The Bible states the shedding of innocent blood, sex outside of marriage and homosexuality defile a land. Unless there's serious repentance, our days are few.

I agree with that statement.

Isaiah 55:6 Seek the Lord while He may be found;
Call upon Him while He is near.
7 Let the wicked abandon his way,
And the unrighteous person his thoughts;
And let him return to the Lord,
And He will have compassion on him,
And to our God,
For He will abundantly pardon.
8 “For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways My ways,” declares the Lord.
9 “For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are My ways higher than your ways
And My thoughts than your thoughts.
10 For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven,
And do not return there without watering the earth
And making it produce and sprout,
And providing seed to the sower and bread to the eater;
11 So will My word be which goes out of My mouth;
It will not return to Me empty,
Without accomplishing what I desire,
And without succeeding in the purpose for which I sent it.
12 For you will go out with joy

Sorry it took so long to reply to your legitimate question. Everyone in our house has contracted C***d And even this "milder" version can knock the wind out of your sails. We're all on the mend but still dealing with the residual effects. I wouldn't wish this on my worst enemy!

1) The Lord, God was Not manufactured by man, but He created man.
2) There are thousands of manufactured 'gods' but none of them are the Creator.
3) Religion is man's effort to make their own 'god' so they don't have to deal with their own shortcomings, i.e., sin.
4) Christianity is the FACT that Christ (the hypostatic union of God and man) led a perfect and sinless life.
5) He died on the cross and paid in full the penalty for the sin of every person throughout history, past, present and future.
6) All that is necessary to be 'born again' is to believe on the redemptive work (As many as believed, to them was given life eternal)
7) Christians are called to give out the Gospel.
8) You have the freedom to believe or reject the Gospel. NO ONE can force you to believe. Ylou can ignore this post, or . . .

Don't you realize your anti-Christian posts are JUST a religious as are the Christian posts? You don't know God and soi you rant against Him. If you don't like the post, don't read it. It's a really simple concept.

I really do not care if they're foxes or coyotes. I hope some merciful h****r just put them out of their misery! Mange is a terrible way for any creature to slowly and torturously die!

On 7-19 Radiance 3 posted the following====================
I can't stand this. I must respond. All these things since the beginning were massive concocted farce. Designed to convict president Trump since it started in 2016. Nothing had been proven, yet they relentlessly pursue evil schemes until this innocent man is convicted.

Facts of the matter, and in particular the J*** 6th event. Pelosi was overall in charge of Congress. The flow of responsibility must start from her. And when she relinquished, denied that responsibility, she was in dereliction of duty.

President Trump offered her security forces from 10,000 to 20,000 National Guards. Three times offered from Jan. 3,4,5 was suggested by the Nat. Defense Dept., proven by Kash Patel former Chief of Staff to Acting Sec. of Defense Miller. Pelosi and Mayor of DC, Bowser, refused/denied to accept. Had this 20,000 National Guards been accepted, the mayhem could not have happened. That was the moment that Pelosi was in dereliction of her duties to protect Congress.

Responsibility of president Trump ended upon the rejection and refusal of the security offered to Pelosi and Bowser. That chain of command must start from Pelosi. Fact of the matter was the Chief C*****l P****e Officer wanted badly that added security. Pelosi ignored and neglected that.

This was designed on purpose to frame up so many lies and falsified events and issues against Trump. Pelosi denied the admission of Jim Jordan and Jim Banks, of GOP to present and cross examine the testimonies of the witnesses. No representation was allowed from the party accused. The breakdown of falsified evidences and tutored witnesses to lie. Doctoring of evidences. All of them were framed up to convict Trump. Liz Cheney's lies, Cassidy Hutchinson lies, and all the testimonials presented sounded farces and tutored by the framers of these h**xes. All the characters on this mayhem were liars and had malicious motives to convict Trump. And Pelosi was the framer. She must be held responsible for dereliction of duties, at the end, she must be locked up.

At the end:
John 8: 31-32 The T***h Will Set You Free!

******

This is an accurate timeline with documented proof that Pelosi is the culprit, not Trump.

Sounds like what you're doing. Again, I'm going to repost Radiance3's post of 7-19 and let's see if you, Woodguru, can understand what is posted here.====================
I can't stand this. I must respond. All these things since the beginning were massive concocted farce. Designed to convict president Trump since it started in 2016. Nothing had been proven, yet they relentlessly pursue evil schemes until this innocent man is convicted.

Facts of the matter, and in particular the J*** 6th event. Pelosi was overall in charge of Congress. The flow of responsibility must start from her. And when she relinquished, denied that responsibility, she was in dereliction of duty.

President Trump offered her security forces from 10,000 to 20,000 National Guards. Three times offered from Jan. 3,4,5 was suggested by the Nat. Defense Dept., proven by Kash Patel former Chief of Staff to Acting Sec. of Defense Miller. Pelosi and Mayor of DC, Bowser, refused/denied to accept. Had this 20,000 National Guards been accepted, the mayhem could not have happened. That was the moment that Pelosi was in dereliction of her duties to protect Congress.

