Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
An opposing viewpoint, with which I am not agreeing or disagreeing.
https://www.theamericanview.com/is-there-a-significance-of-the-gold-fringe-on-the-american-f**g/
The American View
Is there a significance of the gold fringe on the American f**g?Home More Commentary Pastor David Whitney Is there a significance of the gold fringe on the American f**g?
There are a variety of ideas put out regarding the meaning of the fringe on the f**g. The most important one from a constitutional perspective is the claim that that f**g with fringe is a f**g that indicates admiralty law is in effect wherever that f**g is displayed, such as in a court room. If true that would mean that courts which have a fringed f**g (which is almost all courts in the land) are not Constitutional courts (Article Three Courts) but Admiralty Courts where Constitutional provisions do not apply but rather Admiralty law prevails. Now take that idea and put it together with the clear reality that most of our courts are not following the Constitution as ratified by our founders, but some other form of unconstitutional law such as international law, and you can see why this idea has gained legs in the patriot community. Thus this theory would help us understand the other wise infuriating and treasonous actions of the judicial branch. So the theory claims we are under martial rule and admiralty law, some would date that from The War to Prevent Southern Independence, others from World War I or World War II; it matters not according to this theory because the end result is that today we are no longer under the Constitution but under martial law and the fringed f**g is but one demonstration of that reality.
But such a theory has one gigantic problem, there has been no legal suspension of the U.S. Constitution, it is still the supreme law of the land. Even though it is violated daily in Washington D.C. and all across this land, it still is the law and can and must still be enforced by all those who take an oath to uphold it – whether military folk or politicians. So even if the above theory were true, and the quote below I believe dispels that idea, the Constitution is still the supreme law of the land even when grossly violated as it is in our day. And our duty as citizens is to educate an ever widening circle of Americans on the true meaning of our Constitution so that we can restore the Republic. I think the Admiralty law theory brings despair and hopelessness to patriots who are told we have no way to restore America.
Some researchers have concluded,
There is no record of an Act of Congress or Executive Order which either prescribes or prohibits the addition of fringe, nor is there any indication that any symbolism was ever associated with it. The use of fringe is optional with the person or organization displaying the f**g.
This additional quote is from the book “So Proudly We Hail, The History of the United States F**g” Smithsonian Institute Press 1981, by Wiliam R. Furlong and Byron McCandless.
The placing of a fringe on Our F**g is optional with the person or organization, and no Act of Congress or Executive Order either prohibits the practice, according to the Institute of Hearaldry.
Fringe is used on indoor f**gs only, as fringe on f**gs on outdoor f**gs would deteriorate rapidly. The fringe on a F**g is considered an ‘honorable enrichment only’, and its official use by the US Army dates from 1895. A 1925 Attorney General’s Opinion (34 Op. Atty. Gen 483) states:
the fringe does not appear to be regarded as an integral part of the F**g, and its presence cannot be said to constitute an unauthorized addition to the design prescribed by statute. An external fringe is to be distinguished from letters, words, or emblematic designs printed or superimposed upon the body of the f**g itself. Under law, such additions might be open to objection as unauthorized; but the same is not necessarily true of the fringe.
So it appears the gold trim is generally used on ceremonial indoor f**gs that are used for special services and is believed to have been first used in a military setting. It has no specific significance and its use, from what I understand, is in compliance with applicable f**g codes and laws. To conclude, gold fringe is used on the f**g as an honorable enrichment only. It is not regarded as an integral part of the f**g and its use does not constitute an unauthorized addition to the design prescribed by statutes.
An opposing viewpoint, with which I am not agreein... (
show quote)
Thank you very much for your logical and reasoned post. For at least 2-3 decades, I've heard argument that the fringe signified a fundamental change in the nature of our country and suspension of our Constitution. I've never found this to be compelling but didn't know enough to fully get beyond those arguments. Thanks!