One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: UncleJesse
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 213 next>>
Sep 10, 2016 16:55:34   #
eagleye13 wrote:
A few HRC quotes:
"I don't recall" - Hillary Rodham Clinton
"I don't recall" - Hillary Rodham Clinton
"I don't recall" - Hillary Rodham Clinton
How many more like this will there be? 40 and counting so far.
http://www.mediaite.com/e******n-2016/heres-all-40-times-hillary-clinton-told-the-fbi-she-couldnt-remember-something/
The FBI and corrupt Attorney General, Janet Neapolitan, accepted that.
Works at the IRS for Democrats also?


They actually did themselves a favor. They purposely made the questions so she would be led into answering that way over and over again. That way, they could end the investigation and get back to their normal criminal investigations. Because if they really wanted to get HRC, they knew she was actually the one that the email was sent to. And if you look at the over 100 emails of interest, it was a long, long chain mail. And all the people on that chain who were sending her the email would have to be prosecuted. So you are talking about hundreds of millions of dollars and federal prison time for non-political state department workers. It just didn't make sense. HRC was shielded by the reality that if she is going down, a lot of others were going with her. The FBI doesn't want to go there especially because all of the over 100 emails were the lowest classification anyway, "confidential". None of the emails were classified top secret or secret.

It's like with RWR and Iran Contra. The questions were purposely made so he would be led into answering "I don't recall" in order to get it over with and get back to real criminal investigations.
Go to
Sep 10, 2016 16:38:43   #
eagleye13 wrote:
You can learn a lot about a man by knowing who his enemies are, and what they are up to:
“GANG OF 50”
The “Gang of 50” or, as Limbaugh calls them the “50 clowns,” can be found in various positions of privilege within the ruling establishment. They are men who serve the power elites who run with the global oligarchy. Simply, they are men whose allegiance is not to America but to their international masters and their New World Order agenda. They have no real interest in American sovereignty or prosperity. For the most part they operate in stealth and have extensive influence in US domestic and foreign affairs.

GANG OF 50 (KEY NAMES):
CFR • Michael Hayden: former CIA and NSA Director.....by Thomas Ertl
You can learn a lot about a man by knowing who his... (show quote)


Probably so, who knows? It's all conjecture but even if not these people, then likely there will be others anyhow. Always some group opposing the direction of an administration for one reason or another. What is self-interest and NWO to one can be claimed to be altruistic betterment for mankind to others. Like NATO, for example.
Go to
Sep 10, 2016 16:31:54   #
BigMike wrote:
The spirit of America has already been destroyed, obviously, if people are willing to be led by the criminal hag.


The whole spirit of the political campaign is to ruin the character of the opponent so, the word "criminal", after taking the political filter off, t***slates into "we want you to believe she is a criminal". But with Trump, you take the word "con man" and remove the political filter and the best it t***slates into is, "he can sell bs to a politician" which is what he is doing to the GOP (except for some, maybe a third who just don't need the GOP to earn a living). I believe that Trump actually has gone overboard mentally after years of bs and surrounding himself with admiring children and "yes men", that he actually believes the bs he is saying.
Go to
Sep 10, 2016 16:04:04   #
DJRich wrote:
When will all of the uber military types who reside on OPP decide they have had enough of boss hogface?

When confronted about his interview with king, trump said, "I didn't know", which according to all contards on OPP is no excuse at all.

So what is it children? you simply cannot have it both ways, either hogface trump is an asshole, or Hillary did nothing wrong.

BTW, was hogface sucking up to his main squeeze, pooty?

After all, hogface has a c****e official for a father-in-law

Why don't the fools at fox and other rightwingnut media want to report this stunning stupidity by hogface?

Don't bother trying to answer, it is already obvious


http://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-goes-russia-owned-tv-160905449.html
When will all of the uber military types who resid... (show quote)


I thought they were exaggerating at the time but now I see why Rubio and then later, Romney, said Trump is a con man. At first I thought I wouldn't v**e but the way it's turned out, I will v**e for Hillary because the guy is a mental case and it is scary looking at his history of destroying things he takes over (like a kid building a sand castle and then smashing it all up) followed by some weird enjoyment of being in the spotlight blaming others for the destruction. I don't want to see what things he destroys with the presidency.
Go to
Sep 8, 2016 00:39:33   #
cold iron wrote:
WWII veteran overhearing someone say that "You can't bomb an ideology."

