permafrost wrote:
One fact you do not mention..
trump was the only head of state who did not attend the ceremony for the dead.. the rain/weather was not a problem for any of them. only trump was worried about his hair.. or wh**ever he felt was more important then honoring the vets k**led in action.
LOGISTICS and SECURITY.
I am wondering if you read the ENTIRE reports...the OFFICIAL reports?
Did anyone consider how finite the Secret Service are Tuned?
I'm wondering just how many of you understand that last minute changes to itinerary are a nightmare for the Security Changes if travel plans are drastically changed?
Ask what kind of security is required for anyone other that the President of the USA?
I can tell all of you that it is not nearly as impeccably researched, planned or as intensive.
Now ask yourselves if the ORIGINAL and PRIMARY itinerary was to fly OUR President to the location and then that is then suddenly canceled due to weather what is the next plan? Do you drive a route that has been checked, double checked and then deemed a security nightmare or cancel the entire event?
ASK yourself this question. IF you were head of the secret service and were the MAN or WOMAN in charge would you take a chance at risking the President of the USA safety?
If you answer YES then I guarantee that if even a flat tire causes any deviation of anything less than 1,000% Security of OUR President that you will be dismissed and sent to Alaska to count fish for the rest of your life...that or if he is attacked then that will become a NATIONAL INCIDENT. Would you still risk it?
If you answer NO then congratulations you are human after all.
I find more and more short sited thoughts in more and more sites like this. It is as if all rational has been lost to the irrational and fallen off the charts into the TWILIGHT ZONE.
I get that not all read an entire article and even find myself doing that same thing...BUT, I then force myself to go back and read the entire article to become completely informed of the event and what actually took place. That sometimes requires reading the referenced material. It is amazing how some leave out the most important details of a reference material so the author can manipulate a narrative to his or her less than true account.
I understand that this takes time and effort to find the whole story but then that is the fault of the press or authors of fiction.
Now go ahead and slammmm me for standing up for the entire t***h. I'm interested in how you do this since there is a lot more to this event that has been reported. More of the REAL, behind the scenes T***H is not made available to us nobody-Joe-publics. You must know this by now and realize this is not as it was reported.
If you still want to spout about something that has not been completely researched and referenced then by all means...
I need a good laugh today, so as Sammy Davis JR and the entire Laugh-In cast would say, SOCK-IT-TO-ME-SOCK-IT-TO-ME-SOCK-IT-TO-ME-BABY.
WE've got to do the research folks before just swallowing the over-Salted peanut butter they spout off these days for pure and utter smoke screen effect.
Do any, and I mean ANY of you try to look at what they are attempting with these outlandish bashing?
NAH, I think this is sufficiently different for another TOPIC altogether.
Have a Great Day ya-all...
JUST SAYIN'