Given her statutre she had no right making such a comment and yes, eagle, it does show how "politics" plays within the SCOTUS who is to be independent in thought of an party when ruling on Constitutional Law/..

She did make a mockery of the highest court and did bring in that already known fact that they are anything but impartial or independent in thought..She should retire now~~

As for Ryan, his 15 minutes of fame is all he is looking for..

Took the position "temporarily" didn't he say?? Well he's run his course and his "temporary" needs to come to an end not when Trump goes in, if he goes in...

That man is a snake through and through..Not just because of all his trumped up attacks on Trump but because he is no Republican sitting there, he's a s**m artist!!!

The T***s Bathroom Fight and the Disturbing Endgame
July 11, 2016
Last week, the Obama administration proved that they were not about to let their t*********r bathroom agenda fall by the wayside, regardless of the intense political and legal pushback it is drawing from states across the country. On Tuesday, the Department of Justice asked a federal judge to block North Carolina’s law that requires men and women to use the men’s and women’s bathroom facilities respectively. North Carolina is, in turn, suing the Obama administration, accusing the federal government of once again exceeding its constitutional mandate. A mandate that Obama has gotten very good at ignoring.

Imagine it was 1995, and the story unfolding today was the plot of a dark sci-fi novel. You wouldn’t believe it. Sure, maybe society could crumble into various districts and pit children against each other for the sake of entertainment. Sure, maybe scientists could bring dinosaurs back to life. But to believe that a president – even a liberal Democrat – would try to legally erase the lines between men and women? No, that’s ridiculous.

Somehow, though, it’s not ridiculous. It’s controversial, but we’ve already accepted it as part of American life in 2016. And it shouldn’t be surprising that it happened so fast. All of us have been indoctrinated for twenty years, preparing us for this moment. This is especially true for millennials, who have been taught that one concept matters more than anything else: Tolerance.

Tolerance can be a great thing, but here’s the problem: it’s always been a one-way street. No one has pushed gays and t*********rs to be tolerant of Christians. No, “tolerance” only comes into play when there’s a liberal agenda at stake. We’re not opening our society to a larger spectrum of available viewpoints and opinions; we’re simply replacing certain opinions with others. These opinions over here are now acceptable; those opinions over there are now bigoted and backwards. So it is written. So shall it be.

To liberals, this is progress, and it’s not hard for them to convince others that they’re on the right side of history. Look at s***ery. Look at the Jim Crow south. Look at the way we used to limit the rights of women. Only a fool would argue that societal beliefs and norms must remain rigid and unchanging; we learn, we grow, and we correct historical injustices along the way.

But if you pause and take a step back for a moment, you can see that they’re trying to take advantage of a logical fallacy. Do the mistakes in America’s history mean that all of our old beliefs were just as wrong as our beliefs about b****s and women? Do we need to examine our beliefs about child molestation? Do we need to re-think our position on criminal behavior? Is it time to update this whole “freedom” thing?

Increasingly, liberals are pushing us to see Old America as a country that got almost everything wrong. They don’t want to tweak it here and there; they want to dismantle the whole thing and build something new from the pieces. And if they can get us to believe and accept that, on any given day, a man can become a woman and a woman can become a man, they can get us to believe just about anything.

Justice Ginsburg Slams Trump, Draws Fire From…Liberals?
http://unfilteredpatriot.com/justice-ginsburg-slams-trump-draws-fire-from-liberals/

Other than the late Antonin Scalia, no Supreme Court Justice has been more eager to comment on American politics than Ruth Bader Ginsburg. But when Ginsburg took shots at Republican nominee Donald Trump this week, many critics – mostly liberals and anti-Trump conservatives – said she crossed a line.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be – I can’t imagine what the country would be – with Donald Trump as our president,” Ginsburg said in an interview with the New York Times. “For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be…I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

To leave no doubt about where she stood, she recalled what her late husband used to say when disagreeing with political developments: “Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand.”

In a separate interview with the Associated Press, Ginsburg slyly alluded to her e*******l predictions.

“It’s likely that the next president – whoever she will be – will have a few [Supreme Court] appointments to make,” she said....

In a Chicago Tribune editorial, the paper – fiercely anti-Trump from the beginning – accused Ginsburg of tarnishing the court.

“For justices to descend into partisan e******n campaigns would undermine public faith in their willingness to assess each case strictly on its legal merits,” they wrote. “It would also encourage justices to let their political biases affect, if not determine, their decisions.”

Uh-huh. See what’s going on yet?

We should welcome Ginsburg’s comments. They chip away at a very dangerous myth – that Supreme Court justices are apolitical, unbiased arbiters of t***h. We should not encourage the American people to have “faith” in an idea that is completely fictional. Ginsburg’s political beliefs don’t change based on whether or not she blabs about them to the New York Times. Isn’t it better to know than to pretend that these justices are using “strictly legal merits” to govern their rulings? Who, at this point in time, can still believe that anyway?....

6 Days to Cleveland - Buy Ammo, Weapons, Supplies and DIG IN !



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>



Black Panther Party 'Will Bear Arms' at RNC Protests

Alissa Lopez | 12 hours ago

The ‘New Black Panther Party,’ whose motto is "freedom or death," has gained immense media attention following the police shootings last week in Minnesota and Louisiana. And the next thing on their apparent to-do list is to protest the Republican National Convention taking place in Cleveland next week -- armed.

If allowed, the group said they'll be openly carrying guns.

The chairman of the party, Hashim Nzinga, told Reuters in a telephone interview, “If it is an open state to carry, we will exercise our Second Amendment rights because there are other groups threatening to be there that are threatening to do harm to us.”

"If that state allows us to bear arms, the Panthers and the others who can legally bear arms will bear arms," he reiterated.

And as it turns out, the New Black Panthers members may be able to carry weapons outside the convention because of the state’s open carry law.

State law does not prohibit the open carrying of firearms except in certain locations, but a person should exercise caution when carrying a firearm in public… may t***sport a loaded handgun in a motor vehicle at their discretion, but must exercise caution regarding access to the firearm (i.e. if their are children in the car and the firearm can be accessed by them, a case of child endangerment may exist)…

Considering the rising hostility toward police officers, the Cleveland police may have their work cut out for them.

These self-proclaimed anti-capitalists seek to “fight the gentrification or THE WHITE TAKEOVER of the (CITY)” and will “fight against it by any means necessary.” The group's been around since the 80's, but have just recently gained media traction after calling for a new-and-improved version of racial segregation: creating a new all-black nations by taking control of the economies in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina.

And the reason it will supposedly work? Because all white people are r****t.

Breitbart reported this statement from Babu Omowale’s, the group's national minister of defense:

“We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it’s not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country”

The NBP have supplied a 10-point platform on their website along with nine local objectives, which are all similar to the original Black Panther Party’s goals.

The platform includes things such as full employment for the African American community, an end to the “r****t death penalty,” free healthcare, tax and military exemptions, an end to “police harassment, brutality and murder” and education that “exposes the true nature of this devilish and decadent American society.”

They also call for the immediate release of the black men and women in prison on the grounds that each of their trials were unfair, saying they should be retried in a court “by a jury of their peer group or people from their black communities.”

As for the local objectives, Hypeline sums it up quite nicely:

In order to “further Black agenda,” they plan to elect black leaders in their community, monitor police, and “control politicians.” Also, they pledge to “deal firmly” with black leadership who “betray the interests of the Black Nation.”
And here I was thinking the black l***s m****r movement was a handful.