"When all this unravels ( and it will ) you'll look a little silly ( or a lot ) for denouncing the Patriots who put their country first" - lpnmajor

Were you inferring that the Lefties are patriots, major?
These types?
“This system to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.” - Insider, Professor Carroll Quigley – ‘Tragedy and Hope’,( p. 324)

10 Things You Didn't Know About "Giorgi" George Soros
https://youtu.be/tfBHYxEojZk
SOROS ROTHSCHILD RACE WAR PROPAGANDA EXPOSED
https://youtu.be/lhqqz3QFQKE
George Soros: Evil Puppet Master Exposed
https://youtu.be/1eRFTHD2CTg

BTW; This is funny!!!
The left asked their comrades to boycott Chick-fil-A. Sales sky rocketed. I started eating there.
The left asked their comrades to boycott Ivanka's clothing line, and some stores dropped the line. Sales are up big time, and they should be.
The left asked their comrades to boycott ALL things Trump.
Not working well?
Some advice; Buy stock in Pampers; because sales are rising.

I remember that song. But, I don't DO utubes, so cannot listen to it!!

what I meant by defend is to tell you that you're a stupid ass incorrect muthaphuckah for these statements about me:

you stated/concluded incorrectly because you don't know s**t:
He thinks his success will justify and make up for the rest of the i***tic nature of his race, convincing us that b****s don't have a degenerate, feminist, male just for breeding purposes, race.

It's a pathetic picture, to be sure. He h**es that he's black. He sees his race as despicable. He wants to be white so bad! He probably jacks off to pics of white women, or men. He knows if a black woman came into his life, he'd be whipped by her in a new York minute.

He's smart and educated, but he h**es his blackness. H**es it.

*All these statements made when you don't know a motherfking thing about me unless I choose to tell you. Get it NOW? You don't understand simple concepts?

So does that mean yes? We the People became We the Corporate" by the Act of 1871? When I worked for the IRS, 1991-1996, I was paid through the Department of Agricultural. I guess that made me a Commodity employed by the government.

Lawyers. I would have saved a great deal of money had I only had the courage. After I pummeled mine for ignoring TWO key issues: No "Journal Entry" was submitted after over a year in court plus walking out on a court ordered UA of his sides insistance at that court hearing, I stopped receiving her bill above and beyond her $2500 retainer. She was lucky I pummeled her personally, and not through her firm. Some days I regret that decision.

To clarify, both parties here had changed lawyers during the course of that year. Mine did not listen to me, responding to both my concerns with, "It doesn't matter." I then thinking, "She's the lawyer, I guess she knows best." It wasn't until the word "manipulate" was used, did she finally "get it", but it was too late by that point. Had I only had the courage here, I never would have needed her. Or at least not for another year or two down the road.

EDIT: Another oddity, 1800MediCare, is outsourced by the Defense Department, to GDIT, General Dynamics Information Technology, at least in my area. I find that frighteningly odd.