Responsibility of president Trump ended upon the rejection and refusal of the security offered to Pelosi and Bowser. That chain of command must start from Pelosi. Fact of the matter was the Chief C*****l P****e Officer wanted badly that added security. Pelosi ignored and neglected that.

This was designed on purpose to frame up so many lies and falsified events and issues against Trump. Pelosi denied the admission of Jim Jordan and Jim Banks, of GOP to present and cross examine the testimonies of the witnesses. No representation was allowed from the party accused. The breakdown of falsified evidences and tutored witnesses to lie. Doctoring of evidences. All of them were framed up to convict Trump. Liz Cheney's lies, Cassidy Hutchinson lies, and all the testimonials presented sounded farces and tutored by the framers of these h**xes. All the characters on this mayhem were liars and had malicious motives to convict Trump. And Pelosi was the framer. She must be held responsible for dereliction of duties, at the end, she must be locked up.

At the end:
John 8: 31-32 The T***h Will Set You Free!

July 19, Radiance3 posted the following: ====================
I can't stand this. I must respond. All these things since the beginning were massive concocted farce. Designed to convict president Trump since it started in 2016. Nothing had been proven, yet they relentlessly pursue evil schemes until this innocent man is convicted.

Facts of the matter, and in particular the J*** 6th event. Pelosi was overall in charge of Congress. The flow of responsibility must start from her. And when she relinquished, denied that responsibility, she was in dereliction of duty.

President Trump offered her security forces from 10,000 to 20,000 National Guards. Three times offered from Jan. 3,4,5 was suggested by the Nat. Defense Dept., proven by Kash Patel former Chief of Staff to Acting Sec. of Defense Miller. Pelosi and Mayor of DC, Bowser, refused/denied to accept. Had this 20,000 National Guards been accepted, the mayhem could not have happened. That was the moment that Pelosi was in dereliction of her duties to protect Congress.

Responsibility of president Trump ended upon the rejection and refusal of the security offered to Pelosi and Bowser. That chain of command must start from Pelosi. Fact of the matter was the Chief C*****l P****e Officer wanted badly that added security. Pelosi ignored and neglected that.

This was designed on purpose to frame up so many lies and falsified events and issues against Trump. Pelosi denied the admission of Jim Jordan and Jim Banks, of GOP to present and cross examine the testimonies of the witnesses. No representation was allowed from the party accused. The breakdown of falsified evidences and tutored witnesses to lie. Doctoring of evidences. All of them were framed up to convict Trump. Liz Cheney's lies, Cassidy Hutchinson lies, and all the testimonials presented sounded farces and tutored by the framers of these h**xes. All the characters on this mayhem were liars and had malicious motives to convict Trump. And Pelosi was the framer. She must be held responsible for dereliction of duties, at the end, she must be locked up.

At the end:
John 8: 31-32 The T***h Will Set You Free!

It was true 7-19 and it's still true today.

IF the bill was passed, it would not affect g****l w*****g one little bit. one average sized belch from your average volcano puts out more pollution than the entirety of civilization. I guess we need electric volcanoes or at least corks large enough to stop their effluvium.

There's a huge problem in Africa with rabies. Essentially nearly every mammal can get it. Due the limited amount of money to help decrease the epidemic, human rabies is not rare. I have seen videos of affected people chained to trees to prevent them from harming others until they died. Years ago, when working in ICCU, we had a teenager and the doctors were having a terrible time diagnosing, until a resident a noticed a couple of small puncture wounds on his lower leg, so he suggested testing him for rabies. By this time, he was on a ventilator The results came back, and you wouldn't believe the isolation that was put on that room. And, yes, everyone associated with his case had to be v******ted for rabies. He died about a week later.
I willl admit I'm guilty of feeding wildlife, but NEVER from my mouth or hand, Usually, the treat is tossed on the ground.
I remember in the 70's, Texas was having problems with rabies and then they started dropping chicken heads that had been treated with the rabies v*****e. These were dropped over the affected areas with much decreased incidence of wildlife rabies.

While I wish it were true, I don't believe it. A Demoncrat giving up power? Why, it just isn't done.

[quote=AuntiE]https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2022/07/19/woke-college-professors-call-on-archeologists-to-stop-identifying-ancient-human-remains-by-g****r-n597422?

Woke College Professors Call on Archeologists to Stop Identifying Ancient Human Remains by G****r
Mike MillerJul 19, 2022 9:00 AM ET


Who didn’t see THIS coming?

As if everything on the planet isn’t already r****t, h********c, t***sphobic, Islamophobic, misogynistic, or other such nonsense, a new controversy is brewing among anthropologists about archeologists identifying ancient human remains by g****r. No, you haven’t accidentally stumbled over to The Babylon Bee.

