That's a good question. Why is Prince Andrew not being subpoenaed and why is he hiding under the queens skirt? Why is Billy bob Clinton not being subpoenaed for all of his sexual escapades with underage girls and many assaults on women? Why is Al Gore not being charged with assault for fondling his masseuse's a$$ and bust? Why is Slo joe not before a congressional hearing to hear about his fingering Tara Reade znd groping young prepubescent girls? Why did that s**t puppy Andrew Cuomo get a free ride on his many sexual assaults on women? What about John Roberts and his escapades to Epstein Island? What about Hitlery Rotten Clinton's many trips to p*******e island? Everyone knows she prefers women. Just ask Huma Abedeen.

My threads 'of no consequence' get more comments and views. Curious. Why are there zero comments and little views on that thread which opens a huge opportunity to crucify me? But that is not as shocking, perhaps, as no comments on the bent of the article, which favors the Anti-V**xers choice and gives it credence. It is perfect ammunition to successfully fight any C***d mandates for v******tions, and masks. Yet not a soul on the Right, which promotes and defends such behavior as violating health guidelines for a political advantage, has responded. Biden's government extra-legal and oppressive measures over this v***s would face its biggest challenge and probably be defeated...but zero comments. Very strange.

I have my conjectures as to why, yet what good are they? No, I ask you why this apparent foolish reticence to ignore such a golden opportunity happened. Might just be as simple as not giving the Right a chance to call me h**er. Pretty tough when I presented something favorable to their political cause. Step back, folks, nothing happened here.

https://thepatriotjournal.com/pelosi-surge-3-democrats/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=pjnewsletter

Democrats are entering 2022 on a very bad foot. Generic polls show Republicans are beating Democrat candidates by over 10 points. Changes to district maps also mean incumbent Democrats will have a tough time defending their seats. This year, Democrats lost big in blue states, especially Virginia.

We all know why this is happening. Joe Biden and his cronies in Congress are d**gging down the party. Pelosi has a very slim majority in the House—with a difficult battle in the 2022 midterms. Now, it’s gotten even harder, as more Democrats flee Congress.

From Fox News:

A trio of Democrats in the House of Representatives – Reps. Stephanie Murphy of Florida, Lucille Roybal-Allard of California, and Albio Sires of New Jersey – last week said that they’ll retire at the end of next year rather than run in the 2022 midterm e******ns for another term in Congress.

The latest news brought to 23 the number of House Democrats who are retiring or bidding for another office rather than run for ree******n in 2022.

Three more Democrat representatives announced they will not be running for ree******n in 2022—meaning their seats will become toss-ups in the tough midterms. This brings the total number of Democrats leaving the House to twenty-three. Meaning, Nancy Pelosi is likely to lose her majority—and the Speakership.

The party of a sitting president always does poorly in midterms. But next year’s e******ns will be different than others. Americans are already sick and tired of Joe Biden. His approval is a dismal 36% in some polls. Many Americans blame him for the mountain of crises hitting our country.

Worse than that is how Democrats in Congress responded this year. They sat back and did very little to check Biden’s broken agenda. Even after he let Afghanistan fall to the Taliban, they did not investigate or question him. (If that had happened under Trump, they would have impeached him a third time.)

Democrats seemingly assumed they could save their bacon, if they got the “Build Back Better” socialist bill passed. But even that failed, meaning Democrats have nothing to show for 2021. That’s the real reason 23 and counting Democrats are fleeing the House.

How many more will bow out, before the e******n? And many who stick around will have a very hard ree******n bid (especially those in swing and conservative districts).

Please—Stop the C**p Porn
Military officers should quit all their c**p porn talk—either to remove a president they don’t like, or to project their own reckless, i**********nary behavior onto their political opponents.
By Victor Davis Hanson

December 22, 2021
In a recent Washington Post op-ed, three retired generals, Paul Eaton, Antonio Taguba, and Steven Anderson warn of a supposedly impending c**p should Donald Trump be elected in 2024.

The column seemed strangely timed to coincide with a storm of recent Democratic talking points that a reelected Trump, or even a Republican sweep of the 2022 midterms, would spell a virtual end of democracy.

