One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: saloopo
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 119 next>>
Apr 6, 2015 09:17:08   #
Ronald Hatt wrote:
Don't try to inject R****m, where there isn't any"! What are you?.....another "Al the rat Sharpton"?


Huh??? You got something against the t***h?
Go to
Apr 6, 2015 09:07:06   #
KHH1 wrote:
Don't try to fuel r****t discussions....by framing questions a certain way.....


Law students elected to the prestigious Harvard Law Review spend two years working there. In their first year, most write a brief. Not obama, an affirmative action member of the Review supporting the political correct machinations of the school. "They probably don't want [to] have you [reporters] going back" to examine the Review, University of Southern California law professor Susan Estrich said. This guys as phony as a three dollar bill.
Go to
Apr 6, 2015 00:01:23   #
KHH1 wrote:
THIS S**T HAS BEEN POSTED 50 TIMES......

Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges?

A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so.
THIS S**T HAS BEEN POSTED 50 TIMES...... br br Q:... (show quote)


The whole point of a 'surrender' is so no disciplinary action need be taken. Still,.....no license,.....no lawyer. Who in their right mind would trust either obama or his bitter half to defend in a court of law? BTW, its not an inactivation, its a 'surrender' and does require court action to reverse.
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 17:20:59   #
KHH1 wrote:
It is always the least knowing among us that tend to be the most insulting....you're right....close that door indeed.


dont kid yourself, your doors have been closed for a long time. Thats why people are laughing at the both of you.
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 15:46:47   #
jelun wrote:
They can't help it, that alex person who just LOVES calling people stupid just admitted that he doesn't know how to do a search.
Well, shut the door!


..... derp.
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 15:43:16   #
KHH1 wrote:
i'll make is simple.......LOSING JOBS versus JOB CREATION.......you're like a walking man making fun of another man's car...or an unemployed man telling another his job sucks....do you even get it?


Ill make it even simpler for you. More jobs were lost than created... count em'. The rest of your statement makes no sense at all. I expected better from someone with nine degrees. I guy that smart should at least be able to read.
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 09:47:45   #
jelun wrote:
Really? It isn't working?
Because the numbers say something different...


Your charts are out of date, get with it durp.
U.S. Economy Gained 126,000 Jobs in March, an Abrupt Slowdown in Hiring.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/04/business/economy/jobs-report-unemployment-march.html?_r...

The previous three month employment figures have been revised down and GDP for the first quarter will come in at or near 0%.
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for January was revised from +239,000 to
+201,000, and the change for February was revised from +295,000 to +264,000.

Any comparison between Reagan and obama is luney tune apples vs squirrel nut comparison. Total job growth during the first four years of the Obama recovery has been 4,657,000 or 97,020 jobs per month. That's not even enough to hit the breakeven level of 150,000 jobs per month.

Reagan recovery generated a total of 11.2 million new jobs or 233,333 per month. Reagan's best job month topped any ranking since WWII with 1,114,000 jobs added in September 1983. So far the Obama recovery is a flop (as in cow flop). But what do you expect from a progressive marxist smoke blower?
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 09:08:14   #
jelun wrote:
I responded directly to your post.
So I am not sure how you see that as changing the subject.


jelun wrote:
The numbers are not terrible. They are just not as good as we might like.


Dont play your stupid word games with me! durp
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 09:04:21   #
jelun wrote:
The numbers are not terrible. They are just not as good as we might like.


NO! the numbers are terrible and your central planner friends are responsible for it. Spare me the jabberwocky analysis. Your friends are on their way out the door. good riddance.
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 08:57:36   #
Alicia wrote:
********************
Only the First Crusade began with protecting Christians and Jews visiting their holy land or site. The balance was based on greed and power as is the present ISIL.

Our President Obama is correct in protecting all beliefs. Don't be so damned high and mighty in believing that only Christianity preaches the t***h.

http://www.alternet.org/brutal-christianity-well-see-more-cruel-laws-indianas-until-christian-right-defeated


absolute bullschitt. you wackos are more worried about imaginary 'what ifs' in Indiana by destroying the life of a young pizzaria owner for an imaginary crime invented by media and then have the GALL to say obama is protecting ALL beliefs? Except hers! You are an insane i***t and if there is a hell, you will surely rot there. People are on to your nut case games and theyre sick and tired of it.
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 08:26:31   #
jelun wrote:
Actually, the numbers come THROUGH the US Bureau of Labor Statistics FROM private companies.
That is the reason for typical refiguring of stats, reporting is voluntary and irregular.