Before we continue, let’s revisit a couple of definitions, according to Merriam-Webster:

Archeology: the scientific study of material remains (such as tools, pottery, jewelry, stone walls, and monuments) of past human life and activities; remains of the culture of a people.

Anthropology: the science of human beings, especially: the study of human beings and their ancestors through time and space and in relation to physical character, environmental and social relations, and culture.

George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley summed up the crazy, perfectly:

Professors are objecting to identifying ancient human remains by biological g****r because they cannot gauge how a person identified at that the [sic] time. Others are objecting to identifying race as a practice because it fuels w***e s*******y.

Of course, not — and of course.

Besides, “misg****ring” ancient human remains is disrespectful as hell. Or something.

As reported by The College Fix, g****r activists [rolling-eyes emoji] are actually pushing to bar archeologists from identifying remains as “male” or “female,” arguing that scientists cannot possibly know how ancient humans self-identified. Enjoying the ride on the crazy train, so far?

Emma Palladino who is seeking an advanced archeology degree and is a self-proclaimed “rightful heir of Ilsidur” — a bizarre reference to J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings —tweeted this whacked-out gem, in early July, as part of a seven-tweet, crock of crap missive:

My t***s+non-binary friends: you might know the argument that the archaeologists who find your bones one day will assign you the same g****r as you had at birth, so regardless of whether you t***sition, you can’t escape your assigned sex. Let me tell you why that’s bulls**t.

Please, professor, I await your explanation with bated breath. Alas, you can’t view the following, because Palladino limits who can view her tweets.

My t***s+non-binary friends: you might know the argument that the archaeologists who find your bones one day will assign you the same g****r as you had at birth, so regardless of whether you t***sition, you can’t escape your assigned sex. Let me tell you why that’s bulls**t. 1/

— Emma Palladino🏺 (@EmmaPalladino) July 4, 2022

It got worse, with Palladino going on to say, as noted by College Fix:

Labeling remains ‘male’ or ‘female’ is rarely the end goal of any excavation, anyway. The ‘bioarchaeology of the individual’ is what we aim for, factoring in absolutely everything we discover about a person into a nuanced and open-ended biography of their life.

Huh? Obviously over my head.

G****r activists have now formed a group called T***s Doe Task Force to “explore ways in which current standards in forensic human identification do a disservice to people who do not clearly fit the g****r binary.” (If your eyes have already glazed over, you’re not alone.)

The group’s mission statement reads:

We propose a g****r-expansive approach to human identification by combing missing and unidentified databases looking for contextual clues such as decedents wearing clothing culturally coded to a g****r other than their assigned sex.

We maintain our own database of missing and unidentified people who we have determined may be T*********r or g****r-variant, as most current database systems do not permit comparison of missing to unidentified across different binary sex categories.

Lemme t***slate: “We look for every excuse possible — including sciencey, really smart-sounding, meaningless nonsense, in an attempt to justify our predetermined anti-g****ring position.”

However, San Jose State archaeology Professor Elizabeth Weiss says eliminating g****r classifications amounts to “ideologically-motivated fudging.” Weiss told College Fix a move exists among academics “toward getting all of the academy’s favored shibboleths to accord with one another,” further explaining:

Some early anthropologists sometimes mistook some robust female skeletons as male skeletons, particularly in the Aleut and Inuit collections; this reinforced false stereotypes that females were not as hard-working as males.

Over time, biological anthropologists and archaeologists worked hard to determine which traits are determined by sex, regardless of time and culture. This new policy of erasing this progress is a step back for science and women.

Sexing skeletal remains is a critical sk**l in forensics and any diminishing of this sk**l will negatively impact criminal investigations, denying the victims and their families justice.

Weiss has paid a steep price for her forthright professional opinion, which appears to be based on data and scientific facts — as opposed to a radical wokified agenda; she is currently suing San Diego State for locking her out of its human remains collection, which she says is retribution for her position opposing the repatriation of human remains.

Turns out, Professor Weiss apparently overestimated the market for her professional scientific opinion within the no-longer-hallowed — but very much woke — halls of academia.

Someone in academia who does appear to agree with Professor Weiss is Professor Turley. In a piece on his website, Turley mused about the above insanity (emphasis, mine):

[i]t would seem that g****r does reflect physical distinctions that impact elements of society, migration, and other relevant issues. In the end, you can collect this data and reach your own conclusions. If there were non-binary Neanderthals, I would frankly love to read about them. […]

However, given the reliance on legal and political events by some of these writers, it is worth having a broader debate over whether such concerns should be used to limit scientific inquiry or classification on these points.

It would seem to some of us that the focus should be not on the collection but the importance given such data.

Then again, virtually nothing in today’s America is immune to being viewed through the political lenses of predisposed positioning,vs. on the basis of objectivity, facts, data, history, or logic.

Think about it. Objectively, of course.[/quo


The Lord is not the author of confusion Satan is and I've never in 73 years heard so much garbage.

They often carry rabies. Not a smart thing to do!

Love it. Iliamna

And a lot cheaper.