GOP Congressional Creeps would rather See the USA die Than give up Power and Wealth

Article By Sher Zieve January 11, 2016
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd

With ongoing acts of patent lunacy—or the darker reason…collaboration—the Republican-controlled US Congress refuses to remove the cancer eating away at Washington D.C. just as the Democrats have done for decades. Instead, the aforementioned Congress seems to prefer the ultimate demise-for-lack-of-proper-care that will soon be the cause of death. One of the primary reasons used as an excuse is the now cliché false fear of being called a “r****t” if they oppose the country’s ens***ement of its citizens with replacement of illegal ones and totalitarian l*****t policies.

Note…at some point almost all politicians become l*****ts in order to enrich themselves and they begin to view their constituencies as “the great unwashed masses” who are beneath them. They, then, begin to use any inane excuse to draw curious eyes away from what they’re really doing. And, at some point it no longer matters on which side they pretend to be…because it’s the side that solely enriches them.

Omnibus Bill filled with frills

After passing the “Omnibus” bill—which already includes all sorts of snakes and vermin including, but not limited to, fully funding Planned Parenthood, ObamaCare and the resettlement of Syrians “refugees” and other thousands of assorted Muslims into our country—our replacements—Speaker of the House and Boehner clone Paul Ryan patted himself on the back for passing another bill in the House which eliminates ObamaCare and defunds Planned Parenthood. Do you remember when Paul Ryan said that he’d wait to pass the omnibus bill until after a new POTUS is elected…then passed it in the middle of the night ala Harry Reid and the rest of the Marxist Dems?

One Party Rules

As I’ve stated multiple times before, the USA is now under a one-party political system that has 2 heads which attempt to speak opposite messages in order to confuse and better control the proletariat. Our Republic was replaced quite some time ago. In the history of our country this has never been clearer than it is today. Our Founders—including John Adams and George Washington amongst others—warned us about a 2-party political system. Adams said:

“There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution” while Washington followed with (in part) “The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.

“Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind, (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight,) the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.”

“It serves always to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally r**t and i**********n. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.”

People to Blame

In my opinion, however, it is not necessarily a political party system that is to blame for our current enormous problems. Rather, it is an e*****rate that—long ago—left the running of the federal government to the “professional” politicians…so that it could grow unchecked in power, wealth (ours) and scope and eventually encompass and subjugate us all. Term limits should have been invoked years ago. It is also a citizenry which, in large part, turns up its collective nose and says “I don’t follow or get involved in politics” because it sounds worldly and urbane to do so or—perhaps more likely—because of laziness or being screwed down to their 24/7 jobs. Governments built upon the concept of liberty, property ownership and the e******y of pursuit of individual opportunity (to date only one comes to mind and that is the one now being summarily destroyed) cannot survive unless its citizenship becomes directly involved in its policy implementation.

Citizens should be involved

When American citizens did become involved in government, organizations such as Planned Parenthood abortuaries and a Bureau of Land Management gone rogue (and for all intents and purposes is now a mercenary institution reporting to the highest bidder) would not be allowed to exist. These—and other oppressive to the people that are now prevalent—would have been stopped in their tracks before their power became so great.

The clear & present dangers

By now, most of us should be—and I believe are—fully awake to the clear and present dangers which face our country and us. More and more are becoming active. Keep it up, grow your numbers and we might actually be able—with courage and lots of work—be able to pull our country out of the Luciferian Left morass. A convention of states would be a good start. I don’t, however, believe we can do it with the vast majority of those currently in power. Nothing less than a sea change is required, gee maybe term limits.

Middle class is gone

The American middle class has been broken, busted & disgusted bombed so big you could probably see it easily from space. As these political blowhards stand over the fallen body of their original conceit, we can all wrap our bluesy head around these wobbly empty suits bottom feeding scumbags, these incompetent, lying, flip-flopping, double talking, radical socialist, terrorist excusing, criminal coddling, bleeding heart, narcissistic scientific and economic morons now currently sabotaging every citizens move in Congress and in the White House.

