WHAT IN THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THESE REPUBLICANS, FROM THE TOP DOWN, THEY ARE ALL JERKS FOR THE MOST PART... MAYBE THE RUSSIAN HAD IT RIGHT IN 1918, K**L THEM ALL, AND START OVER... DON D.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

GOP CONGRESSMAN SCOLDED FOR BEING 'PLAYED' BY BOEHNER

Laura Ingraham Exposes Bill Designed to 'Placate' Conservatives

December 4, 2014 - WND - FOX News

Boehner Holds Press Briefing At The Capitol

House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio (Trader To GOP)
A Republican House member sponsoring a bill purporting to roll back President Obama’s executive action on immigration is being played for a fool by House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, charged talk-radio host Laura Ingraham.

Ingraham told the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla., in a radio interview Wednesday that Boehner is supporting the measure as a move to “placate” the conservative base. Conservatives are angered by the House leader’s agreement to a continuing resolution on the budget that would effectively strip Republicans of their power to stop Obama’s plan to allow up to 5 million i*****l a***ns to remain in the U.S.

Even Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid favors Yoho’s bill, Ingraham argued, and the congressman admitted Boehner has not agreed to fight Obama’s executive actions in March when the continuing resolution expires March 31.

Yoho pushed back, but the talk host contended “there’s no mention in your very short bill of funding, and the way to stop [Obama] is to use the power of the purse.”

Yoho replied: “I agree with you a 100 percent and that’s the purpose of the CR we are going to come up with, but this [stand alone bill] takes away [Obama's] legal authority.”

Ingraham shot back: “No, it doesn’t. The court can only take away his legal authority.”

She argued the Constitution doesn’t give authority to the House of Representatives to declare a bill unconstitutional.

“The thing you’re left to do is stop funding of this outrage that is k*****g American jobs,” Ingraham said.

“Congressman, I like you, but I’m going to say it … you’re being played here.”

Ingraham asserted Yoho is giving the Republican establishment “the cover they desperately crave because they know America is onto this.”

“We’ve been played for fools before,” she said.

Ingraham asked Yoho if Boehner has pledged to replace the continuing resolution when it expires with a proposal by Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., which would take advantage of Congress’ ability to block funding of Obama’s immigration action.

Yoho didn’t give a direct answer.

“We haven’t gone that far,” he said. “What we’re dealing with is crisis management up here, over and over again. [Work authorizations] are self-funding through the fees and things like that they collect. We can’t shut off funds until we get into appropriations process and rewrite those bills.”

Ingraham argued the Congressional Research Service reported that last year’s omnibus spending bill included 16 funding restrictions on fee-based programs.

“So you can cut off the money to the fee-based programs. We did it last year. So Boehner is trying to cook up, ‘Well, we can’t do this because it’s funded.’ Oh bull! He doesn’t want to do it because he wants this immigration amnesty because the Chamber of Commerce wants it, the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce wants it and every big fat-cat donor of the Republican Party wants it,” the talk host said.

“That is the t***h, and if more Republicans had the guts to say that on Capitol Hill, you wouldn’t win by one percentage point, which you won by last time, or the first time, you’d win by 20 points or you wouldn’t be challenged like Jeff Sessions,” said Ingraham.

She further asked why Senate Majority Leader Reid, a Democrat, supports Yoho’s bill.

“Uhh … I don’t know if he will,” Yoho replied.

Ingraham said: “He does! … He is supporting [Boehner's plan].”

Ingraham, noting Yoho has been critical of Boehner in the past, asked why the House leader should be trusted now.

“It’s not a matter of trust,” he said.

Ingraham interrupted: “Yes it is! Absolutely!”

She insisted it’s a matter of trust because “in the end, Boehner really wants what Jeb Bush really wants, which is comprehensive immigration reform, which is concurrent amnesty with bogus promise of enforcement.”


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/12/gop-congressman-scolded-for-being-played-by-boehner/#4fKMhS465JKyEgay.99

There a four black activists out of Detroit, I believe, who will never see their message on the mainstream media syndicated circuit. Their message is that the people who have been holding them down "look the same." There are no w****s, conservatives or Tea Party advocates in their ghetto neighborhoods. But there are [on the other side of the tracks] gated communities and limos that t***sport their black progressive Democrat representatives and their armed security forces back and forth, dripping the money from their pockets that had originally been allotted to "The war on drugs, poverty and crime."

After reading some of the comments on other post’s from some on OPP, I need to ask this question.

