Posts for: Rinnai
Nov 14, 2016 09:45:45 #
(Main)
George Soros and his fellow liberal mega-donors are currently readying the post-Hillary Clinton Democratic party to oppose President-Elect Donald Trump.
Soros and other key members of the so-called “Democracy Alliance” met in Washington, DC at the Mandarin Oriental hotel on Sunday for the first day of the group’s three-day investment conference.
The Democracy Alliance has funneled upwards of $500 million toward liberal activist groups and candidates since Soros co-founded the group in 2005.
DA requires all members — which in 2016 includes more than 100 “finance titans” — to donate at least $200,000 a year to approved activist groups.
Soros and other key members of the so-called “Democracy Alliance” met in Washington, DC at the Mandarin Oriental hotel on Sunday for the first day of the group’s three-day investment conference.
The Democracy Alliance has funneled upwards of $500 million toward liberal activist groups and candidates since Soros co-founded the group in 2005.
DA requires all members — which in 2016 includes more than 100 “finance titans” — to donate at least $200,000 a year to approved activist groups.
Nov 13, 2016 10:19:10 #
(Main)
It was r****d by the Clintons and Soros. With their created chaos they make Trump appear as a impossibly r****t and brutal individual who will turn the US into a dictatorship that is easily slotted into a larger, international technocracy. In fact, the danger of this of social manipulation definitely comes from Soros and the Clintons – and the larger shadow state itself. Trump on the other hand is the target.
Nov 13, 2016 10:10:51 #
(Main)
The idea behind this manipulation is be to create an administration that is seen by people as representing a victory over globalism, but one that is then gradually destroyed and ultimately removed. People would thus realize that there is no alternative to the g*******t paradigm they have struggled against. The Trump administration may continue to coalesce and take effect, but it will be accompanied by significant agitation, turmoil and economic and even military violence.
Trump may well be dedicated to his cause of “Making America Great Again,” but the forces arrayed against him are formidable and dedicated to turning his victory into a message of defeat. This would be a classic form of the kind of “directed history” that we often analyze. It is always married to a dominant social theme – a meme – developed as elite propaganda and purveyed by the press.
Conclusion: In this case the meme informs us that Trump is an impossibly r****t and brutal individual who will turn the US into a dictatorship that is easily slotted into a larger, international technocracy. In fact, the danger of this sort of social manipulation comes from Soros and the Clintons – and the larger shadow state itself. Trump on the other hand is the target.
Trump may well be dedicated to his cause of “Making America Great Again,” but the forces arrayed against him are formidable and dedicated to turning his victory into a message of defeat. This would be a classic form of the kind of “directed history” that we often analyze. It is always married to a dominant social theme – a meme – developed as elite propaganda and purveyed by the press.
Conclusion: In this case the meme informs us that Trump is an impossibly r****t and brutal individual who will turn the US into a dictatorship that is easily slotted into a larger, international technocracy. In fact, the danger of this sort of social manipulation comes from Soros and the Clintons – and the larger shadow state itself. Trump on the other hand is the target.
Nov 2, 2016 08:00:14 #
(Main)
“I think we should get a credible leak out that we’re announcing on the 20th. As a decoy,” campaign manager Robby Mook told Clinton adviser John Podesta in a March 12, 2015, email 10 days after the New York Times story broke. The email was made public Monday by Wikileaks.
Completing this poll entitles you to Daily Caller news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Podesta didn’t respond to the email thread and Clinton’s campaign didn’t officially announce her candidacy until April 12, 2015.
Clinton’s use of private email addresses and a homebrew server located in her New York mansion to conduct official Department of State business and communicate classified information continues to plague her candidacy, with less than one week before the p**********l e******n.
Completing this poll entitles you to Daily Caller news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Podesta didn’t respond to the email thread and Clinton’s campaign didn’t officially announce her candidacy until April 12, 2015.
Clinton’s use of private email addresses and a homebrew server located in her New York mansion to conduct official Department of State business and communicate classified information continues to plague her candidacy, with less than one week before the p**********l e******n.
Nov 2, 2016 07:55:42 #
(Main)
“Putin At Valdai Club: ‘Does Anyone Seriously Imagine That Russia Can Somehow Influence The American People’s Choice?'” MEMRI, November 1, 2016:
Russian President Vladimir Putin took part in the final session of the Valdai International Discussion Club’s 13th annual meeting in a session lasting three-and-a-half hours. This year’s theme was: “The Future in Progress: Shaping the World of Tomorrow.” The final session was also attended by former president of Finland Tarja Halonen, former president of Austria Heinz Fischer, and former president of South Africa Thabo Mbeki. In his speech, Putin discussed the new world order. He stated that countries that viewed themselves “as victors” in the Cold War opted to reshape the global political and economic order to fit their own interests. “In their euphoria, they essentially abandoned substantive and equal dialogue with other actors in international life,” Putin said. He then added: “If the powers that be today find some standard or norm to their advantage, they force everyone else to comply.”
Discussing NATO, Putin described the organization, established during the Cold War, as “clearly out of date.” He accused NATO of churning out “imaginary and mythical threats such as the Russian military threat.” According to Putin, to talk about the “Russian military threat” is a “profitable business that can be used to pump new money into defense budgets at home, get allies to bend to a single superpower’s interests, expand NATO and bring its infrastructure, military units and arms closer to our borders.”
Concerning U.S.-Russia relations, Putin described as “hysteria” the U.S. accusations that Russia is meddling in the American p**********l e******ns. Putin said: “You would think that the e******n debates would concentrate on these and other unresolved problems, but the elite has nothing with which to reassure society, it seems, and therefore attempt to distract public attention by pointing instead to supposed Russian hackers, spies, agents of influence and so forth.” He then added: “I have to ask myself and ask you too: Does anyone seriously imagine that Russia can somehow influence the American people’s choice? America is not some kind of ‘banana republic’, after all, but is a great power. Do correct me if I am wrong.”
During the Q&As, Putin also discussed the U.S. e******ns, saying that the media have created the view that Russia favors Republican candidate Donald Trump. “I think that this idea, inserted into the public consciousness in the middle of the U.S. p**********l campaign, pursues the sole aim of supporting those defending the interests of Ms. Clinton, the Democratic Party candidate, in her fight against… Trump,” Putin stated. He then added: “How is this done? First, they create an enemy in the form of Russia, and then they say that Trump is our preferred candidate. This is complete nonsense and totally absurd. It’s only a tactic in the domestic political struggle, a way of manipulating public opinion before the e******ns take place.”
With regard to nuclear weapons, Putin said that nuclear weapons are “a deterrent and a factor of ensuring peace and security worldwide.” He stated it is impossible to consider nuclear weapons as a factor in any potential aggression. “It would probably mean the end of our civilization,” he added. However, Putin stated that Russia and the U.S. escalated the arms race in this area, since the U.S. withdrew from the ABM treaty in 2002.
Russian President Vladimir Putin took part in the final session of the Valdai International Discussion Club’s 13th annual meeting in a session lasting three-and-a-half hours. This year’s theme was: “The Future in Progress: Shaping the World of Tomorrow.” The final session was also attended by former president of Finland Tarja Halonen, former president of Austria Heinz Fischer, and former president of South Africa Thabo Mbeki. In his speech, Putin discussed the new world order. He stated that countries that viewed themselves “as victors” in the Cold War opted to reshape the global political and economic order to fit their own interests. “In their euphoria, they essentially abandoned substantive and equal dialogue with other actors in international life,” Putin said. He then added: “If the powers that be today find some standard or norm to their advantage, they force everyone else to comply.”
