One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: BigMike
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 ... 3079 next>>
Nov 19, 2016 23:41:47   #
endgame wrote:
She has "dogs" she wanted "to curl up with"- & a book and " never leave the house" ... After her loss.

Perhaps if this very human part of her was displayed throughout the 'campaign' - mightta won....


She's lying!
Go to
Nov 19, 2016 23:39:59   #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
Think about this for a moment, my Friends:

Tuesday Nov. 8 at around 1700 hours, Hillary and 400+ Hillary Clinton loyalists gathered with 100+ cases of champagne, a Two-Million-Dollar, ($2,000,000.00) paid for massive fireworks display in downtown New York and a custom built dome with the mythical “glass roof” and the B***h, (or as her Secret Service call sign names her-- “Broomstick One”) to celebrate Broom Stick One's victory over Trump as the first Female President of the United States. The inner cities were dancing in the streets, knowing their Welfare checks were going to continue and go up. Mexico was happy as they could continue to empty their prisons into America. ISIS was happy as they could continue to infiltrate America with their Terrorists!

Newsweek had already published and shipped the next issue with the cover “Madam President” and a detailed analysis of precisely how the Clinton political machine had captured the E*******l College with a whopping 324 v**es. They had her acceptance speech in an article gracefully calling for all Americans to join with her and blah, blah, blah.

Among the 400+ giddy followers were those who had already received confirmation of their future assignments and high paid government jobs in the White House, FBI, Department of Labor, Ambassadorships and the list goes on. All were assured of at least four (4) and probably eight (8) years of lucrative jobs that they had dedicated over 3 years of their lives to achieving. They had all rented or bought housing in D.C. or nearby in Georgetown. Reservations had been made at the Hilton and other 5 star hotels in New York City for the PARTY.

They knew the fix was in: every poll and every media outlet except Fox News and Drudge was in the tank for Hillary and against Trump. At a rate of 45 to 1 Department of Justice employees had contributed to the campaign over Trump. CNN, NBC, CBS had all supplied Hillary with the debate questions well in advance. The fix was in over all the scandals and the WikiLeaks was all the fault of the Russians who had even changed the language in the emails. The Department of Justice and FBI had cleared Hillary of any criminal conduct.

Every media pundit and all of the polls except the LA Times and one other had Hillary with a 1-8 point lead. The odds in Las Vegas were 200 to 1 and by e******n time were still 5 to 1. The exit polls were 100% in the Democrat’s favor and the path to victory was clear.

Then within 5 short hours it all came crashing down. They were stunned—told to go home and go home they did so they could organize r**ts and proclaim to the world that Trump was not their President.

Imagine the abject depression and shock that set in.

I freaking love it.


"Congrats to All Patriotic Americans that love their Republic, great job!"
Think about this for a moment, my Friends: br br ... (show quote)


Poor babies. Wait until we cut their funding off and use it to bump off Soros!
Go to
Nov 19, 2016 22:56:26   #
Cool Breeze wrote:
You say that you are protecting the life of the unborn. What about the life of the born? http://youtu.be/_3b2hc2AWRs

David Clark should be roasted then. The pro lifers should up in arms about this outrage. But this really isn't about Pro Life is it?


Go to jail and you're lucky to be treated for anything. That's any jail anywhere. Why was she in jail?
Go to
Nov 19, 2016 19:37:43   #
AuntiE wrote:
Color me extremely red faced.
Color me color=red extremely red faced /color . ... (show quote)


It happens. I turned my autocorrect OFF.
Go to
Nov 19, 2016 19:34:05   #
PaulPisces wrote:
I think you are being either dishonest or obtuse, JF.
The Trump team has asked for his son-in-law to be given security clearance, even though he is married to Trump's daughter who would be tasked with running his businesses. Then only thing "blind" in this equation is the willful ignoring of obvious conflicts of interest.

Why is this OK for Trump, but Clinton's strategy to leave Chelsea on the board of The Clinton Foundation is not?

I smell hypocrisy.


I don't remember criticism of Chelsea being much of an issue.
Go to
Nov 19, 2016 12:57:48   #
JFlorio wrote:
Proof Paul. That's ridiculous. You are starting to sound like the unhinged l*****ts. Show me the oligarchy. By the way an oligarchy has pretty much been in charge for the last twenty years.


Twenty?!
Go to
Nov 19, 2016 11:49:22   #
Super Dave wrote:
They belonged to the US Government and were taken illegally. Assange knew this at the time that he got and forwarded them.

If I hacked a guy's email and got his bank account and sent it to you, and you sent it to someone else, you would be committing a crime, regardless of where you were at the time you were physically.

This applies to mailing documents in an envelope as well... BTW....


