One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bigmac495
Page: <<prev 1 ... 202 203 204 205
Sep 8, 2013 16:33:57   #
rumitoid wrote:
Doesn't it seem logical that if snopes.com is as unreliable as many here claim that some solid proof of this would exist (not just a v***l email that purports it has been “wrong many times”)? Doesn't it defy logic to continue in the belief it is unreliable when after all these years of its existence, especially with so many invested in undermining its reputation, no one has proven it wrong on political facts? (I will get to where it has been off but those were not on political questions.)

The lack of trust in snopes.com may come from the fact that some of the most cherished lies about Obama are debunked as false, making it appear to be obviously an agent of the Left and actually financed by Soros who uses a “proven radically liberal couple” as puppets to support his “c****e” agenda. There is a simple way to resolve whether snopes.com can be trusted or not and thus far no one here, when asked to do this, has either bothered or perhaps has been disappointed and failed to report those results. (Most often the response is “Everybody knows it is liberal-biased.” The phrase “everybody knows” is the standard introduction for almost every urban legend. I gave Crazy Horse a list from snopes.com titled “50 Lies by Obama” a v***l email sent a number of years ago, which they factchecked, and I haven't noticed any posts from him lately; probably coincidence.)

All one needs to do is find something snopes.com called false or true and prove they were wrong. Same goes for the other fact-checking sites, that it seems mostly those on the Right do not trust. Now, why would that be case?

Two assumptions can be immediately made: 1) if those on the Left trust it more, it must be biased; 2) there a lot of lies out there about Obama. Only an earnest attempt to verify the veracity of snopes.com can answer those questions.

I have used Bing, google, and yahoo in the search to find any reference to snopes.com being proven wrong: I found three non-political examples were their facts were somewhat off but later corrected the errors and printed an apology.

A few links to peruse:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com

http://www.t***horfiction.com/rumors/s/snopes.htm

http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/internet/a/snopes_exposed.htm

http://garthright.blogspot.com/2011/12/snopes-gets-it-wrong.html
Doesn't it seem logical that if snopes.com is as u... (show quote)


I read that Snopes is bankrolled by Obama backer billionaire George Soros ! Does that explain anything ?
Go to
Sep 8, 2013 12:39:50   #
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When replying to a specific comment, you MUST click on "quote reply" and NOT "reply". If you click on "reply" no one knows to whom you are speaking. We all had to learn this from experience and others helping us.


Thanks Tasine . I didn't know that .
Go to
Sep 7, 2013 10:13:37   #
There is no national interest in Syria ! Obama's interest is his political legacy and ego. He is going to send $1.5 million dollar cruise missiles into Syria and even though they are pretty smart bombs I don't think they can tell the good muslins from the bad ones . And since Syria has had some months of warnings from Obama they have had enough time to evacuate the whole country if they want to !
Our boots on the ground can't even tell the good people from the bad people over there until they start getting shot at , so when those cruise missiles start k*****g people Obama wants some one else to blame ! "Congress"
Go to
Sep 7, 2013 09:45:28   #
Oh ! I see ,if you jump on someone and try to bash their brains out on the concrete , you get a "Asteroid" named after you. Nice!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 202 203 204 205
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.