One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PeterS
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 ... 2664 next>>
Jun 16, 2016 00:15:08   #
Kevyn wrote:
Donald Trump is both allowing and forcing Republicans to face what they really represent. It is fascinating that the most dishonest politician in the history of p**********l campaigns is showing us the t***h of the Republican party. For years republicans have lied and done their best to hide the r****m, hatred for the poor, warmongering, greed, xenophobia misogyny and religious extremism that is the heart of the party. True believers own this, and are proud of it and Trump in his quest to end so called political correctness is empowering the base of the party to embrace and take p***e in their worst instincts. They h**e years of being told they shouldn't use racial slurs, abuse and ridicule homosexuals, objectify threaten and degrade women and stereotype immigrants and foreigners. Donald Trump has given them license to be themselves and they love it! In doing so he has shown thinking people in the country the extent of the rotten scum that the civil rights movement has failed to cleanse our nation of. As he d**gs the republicans into the light, and down the sewer he will be remembered as the force that finally cleansed our nation of the failed h**e filled cancer of conservative dogma.
Donald Trump is both allowing and forcing Republic... (show quote)


You hit the nail on the head Kevyn--except that they still don't see it as r****m or bigotry or anything else. They just think they are wonderful Americans and everyone else is just fucked up. But, as I say, good post...
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 20:34:45   #
Docadhoc wrote:
You like to repeat the phrase "intellectual integrity".

I had thought you to be seriously asking questions. I gave you clear understandable answers and explanations and asked you serious questions, yet you completely dodge what I said and asked because they were too clear for you to cloud.

You are exhibiting lack of integrity and are obviously just another denier masquerading as someone who has intetest, but in reality has no interest in CHristian perspective.

Believe what you wish. I see no sense in discussing further with one who totally refuses to acknowledge answers or questions when they don't open the door to more denial.
You like to repeat the phrase "intellectual i... (show quote)


As I said before--anecdotes and fallacies are not rational answers. If you want answers than you have to ask real questions. I've answered to the best of my ability what you've posed. I can't do any thing more than that...
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 19:58:32   #
JW wrote:
You are almost correct. They are essentially the same, semiautomatic, clip fed rifles but neither one is worth a damn as a weapon of war.


All the more reason to get rid of them then...
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 19:57:15   #
cesspool jones wrote:
If she does win....needs to be assassinated

Should-a, could-a, would-a, Cesspool. Get out your big gun and take care of things yourself...
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 19:54:41   #
waltmoreno wrote:
I know. It's absolutely disheartening! To think that we'll be saddled with a third Obama term in Hillary who could be easily beaten by a competent candidate is devastating.
Trumpots and all you 'Goooooo Trump robots" need to understand that Trump's bluster, smears, name calling, etc., that worked so well for him in the primaries, helped along with a complicit media, will all backfire against him in the general
e******n.
And as against Hillary, the media will gravitate towards her, leaving Trump without all the free media coverage that served him so well in the primaries. Henceforth he'll have to spend money to get media coverage or if he gets any media coverage it'll be negative. And donors aren't donating. They are beginning to see that Trump will bring down many down-ticket candidates as well.
So what can be done. Again delegates aren't bound to v**e for Trump on the first round. More v**ers v**ed against Trump than for him. He won the primaries because the v**e was split among 16 other candidates.
The delegates can abstain from v****g on the first round. It's written into the rules of the Republican Party, a private organization. And on the second and subsequent rounds of v****g, delegates are free to v**e their conscience. Like for any God fearing constitutional conservative with the attributes needed to beat Hillary and right our ship of state that's listing badly to port (left).
Here's an excerpt from Eric Ericsson's piece today as to specifically why delegates should v**e their conscience.

"And after 55 years in the making, the Great Council of Orthodox Churches is being cancelled. A number of of the churches have decided to withdraw, including Russia. There are various reasons for the withdrawals of churches and the Church of Constantinople, whose Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew I, is considered first among equals, is blaming Russian imperial ambitions. But the reality, according to a dear friend of mine active in the Orthodox Church in America, is that a number of the churches have taken issue with Bartholomew’s leftward drift toward Pope Francis style social justice and environmentalism. There are other subtexts and pretexts too for scuttling the Council, including issues involving the relationships of the various churches.

Republican should pay attention to what is happening. Hiding behind the so-called “will of the people,” which amounts to a minority of Republican v**ers who cast their v**e for Donald Trump, Republicans have set themselves on autopilot for destruction in November. Even with polling showing Hillary Clinton now at a double digit lead despite the events of Orlando, Republicans seem unwilling to change course.

Republicans, however, should not hide behind changeable rules when history itself is on the line. The delegates can unbind themselves. They can decide Donald Trump is a bridge too far. They have the power to do this.

If an organization set up by God himself can take 55 years to reconvene after 1,000 years and then cancel at the last minute, the GOP should be able to do the same thing. Eternal matters are not even on the line, just the politics of the day."
I know. It's absolutely disheartening! To think t... (show quote)


Hey, conservatives had a great set of people to choose from and wound up picking Trump. That means there is no one to blame but themselves. But it not the presidency that is the problem--the senate and congress are now up for grabs and thanks to Trump at least one of them will fall...
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 19:33:52   #
DJRich wrote:
Sounds like this could a major, major flip flop by tRump.