Am I a R****t because I believe

In fair and equal treatment for all?

That no one deserves special treatment because of race, g****r or religion?

Discrimination is wrong in every form ( affirmative action, special treatment)?

Common courtesy and respect is required and expected from all and given to all?

A person should keep their word?

That all people should obey the laws of the land?

Honest answers are welcomed and appreciated.

Shame *IN* me?

Sing, you do know, I hope, that many things you say don't make much sense, the way you word them. That doesn't mean they don't make sense in your mind, I'm sure they do, it's just when you put them down on paper, so to speak, that meanings get lost.

We know you're lesbian oriented, that's okay, not an issue until you make it one by saying something like the above and not giving any reason for that blurt. Which makes it just a blurt and nothing more.

It is true that homosexuals like to parade naked in the streets, and that's an obscene act that normally gets people arrested and psychologically evaluated before trial. We do have laws against that behavior, yet homosexuals demand to do it as a right.

They do want to adopt same-sex children. That's a fact, and is part of the reason they want legal marriage, which is also a fact.

Homosexuals engage in a higher rate of p********a than heterosexuals, also a fact even though they keep denying it, and while there's no push right now to drop the consensual age limit to zero, you know it's out there as well as I do.

Here's another fact. Homosexuals tend to be sociologically and psychologically unstable. I lived up in No. Calif. for about 25 years and there's q***r communities up there of both men and women, all-lesbian communes, all-male mountain communities, and boy, do they ever carry on. Constant domination bickering, jealousies, fights, lots of alcoholism and partner swapping and drug use.

I know how they act and I know what they want. That's not crap, lies or stupidity, Sing. That's reality.

Yup, sure is.
THERE ARE NO GAY RIGHTS. Being Festive is an emotional state.
However, there ARE Homosexual Rights, and I will enumerate some of them, as previously explained here on OPP by homosexuals.

Homosexuals have the right to parade naked in public.

Homosexuals have the right to marry each other and adopt children who are the same sex they are, and raise those children to be homosexuals also.

Homosexuals have the right to have sex with children.

These are homosexual rights as expressed by homosexuals. They aren't "gay" rights because gay means festive and any other use of that word is just slang and a willing perversion of the t***h. If you want homosexuals to have the rights I've described above, just keep saying "gay" because you're lazy, instead of saying "q***r" like we always have, and eventually they will have those rights.

Because for every inch you give they will take and have taken a mile. Don't be lazy, if typing out "homosexual" takes too much of your effort, then type"q***r", that works just fine.

The present government is the most inept and corrupt group of criminals to ever occupy Waste-ington, District of Criminals. Dim-o-craps and Republicans. Nuff said.

My two favorites:

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
-- Thomas Jefferson

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."-- Thomas Jefferson

The state of North Dakota has named a new publicly-owned landfill after President Barack Obama.

In an overwhelming 35-10 v**e, the state Senate advanced a bill naming a 650-acre site currently under construction after the nation’s 44th president. Governor Jack Dalrymple is expected to sign the measure into law Tuesday.

When completed, the Barack Obama Memorial Landfill will be the largest waste disposal site in North Dakota, and the 17th largest in the United States. It will be especially rich in toxic waste from the local petroleum and medical industries.

“We wanted to do something to honor the president,” says Republican State Senator Doug Perlman, who was the lead sponsor of the bill. “And I think a pile of garbage is a fitting tribute to Obama’s presidency.

“We originally planned on naming it after a nearby mountain. But then someone jokingly suggested we name it after Obama. I never thought and idea like that would actually pass. But I was pleasantly surprised.”

The president is hardly popular in North Dakota. The most recent poll in December 2013 found that Obama has a 35% approval rating in the state, although that figure may have fallen further in the year since. Yet even considering the political climate, seasoned observers are surprised that two Democratic lawmakers v**ed for the bill’s passage.

“I supported Obama because I thought he would end the wars in the Middle East;” says Allison Mitchell, a progressive Democrat from Grand Forks. “But he decided to fight new wars abroad instead of fighting for single-payer health care and jobs here at home.
“I guess people expected me to oppose this landfill thing because I’m a Democrat. But honestly I don’t really care anymore. Maybe this small act of protest will wake him up.”
Ordinary citizens in the state also seem to approve of the government’s choice.
“I can’t think of a better name,” says Joe Blough, a plumber from Minot. “It’s darkly colored and it's full of s**t. That pretty much sums up Obama.”

http://dailycurrant.com/2014/11/17/north-dakota-names-landfill-after-obama/