One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: gaconservative74
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 47 next>>
Oct 13, 2020 19:17:56   #
Milosia2 wrote:
Care to expand on “ the right man in the Whitehouse?”’
The right man for what?
He’s an unstable lunatic !
Leading a bunch of unstable lunatics !
With no plans other than burning everything to the ground.
Are you really sure you H**e this country so much ?


That’s hilarious!!!! I believe it’s B*M and A****a and the “peaceful protestors” burning everything down.
Go to
Oct 13, 2020 17:07:35   #
roy wrote:
How any women would approve of her ,women have faught for their rights for years,and even though this is a women ,she believes a women is supposed to bow down to their husband,the way she thinks you women may be wearing a veil .Then again she may rule against trump on everything ,he wants,Wouldn't that be something,I can just hear the names she's called on opp


See, you apparently have no idea what she believes. Her submission to her husband is biblical. Like it or not. God designed man and woman differently so they can compliment one another in a marriage relationship. Here’s the deal though, life in general is most definitely not a democracy. Your job.... your employer tells you what to do... school... the teacher tells the students what to do..... in a family.... the children do what the parents say..... it’s just that way...... see, a man has more responsibility in a family and by that I mean God will hold a man accountable for what happens in his family, not the woman...... you ain’t gotta like it or agree with it but that is what the Bible says and she follows that..... that doesn’t mean she is subservient to every male she comes In Contact with, not does it mean she is less than a man, she understands the role God designed for her and chooses to submit to her husband. but somebody has to be in charge in a family and God designed and expects the man to fill that roll and holds him accountable for it.

On the other hand if you are atheist, just do wh**ever you want because it really makes no difference in the end.
Go to
Aug 25, 2020 18:15:30   #
steve66613 wrote:
Find a spot, in that 2024 administration, for Nikki Haley!


I’d v**e for Nikki for president!!!
Go to
Aug 19, 2020 19:07:32   #
Kevyn wrote:
You have no idea what I make or own. I have been successful through work, health and good fortune by most measures. I own, outright, homes in three states, 5 vehicles, 3 boats and am able to travel extensively with my family. At least until the Cheeto faced S**tgibbon mishandled his plague making Americans persona non grata across the world. Throughout the course of my life I have employed scores of people. Taxes are simply the price all patriots contribute for their freedom and opportunity. At a certain point you are not making income from your own sweat you make it by exploiting the labor of others. Once you get to this point in life you have a moral obligation to pay increased taxes.
You have no idea what I make or own. I have been s... (show quote)


Seeing as your math sk**ls really SUCK I would question your resume that you so arrogantly provided. It would be 40,000.00 in taxes.
Go to
Aug 13, 2020 17:42:46   #
byronglimish wrote:
What are Kamala Harris's qualifications for being Biden's pick?

I can't think of anything, can you.

Don't worry, I expect the crickets reply.


Female and black. Only two qualifications required
Go to
Jul 17, 2020 17:50:42   #
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
Sometimes it seems that there is another law, the law of nature to protect your own (offspring) with your life if necessary, and sometimes in the rage that the Perp caused, he loses track of when to stop. If this goes to trial, he will probably be convicted. Maybe he should be. And if so, the Judge should give him a lecture about losing his cool, sentence him with the minimum sentence required by law, and then suspend the sentence. Justice is still about what is just.


There should have been no stopping until the bot stopped breathing and they had a parade for the father.
Go to
Jul 13, 2020 17:04:35   #
Kevyn wrote:
A group of 83 of the world’s richest people have called on governments to permanently increase taxes on them and other members of the wealthy elite to help pay for the economic recovery from the C****-** crisis.

The super-rich members, including Ben and Jerry’s ice cream co-founder Jerry Greenfield and Disney heir Abigail Disney, called on “our governments to raise taxes on people like us. Immediately. Substantially. Permanently”.

“As C****-** strikes the world, millionaires like us have a critical role to play in healing our world,” the millionaires said in a letter shared with the Guardian. “No, we are not the ones caring for the sick in intensive care wards. We are not driving the ambulances that will bring the ill to hospitals. We are not restocking grocery store shelves or delivering food door to door.

“But we do have money, lots of it. Money that is desperately needed now and will continue to be needed in the years ahead, as our world recovers from this crisis.”

The group warned that the economic impact of c****av***s crisis will “last for decades” and could “push half a billion more people into poverty”.

Among those adding their names to the letter are Sir Stephen Tindall, the founder of the Warehouse Group and New Zealand’s second richest man with a $475m (£370m) fortune; the British screenwriter and director Richard Curtis; and the Irish venture capitalist John O’Farrell, who made millions investing in Silicon Valley tech companies.

