increase access to healthy food.

I wonder is Maine's Republican Senator Susan Collins involved in this giveaway too?

By the way, the next time you see one of those articles in which the resettlement industry brags about how refugees bring economic booms to struggling towns, remember this! In the case of Lewiston, there is now an additional $700,000 sloshing around the community. But, it is still tax money coming from the money tree growing in Washington (joke of course).

It is not that the Somalis have helped the economy in the way the industry wants you to think---it is basically welfare dollars flowing from your pockets to theirs!

Limited food access for Somalis in Lewiston?

Missinglink, you are much too polite! Rectum is more like it.

B******i Survivor Rips Into 'Biased' Holt: 'Hillary Put People in Harm's Way for Political Gain'

After Monday night's p**********l debate between Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump, a number of Americans noticed that the moderator — NBC News's Lester Holt — seemed to focus the more difficult questions (and four real-time fact checks) on Trump.

That tendency did not go unnoticed by Trump's personal guest at the debate, B******i survivor Mark "Oz" Geist.

THIS WOMAN BLAMES HILLARY CLINTON FOR HER SON’S DEATH IN B******I

http://videos.tout.com/dry/mp4/950381c69a7e5a8a.mp4


Geist appeared on Fox News's "Sean Hannity Show" on Tuesday evening, along with former Defense Intelligence Agency Director (and fellow Trump supporter) Gen. Michael Flynn.

Geist noted that Holt missed several golden opportunities to challenge Clinton, particularly on the subject of B******i:

"It just goes to show the bias that was there with the moderator—with Lester. They never followed up on any question. They [therefore] missed an opportunity to show America the type of leader [Hillary Clinton would] be.

We have to look and see if this is the type of person that we want, they're going to be leading our country, that ended up putting people in harm's way for strictly her political gain."

Flynn also attended Monday's debate, and was equally dismayed by Holt's failure to ask questions about the B******i attack:

"Let's get down to brass tacks: the 'birther' issue was raised and B******i was not raised? The 'birther issue' did not result in four dead Americans [or] a failed nation-state in Libya.

For that not to have come up is unbelievable."

The candidates will next face off on October 9th in a town hall-style debate at Washington University in St. Louis.

This was published 13 days before Clinton collapsed in New York City. The original story said Clinton was sleeping 18 hours a day. Some days she slept more. Would anyone refute that intelligence now?

Hillary memorized canned answers to topics: Correct Intel
Spouted memorized answers did not always even correspond to the question: Correct Intel
Moderator would not redirect Clinton or cross examine original answer, no matter how poorly she addressed it: Correct Intel
Hillary was free to pontificate without being called on her verbal nonsense: Correct Intel
You can bet no such agreement is in place for Trump: Correct Intel
Hillary’s handlers thought she would choke under stressful questions: Correct Intel
Hillary would not release medical records: Correct Intel
Hillary would not hold a press conference: Correct Intel


*Hillary is already being coached for the Sept. 26 P**********l Debate. But the Democratic strategy is bizarre. Her handlers do not think she will respond well to stressful questions or rhetoric so Hillary is memorizing canned answers that may not even directly address the subject or question. Why is this a viable strategy? We’re told this will work because the moderators will not redirect Clinton or cross examine her original answer to a question, regardless of her answer. This has been negotiated. So Hillary is free to pontificate without being called on her verbal nonsense, regardless of topic or content. Must be nice. You can bet no such agreement is in place for Trump.

“The debate is already stacked against the guy,” the former operative said. “Hillary’s lawyers already hammered out her ground rules before the debate questions were even formulated. It’s a stacked deck. She knows the game and all the referees.”

-Excerpt From True Pundit, August 30, 2016

WELFARE S**M - Muslims Caught buying Soda with Food Stamps to sell at THEIR STORE


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-2lrDL4PgU

"It’s a dire day in our country when the president is allowed to unilaterally give away America’s pioneering role in ensuring that the internet remains a place where free expression can flourish," the statement read. "We will continue to weigh our options as the suit moves forward."

