RascalRiley wrote:
Hello JoyV.
You are obviously much more qualified to speak on the Constitution then top law school professors and judges.
Donny needs you on his legal team but you will have to work for free, pay for all of the court costs you incurre on his behalf and personally lawyer up for that privilege.
T***h, the f**e e*****rs were dirty trickster Roger Stone’s invention.
Show me what top constitutional lawyer says certification of e*****rs by the state executive branch o*******ws certification by the state legislative branch. Not only are the slate of e*****rs certified by the legislative branch not "f**e" e*****rs, those illegally certified by the executive branch are not f**e e*****rs either so long as the slates of e*****rs were chosen by their party in the way the designated in their state. Usually at the party convention or caucus. Each party chooses a slate of e*****rs. The one selected in the manner chosen by the state legislatures under their authority, are the ones authorized to v**e in December. This is clearly spelled out in our federal constitution, and in state constitutions as well.
Usually, but not always, the slate chosen is of the party the candidate winning the popular v**e belongs to. When the outcome of the popular v**e is not clear, the state legislature either calls for another e******n in their state, or makes a decision on which slate to choose. In my state of Arizona it was the latter our legislature chose. The Secretary of State, nor anyone appointed by the SoS, had no authority to certify e*****rs. Neither does the governor or any other executive branch official whether elected or appointed. Nor does the SoS have the authority to write and enact laws which don't go through the legislature to be v**ed on
, including e******n laws.
Our then SoS, Katie Hobbs, wrote e******n laws a few months before the e******n making it mandatory to use D******n v****g machines, or machines with the same parameters and internet access, to count all but 2% of the b****ts. This despite that many rural counties, including Cochise County where I am was a registered v**er, have few or no such machines [NO D******N MACHINES] and heavily rely on hand counting as the citizens of the county v**ed on several e******ns ago. The SoS stated that the machines were more accurate than hand counting since they are certified by a test of a sample of b****ts run through the machines then checked by hand counting to verify accuracy. If the machine count matches the hand count, it is certified accurate. The hand count is the standard the machines must meet
My county usually hand counts 75% of the b****ts. In 2022 there was such a high turnout that there were not enough tabulators to count the usual 25%. Nor does my county have ANY D******n machines. So the supervisors v**ed to count 90% by hand. Then 3 people not registered to v**e in our county, in fact 2 were not registered to v**e anywhere and the third was registered in a different state, made a complaint to a judge in Pima county about our county hand counting more than 2% of the b****ts. The judge, from Pima county, placed an injunction to stop our county from counting b****ts. This judge had no jurisdiction to do so, so our supervisors didn't comply. Within a quarter of an hour, our SoS, Katie Hobbs, who was running for governor, threatened to have the supervisors jailed if they counted one more b****t. She demanded the count be certified as is, disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of v**ers. One hour had gone by since the polls closed when the injunction came down and only 75,000 b****ts had been counted. I was a volunteer poll worker so know this first hand. The supervisors made an emergency appeal to lift the injunction and let the v**er's b****ts be counted, whether by hand or machine. The court refused to see the case as an emergency and put the appeal on the docket to be seen the earliest in a few weeks, but possibly a few months. Our supervisors held out until arrest warrants were issued under the order of Hobbs. They certified the v**e. My v**e was one of the ones never counted.
Maricopa County had even a greater number of irregularities.
Trump is saying he won the e******n. As for the general e******n, there has been a great deal of evidence of massive fraud in multiple states. But even if fraud is proven and the courts agree, that doesn't prove he won the e******n. Instead it means we don't know who won. And as for the e*****rs v**es, Pence CHOSE to read the v**es of the e*****rs in several states who were NOT legally certified instead of the ones certified by the state legislatures. He did this while making a big todo over how he had no authority to choose who won the e******n. Yet he CHOSE which v**es to read despite that there were well over a hundred challenges by members of congress both in the House and Senate.
So constitutionalists like myself communicated to our representatives that we expected them to abide by our constitution during the joint session on J****** 6th. The violence, such as breaking windows, gave them the excuse to ignore our constitution and read the unconstitutional v**es.
Did Trump win? We will never know because the constitutional v**es were destroyed.