One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: buddy42
Page: <<prev 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 next>>
Mar 15, 2014 00:14:28   #
HomeLearner wrote:
The majority of our population is NOT Hispanic and your comment does not explain how approximately 1/3 of the population is responsible for the results of the WHOLE state. :?


He did not state that the majority was Hispanic. His statement was 36%.
The number I found was 38.2% at
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/48000.html
Go to
Mar 11, 2014 10:57:45   #
cold iron wrote:
One can see Russia from the west coast of Alaska. Get a map, it's only 30 some miles away. She did say that a few times. I have a video of it. And the pin heads laughed at her, well I give them a pass, they went to a government school.


Read my reply. Snopes information states that Palin did not say she could see Russia from her house. Everyone knows (or should know) that you can see Russia from the Aleutian Islands. I will do further research and correct my statement.
Go to
Mar 11, 2014 03:00:13   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Yeah, when asked what time it is and a person that always replies "noon", will be right once a day. I mean, what did these brainiacs expect to happen back then, if their "warnings" had been heeded, that we'd have gone to war with Russia? It sure seems that republicans are desperate to find things they might have been right about. Palin could see Russia from her home? It hasn't moved and I'm pretty sure she wouldn't have been able to see troop movements in the Crimea anyway.

Perhaps if they practiced real time genius, things would be better. If only they had stopped Reagan from ending the cold war, we'd not feel so helpless about how to deal with such a monumental non issue. Not dealing with something that doesn't need to be dealt with, must be keeping some folk up at night.
Yeah, when asked what time it is and a person that... (show quote)


She did not say that she could see Russia from her house!
http://snopes.com/politics/palin/russia.asp
Go to
Mar 6, 2014 00:41:43   #
BoJester wrote:
Another great example of Texas gun laws, or lack of same.

Of course if the teapartyconaservatives were telling the t***h, the government would have already confiscated all the guns in Texas.

Instead, an innocent 9 year old girl is in critical condition because some fool was "excersing his rights".

Hopefully a long prison sentence will follow


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/03/texas-man-shoots-9-year-old-in-the-head-during-illegal-backyard-target-practice/
Another great example of Texas gun laws, or lack o... (show quote)




Neighbors told WFAA that there were four or five gunshots. After four men were questioned by authorities, Manzano was eventually charged with causing serious bodily injury to a child and discharging a firearm in city limits.

Manzano had been ordered to turn over a handgun as part of an earlier plea agreement, but it was not immediately clear if the same weapon was used in Saturday’s shooting.

He had pleaded guilty on Feb. 11 to unlawfully carrying a weapon and marijuana charges. At the time, he agreed to a $100 fine, and to forfeit the firearm.

The Dallas Morning News reported that neighbor Herbert Lopez had called the police about hearing gunshots coming from Manzano’s backyard on two other occasions.

From his picture you can tell he is a typical gangbanger and you can bet that he has never had a Concealed Weapons License or firearm training. He had a previous charge of unlawfully carrying a weapon which he was to turn in. Nothing about this nut is legal. I can't imagine you liberals badmouthing him as he is one of the potential democratic v**ers you espouse. He is the same as the Chicago gang members which you never complain about. They all have illegal guns!
I hope he does get a long prison sentence!
Go to
Feb 26, 2014 19:15:12   #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Reagan stopped released of P**********l records to hide the fact that he was illegally selling weapons to Iraq!



What was Obama hiding when stopped the release of P**********l records on his first working day?
Go to
Feb 25, 2014 22:07:32   #
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-01-26/pdf/E9-1712.pdf

President Reagan on 1/18/1989 signed an EO to stop the release of P**********l records (open to interpretation). President GW Bush revoked this EO on 11/1/2001 which then permitted these records to be released. Obama the reversed GW Bush's EO with his own EO 13489 on his first full day of work on 1/21/2009. He made it very quickly so what was so important that it had to be completed on his first day of work? Very suspicious since he wil not release any of his academic records!
Go to
Feb 23, 2014 22:08:11   #
BoJester wrote:
According to gun nuts, handgun owner are just, honest, hardworking, god fearing citizens who only want to protect themselves from "criminals"

So this "responsible" gun owner just proved that guns k**l even if they are unloaded.

Tragic for his family, but he was probably a conservative gun rights supporter

Imagine that


Same Liberal site
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/02/23/three-separate-detroit-homeowners-shoot-intruders-in-one-week-two-k**led/
Don't just pick and choose!


