"Imagine the 64% of Americans now living paycheck to paycheck.

Imagine you’re one of them, even if you’re not.

Your bank account balance is 0.00.

You get paid 4000 every pay term in FedCoin.

Payday arrives and it’s directly deposited in your JPMorgan Chase account by their FedNow settlement system because JPMorgan Chase owns and profits off your debt.

JPMorgan Chase is the largest of only five banks left. They hold your mortgage note and immediately deduct your monthly mortgage payment from your pay. They also hold your auto loan and student loans. They immediately deduct FedCoin for both. The auto insurance company has connections to JPMorgan Chase and wants their money right away.

They take it.

Amazon notices you bought some things six months ago in installments and still owe two more months of payments.

Amazon takes its monthly share. Deducted immediately from your FedNow wallet.

You’re left with 1000 until the next payday.

Your fridge is empty and your kids are hungry.

FedCoin is programmed so you can only spend it at certain grocery stores.

You buy food and some other essentials, paying with the FedNow Wallet on your phone that has your Social Security number and all your information.

It tracks where you are at all times based on the geolocation positioning of your pocket computer.

Border crossers are handed free phones with FedNow wallets already loaded with FedCoin. They don’t need a social security number because the people who gave them the FedCoin know there will be no social security by the end of the decade.

The deductions continue.

FedAgents (Formerly FBI) working at Facebook reported a post the week prior that you made criticizing P****r and the CDC.

Your FedCoin balance is deducted 50 tokens for “spreading misinformation about the government.”

This is your second strike for having wrong thoughts online. If you get a third strike they will deduct 500 tokens. Even if you don’t have it in your account, it will be deducted from your next payday.

You can see where all this is going.

That boot on a human face forever.

And we’re pretty much already there…"

https://thegoodcitizen.substack.com/p/dancing-with-the-cbdc-devil

The Biden NATO plan is in place and won't waver from it.

Is the Kremlin capable of facing reality? How much more evidence do the Kremlin and China need? Will Putin ever realize that he must quickly win this war or it is going to spin out of control?

Putin has said time and again that it is fruitless to negotiate with the West, so why is he still trying to negotiate? Putin seems to have a fundamental problem recognizing reality. By failing to act, Putin is setting up the world for nuclear war.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/white-house-says-opposes-ceasefire-ukraine/5812743

You really are the king of inconsequential trivialities. If I asked about WW2 and wished to know the start of US involvement, the December 7, 1941 Pearl Harbor attack and the December 8, 1941 US declaration of war on the Empire of Japan might come up. According to your friends in the G****l W*****g Movement, man caused C*****e C****e is an even bigger deal. Yet I cannot get a simple answer when I ask exactly when the period of G****l W*****g began.

There should be a date. That way when I compare pre G****l W*****g weather to the present G****l W*****g weather I have a starting point.

You believe in this stuff. Yet you know very little about something this important. I do not believe in it. Which is why I have spent an awful lot of time reading about it. If you ask me about anything I say I believe in, I will usually respond with so much information you will be sorry you ever asked me.

You're batting about .500. We need campaign finance reform badly. We have the best politicians money can buy. We already have term limits for politicians, they're called e******ns. What we need are non-moron v**ers. Term limits should be imposed on the Federal Judiciary, from the SCOTUS on down.
The E*******l College was implemented as a safeguard against a few highly populated states bulldozing less populated ones. It has served that purpose well since the country's inception. The only people I have ever heard oppose it are big city Liberals from either the Northeast or the Left Coast.
The CATO Institute did a pretty thorough study about minimum wage and recommended a raise to about $9/hour. This was before your boy Biden's record-setting inflation, so that amount may have changed.
Concerning taxing Churches.... I suggest you re-read the First Amendment. This flies in the face of the First of the Bill of Rights. It is not your purview to decide what is a church and what is not.
Oh, yes, expanding the SCOTUS. Every time there is a Conservative majority this is the cry of Liberals all over the land. They are careful to only voice it when they have the majority in the Senate, however. Kind of like abolishing the filibuster and gerrymandering. Both were invented by Democrats and used very effectively in furthering their efforts. Harry Reid, when he was minority leader, made an impassioned defense of the filibuster, right up until his party took over the Senate, at which point he couldn't wait to abolish it. The reason there is a majority of Conservative Federal Judges now is because this blatant power grab came back and bit Democrats in the ass. Ditto for gerrymandering, a practice invented by a Democrat Governor. You were fine with it until it started being used against you.
As for student loan forgiveness; what did these people think was going to happen when they spent 30 grand getting a degree in "G****r Studies," or "Art Appreciation" or some other non-starter and couldn't find a job?
In Europe, it is tougher to get into college, and their free programs are in useful majors, like medical and engineering fields. They also have to actually finish the curriculum and get their degree.
There is nothing wrong with lots of help for critical fields such as computers, medicine, and some of the sciences.
Government run anything is inefficient. While our health care needs reform, putting a bunch of brainless bureaucrats in charge of anything is unlikely to have the desired effect.

