Isn't that what America is all about? And what about America as one of the premier gun producers in the world supplying either side guns in any conflict.
The government of the USA is a prime, grade A hypocrite. They stand up in the House and Senate and blather on about stopping wars and using "The Rule of Law" to settle disputes in the UN. How is that working out? More and more wars, bloodier and bloodier, now getting back to using biological weapons and littler and littler countries getting the nuke. Then it will be on to "Scalar Energy Weapons" already being developed in the US, Russia, China, England, India, Brazil, and who knows how many others. They have already deployed energy weapons in space and have used nukes in space in contravention of their own treaty's with other powers.
Next up will probably be North Korea launching a pair of EMP bombs over the coasts of the US, knocking us back to the stone age. Wonder why the US and other countries are frantically building underground cities and prepping for apocalypse? It is coming and they know it. The "New World Order's" primary agenda is to reduce the bulk of the population of the world so the greedy bastards can have the biggest piece of the pie yet.
In other words, the Whole Pie.

Question for Hillary

I would ask Hillary a hypothetical question.

Say I own a gun. I have no intention of using it on myself or any other innocent person or in commission of any crimes. I am considered a sane, moral, and concerned citizen.

Now, you legislate against me and other gun owners, and take away our guns. The question then becomes, "how does that make us safe"?

There are still criminals out there who would do me harm, including in the government. They are still armed, but I am not. I can't defend myself against them.

Police wont be able to protect me before I can be k**led. (In most cases, the police are under the control of the government and are the first line of oppression against the people.) The criminals will be long gone before any can arrive. I am helpless and defenseless against criminals, who will always be out there. I am helpless and defenseless against my own government which is becoming more and more despotic and tyrannical every e******n cycle. (Hillary wants to be a despot, just like Obama)

Your so-called "Rule of Law" is nothing but a euphemism for tyranny. The laws form an ever expanding web of traps that will close in so tight that very soon there will be no freedom for anything. It will be total control, of our lives, our actions and finally our thoughts.

With the second amendment gone, (what Hillary and Obama want) I am helpless and defenseless. Again, the question arises, how does taking away law abiding citizen's guns make us safe? As I see it, the only people who will be safe are the criminals and politicians (maybe one and the same) who would oppress us.

Without arms, we can't mount a revolution as provided for by our Constitution and Bill of Rights, (remember the second amendment? That is why our founding fathers put it there. It is the ultimate protection against criminals and/or politicians who would do no less than oppress us. Having the Constitution and Bill of Rights and being armed is what makes the people of this country safe, not some ill conceived gun control scheme that is only a ploy to disarm us, like all of them are. Obama has already tried this ploy in the UN with his "small arms trade treaty" that would have stripped America of its sovereignty and taken away our civil rights. The citizens "right to keep and bear arms". (An act of treason as I see it. No?) Hillary will only try to push this agenda or some other act of treason through on her own if nothing else works. She already has enough crimes on her plate to make a h*****g a good answer to her career in politics. Obama is no better.

Now again to the point, how will taking away the guns of honest upright and law abiding citizens make them safe? The answer is so obvious as to be absurd, it will not make them safe. It will make them subject to s***ery. It will remove any possibility of them having any freedom at all.

Our government and the forces of evil who control them know this and relentlessly go after the second amendment and our "right to
keep and bear arms". The "New World Order" that they represent and would force upon us doesn't want "We The People" to be safe,
they want us DEAD, no less, so we can't impede their global (C*******t/Socialist) agenda. Disarming us is a necessary first step so they can succeed in eliminating us in the long run. (Can't happen in this day and age? Refer to WWII and Hitler's attempt to eliminate the Jews.
It can and already has happened and can happen again if no one pays attention.) Don't want to learn from history, then be prepared
to repeat it, or worse, die from it. Why do you suppose we have so many FEMA camps that don't house victims of natural disasters as
we are told? Why did we have the "Jade Helm" operation all over our country. It was a trial run for UN troops going door to door disarming citizens and/or k*****g or imprisoning them if they resisted. Next time, "Jade Helm" will be for real, and it will follow some sort of gun control scheme that our t*****rs in government will force upon us. There will probably be some sort of "False F**g" event like 9-11, followed immediately by Obama's declaration of "Martial Law". (Too soon old, too late smart?, will be the new mantra for the US.) See a pattern here?