Clean air rule reversal tests GOP
Efforts to roll back methane gas mandate draw public backlash.
By Evan Halper
WASHINGTON — As Republican lawmakers consider how closely to align with the climate skepticism and fossil-fuel fervor radiating from the White House, a nascent clean air initiative that energy firms want scrapped is fast testing their comfort zone.
Weighing on them is 41 billion cubic feet of methane, a greenhouse gas leaking from many of the nearly 100,000 oil and gas wells on federally owned land. Methane is among the most potent accelerators of g****l w*****g, 25 times more harmful than carbon dioxide.
Since the House swiftly v**ed last month to lift a requirement that escaping gas be trapped and converted to electricity, the backlash has been intense.
Anger is most pronounced in the West, where tens of thousands of residents near drilling operations risk exposure to the toxic compounds that leak in tandem with the methane. Local governments are also desperate for the royalty money they would be entitled to if that gas were turned to energy.
“The thought of a bunch of disconnected lawmakers who don’t live next to leaking gas wells deciding to v**e to take this protection away from us just leaves me speechless,” said New Mexico cattleman Don Schreiber, whose Devil’s Spring Ranch in Rio Arriba County is surrounded by 122 natural gas wells.
Supervisors in adjacent La Plata County, Colo., passed a resolution calling on Congress to abandon the rollback. More than 80% of the people in Western states including Arizona, Colorado, Montana, Utah and Wyoming support the Obama-era mandate, according to a Colorado College poll taken in December.
The political tension has left many Republican senators wavering as they struggle with the potential fallout of going after a signature Obama administration c*****e c****e policy that — like many others — has a constituency that extends far beyond climate hawks.
They face competing pressure from the Trump administration, as Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt rebukes climate science and steps away from his agency’s far-reaching methane blueprint, intended to stem leaks that in some cases are so large they can be spotted from outer space.
Oil and gas companies have recruited powerful allies in the fight, including in California’s Central Valley, home to some of the highest concentrations of methane anywhere.
“As federal lands become less cost-effective to produce energy on, this unnecessary rule adds to that burden and could wipe out marginal wells run by family-owned businesses who can’t pack up and move their operations,” warned a report posted by House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield.
He also forecasts financial peril for local governments if the Obama-era rule is not immediately rolled back.
Such pressure has yet to sway many GOP colleagues tangled in the messy politics of methane, such as Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner. His state, like McCarthy’s, is among several that have passed their own laws requiring oil and gas companies to pursue aggressive measures to contain the methane. Many of Gardner’s constituents, including energy firms subject to the new state law, are demanding he help preserve the federal restraints so operators in adjacent states with no local laws would have to abide by the same rules.
They point to pollution drifting from Utah and New Mexico, exacerbating air problems in Colorado. Firms there resent that their nearby competitors can ignore leaks they can’t. The state’s burgeoning clean-energy industry, with its growing bipartisan political might, is applying its own pressure.
“I’m continuing to meet with my constituents on this topic and will continue to do so until the v**e,” Gardner wrote in an email.
GOP Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina both announced they would v**e against efforts to roll back the rule.
Other Republicans are leaving open the option of joining them, as public concern about leaking methane across the country puts energy firms under new pressure to invest in technology to contain it.
Charges by energy companies that the rule would bankrupt them conflict with Bureau of Land Management findings that the average small business with an oil or gas operation on federal property would see its profit margin reduced by two-tenths of 1% as a result of the rule.
The amount of methane escaping each year, the Obama administration ultimately concluded, is enough to provide electricity for nearly 740,000 homes. The Government Accountability Office alerted Congress in July that capturing it would boost royalties owed to taxpayers by $23 million.
“We shouldn’t just be giving away these taxpayer assets,” said Ryan Alexander, president of the advocacy group Taxpayers for Common Sense. “We should be demanding fair compensation for them.”
But layered over the fights about royalties and air pollution is the more contentious issue of c*****e c****e. Methane was a focal point in the Obama administration’s governmentwide plan to limit greenhouse gas emissions that President Trump set about tearing up upon taking office.
The White House calls the plan “expensive and unnecessary.” This month, Pruitt told oil and gas companies not to bother complying with a directive from the EPA to compile and report data related to their methane emissions, which the agency was to use in crafting new restrictions that would apply to all oil and gas operations, not just those on federal land.
Some Republicans have allied with the charge that methane’s role in changing the climate is exaggerated, noting the gas escaping from oil and gas operations on federal land accounted for a tiny fraction of the greenhouse gas that must be cut under the global climate agreement President Obama signed in Paris.
But as climate actions go, this one packs a relatively big punch for the price. Methane leaks are America’s second-biggest industrial source of c*****e c****e, behind power plant emissions, according to the Environmental Defense Fund. Retreating on efforts to contain them is another signal internationally that the U.S. is ceding the leadership role on the issue it cemented in Paris to other nations, such as China.
And that doesn’t sit well with some Republicans, leaving in limbo a rule rollback that oil and gas companies once anticipated would be easy.
evan.halper@latimes.com

Every single word of what you just typed, fits YOU to a T....

You lied to everyone on this website. It is what you do. You as a liar, also have a piss poor memory. You always use the age of 26 that you did something spectacular as to impress everyone...but you failed to recall, you posted here in this above thread to DOC that at age 26 you were on your way to work for a space program...or on a ship which you stated you were on for 2 years...but a long time ago when you used your other name here and you claimed you worked on a shuttle for a few years...at age 26.....oh my...you just don't know WHEN to stop your bulls**t lies!

So now..at age 26 you worked at NASA, worked on the Shuttle for Rockwell and then on a ship up in Alaska...and all of those for "about two years" from your own past posts on this website.

Oh let us know when the detectives stop by your place...they will be there fairly soon...count on it.

that is "wandering" you gotdamn fool who wants to call ME a dumb black guy........you fking i***t.....doc hasn't done s**t but play little homosexual games coupled with an attempt to implement weak ass psychology. He's a dishonest bait and switch piece of s**t. He tries to antagonize by running behind me with little b***h ass condescending sarcastic statements and when I respond in kind, he tries to frame the dynamics of the discussion as if he is controlling and I am powerless in not being able to refrain from responding. His weak ass psychological ploy is to get me to not respond and he can give the illusion that he has shut me the fk up. It is a dishonest ploy to frame my behavior as deficient whether I respond in kind or ignore his feminine ass. He wants to be a jr. mentalist but does not understand I am a professor who teaches within the realm of behavioral science. I have the ability to observe the dynamics of the dialogue as it occurs and specifically notice manipulation attempts on the part of others. I steer the dialogue myself in graduate level Org Behavior and Industrial Psychology courses. You people fail to realize that higher education makes it apparent what one does not know when they accomplish it and what others do not know when THEY do not.......