I have been on this site long enough to see that there is a great division among us.

There are those that claim to be a Patriot who would destroy our nation by force rather than make room in this country for those that are not to their liking.

Those that feel it is best to destroy what made this country what it was at it's best.

Just remember that there is a fine line between a Patriot & a Terrorist. Even though the line is fine it all depends on who draws the line. It is the ones with the most power.

Just remember the Minutemen were Terrorist to the British.

I will let you claim to be what ever you wish but there are others that may claim you to be the other.

The system has come to be not what you would like it to be. You fail to put the blame in the right place.

The way to make things better is to Unite & find the real cause of our problems & look for the changes need to put the country back on track from with in the system.

The greatest threat to this nation is coming from within because we are so divided.

Be careful of what you would destroy in your quest to make this country into what you would like to see.

A few days from now, Hillary Clinton will accept her party's nomination for President of the United States.
And mark my words. When she takes center stage to give her acceptance speech, Hillary Clinton's most venomous attacks won't be aimed at terrorists or criminals. They'll be aimed directly at YOU.

Radical Islamic terrorists have attacked our country three times in the past year - in Chattanooga, San Bernardino, and Orlando. There's no doubt that future attacks are in the planning stages right now. But Hillary Clinton's cowardly response to terror is always the same - to blame you, your guns, and your freedom.
If Hillary Clinton wins the White House, the most precious right we enjoy as Americans - our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms - will be wiped off the face of the earth forever.

I hope you all will v**e for America. Only Trump can save her, lady Liberty.

Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD ~ July 20. 2016
At some point in your life, you will be a patient needing medical care. Your very life may depend on the kind of care you receive. You need timely, accessible, affordable, quality medical care without long delays to see specialists, and a variety of specialists without denials due to third-party insurance or government “gatekeepers.”

In this p**********l e******n, you will be choosing between polar opposites on many issues – national security, border integrity, Supreme Court appointments, strength of our military, the economy, jobs, trade and your medical care.

There is no issue more personal for you – or more directly impacting your life – than the choice of your doctor, what specialists you can see, what hospitals you have available, what medications you are allowed, how much your insurance costs, and how quickly you are able to see the right doctor for urgent needs.

All of these choices for your medical care will be affected by your v**e for president.

The choice is stark: Medical freedom or government control.

Donald Trump’s health-care reform plan is based on two key principles: 1) total repeal of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, commonly referred to as Obamacare, and its government control of all aspects of medical care, including our medical records and health insurance options, and 2) opening market-based competition for increased patient options, reduce onerous and costly government regulations, expanded patient-owned Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), price t***sparency for hospitals and health professionals, improved access to lower cost medications overseas, expanded networks of hospitals and specialists.

Hillary Clinton stands for still more expansion of government control than has already been implemented under Obamacare. Clinton’s goal of a “public option” means a locked-down, government-run, single-payer socialized medicine plan that would close off your medical freedom and end private practice of medicine for the foreseeable future.

“Public option” is politically correct speak meaning socialized medicine or Medicaid for all, for those of you unfamiliar with “health-care” jargon designed to hide the ugly t***h of totalitarian control of every aspect of your medical care.

Hillary Clinton began her push for total government-run medical care when then President Clinton appointed her to head the 1993 task force secret meetings for “health-care reform.” Lost in the cobwebs of time since 1993 is the truly draconian take-over of American medicine that Hillary and her secret group of advisers proposed. At that time, the big insurance companies prevented her take-over agenda with clever ads that helped the public see the dangers of “Hillarycare” plans. Hillarycare Task Force taught Democrats an important lesson. In 2009, they offered financial incentives as “carrots” to get these same insurance companies on board to support Obamacare.

Hillary Clinton was an unelected, unappointed private citizen, whose only “credential” for heading this secret medical care reform task force was being married to, and a political ally of, the president. As “Mrs. POTUS,” Hillary wielded power beyond any first lady in the history of our country.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons fought against the illegal secrecy of the task force meetings in 1993, and secured the release of the documents to the National Archives. Copies of many of these documents are online. Mrs. Clinton’s modus operandi of deleting documents required to be produced in legal proceedings was evident in 1993: A number of the floppy disks, purportedly containing documents that had to be preserved by law, were blank. This was not made public on a broad scale at the time. Clinton’s failure to produce all of the secret task force documents is even more troubling in light of the current investigation into Clinton’s more than 30,000 deleted emails from her time as secretary of state.

Because the “Hillarycare” task force met in secret, and the documents were never publicized by the mainstream media, few medical professionals and hardly anyone among the public knew that Hillary Clinton pushed for complete elimination of private medicine in the United States.

One frightening provision Mrs. Clinton pushed hard to achieve is that doctors who engaged in private medicine would be fined $50,000 for the first offense, and then put in jail for the second offense. Patients would be forced to accept government-employed doctors, government guidelines for medical care, and rationing of services based on a political agenda.

That is why today, in 2016, Democrat POTUS Candidate Hillary Clinton has been saying Obamacare doesn’t go far enough toward government-run, or “socialized” medicine. Hillary has sought all along to create a system for the U.S. like Canada’s. Patients are totally at the mercy of government decisions on the number and specialty of doctors, how many hospitals or MRI scanner or other services are allowed, what medicines may be prescribed and for whom, how many patients the doctors may see before meeting their “quota” for the year, and so on down to micromanaging every detail of medical services.