After Going to War Under False Pretenses in Iraq, High-Level Officials of the Biden Regime Want War With Russia
By Robert Spencer - on February 26, 2023

BeyondWords
Newsweek reported Sunday that Igor Korotchenko, a Russian journalist, which essentially means a spokesman for the Russian government, “has claimed on state TV that the U.S. has declared war on the country following reports of the White House’s approval of targeted strikes on Crimea.” Korotchenko’s remarks “follow on from a previous statement made by the U.S. Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland.” Then on Wednesday, Elon Musk tweeted: “Nobody is pushing this war more than Nuland.” The UK’s far-Left Independent ridiculed Musk for this Thursday with an article entitled, “Elon Musk mocked for claiming ‘no one’ pushing Ukraine war more than US diplomat: ‘Putin for example?’” Yet there is good reason to believe that Musk is right.

Nuland said, according to Newsweek, that “Washington supports Ukrainian attacks on military targets on the peninsula and has called for it to be demilitarized. Crimea was illegally annexed by Russia from Ukraine in 2014.” Crimea’s population is largely Russian, and the Kremlin believes it to be rightly theirs. Consequently, attacks on Crimea could be the flashpoint that make the Russia-Ukraine war into World War III.

Korotchenko declared: “After the U.S. crossed every imaginable and unimaginable red line, today the U.S. State Department actually announced that it was going to war with Russia. I assume that this is how we should interpret Nuland’s statement. There is no need for halftones. The U.S. is an enemy of Russia, a military adversary.” He added: “If it expects massive missile strikes on Russian territory to be carried out with their help, but as if by someone else’s hands, then perhaps we can regard this as a casus belli (cause for war) and react accordingly.”

Michael Clarke, a professor in the War Studies department at King’s College London, dismissed Korotchenko’s statements: “This is just more bluster and repeats things being said on the channel at regular intervals.” Maybe so. But is it just more bluster from the Biden regime? Victoria Nuland is a longtime Washington insider who oversaw the 2014 revolution in Ukraine that led to the installation of the current regime, which has so many questionable ties to the L*****t establishment in the U.S., including suspicions of money-laundering. Would Nuland, therefore, have an interest in preserving and protecting that Ukrainian regime, even to the point of sparking a war between Russia and the United States?

Would an American official advocate going to war on such a flimsy pretext? There are precedents. On Friday, the investigative journalist who goes by the name “Kanekoa” tweeted: “Victoria Nuland’s husband, Robert Kagan, wrote an open letter to George W. Bush nine days after the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001, urging him to invade Iraq and remove Saddam Hussein ‘even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack.’”

The letter to Bush, of which the chief signer was William Kristol, states: “We agree with Secretary of State Powell’s recent statement that Saddam Hussein ‘is one of the leading terrorists on the face of the Earth….’ It may be that the Iraqi government provided assistance in some form to the recent attack on the United States. But even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.”

The Iraqi government hadn’t aided in the 9/11 attacks, and Saddam wasn’t among the chief sponsors of international terrorism. But the invasion went ahead anyway, with disastrous results both for Iraq and for the U.S. Now, Kagan and Nuland might be the George and Kellyanne Conway of the foreign policy establishment; they might not see eye-to-eye on Iraq, or Ukraine, or anything else. But there is certainly good reason to believe that Nuland, at very least, is part of a coterie of foreign policy “experts” who are happy to see war come, for the benefits they perceive it would bring.

These people have learned no lessons from the debacles in Iraq and Afghanistan, and have been casting around now for a new source of income for the military industrial complex now the catastrophe in Afghanistan has ended what was once a profitable cash cow. Are they hoping to get us into World War III? The possibility cannot be ruled out.