Discussing NATO, Putin described the organization, established during the Cold War, as “clearly out of date.” He accused NATO of churning out “imaginary and mythical threats such as the Russian military threat.” According to Putin, to talk about the “Russian military threat” is a “profitable business that can be used to pump new money into defense budgets at home, get allies to bend to a single superpower’s interests, expand NATO and bring its infrastructure, military units and arms closer to our borders.”
Concerning U.S.-Russia relations, Putin described as “hysteria” the U.S. accusations that Russia is meddling in the American p**********l e******ns. Putin said: “You would think that the e******n debates would concentrate on these and other unresolved problems, but the elite has nothing with which to reassure society, it seems, and therefore attempt to distract public attention by pointing instead to supposed Russian hackers, spies, agents of influence and so forth.” He then added: “I have to ask myself and ask you too: Does anyone seriously imagine that Russia can somehow influence the American people’s choice? America is not some kind of ‘banana republic’, after all, but is a great power. Do correct me if I am wrong.”
During the Q&As, Putin also discussed the U.S. e******ns, saying that the media have created the view that Russia favors Republican candidate Donald Trump. “I think that this idea, inserted into the public consciousness in the middle of the U.S. p**********l campaign, pursues the sole aim of supporting those defending the interests of Ms. Clinton, the Democratic Party candidate, in her fight against… Trump,” Putin stated. He then added: “How is this done? First, they create an enemy in the form of Russia, and then they say that Trump is our preferred candidate. This is complete nonsense and totally absurd. It’s only a tactic in the domestic political struggle, a way of manipulating public opinion before the e******ns take place.”
With regard to nuclear weapons, Putin said that nuclear weapons are “a deterrent and a factor of ensuring peace and security worldwide.” He stated it is impossible to consider nuclear weapons as a factor in any potential aggression. “It would probably mean the end of our civilization,” he added. However, Putin stated that Russia and the U.S. escalated the arms race in this area, since the U.S. withdrew from the ABM treaty in 2002.
Nov 2, 2016 07:45:45 #
(Main)
Tin pot rule and corruption in the United States it's like Sodom and Gomorrah: there is not one honest man in the party of treason and treachery.
Podesta brags DOJ's Huma investigation spokesman Peter Kadzik âkept me out of jail."
Now that the FBI has obtained the needed warrant to start poring over the 650,000 or so emails uncovered in Anthony Weiner's notebook, among which thousands of emails sent from Huma Abedin using Hillary Clinton's personal server, moments ago the Us Justice Department decided to also finally join the probe, and as AP reported moments ago, it vowed to dedicate all needed resources to quickly review the over half a million emails in the Clinton case.
BREAKING: Justice Dept. says it'll dedicate all needed resources to quickly review emails in Clinton case.
The Associated Press (@AP) 4:16 PM , 31 Oct 2016
In the letter to Congress, the DOJ writes that it will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible, assistant attorney General Peter J. Kadzik writes in letters to House and Senate lawmakers.
#BREAKING Senior DOJ official sends letter to lawmakers responding to request for more information about email review.#8days
Just the Facts (@JTF_News) 4:36 PM 31 Oct 2016
So far so good, even if one wonders just how active the DOJ will be in a case that has shown an unprecedented schism between the politically influenced Department of Justice and the FBI.
And yet, something felt odd about this.
Kadzik, where have we heard that name?
Oh yes. Recall our post from last week, Clinton Campaign Chair Had Dinner With Top DOJ Official One Day After Hillary's B******i Hearing in which we reported that John Podesta had dinner with one of the highest ranked DOJ officials the very day after Hillary Clinton's B******i testimony?
It was Peter Kadzik.In other words, the best friend of John Podesta, Clinton's Campaign char, at the DOJ will be in charge of a probe that could potentially sink Hillary Clinton.
The day after Hillary Clinton testified in front of the House Select Committee on B******i last October, John Podesta, Hillaryâs campaign chairman met for dinner with a small group of well-connected friends, including Peter Kadzik, who is currently a top official at the US Justice Department serving as Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs.
The post-B******i dinner was attended by Podesta, Kadzik, superlobbyist Vincent Roberti and other well-placed Beltway fixtures. The first mention of personal contact between Podesta and Kadzik in the Wikileaks dump is in an Oct. 23, 2015 email sent out by Vincent Roberti, a lobbyist who is close to Podesta and his superlobbyist brother, Tony Podesta. In it, Roberti refers to a dinner reservation at Posto, a Washington D.C. restaurant. The dinner was set for 7:30 that evening, just one day after Clinton gave 11 hours of testimony to the B******i Committee.
Podesta and Kadzik met several months later for dinner at Podesta's home, another email shows. Another email sent on May 5, 2015, Kadzik's son asked Podesta for a job on the Clinton campaign.
As the Daily Caller noted, the dinner arrangement is just the latest example of an apparent conflict of interest between the Clinton campaign and the federal agency charged with investigating the former secretary of stateâs email practices. As one former U.S. Attorney tells told the DC, the exchanges are another example of the Clinton campaign's âcozy relationshipâ with the Obama Justice Department.
The hacked emails confirm that Podesta and Kadzik were in frequent contact. In one email from January, Kadzik and Podesta, who were classmates at Georgetown Law School in the 1970s, discussed plans to celebrate Podestaâs birthday. And in another sent last May, Kadzik's son emailed Podesta asking for a job on the Clinton campaign.
The political appointees in the Obama administration, especially in the Department of Justice, appear to be very partisan in nature and I donât think had clean hands when it comes to the investigation of the private email server, says Matthew Whitaker, the executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, a government watchdog group.
It's the kind of thing the American people are frustrated about is that the politically powerful have insider access and have these kind of relationships that ultimately appear to always break to the benefit of Hillary Clinton,â he added, comparing the Podesta-Kadzik meetings to the revelation that Attorney General Loretta Lynch met in private with Bill Clinton at the airport in Phoenix days before the FBI and DOJ investigating Hillary Clinton.
Kadzik's role at the DOJ, where he started in 2013, is particularly notable Kadzik, as helped spearhead the effort to nominate Lynch, who was heavily criticized for her secret meeting with the former president.
It gets better because, if there is one person in the DOJ who is John Podesta's, and thus the Clinton Foundation's inside man, it is Peter Kadjik.
Kadzik represented Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky investigation. And in the waning days of the Bill Clinton administration, Kadzik lobbied Podesta on behalf of Marc Rich, the fugitive who Bill Clinton controversially pardoned on his last day in office. That history is cited by Podesta in another email hacked from his Gmail account. In a Sept. 2008 email, which the Washington Free Beacon f**gged last week, Podesta emailed an Obama campaign official to recommend Kadzik for a supportive role in the campaign. Podesta, who would later head up the Obama White House t***sition effort, wrote that Kadzik was a fantastic lawyer who kept me out of jail."
Podesta brags DOJ's Huma investigation spokesman Peter Kadzik âkept me out of jail."
Now that the FBI has obtained the needed warrant to start poring over the 650,000 or so emails uncovered in Anthony Weiner's notebook, among which thousands of emails sent from Huma Abedin using Hillary Clinton's personal server, moments ago the Us Justice Department decided to also finally join the probe, and as AP reported moments ago, it vowed to dedicate all needed resources to quickly review the over half a million emails in the Clinton case.
BREAKING: Justice Dept. says it'll dedicate all needed resources to quickly review emails in Clinton case.