Among other things, Paxton's lawsuit argues the move violates the property clause of the U.S. Constitution by giving away government property without congressional authorization. In a response to the lawsuit earlier Friday, the federal government criticized it as a last-ditch effort to stop something that has been years in the making — with everyone involved "fully aware" of it.

The ruling by Judge George C. Hanks Jr., an Obama appointee, came after a hearing in Galveston that lasted more than an hour. His reasoning was not immediately known.

President Obama promised Americans a fundamental t***sformation of the United States, and boy did he deliver on his promise.

Obama has made it so:
(1) A record number of i*****l a***ns penetrate our wide open borders and manipulate a dysfunctional visa system,
(2) At public schools throughout the U.S. the boys now urinate in the girls' bathroom if they identify as a female,
(3) The growth of Islam in America is unstoppable as we now take in more refugees than ever before, and we accept more immigrants into the U.S. from the Middle East than we do from Mexico and Central America combined,
(4) The national debt is so high that the amount of zeros in the number makes it look f**e, but boy is it real,
(5) Today, the military is as small as it was in the early 1900's,
(6) Veterans are k*****g themselves at record rates,
(7) The war on cops is an epidemic,
(8) America is hooked on heroin,
(9) We’ve reverted back to segregating college campuses,
(10) Obamacare €” the law that was designed to give everyone insurance €” is putting insurers out of business,
(11) We now negotiate with terrorists and pay them ransom,
(12) We cut nuke deals with Iran. In other words, we paved the way for our greatest enemy to wipe our greatest ally off the face of the earth,
(13) Christians can go to jail if they don'€™t bake a cake for a gay couple.

These are 13 t***sformations in place today all because America felt compelled to v**e for a man because of the color of his skin. But Obama didn'€™t like the number 13, so he added another change to seal his fate as the worst president in US history.

Obama caps off his presidency by handing over the greatest communication tool ever known to mankind. As of today, Obama can pen to his resume #14. The internet is no longer managed by the greatest country on earth.

Washington (AFP) The US government on Saturday ended its formal oversight role over the internet, handing over management of the online address system to a global non-profit entity.

The US Commerce Department announced that its contract had expired with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which manages the internet'€™s so-called €œroot zone.

That leaves ICANN as a self-regulating organization that will be operated by the internet’s “stakeholders” — engineers, academics, businesses, non-government and government groups.

The move is part of a decades-old plan by the US to privatize€ the internet, and backers have said it would help maintain its integrity around the world.

US and ICANN officials have said the contract had given Washington a symbolic role as overseer or the internet'€™s €œroot zone€ where new online domains and addresses are created.

But critics, including some US lawmakers, argued that this was a €œgiveaway€ by Washington that could allow authoritarian regimes to seize control.

A last-ditch effort by critics to block the plan €” a lawsuit filed by four US states failed when a Texas federal judge, Judge George C. Hanks Jr, refused to issue an injunction to stop the t***sition.

Lawrence Strickling, who heads the Commerce Department unit which has managed these functions, issued a brief statement early Saturday confirming the t***sition of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).

€œAs of October 1, 2016, the IANA functions contract has expired,€ he said.

Stephen Crocker, ICANN'€™s board chairman and one of the engineers who developed the early internet protocols, welcomed the end of the contract.

€œThis t***sition was envisioned 18 years ago, yet it was the tireless work of the global Internet community, which drafted the final proposal, that made this a reality,€ he said in a statement.

€œThis community validated the multi-stakeholder model of Internet governance. It has shown that a governance model defined by the inclusion of all voices, including business, academics, technical experts, civil society, governments and many others is the best way to assure that the Internet of tomorrow remains as free, open and accessible as the Internet of today.

The Internet Society, a group formed by internet founders aimed at keeping the system open, said the t***sition was a positive step.

€œThe IANA t***sition is a powerful illustration of the multi-stakeholder model and an affirmation of the principle that the best approach to address challenges is through bottom-up, t***sparent, and consensus-driven processes, the group said in a statement.

Really? I think her performance speaks for its self; not to mention her advisers. Read about her closest, Huma Abedin.