Many good parallels, tbut!

F*****m
By Sheldon Richman
As an economic system, f*****m is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), f*****m was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially d******e persecution of the bourgeoisie. F*****m substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, f*****m sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, f*****m did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, f*****m left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, f*****m controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, f*****m denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.

F*****m is to be distinguished from interventionism, or the mixed economy. Interventionism seeks to guide the market process, not eliminate it, as f*****m did. Minimum-wage and antitrust laws, though they regulate the free market, are a far cry from multiyear plans from the Ministry of Economics.

Under f*****m, the state, through official cartels, controlled all aspects of manufacturing, commerce, finance, and agriculture. Planning boards set product lines, production levels, prices, wages, working conditions, and the size of firms. Licensing was ubiquitous; no economic activity could be undertaken without government permission. Levels of consumption were dictated by the state, and “excess” incomes had to be surrendered as taxes or “loans.” The consequent burdening of manufacturers gave advantages to foreign firms wishing to export. But since government policy aimed at autarky, or national self-sufficiency, protectionism was necessary: imports were barred or strictly controlled, leaving foreign conquest as the only avenue for access to resources unavailable domestically. F*****m was thus incompatible with peace and the international division of labor—hallmarks of liberalism.

F*****m embodied corporatism, in which political representation was based on trade and industry rather than on geography. In this, f*****m revealed its roots in syndicalism, a form of socialism originating on the left. The government cartelized firms of the same industry, with representatives of labor and management serving on myriad local, regional, and national boards—subject always to the final authority of the dictator’s economic plan. Corporatism was intended to avert unsettling divisions within the nation, such as lockouts and union strikes. The price of such forced “harmony” was the loss of the ability to bargain and move about freely.

To maintain high employment and minimize popular discontent, f*****t governments also undertook massive public-works projects financed by steep taxes, borrowing, and fiat money creation. While many of these projects were domestic—roads, buildings, stadiums—the largest project of all was militarism, with huge armies and arms production.

The f*****t leaders’ antagonism to c*******m has been misinterpreted as an affinity for capitalism. In fact, f*****ts’ antic*******m was motivated by a belief that in the collectivist milieu of early-twentieth-century Europe, c*******m was its closest rival for people’s allegiance. As with c*******m, under f*****m, every citizen was regarded as an employee and tenant of the totalitarian, party-dominated state. Consequently, it was the state’s prerogative to use force, or the threat of it, to suppress even peaceful opposition.

If a formal architect of f*****m can be identified, it is Benito Mussolini, the onetime Marxist editor who, caught up in nationalist fervor, broke with the left as World War I approached and became Italy’s leader in 1922. Mussolini distinguished f*****m from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

The citizen in the F*****t State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The F*****t State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. (p. 280)

Before his foray into imperialism in 1935, Mussolini was often praised by prominent Americans and Britons, including Winston Churchill, for his economic program.

Similarly, Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (N**i) Party adapted f*****m to Germany beginning in 1933, said:

The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property. (Barkai 1990, pp. 26–27)

Both nations exhibited elaborate planning schemes for their economies in order to carry out the state’s objectives. Mussolini’s corporate state “consider[ed] private initiative in production the most effective instrument to protect national interests” (Basch 1937, p. 97). But the meaning of “initiative” differed significantly from its meaning in a market economy. Labor and management were organized into twenty-two industry and trade “corporations,” each with F*****t Party members as senior participants. The corporations were consolidated into a National Council of Corporations; however, the real decisions were made by state agencies such as the Instituto per la Ricosstruzione Industriale, which held shares in industrial, agricultural, and real estate enterprises, and the Instituto Mobiliare, which controlled the nation’s credit.

Hitler’s regime eliminated small corporations and made membership in cartels mandatory.1 The Reich Economic Chamber was at the top of a complicated bureaucracy comprising nearly two hundred organizations organized along industry, commercial, and craft lines, as well as several national councils. The Labor Front, an extension of the N**i Party, directed all labor matters, including wages and assignment of workers to particular jobs. Labor conscription was inaugurated in 1938. Two years earlier, Hitler had imposed a four-year plan to shift the nation’s economy to a war footing. In Europe during this era, Spain, Portugal, and Greece also instituted f*****t economies.

In the United States, beginning in 1933, the constellation of government interventions known as the New Deal had features suggestive of the corporate state. The National Industrial Recovery Act created code authorities and codes of practice that governed all aspects of manufacturing and commerce. The National Labor Relations Act made the federal government the final arbiter in labor issues. The Agricultural Adjustment Act introduced central planning to farming. The object was to reduce competition and output in order to keep prices and incomes of particular groups from falling during the Great Depression.

It is a matter of controversy whether President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal was directly influenced by f*****t economic policies. Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.” Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator.

About the Author
Sheldon Richman is the editor of The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty at the Foundation for Economic Education in Irvingtonon-Hudson, N.Y.
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/F*****m.html