The Associated Press (@AP) 4:16 PM , 31 Oct 2016
In the letter to Congress, the DOJ writes that it will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible, assistant attorney General Peter J. Kadzik writes in letters to House and Senate lawmakers.
#BREAKING Senior DOJ official sends letter to lawmakers responding to request for more information about email review.#8days
Just the Facts (@JTF_News) 4:36 PM 31 Oct 2016
So far so good, even if one wonders just how active the DOJ will be in a case that has shown an unprecedented schism between the politically influenced Department of Justice and the FBI.
And yet, something felt odd about this.
Kadzik, where have we heard that name?
Oh yes. Recall our post from last week, Clinton Campaign Chair Had Dinner With Top DOJ Official One Day After Hillary's B******i Hearing in which we reported that John Podesta had dinner with one of the highest ranked DOJ officials the very day after Hillary Clinton's B******i testimony?
It was Peter Kadzik.In other words, the best friend of John Podesta, Clinton's Campaign char, at the DOJ will be in charge of a probe that could potentially sink Hillary Clinton.
The day after Hillary Clinton testified in front of the House Select Committee on B******i last October, John Podesta, Hillaryâs campaign chairman met for dinner with a small group of well-connected friends, including Peter Kadzik, who is currently a top official at the US Justice Department serving as Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs.
The post-B******i dinner was attended by Podesta, Kadzik, superlobbyist Vincent Roberti and other well-placed Beltway fixtures. The first mention of personal contact between Podesta and Kadzik in the Wikileaks dump is in an Oct. 23, 2015 email sent out by Vincent Roberti, a lobbyist who is close to Podesta and his superlobbyist brother, Tony Podesta. In it, Roberti refers to a dinner reservation at Posto, a Washington D.C. restaurant. The dinner was set for 7:30 that evening, just one day after Clinton gave 11 hours of testimony to the B******i Committee.
Podesta and Kadzik met several months later for dinner at Podesta's home, another email shows. Another email sent on May 5, 2015, Kadzik's son asked Podesta for a job on the Clinton campaign.
As the Daily Caller noted, the dinner arrangement is just the latest example of an apparent conflict of interest between the Clinton campaign and the federal agency charged with investigating the former secretary of stateâs email practices. As one former U.S. Attorney tells told the DC, the exchanges are another example of the Clinton campaign's âcozy relationshipâ with the Obama Justice Department.
The hacked emails confirm that Podesta and Kadzik were in frequent contact. In one email from January, Kadzik and Podesta, who were classmates at Georgetown Law School in the 1970s, discussed plans to celebrate Podestaâs birthday. And in another sent last May, Kadzik's son emailed Podesta asking for a job on the Clinton campaign.
The political appointees in the Obama administration, especially in the Department of Justice, appear to be very partisan in nature and I donât think had clean hands when it comes to the investigation of the private email server, says Matthew Whitaker, the executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, a government watchdog group.
It's the kind of thing the American people are frustrated about is that the politically powerful have insider access and have these kind of relationships that ultimately appear to always break to the benefit of Hillary Clinton,â he added, comparing the Podesta-Kadzik meetings to the revelation that Attorney General Loretta Lynch met in private with Bill Clinton at the airport in Phoenix days before the FBI and DOJ investigating Hillary Clinton.
Kadzik's role at the DOJ, where he started in 2013, is particularly notable Kadzik, as helped spearhead the effort to nominate Lynch, who was heavily criticized for her secret meeting with the former president.
It gets better because, if there is one person in the DOJ who is John Podesta's, and thus the Clinton Foundation's inside man, it is Peter Kadjik.
Kadzik represented Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky investigation. And in the waning days of the Bill Clinton administration, Kadzik lobbied Podesta on behalf of Marc Rich, the fugitive who Bill Clinton controversially pardoned on his last day in office. That history is cited by Podesta in another email hacked from his Gmail account. In a Sept. 2008 email, which the Washington Free Beacon f**gged last week, Podesta emailed an Obama campaign official to recommend Kadzik for a supportive role in the campaign. Podesta, who would later head up the Obama White House t***sition effort, wrote that Kadzik was a fantastic lawyer who kept me out of jail."
Nov 2, 2016 07:20:42 #
(Main)
Where is L**T leadership? Where are Hillary's gay supporters? Why don't they call Hillary out for her support of sharia states? The hypocrisy is deadly.
She may claim pro choice and pro planned parenthood , but with all the money she takes from muslim countries she must be pro sharia also.
She may claim pro choice and pro planned parenthood , but with all the money she takes from muslim countries she must be pro sharia also.
Oct 22, 2016 09:19:54 #
(Main)
cold iron wrote:
GE is moving from Wisconsin. Keep your eye on Wauk... (show quote)
I can't believe anyone falls for her crap. Women think she is on their side...do they want sharia law? How do people think that raising the minimum wage is going to make a difference? It may for a very short period. Here in Japan the have robots all over the place, flipping burgers and taking orders. The employers love them, never complain, don't screw up, don't ask for days off or breaks. Most assembly plants are robotics as are packaging plants-there are few low paying jobs that humans do here.
Oct 22, 2016 09:00:16 #
(Main)
Absolute, utter corruption.
Watch the media ignore this, too ….
“WIKILEAKS: Hillary Took Algeria Off Terror Watch List After Donation to Clinton Foundation,” USA Politics, October 20, 2016:
A new Wikileaks document reveals Hillary took Algeria off the US terror watch list after they made a hefty donation to the Clinton Foundation’s Haiti relief project.
How is that legal?
The Clinton camp was discussing Joe Scarborough’s discussion on the Algerian donations to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton advisors defended the move in the email saying it’s “legal gray area.”
Watch the media ignore this, too ….
“WIKILEAKS: Hillary Took Algeria Off Terror Watch List After Donation to Clinton Foundation,” USA Politics, October 20, 2016:
A new Wikileaks document reveals Hillary took Algeria off the US terror watch list after they made a hefty donation to the Clinton Foundation’s Haiti relief project.
How is that legal?
The Clinton camp was discussing Joe Scarborough’s discussion on the Algerian donations to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton advisors defended the move in the email saying it’s “legal gray area.”
Hillary Clinton at the Dar al-Hekma college for women during a "town hall" meeting in the Red Sea port city of Jeddah in 2010. Abedin's mother, Dr. Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is second from right, standing next to Clinton.
Oct 22, 2016 08:50:18 #
(Main)
I predict the same emigration should Hillary Clinton get elected. Her promise to increase Muslim migrants from sharia nations by 550% dooms this nation.
You won’t like what comes after America. Where are you going to go? Japan is one good place to move! I have lived here for 15 years. One mosque has been built in Tokyo, and the protests have been so great , it may well be closed down.
Germany is facing a spike in migrant crime, including an epidemic of rapes and sexual assaults. Mass migration is also accelerating the Islamization of Germany. Many Germans appear to be losing hope about the future direction of their country.
“We refugees… do not want to live in the same country with you. You can, and I think you should, leave Germany. And please take Saxony and the Alternative for Germany (AfD) with you…. Why do you not go to another country? We are s**k of you!” — Aras Bacho an 18-year-old Syrian migrant, in Der Freitag, October 2016.
A real estate agent in a town near Lake Balaton, a popular tourist destination in western Hungary, said that 80% of the Germans relocating there cite the migration crisis as the main reason for their desire to leave Germany.
“I believe that Islam does not belong to Germany. I regard it as a foreign entity which has brought the West more problems than benefits. In my opinion, many followers of this religion are rude, demanding and despise Germany.” — A German citizen who emigrated from Germany, in an “Open Letter to the German Government.”