Could he really be that desperate that he is reduced to pandering to every group?



http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/crime/trump-splits-nra-supports-banning-terror-list-suspects-buying-guns


Oh, he's just showing his true colors...
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 19:31:14   #
archie bunker wrote:
Lefties first, please!


Nothing. They are both weapons of war and should be banned...

Next!
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 18:07:12   #
bdamage wrote:
Those that speak the t***h walk a lonely path.

Finally you found a meme that fits you BD. Nice job...
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 18:06:11   #
Wolf counselor wrote:
That's better than being a SPOOK any day.........................................PUNK !!!


Have you ever seen what color roaches are? Maybe you are one of those 'blonde' German kind. Is that the case?
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 17:59:07   #
eagleye13 wrote:
Republicans are trying to clean up the party of the F*****ts.
When will the Democrats clean up their party of the Parasites in it?

Hillary Clinton spills the beans at the inauguration of the new office for Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in Washington, D.C. Some have said it was simply a slip of the tongue but wh**ever the perception is Clinton frankly revealed who's running the show in these United States:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2T-5Pd3oYY

Cheney on CFR, Council on Foreign Relations http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOAk-7F1EVU
Republicans are trying to clean up the party of th... (show quote)


Oh come now. You conservatives can't sit there and support Trump and than think you are cleaning up anything. Christ, you are substituting one pile of s**t for an even bigger one. The only problem is that by doing so it probably cost you the WH plus the senate and congress too!

Why it is I don't know, but you guys can't help but to fall for the most corrupt POS out there. The only person out there who can make Hillary look good is Donald J Trump. Thanks for picking him because if you didn't Hillary would never have a shot at being president...
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 17:50:36   #
mwdegutis wrote:
You go ahead and believe your misguided notions.

Oh, there is nothing misguided about my notions. Every time you have to face the t***h you find a way to duck out. God was very clear in his command to the Israelite's--that no one was to be left alive--not the old, not women (even if they were pregnant), not even the little children. And in his command the Israelite's were to take their property and their land and keep them for themselves. For the Israelite's this was to be their promised land! And we wonder why there are problems in the middle east today...

These commands from god not only make murder relative but stealing too. What this means is that so long as we perceive it as a command from god than EVERYTHING is relative. If this isn't true than come out of hiding and openly debate!~
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 17:40:50   #
Docadhoc wrote:


Where do you get these ridiculous ideas?


By reading the bible. Have you never read it?
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 17:22:16   #
Docadhoc wrote:
What do you find so difficult to understand?

Who told you that any Christian NEEDS a gun?


Conservative Christians in every thread on gun control. You should try reading them some time...
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 17:17:54   #
mwdegutis wrote:
I'm not even going to waste my time discussing this with you because you have a debased mind.


You can't discuss it with me because it contradicts the point you were trying to make. It's not my mind that is the problem but the fact that you have no intellectual integrity because your belief in god had stripped it from you. Your attempt to pin this on me only shows how little personal integrity you have left...
Go to
Jun 15, 2016 17:14:53   #
Artemis wrote:
If I may cut in here with you Peter, and correct me where I might be misunderstanding you. You seem to believe that under the belief in God our life's course is predestined no matter what we do...untrue. This is why we have free choice. The creation of our own life is completely up to us. I don't believe in heaven or hell but if one did, God/ Divine source doesn't know your outcome until it is done.

God didn't know Hitler's outcome no one did. What god might have known were events to happen and how Hitler would react to them was up to him. A persons destiny is an unknown as it's a path we walk towards to with many forks.


Second ~God is not irrational, man is, but that is coming from a stance where rational is superior, not necessarily. Who says irrational has to be chaotic.
If you define irrational has one who depends on instincts and intuition. Where we have gained in rationality we have lost in intuition. Animals in the wild go by instincts and intuition and many are still well organized, no chaos involved. Don't misunderstand me reason is a good thing but not all inclusive.

And lastly aside from what is in our imagination and what is "real" in the physical world. All I have to say to that is think how much has been revealed to us that we never knew existed, simply because we didn't know it did exist, didn't mean it didn't. Wow did that come out right
If I may cut in here with you Peter, and correct m... (show quote)


The point I am arguing is omnipotence. Conservative Christians like to say that god is all knowing, even to the point that he knows the future. That being the case a god would know what his creations would do before they have even done it--thus he would know Hitlers actions before they were even made. And no, I don't think this true because I don't believe in a god but the facts are if one exists and is omnipotent than free will is irrelevant.

As for rationalism and irrationism I think you've misunderstood me; neither is a superior position. The mind of man is rational while the belief in god is irrational. This is the dictionary definition on Irrationalism:a system emphasizing intuition, instinct, feeling, or faith rather than reason or holding that the universe is governed by supernatural forces.

The beliefs of irrationalism are not bad but some of our most positive. They aren't rational though but irrational and why man will never be able to fully understand what or who god is...
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 ... 2664 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.