The hell you can't. Because we did it. These Muslims are no different than the [Imperial] Japanese. The Japs had their suicide bombers too. And we stopped them. What it takes is the resolve and will to use a level of brutality and violence that your generation can't stomach. And until you can, this s**t won't stop. It took us on the beaches with bullets, clearing out caves with flame throwers, and men like LeMay burning down their cities, k*****g people by the tens of thousands. And then it took 2 atom bombs on top of it. But if that was what it took to win we were willing to do it. Until you are willing to do the same...well, I hope you enjoy this s**t, because it ain't going to stop ..

The ball is in our court. Are we the last generation of AMERICANS??
WWII veteran overhearing someone say that "Yo... (show quote)


If we had drones back then and if we could talk the Chinese into doing all the fighting back then in WWII against Japan, that would've been a whole lot better than sending our boys. Such is the case today, using drones and Iraqi's is much better than sending ours. They can't hold onto their recruits because they get there and realize it ain't what was shown on the smart phone video. It's close to the point of collapsing and we can patiently watch from drones and strategically drop a grenade on their leaders rather than waste millions on planes and bombs that honestly increases recruitment from their boys being told infidels are bombing their land to take their women.
Go to
Sep 6, 2016 22:17:29   #
eagleye13 wrote:
Why Republicans want v**er ID

I thought you might find this interesting. I sure did!


Next time you hear Hillary, or any other Democrat, ranting about Republicans wanting to disenfranchise minorities by requiring v**er ID, keep the following in mind:

* In 59 v****g districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the v**es ....

Imagine that.....


ARE WE THE DUMBEST NATION ON THE PLANET OR WHAT?


Question: ARE WE THE DUMBEST NATION ON THE PLANET OR WHAT?
Answer: Apparently, there are some that are very gullible to believe everything they read on email and the internet but no, most folks suspect a liar when they read an article like this one. Folks are getting much more savvy than in the past and can easily research the facts by going to the county and district v**er results that are public domain and confirm the whole article is a damned lie!
Go to
Aug 28, 2016 22:10:32   #
I didn't read or hear what you did. I read and heard that there were about 100 emails that were part of a chain initiated by others in the State Department that got forwarded to her and sometimes she commented on them. None were marked classified. So if she is wrong for commenting on them then there are dozens of others (low and high level government workers) that are wrong. And she did not believe they were classified and there was nothing to indict her on because those that sent the emails and forwarded them back-and-forth and so-on and so-on over 100 times in a chain never believed they were classified and there were no words "classified" anywhere to be found.

Separately, there were three instances where the following was somewhere in the email: (c)
It does not read, "classified" but it is supposed to mean either copyright, classified at the lowest, confidential level.

All the above means she is guilty of mishandling confidential information.

So this is far from the treasonous and unethical behavior we've been led to believe. It's just all hype and I'm very disappointed that a congressional case was made of it because it gives a historical record of how politically hyper they've been over her and a big waste of time and energy.

Loki wrote:
I printed a retraction to that a few minutes after I posted it, slick. I realized it was a f**e. You must not have listened to FBI Director Comey list Hillary's violations of security protocol; you know, the part where he enumerated the emails that were clearly marked as secret? Not to mention the ones that he said any reasonable person in her position should have known they were classified. So she is either a liar or an i***t.
Go to
Aug 28, 2016 16:21:17   #
America has become conspiracy happy. It used to be that an investigation that had facts is what it took before folks believed any wrong doing. But since Watergate and Iran-Contra, now so many believe wrong doing occurs and then when ever an accusation occurs such as this, it is the equivalent to fact in many minds.

As it turns out, the US Constitution and US Law actually requires proof. Otherwise, anyone can invent wrong doing, such as Trump is a secret liberal plant to prevent establishment republicans from winning the nomination and then throw the e******n with careless statement about race and religion on social media. He is a Clinton friend and supporter and was for a******n and liberal agenda and a card carrying democrat.