“I believe that immigration is producing major and irreversible changes in German society. I am angry that this is happening without the direct approval of German citizens. … I believe that it is a shame that in Germany Jews must again be afraid to be Jews.” — A German citizen who emigrated from Germany, in an “Open Letter to the German Government.”
“My husband sometimes says he has the feeling that we are now the largest minority with no lobby. For each group there is an institution, a location, a public interest, but for us, a heterosexual married couple with two children, not unemployed, neither handicapped nor Islamic, for people like us there is no longer any interest.” — “Anna,” in a letter to the Mayor of Munich about her decision to move her family out of the city because migrants were making her life there impossible.
A growing number of Germans are abandoning neighborhoods in which they have lived all their lives, and others are leaving Germany for good, as mass immigration t***sforms parts of the country beyond recognition.
Data from the German statistics agency, Destatis, shows that 138,000 Germans left Germany in 2015. More are expected to emigrate in 2016. In a story on brain drain titled, “German talent is leaving the country in droves,” Die Welt reported that more than 1.5 million Germans, many of them highly educated, left Germany during the past decade.
The statistics do not give a reason why Germans are emigrating, but anecdotal evidence indicates that many are waking up to the true cost — financial, social and cultural — of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to allow more than one million mostly Muslim migrants to enter the country in 2015. At least 300,000 more migrants are expected to arrive in Germany in 2016, according to Frank-Jürgen Weise, the head of the country’s migration office, BAMF.
Mass migration has — among many other problems — contributed to a growing sense of insecurity in Germany, which is facing a spike in migrant crime, including an epidemic of rapes and sexual assaults. Mass migration is also accelerating the Islamization of Germany. Many Germans appear to be losing hope about the future direction of their country.
At the height of the migrant crisis in October 2015, some 800 citizens gathered at a town hall meeting in Kassel/Lohfelden to protest a unilateral decision by the local government to set up migrant shelters in the city. The President of Kassel, Walter Lübcke, responded by telling those who disagree with the government’s open-door immigration policy that they are “free to leave Germany at any time.”
This attitude was echoed in an audacious essay published in October 2016 by the newspaper Der Freitag, (also published by Huffington Post Deutschland, which subsequently deleted the post). In the article, an 18-year-old Syrian migrant named Aras Bacho called on Germans who are angry about the migrant crisis to leave Germany. He wrote:
“We refugees… are fed up with the angry citizens (Wutbürger). They insult and agitate like crazy…. There are always these incitements by unemployed r****ts (Wutbürgern), who spend all their time on the Internet and wait until an article about refugees appears on the Internet. Then it starts with shameless comments….
“Hello, you unemployed angry citizens (Wutbürger) on the Internet. How educated are you? How long will you continue to distort the t***h? Do you not know that you are spreading lies every day? What would you have done if you were in their shoes? Well, you would have run away!
“We refugees… do not want to live in the same country with you. You can, and I think you should, leave Germany. And please take Saxony and the Alternative for Germany (AfD) with you.
“Germany does not fit you, why do you live here? Why do you not go to another country? If this is your country, dear angry citizens (Wutbürger), then behave normal. Otherwise you can simply flee from Germany and look for a new home. Go to America to Donald Trump, he will love you very much. We are s**k of you!”
In May 2016, the newsmagazine, Focus, reported that Germans have been moving to Hungary. A real estate agent in a town near Lake Balaton, a popular tourist destination in western Hungary, said that 80% of the Germans relocating there cite the migration crisis as the main reason for their desire to leave Germany.
An anonymous German citizen who emigrated from Germany recently wrote an “Open Letter to the German Government.” The document, which was published on the website Politically Incorrect, states:
“A few months ago I emigrated from Germany. My decision was not for economic gain but primarily because of my dissatisfaction with the current political and social conditions in my homeland. In other words, I think that I and especially my offspring may lead a better life somewhere else. ‘Better’ for me in this context is primarily a life of freedom, self-determination and decent wages with respect to taxation.
“I do not, however, want to close the door behind me quietly and just go. I would hereby like to explain in a constructive way why I decided to leave Germany.
1. “I believe that Islam does not belong to Germany. I regard it as a foreign entity which has brought the West more problems than benefits. In my opinion, many followers of this religion are rude, demanding and despise Germany. Instead of halting the Islamization of Germany (and the consequent demise of our culture and freedom), most politicians seem to me to be more concerned about getting reelected, and therefore they prefer to ignore or downplay the Islam problem.
2. “I believe that German streets are less secure than they should be given our technological, legal and financial opportunities.
3. “I believe that the EU has a democratic deficit which limits my influence as a democratic citizen.
4. “I believe that immigration is producing major and irreversible changes in German society. I am angry that this is happening without the direct approval of German citizens, but is being dictated by you to German citizens and the next generation.
5. “I believe that the German media is increasingly giving up its neutrality, and that freedom of expression in this country is only possible in a limited way.
6. “I believe that in Germany sluggards are courted but the diligent are scourged.
7. “I believe that it is a shame that in Germany Jews must again be afraid to be Jews.”
Many Germans have noted the trend toward reverse integration, in which German families are expected to adapt to the customs and mores of migrants, rather than the other way around.
On October 14, the Munich-based newspaper Tageszeitung published a heartfelt letter from “Anna,” a mother of two, who wrote about her decision to move her family out of the city because migrants were making her life there impossible. In the letter, addressed to Munich Mayor Dieter Reiter, she wrote:
“Today I want to write you a kind of farewell letter (Abschiedsbrief) about why I and my family are leaving the city, even though probably no one cares.
“I am 35 years old, living here with my two young sons and my husband in an upscale semi-detached house with parking. So you could say we are very well off for Munich standards…. We live very well with plenty of space and next to a green park. So why would a family like us decide to leave the city? ….
“I assume that your children do not use public facilities, that they do not use public t***sportation, and that they do not attend public schools in “problem areas.” I also assume that you and other politicians rarely if ever go for walks here.
“So on a Monday morning I attended a neighborhood women’s breakfast that was sponsored by the City of Munich. Here I met about 6-8 mothers, some with their children. All of the women wore headscarves and none of them spoke German. The organizers of the event quickly informed me I will probably find it hard to integrate myself here (their exact words!!!). I should note that I am German. I speak fluent German and I do not wear a headscarf. So I smiled a little and said I would try to integrate myself. Unfortunately, I brought a salami and ham sandwich to the breakfast, to which everyone was asked to bring something. So of course I had even less chance of integrating.
“I was not able to speak German to anyone at this women’s breakfast, which is actually supposed to promote integration, nor was anyone interested in doing so. The organizers did not insist on anyone speaking German, and the women, who appeared to be part of an established Arab-Turkish group, simply wanted to use the room.
“I then asked about the family brunch…. I was advised that the brunch would be held in separate rooms. Men and women separately. At first I thought it was a bad joke. Unfortunately, it was not. ….
“So my impression of these events to promote integration is miserable. No interchange takes place at all!!! How can the City of Munich tolerate such a thing? In my view, the entire concept of these events to promote integration must be called into question…. I was informed that I am not allowed to include pork in my child’s lunchbox!!! Hello?! We are in Germany here! ….
“In summary, I find conditions here that make me feel that we are not really wanted here. That our family does not really fit in here. My husband sometimes says he has the feeling that we are now the largest minority with no lobby. For each group there is an institution, a location, a public interest, but for us, a heterosexual married couple with two children, not unemployed, neither handicapped nor Islamic, for people like us there is no longer any interest.