In e******n 2016, you face only two choices for your life and health:

Will you v**e for medical freedom with total repeal of Obamacare and implementation of patient-centered, market-based solutions allowing continued private medical care to be available for all?

Or:

Will you v**e for the fully government-controlled “public option,” single payer, socialized medicine that may not cost you much money – but may well cost you your life?

E******ns have consequences. In this e******n, your v**e may be the last meaningful choice to allow you choice in your personal medical services.

Staying home is not an option in 2016 if you value your freedom and your life.

Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD is a 2014 Ellis Island Medal of Honor recipient, and the 2007 recipient of the Voice of Women award from the Arizona Foundation for Women for her pioneering advocacy for the overlooked hormone connections in women's health. Dr. Vliet is a preventive and climacteric medicine specialist with medical practices in Tucson, Ariz., and Dallas, Texas, that take an integrated approach to evaluation and treatment of women and men with complex medical and hormonal problems. Dr. Vliet is also Chief Medical Officer for MedExpertChile, SpA, SpA, a global medical consulting company based in Santiago, Chile, whose mission is lower cost, high quality medical care preserving the Oath of Hippocrates focus on individual patients.

Good old republican former kkk leader, whom supports trump and agrees with the r****t rants of trump, is going to run for the senate.

Hell, if david duke runs a campaign based of the trump model, trump will probably support him and help fund his campaign.

And for all of the usual resident dumbasses, just to remind you, david duke is a CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN, the kkk was formed by CONSERVATIVES, and the kkk identifies themselves as CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS, who just happen to believe in W***E S*******Y.

What a trio, trump, pence and duke. Just like the 3 stooges


http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/david-duke-kkk-louisiana-senate/2016/07/22/id/740030/

I love Ben Carson. He may not be up on his Egyptology (which we all know now is a requirement for the presidency, thanks to the Left), but he calls things as he sees them.
This trait, plus the facts that he is a brilliant surgeon, a conservative and a black man are the reasons the Left h**es him so, and the reasons they try so desperately to make him appear wrong, uneducated or ignorant.
This morning, the Left and its media cohorts are working double time to slam Carson because he made a damaging and very correct observation about Democratic p**********l candidate Hillary Clinton during his appearance at the Republican National Convention.

That observation is that Clinton in her college years was heavily influenced by the works of Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals, who offered her a job, which she declined after interviewing him for her senior thesis at Wellesley College.
Although her thesis suggests she didn’t embrace all of Alinsky’s strategies, it also makes clear that she held him up as a role model, and mainly just disagreed over his belief that it was not possible to change the system from within.
The reason any of this matters is not just because of Alinsky’s self-described radicalism that helped shape Clinton’s views of how to wage politics, but because of what Alinsky said in the acknowledgement section of Rules for Radicals.
Carson said at the RNC, Now, one of the things that I have learned about Hillary Clinton is that one of her heroes, her mentors, was Saul Alinsky. And her senior thesis was about Saul Alinsky this was someone she greatly admired. And let me tell you something about Saul Alinsky. So he wrote a book called Rules for Radicals. It acknowledges Lucifer, the original radical who gained his own kingdom.
The various denials and excuses being spread by the liberal media today will tell you things like, oh, it wasn’t really an acknowledgement, it was just a funny thing to say, meant humorously; or, it’s just quote taken out of context; or, Alinsky didn’t really believe in Lucifer; etc. In short, don’t believe your own eyes.

Because this is what Alinsky actually wrote:
Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom Lucifer. SAUL ALINSKY
He quotes himself (using the word acknowledgement) speaking admiringly of how Lucifer (aka Satan) rebelled (against God) and won his own kingdom, which most people know as Hell.
One of the many, many, many failings in Alinsky’s thought processes is that he fails to see any distinction between being a radical as he calls himself, and being a rebel like Thomas Paine, to whom he compares himself. Paine, obviously, was rebelling against a corrupt dictatorship in order to restore the inalienable rights of mankind.
Lucifer’s r*******n, according to tradition, was based solely on his own uncontrollable p***e and selfishness (and it ended with the Fall, in which Satan was expelled from Heaven and d**gged all his friends and allies down with him). That more accurately describes the character of the radical as Alinsky portrays it in his book.
Alinsky lacked the wit to see the difference, and so, too, does Clinton, as her career and now her campaign have shown an embrace of the Alinsky strategies she adored in college.

So here is a man whose rule book is the standard for l*****t community agitation, a man Clinton obviously held as a role model for herself, and his role model is Satan.

Draw your own conclusion.

http://constitution.com/carson-points-clinton-lucifer-connection/

While I know some of you feel that the newspapers of record in our nation are not trustworthy and instead rely on Crossburners Quarterly, Wing Nut Digest and Rush Limbaughs 3 hours of dope fueled h**e as information sources the fact remains that The Washington Post is a paper of record for our nation and has won countless awards for their even handed journalism and investigative reporting. Here is a link to their editorial boards opinion on Donald Trumps p**********l aspirations. Please take a few minutes to read the piece and comment on it thoughtfully.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-is-a-unique-threat-to-american-democracy/2016/07/22/a6d823cc-4f4f-11e6-aa14-e0c1087f7583_story.html?wpisrc=nl_az_most