The sobbing nutjob whimpering on camera last week about taking guns away from the citizens to protect the k*****g of children in our schools was absolutely delusional. What we need is to pay for police guards in our school with fully loaded weapons and lock all the entrances. Celebs have armed body guards, Congressmen have armed guards, the Prez is protected by an armed Secret Service; aren’t our children just as important as these criminals? Come on people take up the fight and get these power leaches to v**e term limits or they go to jail for misrepresentation, lying to the public, and stealing your tax money. The laws are there use them.

From Townhall Daily
Did You Hear About the Father Who Is the Mother and the Mother Who Is the Father?
Michael Brown | Dec 30, 2015
Michael Brown
townhall.com/columnists/michaelbrown/2015/12/30/did-you-hear-about-the-father-who-is-the-mother-and-the-mother-who-is-the-father-n2098307

It used to be pretty simple.

A man marries a woman.

They have a baby together.

The man is the father and the woman is the mother.

Well it’s not so simple anymore.

Today, you have to figure out if the man who is marrying the woman is actually a man and if the woman who is marrying the man is actually a woman.

Then you have to figure out if the man is the father or the mother and if the woman is the mother or the father.

Is this starting to make your head spin?

If so, this headline will not help. It reads: “Male partner pregnant with baby of t*********r couple in Ecuador.”

What? A man is pregnant? And he’s part of a t*********r couple? How does this work?

According to the story published by Fox Latino News, “A couple in Ecuador is making history with a unique pregnancy. The father-to-be is carrying the baby of his t*********r partner.”

The couple in question goes by the names Fernando Machado and Diane Rodríguez, but Fernando was born María while Diane was born Luis.

This means that the pregnant “male” is a b********l f****e who is now the man of the house (albeit a pregnant man) while his female partner is a b********l m**e who is now the lady of the house.

Although they take hormones to change their bodies to conform to their g****r perceptions, they have not had sex-change surgery, otherwise, they would not have been able produce a baby together.

That means that Diane, who has male private parts, impregnated Fernando, who has female private parts.

That also means that even though Diane fathered the baby and Fernando will carry the baby in his womb (are you getting all this?), Diane, the b********l m**e who supplied the sperm, will be the mother and Fernando, who provided the egg, will be the father.

As Rodríguez, who is a leading L**T activist in Ecuador, told the Associated Press, “We're trying to break the myths about t***ssexuality.”

It looks to me like they’re creating a whole new set of myths.

Rodríguez also said that, “The [Catholic] church is always criticizing gays and homosexuals for adopting children, so it would be a contradiction to criticize us for giving birth naturally.”

Naturally?

I would say that is putting a whole new spin on the meaning of the word.

What is “natural” is for a man to father a baby and for a woman to conceive, carry, and deliver that baby, just as happens around the world every hour of the day, and just as has happened billions of times before.




Michael Brown
Michael Brown is the host of the nationally syndicated talk radio show The Line of Fire and is the president of FIRE School of Ministry. His newest book is Outlasting the Gay Revolution: Where Homosexual Activism Is Really Going and How to Turn the Tide. Connect with him on Facebook at AskDrBrown or on Twitter at drmichaellbrown


Talk about an intentional destruction of the concept of man and woman and families. Another Goal of C*******m is totally accomplished. Feel sorry for the child who grows up believing males have vaginas, females have penises.
Since the organs function in the DNA designed basis, you should come to the very valid conclusion that Bruce Caitlin Jenner could rape a woman he/she met in a restroom, so these distortions of g****r are as dangerous as many have said not the mild mannered people who could not function sexually toward their biological goals. THINK ABOUT IT. If the g*****ls are matching the DNA the makeup is no more valid than lipstick on a pig.

Islam was banned from the USA in 1952

ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952, but Obama doesn't want you to know that nor does he respect or uphold US law. The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to o*******w the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means." This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the o*******w of our government are prohibited."