Wrong on all counts.

In that context of course I do! I was born, that means I'm a post birth person.

You were born, that means you're a post birth person too.

Everybody ever born is/was a post birth person. That's the definition of post birth. If you came out of the womb alive, you were born. If you were born, you're post birth.

I know you lefties think that by declaring you're something you're not makes it true, that is not reality. It's delusion. If you want you can claim you're an aardvark, but you'll never actually be an aardvark.

If you support post birth a******n, you support murder. Period!

True, but your false assertions about Trump's taxes referred to his federal income taxes, which is what our conversation was about. Now you're just trying to deflect, as usual.

I agree. That's why I vehemently oppose post-birth a******n. You do understand what post-birth means, right?

Despite the fact that a small amount of federal funding supplements some local and state police departments, I stand by my statement because the vast majority of funding is local. From Georgetown Law:

"the federal government only spends $10-30 per capita on local policing, a relatively small percentage of the roughly $350 per capita that the typical U.S. municipality spends on policing each year."
https://www.law.georgetown.edu/georgetown-law-journal/glj-online/glj-online-vol-110/federal-defunding-of-local-police/

In the conversation we were having the subject was federal income taxes, although I recognize that, like in most instances, you were probably unaware.

I'm sure he still is and will be until the moment he dies. Even after that, his hypocritical legacy will live on.

Finally, you made a comment that has some t***h to it. Good for you! Yes, the ability for a woman to choose to have an a******n is favored by Dems and opposed by Reps. That's why, for years, I've been saying they both have it backward.

According to Dem propaganda, they're all about protecting the rights of the most powerless, and yet they're in favor of k*****g the most powerless of all, babies.

Republican propaganda, on the other hand, claims they're all about personal freedom and choices, but refuse the let women have the choice to abort.

I'm a 'small l' libertarian. As such, I'm all for personal choice and personal responsibility. If a woman wants to choose to have an a******n, who am I to say she can't?

Having said that, the Democratic party, in their zeal to be as woke as possible, have now expanded the definition of a******n to include 'post-birth a******n', which was so creepily described and endorsed by ex-gov Northam of Virginia. Waiting until after a child is born to decide to k**l it is, plain and simple, murder. Endorsing or allowing that is something only a psychopath would do. If you don't understand that, then you have no logical reason to be opposed to the murders of those children (and adults) in Uvalde, because it's just post-birth a******n.

Now Dashy, you know that's not true about President Trump. As I said, if he'd done anything actually impeachable, Nancy would have impeached him for it, instead she had to make stuff up. Further, even for the items the Dems made up he was found not guilty after the partisan impeachment.

In your previous message you lamented that Trump didn't spend enough time working as president. Now in this message you say the opposite. It's clear that you're confused. After your previous message I thought you liked having an incompetent, corrupt buffoon as president, which explains why you v**ed for Biden.

It's not possible for a person to make informed decisions if they're uninformed. Federal income taxes don't fund your local or state police.

Close, actually it's '...must be forbidden for other people, not them.' Al Gore is a perfect example.

I like the way you think, as well. Unlike most Democrats, who never bother to think at all, they just feel.

That's because most Democrat v**ers are like children. They need somebody to take care of them because they're incapable of doing it themselves. They want government to be their new 'mommy'. They are also incapable of making their own decisions and need 'mommy' to do it for them. Freedom, to them, is freedom from having to choose.

Have you ever noticed that virtually all l*****t, Democrat-promoting organizations which promote higher taxes and making the rich 'pay their fair share' are all non-profit organizations, making them exempt from paying taxes? Hypocritical much?

Why is it that calling out the left's atrocities is nasty, while the atrocities themselves are considered acceptable?



That's part of the left's religion. They claim to be anti-religion, but they're not. They instead prove that most people, even ones as awful and d********g as they are, need something to believe in. For Christians, it's God. For Muslims, it's Allah. For l*****ts, it's GAIA, government, and environmentalism. K*****g unborn babies eliminates carbon footprints which is perceived by them to be good for GAIA.



Disarming the public is important to protect the lives of members of l*****t mobs bent on destruction and murder.



That's bipartisan. The swamp was threatened by Trump.



That's bipartisan as well. Ukraine is where the swamp launders their ill-gotten gains.



Criminals are the Democrats' brownshirts. They want to protect them.



The left are anything but anti-r****t. They're the worst r****ts in the world. For instance, look at the way the Democratic party views and treats b****s. It's almost identical to the way normal folks look at and treat their dogs. They're convinced b****s can't be held accountable for any crimes they commit because they're no better than animals and can't help it. Much like your dog chewing your shoes. They're convinced that b****s are so inferior to w****s that they need all sorts of special advantages, privileges and rights. That's the very definition of r****m.

L***Q??? You're not being very inclusive there, bud! By now they've co-opted the rest of the alphabet and half the punctuation marks!

The traditional nuclear family is the bedrock of all polite civilization. Tearing that down is essential to the fundamental t***sformation of the society.



Absolutely true. If something will help their cause, that in itself makes it ethical in their warped minds.

That's true. Very good!



That can't be true and I'll explain why. That is an impeachable offense. You see, Nancy Pelosi's favorite hobby is impeaching Trump. She loves it so much that after three years of using every investigative agency in the country, including the FBI and CIA, and being unable to find any valid reason to impeach, she had to make some up. If Trump had been doing what you say, he'd have been impeached for it.



You've previously stated that President Trump is an incompetent, corrupt buffoon. Why do you think the country would have benefited if an incompetent, corrupt buffoon paid more attention to running it? Please explain.



You can't agree with me over something I never said. I don't think millionaires and billionaires should pay more. I think the rest of us should pay as little (percentage wise) as they do.

It's all part of the fundamental t***sformation of America, copied from the t***sformation of Venezuela from a thriving, prosperous capitalist society to a socialist hellhole. Remember, all of Obama's acolytes were worshippers of Hugo Chavez. They are now part of the current administration.

I wonder what part of Obama's 3rd term is the favorite feature among the average American Democrat l*****t?

Is it $5.00/gal gas?
Is it runaway food prices?
Is it rampant violent crime?
Is it endless 'supply chain' problems?
Is it 600,000+ c***d deaths under the current administration?
Is it projected nationwide power outages?
Is it i*****l a***ns being flown/bussed all over the country in the dead of night?
Is it government funds paying to house those i******s in hotels while American vets live under bridges?
My guess is it's none of those. I'll bet the absolute favorite part for our l*****ts is starving babies. Think of it as post-birth a******n. Except the mothers don't want it, but f*ck them. L*****ts LOVE k*****g helpless babies.

From the article you linked: In fall 2020, Forbes said the ex-president was now the 352nd richest person in America — down from 275 the year before, reflecting a drop in net worth from $3.1 billion to $2.5 billion.

If he'd been running his businesses instead of the country, he'd have increased his wealth. He sacrificed a lot ($600M in just his last year) in order to repair some of the damage done by Obama/Biden.

Since he never released his taxes, I'm assuming that $750 payment is a guess on somebody's part. But even if it's true, he would have been taking advantage of the tax loopholes put in place by both parties in congress to benefit their donors. You know, like Jeff Bezos of Amazon and WaPo, who paid no income tax in 2007 and 2011 despite being a multi-billionaire.
https://www.businessinsider.com/jeff-bezos-did-not-pay-income-taxes-2-years-report-2021-6