Posts for: Saspatz007
Mar 25, 2020 18:31:35 #
(Main)
fullspinzoo wrote:
Looks like those payments of around $12,000 will be delayed because Pelosi has thrown a wrench into the whole deal.
Where did you get that number?
The most I’ve heard discussed is $2000 per adult.
Mar 21, 2020 11:35:29 #
(Main)
Unfortunately, not much is known about the negotiations in the House.
We do have some information about the process in the Senate.
March 18:
Senator Rand Paul - Republican, Kentucky:
proposed an amendment that would have:
-required a social security number to receive the child care tax cut
-provided the President the authority to t***sfer funds as necessary
-terminated United States military operations and reconstruction activities in Afghanistan.
The amendment was not approved.
https://www.congress.gov/amendment/116th-congress/senate-amendment/1556/all-info
We do have some information about the process in the Senate.
March 18:
Senator Rand Paul - Republican, Kentucky:
proposed an amendment that would have:
-required a social security number to receive the child care tax cut
-provided the President the authority to t***sfer funds as necessary
-terminated United States military operations and reconstruction activities in Afghanistan.
The amendment was not approved.
https://www.congress.gov/amendment/116th-congress/senate-amendment/1556/all-info
Mar 21, 2020 10:21:02 #
(Main)
The first relief package has been enacted.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6201
Sponsored by representative Nita Lowey a Democrat representing the 17th district of New York.
Here are the revisions made in the compromise with the Senate.
https://www.jacksonlewis.com/publication/new-employer-obligations-under-slightly-revised-families-first-c****av***s-act-hr-6201
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6201
Sponsored by representative Nita Lowey a Democrat representing the 17th district of New York.
Here are the revisions made in the compromise with the Senate.
https://www.jacksonlewis.com/publication/new-employer-obligations-under-slightly-revised-families-first-c****av***s-act-hr-6201
Mar 21, 2020 09:50:46 #
(Main)
son of witless wrote:
He put together a private sector-government team. Other than perhaps S.Korea it is hard to look at any other nation in as good of shape as the US.
Japan
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/03/20/national/c****av***s-explosion-expected-japan/#.XnYUrfdlCEc
Germany
https://inews.co.uk/news/health/c****av***s-germany-death-rate-confirmed-cases-2502388?amp
The key in all 3 countries cases has been testing.
I worry because, as of yet, our health care system is behind the curve.
Mar 20, 2020 15:51:36 #
(Main)
son of witless wrote:
I disagree. It may not have as long a dormant period before symptoms appear in an infected person, but they were long enough to spread to many countries. If memory serves me correctly, many of the cases were spread sexually by truck drivers along some of the major roads connecting the various African countries. Ebola's death rate was much higher.
Ebola is much more dangerous than C****-**.
Ebola is much more dangerous than C****-**.
Seems Trump has his own Ebola situation that could hit the USA.
https://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/issue-brief/the-current-ebola-outbreak-and-the-u-s-role-an-explainer/
Mar 19, 2020 20:27:27 #
(Main)
son of witless wrote:
Yes but that was my point. Both diseases were spr... (show quote)
Generally people infected with Ebola died before they spread it much.
C****-** is asymptomatic and contagious for quite a while, thusly a much greater risk.
Mar 19, 2020 20:15:52 #
(Main)
proud republican wrote:
Well she is out!! So you only have 2 choices!!
I’m writing in Klobuchar.
Mar 19, 2020 00:30:37 #
(Main)
proud republican wrote:
Biden vs President Trump ...Who wins P**********l e******n?? Even though economy right now sinking ,I'll say by e******n time it will be back to normal and President Trump will win again!! So what say you good peopl of OPP?? BIDEN or TRUMP?
Klobuchar is getting my v**e.
Mar 18, 2020 21:32:18 #
(Main)
amadjuster wrote:
I can remember quite a few episodes of C****a sickness....generally on Saturday morning. 🍺 🍺🍺
Mar 18, 2020 21:30:01 #
(Main)
byronglimish wrote:
Have you thought that maybe the President not getting the v***s, could be the Creators doing???
I know that you lack the courage to directly reply to a direct question.
Most liberals are like that.
I know that you lack the courage to directly reply to a direct question.
Most liberals are like that.
Careful...don’t jinx him.
Mar 18, 2020 21:28:58 #
(Main)
amadjuster wrote:
Except the Supreme Court says you're wrong.
True.
And now we reap the consequences.
Yay 😒
Mar 18, 2020 21:25:54 #
(Main)
nwtk2007 wrote:
Ebola is much more deadly, most often k*****g it's host before it can spread.
We don’t know how long someone can carry it without having symptoms.
How many carriers do we have?
Without real numbers, we can’t know how dangerous it really is.
It’s a tough situation. Where’s the line between sensible precautions and paranoia?
Mar 18, 2020 14:36:56 #
(Main)
77Reaganite wrote:
No but you understood exactly what I under exactly what I wrote you can't deny what I just said wasn't actually factual cuz it's every word I just stated was exactly true you know it as well as everybody else knows it who cares about a run-on sentence man I'm tired of these people on here getting on to me about my grammar all right last I checked this isn't School
I’m wound up. Stupid things are bugging me. Fixing grammar gives me something constructive to do.
No offense intended.
Mar 18, 2020 14:32:42 #
(Main)
nwtk2007 wrote:
The two cannot be compared as they are totally different.
In what way?
Mar 18, 2020 04:15:15 #
(Main)
Iliamna1 wrote:
I'm not. And there are many nurses who aren't an don't ant their names associated as supporting him.
Its kind of like the labor unions supporting liberal or democrat candidates, when the union members themselves, support other candidates. It's a misleading statement. Personally, I don't think any union should be allowed to contribute to ANY candidate. Union dues should be used to support the needs of the members of that particular union, but that could be a topic for another thread.
Its kind of like the labor unions supporting liberal or democrat candidates, when the union members themselves, support other candidates. It's a misleading statement. Personally, I don't think any union should be allowed to contribute to ANY candidate. Union dues should be used to support the needs of the members of that particular union, but that could be a topic for another thread.
And corporate profits should be distributed to stock holders instead of going to political causes.
I want one of two things.
Either both can use their funds to promote their agenda, or neither can.