One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: fullspinzoo
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3471 3472 3473 3474 3475 3476 3477 3478 3479 ... 3529 next>>
Jan 26, 2016 11:37:32   #
buffalo wrote:
Maybe it's all just a big ruse for the sheople. If you don't want to read the short article in its entirety because you have AADD or something, be sure to read the Last 3 sentences.

Kinda validates my quote "If v****g really made a difference it would be illegal."

Paul Joseph Watson:

"Highly influential CEO Martin Sorrell suggests that the outcome of the 2016 p**********l e******n has already been decided, remarking, “It doesn’t matter who the Republicans put up…Hillary will win.”
Sorrell’s comment, reported by the DC Whispers website, raises eyebrows given his position as head of, “The single most influential and prominent marketing firm in the world with decades-old ties to the most elite of the elite.”
Sorrell, who is the Chief Executive Officer of WPP PLC (Wire and Plastic Products), has a net worth of over $150 million dollars and is described as having “huge clout” in the world of advertising. “Sorrell’s opinions have huge weight,” reported the Guardian in a 2008 profile.
As DC Whispers highlights, his ties to Fox News, which at times has been antagonistic towards Donald Trump, are also extremely noteworthy.
“WPP and its myriad of affiliates, represents up to HALF of all Fox News ad revenue. WPP’s clients include such corporate giants as Ford, Glaxo Smith, IBM, Microsoft, Nestle, Walmart, Unilever, etc. – clients who in turn represent tens of millions of dollars in monthly ad revenue that keep the lights of Fox News on and pays the salaries of on-air personalities like Megyn Kelly,” reports the website.
“So when someone like Martin Sorrell signals it doesn’t matter who the Republicans nominate because Hillary Clinton is going to be the next President of the United States regardless, it is a prediction/threat that should be taken very seriously.”
As Mac Slavo points out, “Trump has not only been bucking the establishment, as well as contentious Fox News host Megyn Kelly – but he has also taken on some of the very advertisers that Sorrell represents, and Fox News depends on for their operations.”
Sorrell’s comments are in line with similar sentiments expressed by g*******ts at the recent Davos confab. Sorrell is married to Cristiana Falcone, director of media and entertainment industries at the World Economic Forum.
According to a Reuters report, financial elitists are “alarmed” at the prospect of Trump being the Republican nominee, although they still expect his campaign to falter.
Harvard University’s Niall Ferguson told Reuters that Trump’s chances “could be over before Super Tuesday,” and that populists never win the presidency, but that the public is “mad as hell” and this is what’s driving the Trump phenomenon.


Ferguson was even more candid in comments he made to Bloomberg, asserting, “I think there’s going to be a wonderful catharsis, I’m really looking forward to it: Trump’s humiliation. Bring it on.”
According to columnist Ann Coulter, that “humiliation” could come in the form of a “f**e scandal” that breaks right before the Iowa caucus.
As we previously reported, the powerful Bilderberg Group, which counts Ferguson and Sorrell as two of its regular attendees, backed Hillary to become president at its annual confab in June last year."

Does anyone really doubt who is in control?
Maybe it's all just a big ruse for the sheople. If... (show quote)

And they didn't back Hillary last time? If the Bildebergs and an oligarchy are what this country is about, I don't think smart people would be spending upwards of $100 million of their own money to get to the WH.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 11:27:49   #
Super Dave wrote:
Agreed.

That said, Trump needs to face Megyn Kelly instead of talking about hiding from her. POTUS/CIC will have bigger enemies than Megyn Kelly.

That's so infantile, but that's the only thing he should immediately get over. I watch her all the time and she's pretty neutral from my standpoint. She had Beck on putting the screws to Trump. She should come back with Palin or Sessions (if he is TODAY's big surprise). Kind of curious to see who is "the day's big surprise". Any guesses?
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 11:17:49   #
reconreb wrote:
They are catching on to this b***h ,hope it is enough to shine the lite on entire DINO/RINO party ..

Well put. DINO/RINO can I use that? Not much difference. Both a bunch of lying sacks of horse pucky.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 11:12:59   #
Little Ball of H**e wrote:
woz75 diagnosed with a terminal case of stupid. There is no cure. Sucks to be you.

Great comment. There are some real A-holes on this site. They exude not one ounce of humanity. I'm so glad I believe in Karma.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 11:08:59   #
Student at last night's townhall meeting asked Hillary quite bluntly about her "dishonesty". He mentioned that he and a lot of his friends had a problem with just that. She almost seemed taken back, but answered it in a very vague political non-answer type reply. So what else is new?
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 11:00:59   #
[quote=Olden McGroen]
buffalo wrote:
Why? Is it because Trump does not follow in lock-step with the corporate party's right hand establishment?