“When I mentioned at my son’s preschool that we are considering moving out of the city and I told them the reasons why, I was vigorously attacked by the school’s leadership. Because of people like us, they said, integration does not work, precisely because we remove our children. At least two other mothers have become wildly abusive. The management has now branded me “xenophobic.”
“This is exactly the reason why people like me lose their patience and we choose to v**e for other political parties…. Quite honestly, I have traveled half the world, have more foreign friends than German and have absolutely no prejudices or aversions to people because of their origin. I have seen much of the world and I know that the way integration is done here will cause others to come to the same conclusion as we have: either we send our children to private schools and kindergartens, or we move to other communities. Well then, so long!!!!!!!!!!!”
You won’t like what comes after America. Where are you going to go? Japan is one good place to move! I have lived here for 15 years. One mosque has been built in Tokyo, and the protests have been so great , it may well be closed down.
Germany is facing a spike in migrant crime, including an epidemic of rapes and sexual assaults. Mass migration is also accelerating the Islamization of Germany. Many Germans appear to be losing hope about the future direction of their country.
“We refugees… do not want to live in the same country with you. You can, and I think you should, leave Germany. And please take Saxony and the Alternative for Germany (AfD) with you…. Why do you not go to another country? We are s**k of you!” — Aras Bacho an 18-year-old Syrian migrant, in Der Freitag, October 2016.
A real estate agent in a town near Lake Balaton, a popular tourist destination in western Hungary, said that 80% of the Germans relocating there cite the migration crisis as the main reason for their desire to leave Germany.
“I believe that Islam does not belong to Germany. I regard it as a foreign entity which has brought the West more problems than benefits. In my opinion, many followers of this religion are rude, demanding and despise Germany.” — A German citizen who emigrated from Germany, in an “Open Letter to the German Government.”
“I believe that immigration is producing major and irreversible changes in German society. I am angry that this is happening without the direct approval of German citizens. … I believe that it is a shame that in Germany Jews must again be afraid to be Jews.” — A German citizen who emigrated from Germany, in an “Open Letter to the German Government.”
“My husband sometimes says he has the feeling that we are now the largest minority with no lobby. For each group there is an institution, a location, a public interest, but for us, a heterosexual married couple with two children, not unemployed, neither handicapped nor Islamic, for people like us there is no longer any interest.” — “Anna,” in a letter to the Mayor of Munich about her decision to move her family out of the city because migrants were making her life there impossible.
A growing number of Germans are abandoning neighborhoods in which they have lived all their lives, and others are leaving Germany for good, as mass immigration t***sforms parts of the country beyond recognition.
Data from the German statistics agency, Destatis, shows that 138,000 Germans left Germany in 2015. More are expected to emigrate in 2016. In a story on brain drain titled, “German talent is leaving the country in droves,” Die Welt reported that more than 1.5 million Germans, many of them highly educated, left Germany during the past decade.
The statistics do not give a reason why Germans are emigrating, but anecdotal evidence indicates that many are waking up to the true cost — financial, social and cultural — of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to allow more than one million mostly Muslim migrants to enter the country in 2015. At least 300,000 more migrants are expected to arrive in Germany in 2016, according to Frank-Jürgen Weise, the head of the country’s migration office, BAMF.
Mass migration has — among many other problems — contributed to a growing sense of insecurity in Germany, which is facing a spike in migrant crime, including an epidemic of rapes and sexual assaults. Mass migration is also accelerating the Islamization of Germany. Many Germans appear to be losing hope about the future direction of their country.
At the height of the migrant crisis in October 2015, some 800 citizens gathered at a town hall meeting in Kassel/Lohfelden to protest a unilateral decision by the local government to set up migrant shelters in the city. The President of Kassel, Walter Lübcke, responded by telling those who disagree with the government’s open-door immigration policy that they are “free to leave Germany at any time.”
This attitude was echoed in an audacious essay published in October 2016 by the newspaper Der Freitag, (also published by Huffington Post Deutschland, which subsequently deleted the post). In the article, an 18-year-old Syrian migrant named Aras Bacho called on Germans who are angry about the migrant crisis to leave Germany. He wrote:
“We refugees… are fed up with the angry citizens (Wutbürger). They insult and agitate like crazy…. There are always these incitements by unemployed r****ts (Wutbürgern), who spend all their time on the Internet and wait until an article about refugees appears on the Internet. Then it starts with shameless comments….
“Hello, you unemployed angry citizens (Wutbürger) on the Internet. How educated are you? How long will you continue to distort the t***h? Do you not know that you are spreading lies every day? What would you have done if you were in their shoes? Well, you would have run away!
“We refugees… do not want to live in the same country with you. You can, and I think you should, leave Germany. And please take Saxony and the Alternative for Germany (AfD) with you.
“Germany does not fit you, why do you live here? Why do you not go to another country? If this is your country, dear angry citizens (Wutbürger), then behave normal. Otherwise you can simply flee from Germany and look for a new home. Go to America to Donald Trump, he will love you very much. We are s**k of you!”
In May 2016, the newsmagazine, Focus, reported that Germans have been moving to Hungary. A real estate agent in a town near Lake Balaton, a popular tourist destination in western Hungary, said that 80% of the Germans relocating there cite the migration crisis as the main reason for their desire to leave Germany.
An anonymous German citizen who emigrated from Germany recently wrote an “Open Letter to the German Government.” The document, which was published on the website Politically Incorrect, states:
“A few months ago I emigrated from Germany. My decision was not for economic gain but primarily because of my dissatisfaction with the current political and social conditions in my homeland. In other words, I think that I and especially my offspring may lead a better life somewhere else. ‘Better’ for me in this context is primarily a life of freedom, self-determination and decent wages with respect to taxation.
“I do not, however, want to close the door behind me quietly and just go. I would hereby like to explain in a constructive way why I decided to leave Germany.
1. “I believe that Islam does not belong to Germany. I regard it as a foreign entity which has brought the West more problems than benefits. In my opinion, many followers of this religion are rude, demanding and despise Germany. Instead of halting the Islamization of Germany (and the consequent demise of our culture and freedom), most politicians seem to me to be more concerned about getting reelected, and therefore they prefer to ignore or downplay the Islam problem.
2. “I believe that German streets are less secure than they should be given our technological, legal and financial opportunities.
3. “I believe that the EU has a democratic deficit which limits my influence as a democratic citizen.
4. “I believe that immigration is producing major and irreversible changes in German society. I am angry that this is happening without the direct approval of German citizens, but is being dictated by you to German citizens and the next generation.
5. “I believe that the German media is increasingly giving up its neutrality, and that freedom of expression in this country is only possible in a limited way.
6. “I believe that in Germany sluggards are courted but the diligent are scourged.
7. “I believe that it is a shame that in Germany Jews must again be afraid to be Jews.”
Many Germans have noted the trend toward reverse integration, in which German families are expected to adapt to the customs and mores of migrants, rather than the other way around.
On October 14, the Munich-based newspaper Tageszeitung published a heartfelt letter from “Anna,” a mother of two, who wrote about her decision to move her family out of the city because migrants were making her life there impossible. In the letter, addressed to Munich Mayor Dieter Reiter, she wrote:
“Today I want to write you a kind of farewell letter (Abschiedsbrief) about why I and my family are leaving the city, even though probably no one cares.
“I am 35 years old, living here with my two young sons and my husband in an upscale semi-detached house with parking. So you could say we are very well off for Munich standards…. We live very well with plenty of space and next to a green park. So why would a family like us decide to leave the city? ….