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/02/23/indiana-man-accidentally-shoots-himself-dead-during-gun-sale/
According to gun nuts, handgun owner are just, hon... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 19, 2014 22:33:16   #
lpnmajor wrote:
And because you are wealthy ( a claim unsubstantiated ) that makes you smarter? That is a fantasy purposely promulgated by the wealthy for centuries. The wealthy are no more intelligent than anyone else. I challenge you to fix your own car, fix a water leak, install a new electrical outlet, provide your own satellite uplink, grow your own food, slaughter your own cattle and on and on. The wealthy can afford to BUY expertise, they damn sure don't have BE an expert to do that. BTW, I can do all the things I mentioned above. I don't have much money, but then I don't need much, I can do for myself. Mostly, I'm successful because my head ISN'T positioned where the sun don't shine. :shock:
And because you are wealthy ( a claim unsubstantia... (show quote)
:) :) :) :) :)
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 22:50:30   #
emarine wrote:
Ok old fella....you win ..... I hope I have your guts at 72, and for the record I register independent also :thumbup:


Nobody was a winner :-) :-) Next time I will keep it general. Thanks
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 17:52:23   #
stan3186 wrote:
How stupid, calling someone out physically on an internet forum is absurd. Grow up and learn to talk like a man instead of threaten like a school yard bully. Learn to fight with words, the other stuff is just ignorant. I'm a conservative etc. but that is ridiculous and an embarrassment to all conservatives.


Listen, I don't need you to tell me how to conduct my life or my posts. Nowhere have you seen me post that I was a Conservative. I do not take someone calling me dumb and stupid when it was not called for!
Read my reply to emarine on how tough I supposedly am. You might want to take personal attacks and be fine with it but, not everyone is like you. I did not threaten him physically. Next time get you facts straight before spouting off!
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 17:38:54   #
emarine wrote:
What... find out if your dumb or what... :lol: :lol: you proved that with your first reply, then reinforced it with border line r****dation ever since, So now you want to fight me :twisted: Calling me out on the internet :lol: Lets think about the level of STUPIDY you have achieved here tuff guy, Does your mommy know you are fooling with her computer again Buddy.


emarine; Your thread stated all conservatives were dumb. I replied to you, pray tell how you knew that! This was all kept at the general level. You then attacked me by calling me dumb and brought it down to the personal level. You do not know me so do not call me dumb and stupid unless you can back it up. I am not tough and never said I was. I am 72 y.o., born and grew up in the hills of East Tennessee and know how to take care of myself. I've been in SW Florida for 42 years and I'm a Registered Independent and Agnostic. I do not start any trouble but will not back up from any that comes my way. I repeat " do not attack me personally". Drop it, unless you want to take to a higher level.
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 00:20:16   #
emarine wrote:
you failed to comprehend the fact I was referring to poll data on fox viewers being less informed the first time around, you missed the point the 2nd time around again... Now you want to preach about your education and how you are going to try to change my mind...Its guys like you that make it very hard to remain civil in replying... learn how to read before you reply... My take on it is, you are very condescending in your language and not very smart, now I am at your level, happy now :twisted:
you failed to comprehend the fact I was referring ... (show quote)


I put everything in plain english and even numbered them for you dumbass. Take your effing blinders off your pointed liberal as head so you can read it. I've been civil so far but calling me not very smart was the straw that broke the Camel's back, dickhead. You want to meet somewhere and find out if I'm dumb or not? Let me know,
asswipe.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 23:24:58   #
Kevyn wrote:
This is a pretty good definition of the use of teabaggers in the contemporary lexacon, it is a bit course but gets the idea accross.

teabagger
A misinformed, right-wing corporate media consumer who often fails to understand that BOTH major parties represent a corrupt plutocracy that steals from the middle class by taxing labor and profiting from corporate tax subsidies.

A teabagger also often fails to acknowledge that George W. Bush and his neo-conservative minions perpetrated one of the boldest and most egregious executive power grabs in the history of the United States. Furthermore, teabaggers mistakenly continue to blame a newly elected President Obama for all that ails the United States of America, based on a grossly flawed perception of reality (including latent racial prejudice) and despite the fact the U.S. economy collapsed on the previous administration's watch.

Teabaggers are also known to base their misguided, right-wing-media-inspired beliefs about President Obama on stupid conspiracy theories about totalitarian takeovers, FEMA camps, etc., despite the fact these very same theories have been circulating around on the Internet for years, and were originally ascribed to neo-conservative cabalists at a time when Barack Obama had not even entered national politics. Teabaggers also are known to be particularly paranoid, xenophobic and intolerant, especially with regard to immigrants and anyone who isn't white.