==============================================================================

Watch the first video and pay close attention at the :30 mark. Trump mocks Cruz for exposing him as the candidate that the establishment is now backing...and in the same sentence...the very same breath...Trump says that we need to be more "establishment" and make deals...and not be so strident (or rigid in our principles and ideology).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxV8HfVp9-s

Now watch this video and see where Trump is CLEARLY a progressive thinking Democrat. There is no pivot point where he suddenly "saw the light" and became a conservative.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcUCLwWCihE
Why? Is it because Trump does not follow in lock-s... (show quote)

Basically, we don't care. Maybe he will take away a lot of v**es from the LIAR/FELON. Hey, this guy has everything an American would want: successful businesses, more money than an individual would need to live very comfortably, a beautiful wife, and freedom to DO wh**ever he wants. Who, in their right mind, would want this job as POTUS, unless he really wanted to "make America great AGAIN"? Who needs this nightmare? I think he'll do a unbelievably, great job BECAUSE he's doing it for all the right reasons.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 10:01:28   #
pappadeux wrote:
I have been racking my somewhat small brain out over Mr. Trump, and now I think you hit the nail on the head (pragmatist) That being the case then he just might work out as in HST. His first order of the day is to go back to the original concept of 'three branch's of govenrment'

Exactly. He won't be doing this "I have a phone and a pen" bulls**t. It's amazing how a guy with a Socialistic/Marxist/C*******tic viewpoint would take a dictatorial approach to the entire operation. Actually, no surprise there. And for you guys on the left, it's not the quantity, it's the actual type...over the line Constitutionally speaking. You would think "a Constitutional lawyer" would no where that line was.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 09:55:35   #
lindajoy wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: You got that riiiiiighhhhttttt Fullspinzoo.....
Good Morning as well~~

Good Morning to you. Love your style. You're a breath of fresh air. I want you to have the greatest day ever. Nice to see we're on the same page.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 08:53:00   #
Elwood wrote:
http://mychal-massie.com/premium/trump-is-not-conservative-hes-a-pragmatist/


Just the type of guy to lead this country out of the mess it is in. Go Donald. :thumbup: :thumbup:

He's the perfect combination. I like what he says, and I think he has no axe to grind. He'll do what he says. And God forbid if he was a failure. Go Trump.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 06:53:02   #
Little Ball of H**e wrote:
And how is this any different from what liberals do on a daily basis? The reason you're so excited about this is because events like this are so rare from the Conservative side of the spectrum. You finally have something to crow about, and you'll crow until you're hoarse. For every incident like this, I could find 10 about liberals. Of course, being a bunch of hypocrites, you either ignore or can't see this deep flaw in the character of the liberal left. Sucks to be you.

Nice to see the three biggest i***ts on OPP come together. They're doing a film of their own dumb, dumber, and dumbest. Big hit. Let's see how this plays out. Raylan gets his "facts" from the most far left outfit he can find. And 90% of the time they're wrong. So let's just wait and see. Don't get your panties in a big wad with excitement just yet boys.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 06:45:45   #
CowboyMilt wrote:
True conservative is not necessarily the same as it was, I will still v**e for him as he is the only one who see's what We the People want, the conservatives of the DAY sure don't see it!

Seriously, who would want the job? Like somebody said, you have to have a hole your head to take that job. I think he seriously wants to do some good for this country. This guy has everything, lots of money, a beautiful wife, a company that's a money maker. He has it all. So his intentions are sincere. Especially now, where taking on this job is one big headache. I think he's up for the task and wants one more notch on his belt as a winner. And he can accomplish it.
Go to
Jan 25, 2016 18:26:31   #
Kevyn wrote:
It is a travesty that the office of President of The United States has term limits. If President Obama was able to run for a third term against the current candidates he would win in a landslide. When Biden and Warren decided not to enter the race the choices left for democrats became mediocre. The republican hopefuls have been a sick joke from the start. Hillary Clinton will be our next president by default.

You are so delusional or maybe just plain full of s**t. He has so many people that despise him, with good reason. Are you basing this on his phenomenal 7 year record, or the fact he spent $10 trillion and accomplished absolutely nothing. He could do a lot. Turn this country into a Third World Mess. Did you just get out of prison like some the other guys on OPP and your head is a little bit messed up? Thought so. How'd that hopey changey thing work out for ya? Hillary? It's hard to run from prison.
Go to
Jan 25, 2016 17:44:20   #
PoppaGringo wrote:
That is what they would like you fools to believe.

No shiite. So what he (Raylan) is telling me is that even though this material is so sensitive that members of Congress can't even look at it, there is nothing to worry about when Hillary has it on her "unsecured" server. Big mistake on her part and she undoubtedly will pay for it.
The indictment is just around the corner, but keep wishin' just like that "hopey changey stuff.
Go to
Jan 25, 2016 17:37:12   #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Officials: New Top Secret Clinton Emails are Innocuous!

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/officials-new-top-secret-clinton-emails-innocuous-n500586

I'll wait while you look up the meaning of "innocuous"!

I don't care what NBC says, it would be cataclysmic if foreign countries hacked into her "unsecured" server. I'll give you plenty of time to look up "cataclysmic".
Go to
Jan 25, 2016 17:23:54   #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Officials: New Top Secret Clinton Emails are Innocuous!

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/officials-new-top-secret-clinton-emails-innocuous-n500586

I'll wait while you look up the meaning of "innocuous"!

You're such a fucking smartass. So how do you look it up? Fuck you!!!!!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3471 3472 3473 3474 3475 3476 3477 3478 3479 ... 3529 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.