“I assume that your children do not use public facilities, that they do not use public t***sportation, and that they do not attend public schools in “problem areas.” I also assume that you and other politicians rarely if ever go for walks here.
“So on a Monday morning I attended a neighborhood women’s breakfast that was sponsored by the City of Munich. Here I met about 6-8 mothers, some with their children. All of the women wore headscarves and none of them spoke German. The organizers of the event quickly informed me I will probably find it hard to integrate myself here (their exact words!!!). I should note that I am German. I speak fluent German and I do not wear a headscarf. So I smiled a little and said I would try to integrate myself. Unfortunately, I brought a salami and ham sandwich to the breakfast, to which everyone was asked to bring something. So of course I had even less chance of integrating.
“I was not able to speak German to anyone at this women’s breakfast, which is actually supposed to promote integration, nor was anyone interested in doing so. The organizers did not insist on anyone speaking German, and the women, who appeared to be part of an established Arab-Turkish group, simply wanted to use the room.
“I then asked about the family brunch…. I was advised that the brunch would be held in separate rooms. Men and women separately. At first I thought it was a bad joke. Unfortunately, it was not. ….
“So my impression of these events to promote integration is miserable. No interchange takes place at all!!! How can the City of Munich tolerate such a thing? In my view, the entire concept of these events to promote integration must be called into question…. I was informed that I am not allowed to include pork in my child’s lunchbox!!! Hello?! We are in Germany here! ….
“In summary, I find conditions here that make me feel that we are not really wanted here. That our family does not really fit in here. My husband sometimes says he has the feeling that we are now the largest minority with no lobby. For each group there is an institution, a location, a public interest, but for us, a heterosexual married couple with two children, not unemployed, neither handicapped nor Islamic, for people like us there is no longer any interest.
“When I mentioned at my son’s preschool that we are considering moving out of the city and I told them the reasons why, I was vigorously attacked by the school’s leadership. Because of people like us, they said, integration does not work, precisely because we remove our children. At least two other mothers have become wildly abusive. The management has now branded me “xenophobic.”
“This is exactly the reason why people like me lose their patience and we choose to v**e for other political parties…. Quite honestly, I have traveled half the world, have more foreign friends than German and have absolutely no prejudices or aversions to people because of their origin. I have seen much of the world and I know that the way integration is done here will cause others to come to the same conclusion as we have: either we send our children to private schools and kindergartens, or we move to other communities. Well then, so long!!!!!!!!!!!”
Oct 22, 2016 08:46:51 #
(Main)
The NYC Haitian Community (& allies) held a press conference (of sorts) to denounce Schneiderman`s double standard in deciding to persecute the Trump Foundation for fraud while ignoring the lack of audits and billions `missing` from the Clinton Foundation. They demand the Clinton's return BILLIONS stolen from Haiti.
Oct 4, 2016 12:48:45 #
(Main)
Has Hillary read Huma's mom's book?
Huma Abedin's mother Saleha is the sole editor of the book.
In 2010, Hillary praised Saleha directly, while standing next to her and giving a talk together in Saudi Arabia. The transcript is on the state department's web site: http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2010/02/136789.htm , Hillary calls Saleha an accomplished scholar and teacher:
And I am delighted to recognize her before you, but also before her mother, because (applause) as her mother knows, she can be an accomplished scholar and teacher, as Dr. Abedin is, but the best thing that can happen to you is have people say nice things about your children. And so I am very, very grateful to be here with all of you.
Here are some stunning excerpts from the book:
Men have been created in such a way that they are able to go out to work and to provide for their families. Women on the other hand are pre-disposed to stay at home and to fulfill their primary mission in life: bringing up the children and looking after the marital home. (p. 58)
Allah (SWT) has created women to be emotional, delicate, sensitive, reactive, and easily provoked. When confronted with an accusation they become nervous, lose their arguments and consequently become weak and surrender to their opponents. (p. 64)
Cunningness is a characteristic common to all human beings. It is an intrinsic attribute of women agreeing with their very feminine nature since they often resort to cunning devices in order to obtain what they want and in order to achieve their goals. This attitude could sometimes be described as trickery and contrivance. In the noble Quran, women's cunning is described as great.(p. 68)
If a woman were to assume a position of authority, she would be required to travel constantly in order to fulfill her duties. Her job would also involve long hours of free mixing and social interaction with the opposite sex, which is forbidden in Islam. Moreover, women's biological constitution is different from that of men. Women are fragile, emotional, and sometimes unable to handle difficult and strenuous situations. Men are less emotional and show more perseverance. (p. 159)
Of course, the mainstream media will be hesitant to touch any of this. The obvious question for Hillary is whether she'll now rescind her praise for Dr. Abedin. And the obvious question for Huma is if she agrees with any of these statements from her mom's book. If Huma is the moderate everyone says she is, this would be a softball: Huma could explain that while she loves her mother dearly, she rejects her mother's interpretation of women's role in Islam, and she could then explain how she has tried to articulate her perspective to her mother.
Huma Abedin's mother Saleha is the sole editor of the book.
In 2010, Hillary praised Saleha directly, while standing next to her and giving a talk together in Saudi Arabia. The transcript is on the state department's web site: http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2010/02/136789.htm , Hillary calls Saleha an accomplished scholar and teacher:
And I am delighted to recognize her before you, but also before her mother, because (applause) as her mother knows, she can be an accomplished scholar and teacher, as Dr. Abedin is, but the best thing that can happen to you is have people say nice things about your children. And so I am very, very grateful to be here with all of you.
Here are some stunning excerpts from the book:
Men have been created in such a way that they are able to go out to work and to provide for their families. Women on the other hand are pre-disposed to stay at home and to fulfill their primary mission in life: bringing up the children and looking after the marital home. (p. 58)
Allah (SWT) has created women to be emotional, delicate, sensitive, reactive, and easily provoked. When confronted with an accusation they become nervous, lose their arguments and consequently become weak and surrender to their opponents. (p. 64)
Cunningness is a characteristic common to all human beings. It is an intrinsic attribute of women agreeing with their very feminine nature since they often resort to cunning devices in order to obtain what they want and in order to achieve their goals. This attitude could sometimes be described as trickery and contrivance. In the noble Quran, women's cunning is described as great.(p. 68)
If a woman were to assume a position of authority, she would be required to travel constantly in order to fulfill her duties. Her job would also involve long hours of free mixing and social interaction with the opposite sex, which is forbidden in Islam. Moreover, women's biological constitution is different from that of men. Women are fragile, emotional, and sometimes unable to handle difficult and strenuous situations. Men are less emotional and show more perseverance. (p. 159)
Of course, the mainstream media will be hesitant to touch any of this. The obvious question for Hillary is whether she'll now rescind her praise for Dr. Abedin. And the obvious question for Huma is if she agrees with any of these statements from her mom's book. If Huma is the moderate everyone says she is, this would be a softball: Huma could explain that while she loves her mother dearly, she rejects her mother's interpretation of women's role in Islam, and she could then explain how she has tried to articulate her perspective to her mother.
Oct 4, 2016 12:21:00 #
(Main)
Once again, the black hand of George Soros is tied to an initiative that helps i******s at the expense of citizens this time, in Virginia.
What's going on?
E******n officials in the state are apparently helping i******s obtain OKs to v**e via fraudulently processed registrations, Breibart reported. And the coverup is being funded by groups tied to Soros, the news outlet found.
Read the shocking story, excerpted from Breitbart:
Virginia's e******n officials are enabling illegal registration and v****g by foreign citizens, according to an extensive new study, titled Alien Invasion in Virginia, by a former Department of Justice civil rights lawyer.