Blade_Runner wrote:
Got news for you, Jesse, the Clinton Foundation solicited and accepted millions of dollars from foreign and domestic corporate donors. For example, Bill Clinton's speech in Moscow (that's the capitol of Russia) netted $500,000 dollars for the foundation. Money, which in turn, was redirected (laundered) into donations for Hillary's campaign. The donors (including 20 foreign governments, some of whom are hostile to the US) didn't pony up this money because they enjoyed hearing Bubba or Hillary ramble on or out of the goodness of their hearts. They were buying political favors, much of which centered on the sale of arms. the stream of cash that came from 20 foreign governments who relied on weapons export approvals from Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

Federal law designates the secretary of state as “responsible for the continuous supervision and general direction of sales” of arms, military hardware and services to foreign countries. In practice, that meant that Clinton was charged with rejecting or approving weapons deals — and when it came to Clinton Foundation donors, Hillary Clinton’s State Department did a whole lot of approving.

While Clinton was secretary of state, her department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors.


If Hillary wins the WH, these donors are going to call in the markers, they are going to demand their money's worth in her foreign policy decisions (of which we know her record to be disastrous during her tour as SecState). And, if Hillary doesn't come through, she is going to be in some deep, deep s**t. Some of those donors are very dangerous people. Hillary and Bill have set themselves up for the mother of all blackmails.
Got news for you, Jesse, the Clinton Foundation so... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 28, 2016 16:12:25   #
I think it's nice that you are going to bat for Trump but he has a large team of lawyers that he pays for that, a true American believer in suing often because he can. Lately he is suing a former campaign aid and a newspaper but the point is, he has sued over 1,900 times. In the last year, he has "trumped up" at least 70 new ones. There are over 50 civil lawsuits open against him. As president, he'd be the first to have 50 civil lawsuits, let alone one. Oh, but I'm sure you don't believe any of these because they are fact yet you jump at believing any accusation and lie (many that are newer versions of old rumors) about Hillary. Where's the lawsuit against Hillary for any of the accusations you've cited?

America Only wrote:
Being sued for Trump U...everyone forgets those that took his courses and made a BUNDLE by applying what was taught...those that sat on their ass and did nothing with the courses are pissed off because they are still broke...they would be broke no matter what as they are too dumb and lazy to have applied what they were taught..and then the other side of it all...how many people attend ANY University and then FAIL to even find employment? Should they all also SUE their University for their own personal failures?

I'll be attending the law suit maybe...as a witness for Trump. If Hillary was prosecuted for her BUNK billing for what she did on her Haiti Fund, I would be a witness for the Prosecutor....unlike you I do things in life and as you merely wear out the bottoms of your Pajama's you are as clueless as your avatar...a frigging LOONIE TUNE CARTOON!
Being sued for Trump U...everyone forgets those th... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 28, 2016 16:01:19   #
I recall there are over fifty unsubstantiated accusations out there over Obama and Hillary about lying, criminal activity, dictatorship, secret society membership, Haiti charity included. There are lies all right except as it turns out, the lies are about them, not from them.

They've made a lot of enemies with their policies that reigned in more than a few bad apples and I suspect that's what it is all about.

Read what you are writing. She does not even have to be involved to be guilty. You are so hyped up you don't make sense.

She'll be fine as president, don't worry. All the moderate libs like her and the far left libs don't but furthermore, I saw many high ranking in the Pentagon and military wrote her support a few weeks ago and that further supported what I suspected too.

America Only wrote:
Yep you are typical democrap....you never have any first hand knowledge about one single thing involving government or the latest events surrounding the people running or in power already. ALL d**gging that worn out set of pajama's across your couch to watch Hillary lie again and again and think she is just spiffy! Or is it Obama? Take your pick.....the lies both of those two maggots have stated could span the Globe a few dozen times by now....$90,000.00 charged off Hillary's Foundation fund for a lousy small shack house for the people in Haiti....when everything was donated..including labor, materials and shipping for it...how frigging nice..she did not even have to be involved but she was...to be able to LAUNDER millions....of course you are all happy for her...why not, she is just another criminal that you love to support all her felonies as she continues with them daily....yes indeed.
Yep you are typical democrap....you never have any... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 28, 2016 15:00:06   #
I very much doubt that. If that were true, their foundation would be in the doghouse like the Wounded Warriors organization.

Trump, on the other hand, is more like you are referring to. The unethical stuff he's been sued for and is currently being sued for is a tell of his character.

At the present, it's looking like HRC. There's still time left before I make a decision.