"Look not upon me because I am black" (songs of Solomon: 1:6) I don't identify with pigmentation or color or race. My status is Nationality and that nationality is Moorish American Moslem. What's you are reading is the expression of pain, frustration and injustice. Not h**e, h**e is destructive to the spirit. Expression of gross injustice and pain. If there's was h**e in me towards white people or white females. I wouldn't had committed a violence act in the public against them. Collin Ferguson the long Island Railroad Shooter behavior wasn't h**e, it was expression of pain and his respond to that pain inflicted upon him. I'm wiser then him, i know the power of the pen, and words. I endured great pain and long suffering for many years continuously. Nothing is stopping me from entering the subway system and blowing white females up, or people. For their evil deeds and atrocities. I reiterate my statement above (wiser then Mr. Ferguson). I comprehend the law of cause and effect. And have a greater understanding of the spiritual world, and the forces therein. I personally met and know the Divine one. To many this sounds bizarre. But its a reality, that only the spiritual wise and learn one knows. H**e isn't my essential beings. It's divine love. Race isn't a factor, as my beautiful Russian soul mate stated; "You are fighting evil my love". That's a wise analysis, from Russia to America, from a white female to a Moslem of Moorish American Nationality. I write and express my pain, inner feelings and frustration. Others express their pain, feelings and frustration with violence and a gun or bomb. My motto is you don't have to blow them up. Just blow their braincells with T***H or a word. My opponents committed h**e and with impunity. You fight h**e with love, or divine love. I want to share a experience of h**e, White female bisexual Harlot invited me into a lesbian bar, and one African-American lesbian said: "what is he here for". Expression of h**e, feminist or discrimination? Karzar Z*****t Jew used a false charge in his sexual interest in me. To get me to submit to him sexually. With held me in state prison past my time. Not h**e profound pain and injustice. "African Americans', white females told me to my face, that they wanted me dead. Because of my refusal to submit to homosexuality. Not h**e, pain, injustice and frustration. NYC Probation Officer boldly invited me to his phallic. Did I k**l him, do he deserves death? Females lied and lied to City Hall, and had NYPD come to me on their lie. I don't h**e them. I know that they h**e me, I just don't express interest in them or trust anyone of them. I see all of them as the same. No different. You or anyone else can't place h**e at my door, because of my bold expression of pain. I was taught to express your inner feelings and what's going on. Don't keep it inside, because it will damage you. So I write to cope with my pain. I can commit suicide to express it, but I have someone special in my life. Someone's who love me, from a distance. And she's a divine gift and white Russian. My therapist is Jewish and she's don't see h**e in me. She praise me and acknowledged what happened and said "You have been traumatized". Not h**e, never that's, dislike and strong opposition to evil, that's all. If I commit a act of violence like cut the head of white or black females off, than you can place h**e at my door. But consider and take into count the cause of that violence act. You have to see both sides of the coin. That's takes intelligence and education

I celebrated my birthday yesterday, another year of God's blessing, and Satan injustice. I received a letter from the Social Security Administration (SSA), with regards to my communication and evidences inquiry. 2000 the "African-American" homosexual community and Z*****t terminated my Social Security federal benefits. Because I was an active member of the Nation's of Islam. To all who express opposition to Islam and the Minister call for separation. I support the Nation of Islam and am publicly saying it on record. America is at the door of divine judgment. She's heading towards a modern day (white female) Sodom and Gomorrah Nation and sexual culture of white Harlots rules and feminist. Very sad state of affairs. Now let's look at who is behind this sad state of social, and morals dysfunctional state. Z*****t or Karzar Jews. Everyone can challenge the t***h or oppose it, unsuccessfully. Every statement herein I have evidences to support it, and substantiate it has T***H not a lie or fraud. In Islam the homosexual solicitation and sexual interest door is shut. "African-American", Latinos American, and Z*****t Karzar Jews can't approach their sexual interest target. That's was the reality behind the termination of my Federal benefits. The homosexual community and white females was upset with my religion and faith. So they retaliated by cutting off my funds. This act is known in law as financial terrorism. So don't be so quick to step out there's against the Nation's of Islam and Islam in general. As the great lyrics of a beautiful white female stated; GOD is watching from a distance. Theses are not just words, they are spiritual realities and actual facts. I have struggled with the social security administration and the homosexual community for decades. In 2013, i attempted to take my life, by h*****g myself. As a result of the social security administration, "African-American" homosexual community and Z*****t Karzar Jews, Negro Wars females and white Harlots. The homicidal and suicidal thoughts have resurface, after reading the mail from the Social Security Administration. A beautiful white female paralegal assisted me in writing to the social security administration on their false claim of a debt. She saw the financial injustice and harassment, and wanted to help. She's was a blessing and Angel. The Minister isn't anti-Semitic or h**er of the Jews. He's is effectively addressing their atrocities and injustice inflicted on a nation and people. My public revelation is a case for separation or civil war or the full wrath of Allah's (God) to visit America. We as a nation and humanity is at the door of divine judgment. Those b****s who oppose separation are s***es on the democrats plantation, and the Synagogue of Satan sex tools. Yes its true and I got the evidences to support the Minister. I'm waiting to hear his saviour day address of 2019. The case for separation. 2018 he's challenged the Jewish community to present their evidence to prove him wrong. They haven't come forward, he'd called them out to morally battle and they have not taken the call or accepted it. Now ask yourself why haven't they embrace the t***h challenge? I humbly and respectfully refers all to the Bible and Jesus Christ words concerning those who say they are Jews and are not (Rev. 2:9/3:9). They use the money system to solitcate sexual relations and submission to homosexuality. They use white females sexually to control and get some b****s to deny God. I had a unknown white female say to me at a nation of islam public address. "Me or that's", that's meaning the Nation's of Islam. Its is this evil act of one white female, that cause my strong opposition to same sex marriage and homosexuality opposition. Theses boys aren't human, they are beasts in human form. I support separation from evil beings and the expression of white females h**e and oppression and males r****m. I invite all to listen to the public social media statement of Hillary and Obama on the Moors and America. We have come to the words of Christ. You shall know the t***h, and it shall set you free

who pays depends on which system is employed … maybe this will help clarify some...


Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics

Right-wing parties include conservatives, Christian democrats, classical liberals, nationalists and on the far-right; r****ts and f*****ts. ... Eatwell argues that the extreme right' has four traits: "1) anti-democracy; 2) nationalism; 3) r****m; and 4) the strong state".
‎List of right-wing political parties · ‎Category:Right-wing politics · ‎Clericalism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-right_politics


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right