Virginia e******n officials don't seem to care that thousands of [foreign] aliens have corrupted their v**er rolls, by illegally registering to v**e, said J. Christian Adams, the former Department of Justice lawyer, and now the president of the Public Interest Legal Foundation. Even worse than doing nothing about it, they are trying to cover it up, he told Breitbart News.
In eight of Virginia's 130-plus jurisdictions, 31 non-citizens were found to have cast 186 b****ts between 2005 and 2015, according to the report.
And as Adams said, that number is just a fraction of the number of aliens who've been caught. Extend that out to investigate the whole 130-plus jurisdictions in the state, and doubtless dozens more of illegal v**ers would be found, he said.
Breitbart went on, explaining the Soros connection:
State-wide, the problem is most certainly exponentially worse [than seen in the eight localities] because we have no data regarding aliens on the registration rolls for the other 125 Virginia localities, the report said. When the v****g history of this small sample of alien registrants is examined, nearly 200 verified b****ts were cast before they were removed from the rolls. Each one of them is likely a felony.â
The authors highlighted the role played by Edgardo Cortés, the commissioner of the commonwealth's department of e******ns.
Before his appointment by Democratic Gov. Terence McAuliffe, Cortés was a left-wing operative of Virginia V****g Rights Restoration Campaign, within the left-wing Advancement Project. The project was funded and supported by George Soros, through his Tides Foundation and Open Society Foundations.
The report makes the direct charge: At the instruction of Commissioner Cortés, local e******n officials refused to provide us with records showing the v****g history of non-citizens removed from registration lists.
Previous to McAuliffe taking office in 2014, state officials had used the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database, it is also known as the SAVE database, to detect and remove aliens from the v****g rolls, the report said.
One of the top priorities of the Soros' Advancement Project is to stop the use of SAVE to purge v**er lists.
Soros, who's been touting an open-border mindset for years and has embraced the refugees fleeing Iraq and Syria as a means of crumbling the concepts of national identity and sovereignty, has also been funding and fueling groups like the NAACP to help achieve his g*******t visions for years.
But as Breitbart reported:
For years the Left has dismissed suspicions that non-citizens are v****g, Adams said. Now, we know why, [he added].
When an alien registers to v**e, it is a felony, Adams said. When an alien v**es, it is multiple felonies. DOJ under Obama has stopped enforcing this law.
What's going on?
E******n officials in the state are apparently helping i******s obtain OKs to v**e via fraudulently processed registrations, Breibart reported. And the coverup is being funded by groups tied to Soros, the news outlet found.
Read the shocking story, excerpted from Breitbart:
Virginia's e******n officials are enabling illegal registration and v****g by foreign citizens, according to an extensive new study, titled Alien Invasion in Virginia, by a former Department of Justice civil rights lawyer.
Virginia e******n officials don't seem to care that thousands of [foreign] aliens have corrupted their v**er rolls, by illegally registering to v**e, said J. Christian Adams, the former Department of Justice lawyer, and now the president of the Public Interest Legal Foundation. Even worse than doing nothing about it, they are trying to cover it up, he told Breitbart News.
In eight of Virginia's 130-plus jurisdictions, 31 non-citizens were found to have cast 186 b****ts between 2005 and 2015, according to the report.
And as Adams said, that number is just a fraction of the number of aliens who've been caught. Extend that out to investigate the whole 130-plus jurisdictions in the state, and doubtless dozens more of illegal v**ers would be found, he said.
Breitbart went on, explaining the Soros connection:
State-wide, the problem is most certainly exponentially worse [than seen in the eight localities] because we have no data regarding aliens on the registration rolls for the other 125 Virginia localities, the report said. When the v****g history of this small sample of alien registrants is examined, nearly 200 verified b****ts were cast before they were removed from the rolls. Each one of them is likely a felony.â
The authors highlighted the role played by Edgardo Cortés, the commissioner of the commonwealth's department of e******ns.
Before his appointment by Democratic Gov. Terence McAuliffe, Cortés was a left-wing operative of Virginia V****g Rights Restoration Campaign, within the left-wing Advancement Project. The project was funded and supported by George Soros, through his Tides Foundation and Open Society Foundations.
The report makes the direct charge: At the instruction of Commissioner Cortés, local e******n officials refused to provide us with records showing the v****g history of non-citizens removed from registration lists.
Previous to McAuliffe taking office in 2014, state officials had used the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database, it is also known as the SAVE database, to detect and remove aliens from the v****g rolls, the report said.
One of the top priorities of the Soros' Advancement Project is to stop the use of SAVE to purge v**er lists.
Soros, who's been touting an open-border mindset for years and has embraced the refugees fleeing Iraq and Syria as a means of crumbling the concepts of national identity and sovereignty, has also been funding and fueling groups like the NAACP to help achieve his g*******t visions for years.
But as Breitbart reported:
For years the Left has dismissed suspicions that non-citizens are v****g, Adams said. Now, we know why, [he added].
When an alien registers to v**e, it is a felony, Adams said. When an alien v**es, it is multiple felonies. DOJ under Obama has stopped enforcing this law.
Oct 4, 2016 12:12:27 #
(Main)
If you guessed Hillary Clinton’s corrupt and criminal Clinton Global Foundation, you are still living in some alternative universe — see a shrink.
The latest from investigative journalist Peter Schweizer:
Huffington Post: Clintons Bagged at Least $3.4 Million for 18 Speeches Funded by Keystone Pipeline Banks
New York Times: Clinton Foundation Shook Down a Tiny Tsunami Relief Nonprofit for a $500,000 Speaking Fee
New York Magazine: Clinton Foundation “Strong-Armed” Charity Watchdog Group
International Business Times: Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. Gave Clinton Foundation Donors Weapons Deals
Washington Post: Clintons Hid 1,100 Foreign Donor Names in Violation of Ethics Agreement with Obama Admin.
Vox: At Least 181 Clinton Foundation Donors Lobbied Hillary’s State Dept.
BuzzFeed: Two of Hillary Clinton’s Top Donors Were Major Felons
Daily Beast: Clintons’ Charity Scored Millions from Qatar and Donations from Corrupt FIFA Soccer Organization
Associated Press: The Clintons’ Have a Secret “Pass-Through” Company—WJC, LLC
New York Times: Hillary Funneled $10K Monthly Payments to Sidney Blumenthal Through Clinton Foundation
New Yorker: Bill Clinton Scored a $500,000 Speech in Moscow Paid for by a Kremlin-backed Bank
The New Yorker confirms Clinton Cash’s reporting that Bill Clinton bagged $500,000 for a Moscow speech paid for by “a Russian investment bank that had ties to the Kremlin.”
Washington Post: Hillary Clinton’s Brother Sits on the Board of a Mining Co. that Received a Coveted Haitian “Gold Exploitation Permit” that Has Only Twice Been Awarded in 50 Years. Rodham Met the Mining Executive in Charge of the Company at a Clinton Foundation Event.
New York Times: Court Proceedings Reveal Hillary’s Brother Claimed Admits Clinton Foundation and the Clintons Are Key to His Haiti Connections
Wall Street Journal: Clinton Foundation Violated Memorandum of Understanding with the Obama Admin. By Keeping Secret a Foreign Donation of Two Million Shares of Stock from a Foreign Executive with Business Before Hillary’s State Dept.
New York Times: Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Claims She Had No Idea Her State Dept. Was Considering Approving the T***sfer of 20% of U.S. Uranium to the Russian Govt.—Even as the Clinton Foundation Bagged $145 Million in Donations from Investors in the Deal
Bloomberg: A For-Profit University Put Bill Clinton on Its Payroll and Scored a Jump in Funding from Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. When Clinton Cash Revealed the Scheme, Bill Clinton Quickly Resigned.