What a risk he took in doing us the service of telling us what the power players were really up to!
Go to
Nov 19, 2016 11:47:11   #


Propaganda from the looooosers. I'm quite sure there are many more who are still celebrating BREXIT. Globalism will not die. It just lost a couple of battles.
Go to
Nov 19, 2016 11:43:04   #
archie bunker wrote:
I use products easily purchased at Wal-Greens to control my condensation. They help control my aroma while showing my condescension of those who are.......ummmm.....stupid?

Before you wear me out; be aware that I'm aware of how these things try to spell for us!
I use products easily purchased at Wal-Greens to c... (show quote)


I resisted the impulse. Unusual for me, but I know better than to incur Auntie's wrath!
Go to
Nov 19, 2016 11:40:22   #
Big dog wrote:
Either or, peaceful assembly is one thing, interfering with ANY
lawful activity is a crime.


Like trying to o*******w an e******n? S******n!
Go to
Nov 18, 2016 20:47:00   #
Homestead wrote:
What we have is the right to peaceably assemble.

Smashing windows is not peaceable.
L**ting is not peaceable.
Setting fires are not peaceable.
Attacking everyone you don't agree with is not peaceable.

What they are doing is r**ting. We have laws against r**ting.

And since they're staged r**ts, I'd say that they're conspiring to defraud.


More like s******n.
Go to
Nov 18, 2016 20:37:49   #
moldyoldy wrote:
Britain regretted not coming out to v**e too. They quickly realized their mistake.


Um...Britain did come out and v**e. Britain v**ed to leave the EU. The lazy losers...the g*******ts, did not. The mistake was joining the EU to begin with. We told you guys repeatedly to not count your chickens too quickly.
Go to
Nov 18, 2016 20:33:01   #
AuntiE wrote:
I read an interview with David Brooks, NYT, who said the "enlightened, us, need to not be condescending. We need to go out and educate the unenlightened." Oh, Mr. Brooks, please bring on your enlightenment ...you arrogant presumptuous piece of defecation. My other response is, and please, please, please excuse the extreme language (which I normally avoid like the bubonic plague). I will likely never live this down.


Live what down?
Go to
Nov 18, 2016 19:59:43   #
Pennylynn wrote:
"Republican Sen. Doug Ericksen announced plans Wednesday to introduce a bill that would criminalize illegal protests. Sen. Ericksen says the bill would focus protests aimed at “causing economic damage.”

“Washington needs to take a firm stand against illegal protests that block t***sportation and commerce, cause property damage, threaten jobs and put public safety at risk,” says state Sen. Ericksen, R-Ferndale in a release Wednesday. The bill would create a new crime of economic terrorism. The measure would allow felony prosecution of those who intentionally break the law in an attempt to intimidate or coerce private citizens or the government by obstructing economic activity.Republican Sen. Doug Ericksen announced plans Wednesday to introduce a bill that would criminalize illegal protests. Sen. Ericksen says the bill would focus protests aimed at “causing economic damage.”

“Washington needs to take a firm stand against illegal protests that block t***sportation and commerce, cause property damage, threaten jobs and put public safety at risk,” says state Sen. Ericksen, R-Ferndale in a release Wednesday. The bill would create a new crime of economic terrorism. The measure would allow felony prosecution of those who intentionally break the law in an attempt to intimidate or coerce private citizens or the government by obstructing economic activity.

“I respect the right to protest, but when it endangers people’s lives and property, it goes too far,” Ericksen said. “Fear, intimidation and vandalism are not a legitimate form of political expression. Those who employ it must be called to account.”

Ericksen makes clear that the criminal penalties, making certain protests a class C felony when they are aimed at causing economic disruption, would not apply to lawful and protected activities such as strikes and picketing."

http://www.king5.com/news/politics/wash-gop-senator-to-introduce-bill-that-criminalizes-protests/353329433
http://www.myfoxspokane.com/washington-senator-to-introduce-bill-that-would-criminalize-protests/
"Republican Sen. Doug Ericksen announced plan... (show quote)


If they're committing crimes while protesting they should be charged for those crimes.
Go to
Nov 18, 2016 19:58:22   #
Gatsby wrote:
Did the WikiLeaks revelations influence our p**********l e******n?

Did the State Department information WikiLeaks published actually cause "grave damage" to our national security?

Did those efforts to inform the public as to the conduct of our leaders make Julian Assange an "Enemy of the State"?

Should Assange be pardoned or persecuted?

Personally, I think that President Trump should issue a blanket pardon and award him with the P**********l Freedom Medal.
Did the WikiLeaks revelations influence our p*****... (show quote)


I think so too...and the biggest danger to our national security is the current bunch of @ssholes in Washington.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 ... 3079 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.