Ironies abound.

From E******n Day in 2020 to Inauguration Day 2021, we were told by the Left that democracy was resilient and rightly rid the nation of Trump.

The hard Left, for one of the rare times in U.S. history, was now in complete control of both houses of Congress and the presidency.

Spiking inflation, supply-chain shortages, near record gas prices, open borders, the flight from Afghanistan, multi-trillion-dollar deficits, and polarizing racial rhetoric all followed.

In response to these events, Joe Biden’s popularity utterly collapsed. His own cognitive challenges multiplied the unpopularity of his failed policies.

In reaction, the Left again piv**ed. It suddenly announced that should it lose congressional power in 2022 or the presidency in 2024, democracy was all but doomed.

Apparently, what changed Democrats’ views was that democracy was working all too well in expressing widespread public disgust . . . with the Left.

Even more ironies followed.

The three retired generals shrilly write of the dangers of i**********n and c**ps. Yet the FBI found no such i**********n or conspiracy in the buffoonish r**t on J****** 6.

Only serial media misinformation and lies turned a ragtag band of misfits into an existential threat to the nation.

Almost every media talking point turned out to be untrue. No C*****l p****e officer died at the hands of the mob. (Early reports that Officer Brian Sicknick had been beaten into a coma by protesters were incorrect. The Washington, D.C., medical examiner ruled Sicknick died the next day of a stroke.) The media all but ignored the lethal police shooting of a military veteran and unarmed petite female trespasser, for the apparent crime of trying to enter Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office through a broken window. There were no gun-toting “i**********nists” arrested inside the Capitol.

Another irony. The three retired generals say nothing about the Russia collusion h**x in which Obama Administration officials at the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the CIA helped to seed a f**e dossier—paid for by candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Ex-British intelligence operative Christopher Steele’s made-up opposition research was designed first to derail Trump’s campaign, then to disable his t***sition and finally sabotage his presidency. All that seems rather c**p-like.

In t***h, c**ps were regularly discussed during the last four years—but only in the context of a by-any-means-necessary way of deposing Donald Trump extralegally before his term ran out.

In August 2020, two retired officers John Nagl and Paul Yingling, urged Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley to remove Trump from office if Milley felt it necessary after a contested e******n.

Both officers knew that the law forbids Milley from interfering in the chain of command, given his mere advisory role to the president.

Yet Milley himself had dangerously violated his purview at least twice. He once ordered subordinate officers to report to him first should Donald Trump consider any nuclear action against China. And Milley additionally called his Chinese c*******t counterpart to warn him that he would tip the Chinese off about any preemptive American strike on China.

Earlier, Rosa Brooks, a former Obama Pentagon legal official, wrote a now infamous essay in Foreign Policy, listing the choices available in removing Donald Trump from his less than two-week-old presidency. Among the possible means, she listed a potential military c**p.

Article 88 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice forbids even retired military officers publicly attacking or disparaging their current commander-in-chief. Yet several retired generals and admirals serially did just that during the last administration, smearing their president in every imaginable way, from being a Mussolini-like f*****t to a veritable N**i.

The officers published in the Washington Post are clueless as to why the military is now suffering its most dismal public approval ratings of the modern era—with only 45 percent of the public registering trust and confidence in their armed forces.

The nation is clearly not blaming the courageous soldiers in the enlisted ranks. But it has had enough of the Pentagon’s loud top brass who seem more interested in stirring up political divisions at home than adopting winning strategies in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, or deterring China and Russia.

The officer corps too often broadcasts its woke credentials, calibrated for career advancement. Top-ranking officers upon retirement too predictably head for corporate defense contractor boards and procurement lobbying firms.

To restore the military’s reputation, officers should eschew politics to focus on restoring strategic deterrence and military readiness. They should keep clear of d******e domestic issues. They should stop virtue signaling to the media and influential members of Congress.

But most importantly, officers should quit all their c**p porn talk—either to remove a president they don’t like, or to project their own reckless, i**********nary behavior onto their political opponents.