New York Times: The Head of the Russian Govt’s Uranium Company Ian Telfer Made Secret Donations Totaling $2.35 Million to the Clinton Foundation—as Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. Approved the T***sfer of 20% of All U.S. Uranium to the Russians
Hillary Clinton has yet to answer a single question about Uranium One.
Washington Post: Bill and Hillary Clinton Have Made at Least $26 Million in Speaking Fees from Entities Who Are Top Clinton Foundation Donors
The Post added: “Bill Clinton was paid at least $26 million in speaking fees by companies and organizations that are also major donors to the foundation he created after leaving the White House, according to a Washington Post analysis of public records and foundation date.”
Washington Free Beacon: Former Clinton Campaign Operative-Turned-ABC News Host George Stephanopoulos Failed to Disclose His $75,000 Donation and Deep Involvement in the Clinton Foundation Before Launching an Attack Interview Against Clinton Cash Author
Clinton political operative-turned-ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos infamously hid his $75,000 Clinton Foundation donation from ABC News viewers before launching a partisan attack “interview” with Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer.
Roundly condemned by numerous journalists, Stephanopoulos apologized and received zero punishment from ABC News. Hillary Clinton’s campaign then used footage from the Stephanopoulos’ attack “interview” with Schweizer in its political campaign videos.
“It was outrageous,” said former ABC News anchor Carole Simpson.
Hillary Clinton has yet to answer whether her campaign coordinated with Clinton Foundation donor George Stephanopoulos.
CNBC: Clinton Foundation Mega Donor Frank Holmes Claimed He Sold Uranium One Before Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. Approved the Russian T***sfer—Despite His Company’s Own SEC Filings Proving Otherwise
In a highly embarrassing CNBC grilling, Clinton mega donor and uranium executive Frank Holmes claimed he sold his Uranium One stock well before Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. greenlit the t***sfer of 20% of all U.S. uranium to the Russian government in 2010.
However, according to his company’s, U.S. Global Investors, own 2011 SEC filing, Holmes’ company did, in fact, still hold Uranium One stock, a point he later conceded.
Politico: Hillary’s Foundation Accepted $1 Million from Human Rights Violator Morocco for a Lavish Event
But it was Trump’s Foundation that was shut down by corrupt NY politicians (Democrats, of course).
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s office on Monday ordered the Donald J. Trump Foundation to “immediately cease soliciting contributions” after a report that the charity lacked the proper authorization to seek public donations.
The latest from investigative journalist Peter Schweizer:
Huffington Post: Clintons Bagged at Least $3.4 Million for 18 Speeches Funded by Keystone Pipeline Banks
New York Times: Clinton Foundation Shook Down a Tiny Tsunami Relief Nonprofit for a $500,000 Speaking Fee
New York Magazine: Clinton Foundation “Strong-Armed” Charity Watchdog Group
International Business Times: Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. Gave Clinton Foundation Donors Weapons Deals
Washington Post: Clintons Hid 1,100 Foreign Donor Names in Violation of Ethics Agreement with Obama Admin.
Vox: At Least 181 Clinton Foundation Donors Lobbied Hillary’s State Dept.
BuzzFeed: Two of Hillary Clinton’s Top Donors Were Major Felons
Daily Beast: Clintons’ Charity Scored Millions from Qatar and Donations from Corrupt FIFA Soccer Organization
Associated Press: The Clintons’ Have a Secret “Pass-Through” Company—WJC, LLC
New York Times: Hillary Funneled $10K Monthly Payments to Sidney Blumenthal Through Clinton Foundation
New Yorker: Bill Clinton Scored a $500,000 Speech in Moscow Paid for by a Kremlin-backed Bank
The New Yorker confirms Clinton Cash’s reporting that Bill Clinton bagged $500,000 for a Moscow speech paid for by “a Russian investment bank that had ties to the Kremlin.”
Washington Post: Hillary Clinton’s Brother Sits on the Board of a Mining Co. that Received a Coveted Haitian “Gold Exploitation Permit” that Has Only Twice Been Awarded in 50 Years. Rodham Met the Mining Executive in Charge of the Company at a Clinton Foundation Event.
New York Times: Court Proceedings Reveal Hillary’s Brother Claimed Admits Clinton Foundation and the Clintons Are Key to His Haiti Connections
Wall Street Journal: Clinton Foundation Violated Memorandum of Understanding with the Obama Admin. By Keeping Secret a Foreign Donation of Two Million Shares of Stock from a Foreign Executive with Business Before Hillary’s State Dept.
New York Times: Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Claims She Had No Idea Her State Dept. Was Considering Approving the T***sfer of 20% of U.S. Uranium to the Russian Govt.—Even as the Clinton Foundation Bagged $145 Million in Donations from Investors in the Deal
Bloomberg: A For-Profit University Put Bill Clinton on Its Payroll and Scored a Jump in Funding from Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. When Clinton Cash Revealed the Scheme, Bill Clinton Quickly Resigned.
New York Times: The Head of the Russian Govt’s Uranium Company Ian Telfer Made Secret Donations Totaling $2.35 Million to the Clinton Foundation—as Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. Approved the T***sfer of 20% of All U.S. Uranium to the Russians
Hillary Clinton has yet to answer a single question about Uranium One.
Washington Post: Bill and Hillary Clinton Have Made at Least $26 Million in Speaking Fees from Entities Who Are Top Clinton Foundation Donors
The Post added: “Bill Clinton was paid at least $26 million in speaking fees by companies and organizations that are also major donors to the foundation he created after leaving the White House, according to a Washington Post analysis of public records and foundation date.”
Washington Free Beacon: Former Clinton Campaign Operative-Turned-ABC News Host George Stephanopoulos Failed to Disclose His $75,000 Donation and Deep Involvement in the Clinton Foundation Before Launching an Attack Interview Against Clinton Cash Author
Clinton political operative-turned-ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos infamously hid his $75,000 Clinton Foundation donation from ABC News viewers before launching a partisan attack “interview” with Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer.
Roundly condemned by numerous journalists, Stephanopoulos apologized and received zero punishment from ABC News. Hillary Clinton’s campaign then used footage from the Stephanopoulos’ attack “interview” with Schweizer in its political campaign videos.
“It was outrageous,” said former ABC News anchor Carole Simpson.
Hillary Clinton has yet to answer whether her campaign coordinated with Clinton Foundation donor George Stephanopoulos.
CNBC: Clinton Foundation Mega Donor Frank Holmes Claimed He Sold Uranium One Before Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. Approved the Russian T***sfer—Despite His Company’s Own SEC Filings Proving Otherwise
In a highly embarrassing CNBC grilling, Clinton mega donor and uranium executive Frank Holmes claimed he sold his Uranium One stock well before Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. greenlit the t***sfer of 20% of all U.S. uranium to the Russian government in 2010.
However, according to his company’s, U.S. Global Investors, own 2011 SEC filing, Holmes’ company did, in fact, still hold Uranium One stock, a point he later conceded.
Politico: Hillary’s Foundation Accepted $1 Million from Human Rights Violator Morocco for a Lavish Event
But it was Trump’s Foundation that was shut down by corrupt NY politicians (Democrats, of course).
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s office on Monday ordered the Donald J. Trump Foundation to “immediately cease soliciting contributions” after a report that the charity lacked the proper authorization to seek public donations.
Oct 4, 2016 12:09:19 #
