If you guys pull up the local paper-"Daily Progress", you will see that the police did prepare and had set up a specific entrance area at the far and less accessible end of the park. Still made no difference in the fact that the two opposing groups fought.

First, you are clearly poorly informed of the current events. The VA State Police have come out and stated that under the law of VA, President Trump is correct. Both sides are in violation of the law. The other side that attacked, were all NAFTFA or Black L***s M****r people. Both sides came with weapons of some sort.

Lastly, Tgards 79, are you aware that Mr. Kessler is a strong supporter of Obama, and he was at the heart of the "Occupy Movement". One that Obama supported very strongly.
Why, I ask and the only logical reason is that these programs are parts of Soros' master plan to do to the USA, what he has done to many European countries. The T***h will rise.
Wait and see what turning these stones will reveal. A prudent man would wonder about what the far left is trying to do the the people of the USA.
Mr. Kessler was at the heart of both the Neo N**i event and Occupy Movement. How can one be both if their motivation was pure. I say that he cannot be both, thus another motive exists. You will eventually come to realize the t***h, but it might come like a bat if you do not keep your mind open to all the facts.

Latest confirmed news is that Kessler, the organizer of Charlottesville alt right ruccus, was also an Obama supporter and a big part of the "Occupy Wall Street movement". I think that the DOJ will find this and a pay link from the Soros people. Same with the other upcoming situations on history rewrite and racial discord efforts of the democrat party. More than Wasserman will be shaking in their boots. Eventually one of these people will talk and have proof of all the Clinton led issues.

[quote=ACP45]I would like to pass along an article that I read this morning that I think may lead to a bit of self-improvement for many of us on this site involving the use of social media.


The T***h or at least the beginning of the t***h follows:

For all the news reporters. Get your facts straight. This began when the Charlottesville city council solicited ideas for what to do about the monuments displaying history of the Civil War. Many great ideas were presented by all sides and then, without discussion they took a v**e to remove and destroy the displays of US History. Thus, the people that saw this as a destruction and rewrite/removal of US History, decided to protest.
The 30 40 neo n**is that showed up were simply taking advantage of a situation. The attacks started with the adults from UVA.

The democrats stated efforts, that are known from the DNC leaked emails, are trying to ensure they capture the 18 to 30 age group v**es for coming e******ns by creating this false narrative of r****m. When actually, it is just angry Americans, that are finally standing up for our Fore Fathers written constitution. Specifically, "All Men are Created Equal".

You will see more of these demonstrations on college campuses over the next year. The DOJ, if their eyes are open, will see the evidence of origination with the far left. To you news people. Do your job and research the events that led up to this weekend's tragedy.

Seems to me that the last attempt to get e-verify passed was blocked in committee by the democrats.
“Without top to bottom reform of our i*********n l*ws, expanding E-Verify would devastate the agricultural industry, result in closed farms, a less secure America and the mass offshoring of millions and millions of U.S. jobs,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), one of the negotiators in a broad immigration bill that appears to have stalled."
See more at link for years it has been blocked by democrats. http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/e-verify-divides-house-panel-along-party-lines-093476

Or take your pick at Google search link https://www.google.com/search?q=which+political+party+has+blocked+the+e+verify+system&oq=which+political+party+has+blocked+the+e+verify+system&aqs=chrome..69i57.25255j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Misslinglink- You are exactly correct. The issues on the left are almost across the board, they do not read complete news reporting. Their sources are opinions based on agenda to keep power in hands of a few people. Which, most likely does not include TDsrnest. This individual is reading partial news and will remain a subject of status quo and power abuse and policies that destroy the USA as our founders saw it. It is a shame that we have come to this with our news that should be reporting the facts and not their hopes.

So, how do you think we just confirmed NOKO has a small nuclear weapon to fit on their ICBM's? China of course. China has never been part of the TPP. They are free to negotiate with the countries because USA did not sign on to many Billions of dollars trade deficit that would have resulted from the TPP agreement. That is why the other 11 countries would have gained in standard of living and the USA was guaranteed to lose in that regard.

Hope you pay attention. The USA has done more to solve the NOKO issues in 4 months than they have in the previous 25 years of appeasement tactics.
Gaining access to another 300 million Chinese middle class consumers is good for China and the USA.

In your words, the wait and see has already begun to confirm a new era of relations with China and Russia, inspite of all the naysayers.

President Trump has used a total package to negotiate with China. If one watches and reads a full report of news, one can see the Chinese participation in reigning in North Korea on war talk and nuclear weapons development.

Food trade reported to grow to $50 B deal with USA beef being allowed into China, after 14 years of boycott. We accept chicken products from China. Grain is also on the table. Some 2 way success for trade will open the USA to 300,000 million middle class Chinese consumers that we do not have much access to except for phones. Growth will come in autos made with US Steel. Grains to help feed the large number of Chinese struggling to get adequate food supply. Companies like Mc Donald's, that will build retail markets as large as their US operations. And the list goes on.