Additionally, teabaggers generally echo stupid myths about entitlement spending (it actually only accounts for about 1% of federal budget spending), have no idea that most poor people in America are not lazy, actually do work and don't want to be on welfare, and have no idea what socialism actually means or that socialist reform in this country is actually what allowed a middle class to flourish and ultimately make the U.S. one of the most prosperous nations in human history.

Furthermore, teabaggers incorrectly equate socialism with Stalinism, think a system that rewards greed (capitalism) is the divine preference (despite Gospel evidence to the contrary), and are shameless champions of a misguided belief in American exceptionalism. Teabaggers also fail to recognize the inherently unpatriotic nature of their failed every-man-for-himself ideology that ultimately vilifies anyone who supports public policy aimed at reaching out to fellow Americans in need. They celebrate an exploitative corporatocracy (holy creator of jobs, blah blah blah) while denigrating the little guy for being "weak."

Interestingly, teabaggers uphold an immoral, morbidly obese, twice divorced, draft-dodging, college dropout and known drug addict as their de facto leader, and are even known to advocate burning books. Of course, teabaggers fail to recognize the blatant hypocrisy within the GOP and tend to oversimplify all political debate and social issues, much like their pseudo-intellectual, fat-ass leader.

Finally, incredibly, teabaggers fail to recognize the hysterical double entendre associated with their proudly adopted teabag moniker.

Every village has its i***ts, of course, but it's sad when citizens of any nation allow themselves to be whipped into a frenzy en masse by a state-run propaganda machine masquerading as a legitimate, fair, balanced and independent news organization. Teabaggers are right to believe the future of the U.S.A. is in jeopardy, but sadly they have not yet correctly identified the real enemy. Perhaps when teabaggers finally grow up and mature into thinking adults, they will see the right-leaning power establishment for the oppressive and cunning beast that it is.
This is a pretty good definition of the use of tea... (show quote)


This my friends is what has been taught in all of our schools starting about 40 years ago. I and many of my acquaintances have noticed how this has proliferated so much, almost out of hand. I do believe that true Americans have seen it for what it is and we have turned it around.
Also I have read the post above and I identify with quite a few of the items. I am a registered Independent and have never considered myself as a Teaparty or Republican person. Back to the drawing board.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 21:45:32   #




Raylan- Did you just read the headline and not the article?
The article was dated April 28, 2013.

Arizona Sen. John McCain has been among congressional Republicans most critical of the president’s stance on Syria.

He argued on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that the red line strategy has given Assad a “green light” to do almost everything up to that point -- including the use of missiles, helicopter attacks and other civilian strikes that have resulted in “atrocities on a scale that we have not seen in a long, long time.”

However, he joined a bipartisan call this weekend against sending U.S. troops into Syria.

"The worst thing we could do is put boots on the ground," McCain said.

He and fellow Hill lawmakers fear the chemical weapons could be more dangerous in the hands of U.S. enemies or those who might o*******w Assad. And he joined in calls for the United States to be part of an international force to safeguard the weapons.

“The day after Assad [leaves] is the day that these chemical weapons could be at risk,” Chicago Democratic Rep. Jan Schakowsky told ABC. “We could be in bigger, even bigger trouble.”
A few Democrats was in the article also!
They all wanted to keep the Chemical weapons out of the Rebels hands.
If they can get rid of the chemicals first, then by all means no war!!!!
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 20:59:00   #
emarine wrote:
Its not my take, ....poll1 [pohl] Show IPA


noun

1.

a sampling or collection of opinions on a subject, taken from either a selected or a random group of persons, as for the purpose of analysis.
If you are one that dose not believe in polling data then maybe your assumption that Fox viewers are just plain dumber, you may be correct, however I trust the pole data stating Fox is not the best news source, just the most popular.
Its not my take, ....poll1 pohl Show IPA br... (show quote)


(1) You proved my point on liberals thinking they are more intelligent by sending the definition of polling to me! This definition I already knew and understood!
(2) I did not state that I assumed Fox viewers are just plain dumber. That is what all liberal news stations and brain washed libs like you assume!
(3) I did not state that I do not trust poll data. Again that is your dumb assumption. I would trust poll data from an independent association. The data that liberals and the media spout are all from (again) Liberal Sources that you and I know are biased to the extreme!
(4) I went through the school system when there was no brain washing. I have seen over the last 40 or so years just how bad your type of liberal and socialist teaching has changed our country. I can see you are in the middle of this pile of defecation. I will do all I can to change it back.
That is my take!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.