You can change the subject all you want. Its typical your brand of insanity. The numbers are still terrible no matter who they come THROUGH or FROM, obama is the in charge and irresponsible. His administration is a d********g failure....like you.
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 08:07:46   #
jelun wrote:
Where do you get this "buck stops with" the Prez garbage?
These numbers are based on private sector jobs.
Management of businesses is responsible for the numbers.



The numbers come from the bureau of labor statistics . Spare me the double talk, it makes you sound like an i***t. durp!
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 08:03:07   #
jelun wrote:
Nope, not playing that game, thanks.
There must be at least 3 different threads going if you want to play the gay agenda game.


I didnt know you were gay!!!! That explains the f*ggy avatar.
Go to
Apr 4, 2015 07:57:35   #
KHH1 wrote:
You people suffer from cognitive dissonance and that is why we keep reminding you of Cowboy W's fugg ups....he had an economy that shed 750k jobs/month at one point...and you're talking s**t in the midst of 60 straight months of job growth...you all nit pick in your way to disparage the "darkie" in Office...but are all of you so gotdamn dumb to know that even 1 job/month growth is in the positive direction and an improvement over W's negative direction bulls**t? That is the one thing that shows you are r****ts...you never hold your own to task for s**t they do wrong as if your asses are entitled.....look at the diference between you all try to scrutinize what I say and let Anegry amerikkka be a rabid, intelligible h**eful screeching chimpanzee r****d and you all just remain mum.....you have scorn for black achievement and you trivialize black excellence...but give a pass to white ignorance and mediocrity and let that remain unmentioned as if it does not exist....look at how you spin black versus white welfare...that is just who you all are.....
You people suffer from cognitive dissonance and th... (show quote)


One more time. Your stats are a bunch of schitt jack! You want to keep up this bush blame game? You moron progressives were in charge of the economy since 2006 and it took 18 months to trash Bush and crash the economy. Now 8 years later obama the fukup muslim marxist hasnt fixed schitt. Not like reagan fixed the recession he inherited from jimmy (the peanut picker) carter.

U.S. Economy Gained 126,000 Jobs in March, an Abrupt Slowdown in Hiring.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/04/business/economy/jobs-report-unemployment-march.html?_r...

The previous three month employment figures have been revised down and GDP for the first quarter will come in at or near 0%.
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for January was revised from +239,000 to
+201,000, and the change for February was revised from +295,000 to +264,000. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
With these revisions, employment gains in January and February combined were 69,000 less than
previously reported. Over the past 3 months, job gains have averaged 197,000 per month.

Not good news for many citizens. The buck stops with obama even though he seems loath to accept the responsibility for anything except his mediocre golfing sk**ls and appeasing the worlds islamists. The Fed's excuses are running thin as are your ignorant repetitive blame Bush excuses......ps. cant you leave your d********g uproared r****t comments out of at least one comment?
Go to
Apr 3, 2015 23:42:41   #
KHH1 wrote:
I understand that many of you loathe any good news that ever comes from this administration......you live for the negative as you try to juxtapose your h**e behind policy arguments......but that is okay...the greatest thing was Obama's second e******n.....he has handled his and said f-k his naysayers.....andTed Cruz will not lead the wackos to victory....will not even come close to the nomination....at all....he is an extreme fool and has an extreme bigoted fool following...he better stick to Texas....because that is as far as he will ever go...........
I understand that many of you loathe any good new... (show quote)


U.S. Economy Gained 126,000 Jobs in March, an Abrupt Slowdown in Hiring.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/04/business/economy/jobs-report-unemployment-march.html?_r=0

The previous three month employment figures have been revised down and GDP for the first quarter will come in at or near 0%.
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for January was revised from +239,000 to
+201,000, and the change for February was revised from +295,000 to +264,000. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
With these revisions, employment gains in January and February combined were 69,000 less than
previously reported. Over the past 3 months, job gains have averaged 197,000 per month.

Not good news for many citizens. I dont believe obama is solely responsible but neither do I believe he is specifically excused. The buck stops with him even though he seems loath to accept the responsibility. The Fed's excuses are running thin so be prepared for another round of the quantitative easing band aid which if past performance is any indicator, will result in more misery in the future. Printing this much debt is not healthy.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 119 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.