One can Google trade with China plans and you will find both pros and cons. In my opinion, the cons are based on failure. I choose to believe the positive, in light of how both China and Russia signed the UN sanctions agreement placed on North Korea. Also, the Chinese value relationships in order to open the door to more trade. In 40 days Trump has gotten more concessions from China on trade than we have in the last 100 years.

One link that speaks to the early agreement with both industry compliments and nay sayers' fears. As you read the article, please keep in mind that much of the pork we consume now is owned by the Chinese.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/07/07/the-dark-side-of-trumps-much-hyped-china-trade-deal-it-could-literally-make-you-sick/?utm_term=.df5cf17d8267

Wilbur Ross speaks on deal: I hope you take the time to listen to Wilbur on his comprehensive report shared on FOX Business.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5431957592001/?#sp=show-clips

What one fails to realize is that immigration numbers and enforcing the law to remove i******s is not part of a "temporary or green card" policy.

Wisconsin farmers and for that matter anywhere in the country that needs migrant workers will be able to get them through the law. No more illegal walk ins and all the costs that are passed on to those of us that already pay for their support through the welfare programs.

The green card or temporary work permits, are just that. They match need for workers to the need for supply of an industry.

What is also missed, is the fact that President Trump is using our agricultural might to bargain with countries that need the food supply to help balance trade deficits. Countries like China. The reason our trade deficit on latest reports is at its lowest point in years.

You may have also noticed that CA advertises big time for dairy products. Why? Because they have stuck themselves with a huge partially employed i*****l m*****t worker that lives off the huge tax burden in CA. CA is competing for the dairy milk and cheese market, which has a greater impact on what happens in WI dairy farm economics.

https://webapps.dol.gov/elaws/elg/taw.htm

To all that think Russia interfered and changed the outcome of 2016 e******n:

1. 1st - who wrote the emails that Wikileaks or Russia released.

Podesta, Hillary and all her minions.
No story if the DNC did not try to make Bernie disappear though v**es that had nothing to do with population at the v****g polls.
No story if Hillary did not delete forever her 33,000 emails that she admits to.
No story if the FBI did not recover 300 or so classified emails.
No story if Hillary did not lie about knowing how things are clqassified.
No story if she did not sell 20% of our USA Uranium to Russia and Bill did not receive over 600K for a speech in Russia immediately following the deal.
No story if Comey would have done his job.
No story if Lynch would have done her job.

2nd. DNC claimed their servers were hacked by Russians:
No story if they allowed our law enforcement people to verify.
No story if DNC did not hide these servers contents from our Federal Law Agencies? or a different story.

One can talk Trump collusion all they want, however, the exact same rationale applies to DNC with proof that felonies were committed by many of the democrat players.

And that does not even consider the three men that have died that were on the verge of taking Hillary down.
Chew on those facts and we ewill see if t***h wins out. I am betting on t***h.

My guys will not start to eat their food until I say Grace. It did not start out that way. It began after I had to kennel them for a week.
First day home and obviously very appreciative of their home, they sat by their dinner bowls and did not eat. I tried our family grace and they looked up at me and then went immediately to eat. That was five years ago and it is still the same today.

As I said, the Senate rules require the filibuster of 60 v**es. Not the constitution. And they can be changed by majority party and have been selectively changed in history.
Trump is saying to change to majority v**e and eliminate the 60 v**e requirement. So do the House leadership. But not McConnell.
It was originally decided to have the Senate require 60 v**es to create more of a synergistic decision and ensure states fair representation. Much like the P**********l v**e is not based on popular v**e, but delegates to ensure very large population centers do not control the outcome of an e******n.

As far as health care, the issue is money to take care of the sick and drug addicts, buy v**es, and keep power in the federal government. The issue is no one or not many want the lower income people to pay for their care. Some say medicare for all. That still carries a $6700 dollar deductible for most.

Means testing could be argued to be the cause of the national debt. It all still goes back to self responsibility. Davy Crockett was the first rep to speak on the floor of congress, that it was not his responsibility to determine how other people's money was to be spent on things or people that did not belong to them. He was run out of D.C. and it has been down hill ever sense then. Ben Carson is correct when he repeats our founders in the belief that a well educated v**er is required for our system to work. That is all of our jobs, if any of the writings that support our constitution will take hold. The good news is the generation now following the millenials is much more conservative. God acts in many ways to fight for the right stuff.

That is exactly why everyone should have a "Living Will."
Proper instructions about when extraordinary measures are taken to prolong life is a personal decision.
My relatives all opted for "If I cannot expect a high percentage of self sufficiency" upon treatment, then do not treat. Many of them also had DNR orders and wore them on a medical jewelry piece. Everyone should be educated in these facts and that alone, would result in a huge reduction in costs.

When is the last time you or a close relative had that conversation. Or for that matter a friend or neighbor?

Latest statistic I have seen is that 5% of the population creates 80% of the cost for healthcare. "The Uninsureable" hits everyone. All countries with government paid systems, solve this problem by not allowing access. Thus that 5% can not increase the cost. UK is a great current news story showing the t***h about Obama's death boards.

How many jobs and investments do Insurance companies make in all areas of our economy. That money is not just idle. Health care is 16% of GDP and the investments finance another 10% of the GDP. all I am saying is is just not that simple.