America Only wrote:
"What Bridge"??? (Ted Kennedy after murdering Mary Jo)..."I did not have sex with that woman" ( Bill CLIT TON after screwing Monica)...."we paid out a lot of money down in haiti to help those poor people out" (Hillary after she paid herself, Bill, and her brat kid millions of dollars each from the Haiti Relief Fund part of the Clinton Foundation money.... and the Haitian people got next to nothing...) and then we come along another riff raff like you that says there is no proof....what sort of a cum quat are you? The proof is factual history with these frigging morons....but hey..you need proof that you pee on your own foot, look down and see the wet stain i***t...that should work for you!
"What Bridge"??? (Ted Kennedy after murd... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 28, 2016 14:54:07   #
I understand why you admire Trump. You are two peas in a pod.

America Only wrote:
I am glad you support Hillary. SCUM should stick together..and you are so far up her butt crack you need a scuba tank to even breathe....
Go to
Aug 28, 2016 14:52:26   #
Not too sure about that bc she has him on record of saying one thing and then something different the next day. I guess we will see if he can turn things around and if he does well in the debates. I'm not counting on it. He's a big f**er and can't keep his "own facts" straight and is constantly explaining what he really meant and then using the "I was only kidding" excuse.

More accusations against her but it's all hyperbole. There are no lies. There are no criminal acts. If she lied to congress, where in the heck are the perjury charges? Think about it.

America Only wrote:
She laughs at any serious questions now....her emails are "boring" the new 15 thousand they just now got a hold of and are just now looking at. I wonder if Chris Stevens family would agree with you? NOT! Lets see a family member in your household k**led over seas and have HER lie to you more than once about why your family member was k**led....and as to there being "nothing" in her emails...BULLS**T! There is plenty in her emails....as you liberals love to twist what was stated by Comey...CLINTON had classified emails sent and received....so what it this AFTER bulls**t you liberals cling to? The facts warrant she should be charged with Espionage...plain and simple.

Fact: she ignored warnings and what she was told on what to do with email service and wanted to keep it on a private server....first mistake...but not for someone that had plans to run her Foundation along with her working for secretary of state. Even whom she hired to set up and run that server had ZERO security clearance....There is two violations right there...THREE she LIED while under oath to Congress....that is another one...FOUR she lied about turning them over to begin with...she should have been arrested for tampering with evidence and impeding a Federal Investigation when she had her ATTORNEYS scour her email servers...BIG illegal move...that is no different then a DRUG dealer being caught with a warehouse full of dope and then having a defense attorney pour trough the warehouse getting rid of the evidence....I could go on..but you don't actually are what crimes anyone in the democrat party does...you are a democrat and enjoy all criminal activity your party does and gets away with...it is part of the democrat culture...crime...lies..murder...who cares, right?


Trump will blow that b***h out of the water if she actually debates. The front row of audience members can be VICTIMS of Hillary and Bill...all Trump has to do is ask the hag a few questions....and it is over....she is a freaking CRIMINAL.
She laughs at any serious questions now....her ema... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 28, 2016 14:47:40   #
The typical lesson we've learned when these accusations occur is to give some time bc we've all been punked before with stories like these. Sort of like the one about a ban on the pledge of allegiance.

Loki wrote:
As a matter of fact, more than one hundred of the emails were classified. More than twenty were so classified that most of Congress wasn't able to read them because they lacked the security clearance.
Have you forgotten when Hillary was the First "Lady?" She and Bill got caught stealing more than $200,000 worth of furniture, silverware and artwork from the White House and had to give it all back. Anyone else would've been in prison.
Have you forgotten the deal wherein Billary got paid a half million dollars for a few speeches in Russia, and then shortly thereafter, Hillary, using her connections as Sec/State, sold a bunch of our Uranium to a Canadian company that was a Clinton Foundation cutout, who promptly then sold it to the Russians?
As far as Hillary being prosecuted, you have a corrupt Democratic Administration, and a corrupt Democrat Attorney General who has a long history of quid pro quo with the Clintons having the final say as to whether or not she will be prosecuted. What the hell did you think would happen?
As a matter of fact, more than one hundred of the ... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 28, 2016 14:43:20   #
More bs with no proof, a fantasy. Now Trump and Al Capone. That is a good analogy. IRS problems is a common feature to both of them. Hmm...

America Only wrote:
WTF? They so called crap you are stating, had to be REDACTED (censored) so badly before Congress could even view it! You are a real moron...not even a pretend one...the real deal!

Clinton is nothing more than Al Capone in a dress...WORSE!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 213 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.