So I guess your comment to take all Pit Bulls and shake them by their neck until dead is the normal thing to say to all Pit owners and it's not vitriol. I have had a Pit Bull as a pet since 2005 and she is the best pet I have ever had.
Are you a Pit owner and what qualifies you to say k**l them all? Had you stated to k**l all the unresponsible owners, there would not have been a reply from me.
Brian's comment to quarantine all Pit Bulls to Greenland is the same thing. So take your opinion of me and about $2.00 and you can buy a cup of coffee somewhere.
(In my opinion, most young b****s are prone to quick violence. I think their record on people is quite a bit worse than Pit Bulls. Would your recommendation be the same for them?)

I could live with that if they would do the same for all brain washed, holier than thou liberals, including you! I would suggest Africa where you would be with all your protégés.

It could be said that you deserve the same!

Do you mean like Lois Lerner of IRS and Hilary Clinton?

New User:
When you want to reply to someone, hit the "quote reply" button under their post. Otherwise we don't know who you are answering.

Only one major problem with this formula. When you get that many more takers from the Govt and that many less earners to support them, are they just going to keep printing money? How can that type of system support itself?

:D :D :D

I checked this out on Snopes http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/felon.asp
They rated it as false but I read the complete article and my take on it was, he was not guilty of a felony but guilty of everything else!
This is the last two paragraphs from the article;
Although what he did may not have been against the law, Clinton's broken promises and contradictory statements about his efforts to avoid the draft were prime examples of the kind of self-serving doublespeak that later earned him the sobriquet "Slick Willie." As Maraniss concluded in his Clinton biography, First in His Class: "It was just a fluke," Clinton would say decades later, when first asked how he had made it through this period without serving in the military. But of course it was not a fluke. A fluke is a wholly accidental stroke of good luck. What happened to Clinton during that fateful year did not happen by accident. He fretted and planned every move, he got help from others when needed, he resorted to some deception or manipulation when necessary, and he was ultimately lucky.

Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/felon.asp#oxHkdhKuA0BdqDYT.99
My estimation of him and his wife is that they both are still POS and liars!

My quote was about you and your contributions to America, not about your wife and her siblings.
My statement about my ancesters being from England was to show theirs and my contributions to this country, not for admiration.
The indigenous peoples did not write The Constitution or the Bill of Rights or create the USA. The white man was to busy k*****g them which was wrong.
Your hero is Mark Twain. Mine is all the soldiers that gave the sacrifice of their life and limbs heeding the call of their Country. I had one brother in WW2 and two brothers in Korea and VietNam. I just missed Vietnam in the Navy.
What have you contributed. Choice of heros, the difference is you were brain washed in school. I was not.
R****m and white privilege, I was born in the mountains of East Tennessee. Youngest of 8 children. Alcoholic father, beat my mother, left when I was 6 y.o. and my mother never did except welfare. We did live in the low cost Govt Projects until I was 17. Have you ever been called white trash when you were very young. You spout off all the time about b****s and minorities being disadvantaged. Mister you don't know very much at all. The Navy made a man of me. Made me realize I could've had a much worse life than alot of other people. I turned out good enough. I'm not on any Govt help.
My question to you is when are you going to start contributing to this great country and quit preaching h**e to everyone?
BTW- Has Howard Dean perfected his high pitched giggle that ruined his previous bid for the Presidency?

Brian, I've read quite a few of your posts and could not understand the cause of your intense anger against Americans. After this post, I finally see why. "Your grandfather and grandmother were immigrants" makes a very large statement. You experienced r****m growing up and it has consumed you. It should have made you a better person but instead, you let it manifest itself and turn you into a raging liberal (my opinion). You place blame on old r****t angry white men. These same old white men are what made America the greatest country on this earth, so much so, that everyone wants to immigrate here. That among many other things.
I can document my relatives back to England so I can say that they had a part in making this country great like it is. How about you, can you say the same? This is not meant to be facetious, but it appears that you have a good education through the tools made available by these angry old r****t white men. (Actually, we all know, many other colors of persons helped make America what it is but the originals were white). Why are you so angry at the people who provided you with the riches you've used?
I hope you see that I have not called you any names, hoping to remain civil.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Da6dIWPaQ3s
Watch about four or five minutes of this video and then spout about your bigotry and immigrant bashing. Dearborn, Michigan at its best.
See where your freedom of speech has gone and to follow soon, is the rest of our rights! Is this the diversity you were claiming is great for America?

