publican wrote:
Sorry, Navigator, I may have been a little too harsh. Please accept my apologies. But what do you call your statement about "indoctrination in Marxism, one-world, many g****rs, c*****e c****e h**x-ism, oppressor/oppressed f*****m, anti-private ownership, government control of children, anti-white r****m and other fallacious absurdities too numerous to mention"? In the academic world lots of subjects you might find to be personally repellent get studied. How else do you think some kind of t***h is arrived at? Study of a subject is not the same as indoctrination.
Sorry, Navigator, I may have been a little too har... (
show quote)
Apologies accepted, thank you. I don't find any of those topics repellent, merely incorrect. What we have in academia is not simply study of such subjects, it is strong advocacy of those subjects with a virtual lack of any serious exploration of opposing viewpoints combined with official condemnation of those who express a differing philosophy. After 50 some odd years of that poisonous climate its no wonder those who only attended welding or electrician school have a much more realistic view of the world than university professors.