“The problems caused by, and revealed by, C****-** can’t be solved with charity, no matter how generous. Government leaders must take the responsibility for raising the funds we need and spending them fairly,” the letter says. “We owe a huge debt to the people working on the frontlines of this global battle. Most essential workers are grossly underpaid for the burden they carry.”

The group released the letter ahead of this weekend’s G20 finance ministers and central bank governors meeting. They called on politicians to “address global ine******y and acknowledge that tax increases on the wealthy and greater international tax t***sparency are essential for a viable long-term solution”.

The number of super-rich people continues to grow despite the economic impact of the c****av***s crisis and global lockdowns. Jeff Bezos, the world’s richest person and the founder of Amazon, has seen his fortune swell by $75bn so far this year to a record $189bn
A group of 83 of the world’s richest people have c... (show quote)


How bout they quit talking about the government taxing them more and start paying all of their employees substantially more and then that would work the same way. Let the individual decide how to spend their own money instead of the government spending everybody’s money. Also, if they want to pay more taxes then quit taking all of their lawful write offs and they will in essence pay more in taxes. This is all just lip service from a few wealthy people to seem like they really give a flying fart about the common man. They have all the power to spread wealth that they want/need but they really don’t want to and I sure as heck don’t think the government can spend money wisely.
Go to
Jul 10, 2020 07:13:00   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

Ok wow man can you narrow it down a little ?
What would you like to know about this or what part of it ?


Well first of all, what “system” is r****t?
Go to
Jul 9, 2020 09:15:45   #
Most here know what side of politics I’m on but I have a question that I really think deserves real discussion. Not name calling and partisanship. I have heard the term s******c r****m a thousand times over the last month and a half. I would like to discuss this issue and try to understand what “system” is r****t and see evidence and facts to support the idea that this “system” is r****ts.

It would be nice to really discuss this based on fact and quality statistics and be open minded in the end result. I personally have a hard time with just accepting that such s******c r****m exists based off my own personal examination of facts. Maybe I don’t have all the facts and will be persuaded that such r****m exists. Maybe I won’t.

Now, that said, one cop puts his knee on a black mans neck does not indicate s******c r****m. For that matter 10 cops putting their knees on black men’s neck doesn’t make a system r****t. Does that mean those cops are r****t? Maybe, but this doesn’t mean that those 10 cops are a direct reflection of the “system”.

To summarize, what evidence is there to prove the system is r****t?
Go to
Jul 6, 2020 18:41:55   #
PeterS wrote:
Oh, come now, simply because I realize that CC's behavior is anything but Christian doesn't mean I h**e the religion. Anything but liberty tree, I believe Christ to be one of the world's greatest prophets. You CC's just mangled the meaning of what he tried to say...


That’s classic Pete. You deny God but say that Jesus was a great prophet? If He is not God as He said he was, then you are calling a liar and a fraud great. Is that how you see it, because that’s what you’re saying. But that would also be prophesied by Paul. The “wise” would become foolish and call good bad and bad good.
Go to
Jun 6, 2020 17:32:54   #
archie bunker wrote:
Systematic r****m......what the hell is that?


I ask that same question!!!!!! I haven’t gotten a good answer yet.
Go to
Mar 7, 2020 10:36:47   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Females have to meet the same fitness requirements as males. Female fighter pilots have been tested and found to be better pilots than males ( look it up, I dare you ). There's no longer a question about whether female police officers have the required mindset to do the job.


In other words.....................everything you just said was wrong.
Females have to meet the same fitness requirements... (show quote)


As a matter of fact, it has actually changed a bit for males since the early ‘90’s. To max the test at 18 years old it was 82 pushups 92 sit-ups and 11:54 for the two mile run.
Go to
Mar 7, 2020 10:30:19   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Females have to meet the same fitness requirements as males. Female fighter pilots have been tested and found to be better pilots than males ( look it up, I dare you ). There's no longer a question about whether female police officers have the required mindset to do the job.


In other words.....................everything you just said was wrong.
Females have to meet the same fitness requirements... (show quote)



Not quite.

https://usarmybasic.com/army-physical-fitness/apft-standards
Go to
Jan 23, 2020 11:42:14   #
Question Authority wrote:
I don’t think that’ll ever happen as the left is pretty darn tolerant and accepting for the most part of other cultures, religions, ideals and beliefs. I honestly can’t say the same with the venom I see from the current right wing ideologues.


As long as you aren’t a white male straight Christian, the left is fine with you.
Go to
Dec 11, 2019 21:14:01   #
okie don wrote:
There is no telling how many Demo's are getting $$$ from Ukraine.
They are fighting like hell to shut it up.
How about the Clinton's and Obama's?
shhhhhhhh- quiet.


You better watch out. You might get suicided!!!! 😂😂😂😂
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 47 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.