Kobach and Bennett then filed a joint lawsuit against the EAC on Aug. 21, 2013, arguing that “a mere oath without concrete evidence of citizenship” is not sufficient to determine the eligibility of v**ers who fill out the federal forms. Both presented evidence in federal court showing that aliens were in fact being registered to v**e in their states.

“It happens and it’s documented,” Kobach told CNSNews.com.
(Most liberal comments scream denials when illegal v****g has been quoted by anyone)
- See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/federal-motor-v**er-forms-ks-az-must-include-proof-citizenship#sthash.DZb6kjSn.dpuf

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/09/b****s-outv**ed-w****s-in-2012-the-first-time-on-record/

According to CNN exit polls, 93% of African-Americans, 71% of Hispanics and 73% of Asians supported Obama over Romney.

When you have this percentage of takers and uninformed v****g for the givers, I don't believe that is a fair assumption!

Typical response from you:
"if you can't dazzle them with brains, you can baffle them with bulls**t.
I read it completely and it is my opinion. Prophet? WTF. It's only written by another intellectual that could debate you under the table. (Biased stuff) It's only bias to liberals.
Enough said.

Glaucon, I have read many of your previous posts and disagree with most of them, especially this one ( I also do not agree on some of the conservative posts). I'm not as well educated as you and several of the other members on this site, so I'm not real great on stating my opinion in my own words. I read this on another site http://www.angelfire.com/emo2/republican/Manual.htm
and it mostly confirms my opinion of liberals . This is only part of the article because I didn't want to post a big amount of data.

The “Intellectuals”:
The “Intellectuals” are an interesting group of people. They’re typically your academics, people who have very strong academic accomplishments, or believe that they do (these can be interchanged). They often think of themselves as smart people, and associate with like-minded “smart people.” They’re especially found in Ivy League colleges, though this phenomenon easily exists in non-Ivy League schools as well. It extends beyond just the college and university scene, however; other education institutions have similar groups, and the media is full of such people.

These people are usually fairly responsible, fairly intelligent, and are going in a good direction in life- at least academically. However, all of them fall victim to one trap: they believe that everyone else is just as responsible and intelligent as them. Thus, they fall into an ideological world view, which believes that everything can be perfect, and that cases of “human nature” such as greed simply do not exist. (This explains why far left liberals supported c*******m- they thought people would be happy with “to each according to their need”…clearly, that did not work)

These people believe that things like a******n should be legal, because people will be responsible with it, and not take advantage of it. These people believe that drugs should be legalized, for the same reasons. These people believe that children should be exposed to sex and violence (including things that can be seen as the promotion of them), because children would be responsible with such matters. These people do not think things on television and mass media should be regulated, thinking that all people are responsible enough to handle indecent material. They believe all criminals can be “rehabilitated” and become responsible like them, and thus they oppose things like the death penalty. The list goes on and on, but the key thing you must know about these people: they’re frequently not in touch with reality itself- they’re like bookworms. They don’t realize the problems in the world for what they really are, but think they do.

Therefore, they fall victim to an ideological world view which simply does not work in reality: liberalism.

Everything these intellectuals do now has been done before, in essence: Karl Marx once presented an ideological l*****t world view. It didn’t work, but it sure sounded great when he presented his ideology. What looks good on paper may not look good in reality, and that is one thing the “intellectual left” does not understand.

These people also fundamentally believe they are right, and will refuse to argue with anyone who they think is of “less merit” than them; they’re very elitist to a sense, and therefore blindly hold to their ideology despite any arguments thrown at them. It is Ivy League arrogance, journalistic elitism, and wh**ever else you can name, at its finest.