Hillary, I know why you and your anti-gun toadies want gun control, and I know why you don't want us to have guns. You keep ranting
and raving about the poor innocent children and people in public places who get k**led in the "Mass Shootings" that you capitalize upon to your shame. I feel sorry for them and their families, but isolated cases like this that may have been engineered by your "black ops" units or other agencies represent such a tiny percentage of the population total as to be insignificant. More people every year are k**led by skydiving and other extreme sports then by mass shootings. You still have the problem of telling me, "How will taking my gun make me safe?"

The ball is in your court, now tell us in America, (without endless strings of lies please) how does taking our weapons make us safe?

Good luck with that. Obutthead will give her a P**********l Pardon the moment even a hint that she might be prosecuted rises to the surface.

Have you ever tasted an aspirin? You know they were originally made from boiling the bark of an Aspen tree, and condensing the aspirin powder from the water.





:thumbup: :thumbup:

What's that old expression...Oh yes..."out of the mouths of babes comes wisdom". Only a true innocent would think of it that way. Also her first experience with economics.

Elwood, that is the soundest advice I have heard from you yet. Your wisdom seems to be growing along with your years. I would voluntarily man a fox hole on our side of the border and shoot anything that sets foot on the American side. Volunteers would be spaced at fifty foot intervals and rotate out at eight hour intervals for sleeping and eating etc..
Would video pictures suffice for proof of elimination, or should we be thinking of collecting ears? Bringing tourists to the border would work too. Each one would bring a brick for cost of admission, then add the brick to the wall to help build it up. Machine gun turrets would be good at 100 yard intervals too. I bet in less than a week, all traffic would cease.

Why do these statements stink like rancid lies? I think it is a foregone conclusion that Hillary will be given a P**********l pardon long before any s**t hits the fan that might land on her. Don't you all realize that the heads of all the cabinet departments are Obama toadies? Don't you think that they will all lie and swear it is the t***h? Isn't that what Democrats have been doing for the last 50 years or more? Bigger, longer, wider, louder, and repeated until even the Democrats believe them is the way it works in DC. It doesn't matter what the underlings in the FBI, or the Justice department conclude, their bosses won't let it get any farther than the circular file in the corner. Wait and see if it doesn't work out that way.

Yes, it is "more better" to not use "worserer", or worserest. Muchly the more better.

Thanks Elwood for a really good tip. I will pass it to many.

That's a scream Elwood. Here's one a little more generic that almost got me pummeled in a bar one night. I was drinking a beer and was watching and listening to a pair of lovely young women at the next table, a brunette and a red head. They were having a good old time telling blonde jokes, some pretty funny. As I got up to go, I paused at their table and in a genial way asked them, "Why is it that blonde jokes are always told using such small easy to understand words?" They looked at me quizzically and I gave them the punch line. "So brunettes and red heads can understand them." At that moment I turned and ran like hell. All the men in the bar were laughing and the two women were throwing bottles at me, as I fled.

Canada's got the great beer, America has the great music videos. They are good, and so is Elwood.





:thumbup: :thumbup: :D :D

Canadians have better commercials too. Good one Elwood.

Elwood, you almost got it right, they should wash out the mouth of the guy who taught the bird those words. It was funny though.

Reminds me of a reply that Ann Landers wrote when someone raised hell about a barking dog, and how it should have a shock collar. Ann replied "let the dog bark and make the owner wear the collar". Funny too.

Personally, I think the term should be "Trumpeters" not Trumpicans. Trumpsters rhymes with dumpsters so no.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Right on brother, get out the word.