jelun wrote:
Really? It isn't working?
Because the numbers say something different...
Your charts are out of date, get with it durp.
U.S. Economy Gained 126,000 Jobs in March, an Abrupt Slowdown in Hiring.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/04/business/economy/jobs-report-unemployment-march.html?_r...
The previous three month employment figures have been revised down and GDP for the first quarter will come in at or near 0%.
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for January was revised from +239,000 to
+201,000, and the change for February was revised from +295,000 to +264,000.
Any comparison between Reagan and obama is luney tune apples vs squirrel nut comparison. Total job growth during the first four years of the Obama recovery has been 4,657,000 or 97,020 jobs per month. That's not even enough to hit the breakeven level of 150,000 jobs per month.
Reagan recovery generated a total of 11.2 million new jobs or 233,333 per month. Reagan's best job month topped any ranking since WWII with 1,114,000 jobs added in September 1983. So far the Obama recovery is a flop (as in cow flop). But what do you expect from a progressive marxist smoke blower?