http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/democratic-convention-commits-massive-felony-criminal/?utm_source=SailThru%26utm_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=TPI%20Newsletter%20-%20Curated/Horizon%207/27/16%20-%20Tier%201&utm_term=Tier%201



The democratic party has been replaced by criminal's who care nothing for the country. Its dam near unbelievable our present administration
is corrupted to the core. One can only wonder how deep down the corruption goes, but from my vantage point, the whole government is bad.

Now we have running for the office, a person that would make what the government is doing, look like child's play.


The only chance the citizens of this country have in removing this criminal element, is to elect Donald J Trump.



Go Trump


RETW

Liz Peek, The Fiscal Times...8 hours ago

Why did Hillary Clinton reward Debbie Wasserman Schultz after WikiLeaks published emails that exposed how the supposedly neutral DNC Chair helped undermine Bernie Sanders and abused her office? Clinton elevated the disgraced operative to Honorary Co-Chair of her campaign, further enraging Bernie’s army of supporters.

What could enrage them more? Maybe choosing a moderate, rather than a progressive, to be her running mate? Oh wait, Clinton did that, too. She picked Virginia Governor Tim Kaine, who is not popular with the Sanders-Warren set.

There are two possible explanations for the boneheaded Schultz decision. Either Schultz was working during the primary season on orders from Clinton, and thus had to be rewarded for taking the fall. (WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has promised that he will be releasing more emails; perhaps some of those will reveal communications between Clinton and Schultz operatives.) Or else Hillary is confident that Bernie’s supporters will turn out for her because she sees Donald Trump as so especially loathsome.

If the latter is true, Hillary Clinton is in trouble. Not just because her political instincts are truly terrible, but because of this: almost nobody wants Clinton to be elected president. Well, other than Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and maybe Chelsea. She faces a profound enthusiasm gap, which has only widened in recent months.

A mere 33 percent of Democrats in a recent poll said they were very enthusiastic about v****g for Clinton. Only 79 percent of Democrat v**ers say they will “definitely v**e” in the upcoming e******n, compared to 86 percent of Republicans – a serious disadvantage for the former First Lady. Only 72 percent of Independents vow to come out on E******n Day, and only 33 percent of that group say they’ll v**e for Clinton; 40 percent expect to cast a b****t for Trump. That’s what you get for so many lies and for promising four more years – a campaign slogan as riveting as a live reading of the Encyclopedia Brittanica

The leaders of the divided Democratic Party are counting on antipathy to Donald Trump to unite their party. Heaping scorn on the GOP nominee is the underlying theme of their convention, not lauding Hillary Clinton. Michele Obama, the most popular speaker at the opening night of the Democrat gathering in Philadelphia, praised the presumptive nominee saying, “What I admire most about Hillary is that she never buckles under pressure. She never takes the easy way out. And Hillary Clinton has never quit on anything in her life.”

Not exactly warm and fuzzy, Michele’s words conjure up Hillary Clinton stoically gutting it out before the B******i Committee or facing down journalists questioning her use of a private email server – not the image you might want v**ers to recall. Bernie Sanders called on his supporters to v**e for Hillary, “because of her ideas and her leadership.” That’s about the most tepid endorsement imaginable, but, really, what could Bernie have said? V**e for Clinton because she’s an honorable, principled standard-bearer who will fight to keep the promises made during the campaign? He knows better and so does his supporters.

They know that Hillary adopted Sanders’ push for a $15 minimum wage and joined his opposition to Obama’s TPP trade pact to win the primary contest; they also know she didn’t mean it. The se******n of Virginia Senator Tim Kaine as her running mate confirmed what the Sanders camp suspected -- Hillary really is the Secretary of the Status Quo.

That’s why the Democratic convention in Philadelphia got off to a rough start. It’s tough to rally behind a negative – opposition to Donald Trump -- but that’s what the leadership is trying to do. It’s what they have to do.

En route to the convention, Democrats saw their candidate clobbered by the worst polling in her career. A recent CBS poll showed that 67 percent of the country thinks Hillary Clinton is dishonest. Think about that. More than two-thirds of the country, not just of Republicans, think Clinton is deceitful. That survey shows Clinton and Trump in a dead heat, even though Trump has raised only $67 million to Clinton’s $335 million. (Sanders’ supporters are highly skeptical that Hillary wants to get “big money” out of politics, and they should be.) Even though Trump has supposedly offended nearly every slice of the population that Democrats have carved out, still, they are tied.

CNN’s most recent poll shows Clinton’s “favorables” are down to 39 percent -- the lowest according to that organization since April 1992 when she haughtily (and ham-fistedly) pushed for a government takeover of our healthcare system. Gallup concurs, with a 38 percent favorable number, the worst of her 24-year public career.

Towards the end of the primary season, 52 percent of Democrats or those who lean towards the Left had a net favorable opinion of Bernie Sanders. Only 39 percent felt that way about Clinton.

So, what Clinton wants to do in the next several months is convince v**ers (and especially Democrats) that she is honest and that she will abide by the pledges to Bernie Sanders supporters made during the primary season. That’s not going to happen. Instead, she needs to make sure that supporters will come out and v**e. To do that, she needs to make Donald Trump into a monster. This, she will strive to do, aided by her stalwart allies in the media.

Will she prevail? Maybe. She has a lot of guns trained on Trump, and firepower to spare. She will have money to burn and a host of enablers. Obama and Michele will hit the campaign trail on her behalf, as will husband Bill and daughter Chelsea and a host of other Democrats eager to keep the party rolling. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren will do their part, relying on Donald Trump to offend the liberal base.

And yet, Republicans and many Independents dislike Clinton as energetically as liberals h**e Trump. How many v**ers turn out to deny each candidate a win will determine this race. Hillary Clinton could well win that contest.

Today Duke energy cut my power from 9:00A.M. to 2:00P.M. so they could work on lines. I live on the West Coast of Florida and it was hotter than hell. I was mowing the lawn and went in the house for some water. Flicked on lights and everything else tell I remembered the electric was off and the house was heating up quickly. Got me to thinking, with all the hacking of computers going on isn't there a slight chance some one could hack into an energy grid and shut the electric down? Of course being on the coast I realize a hurricaine could hit anywhere close and knock out electric for a couple weeks. Think about that. How many people don't have food stored or spare cash because the banks would be useless. What about a generator, stored water and fuel? Lets be real here. We all know every city has a criminal element and a poorer section of town. Criminals would run rampant in a downed power grid situation and even non-criminals with no way to feed their family might resort to who knows what. If you have all the necessities stored but no way to defend them what good would that do? Fortunately I am close to being prepared for a month long emergency and have the tools to defend myself. Remember, cops have families also. They would be looking to protect their own first and I wouldn't blame them.

A great darkness has descended on America. Poverty and violence increase across the land. Armed gangs roam the streets. I*****l i*******ts pour across cross our borders. Some of them harbor wicked schemes. Others simply want to steal American jobs.

Overseas, death and destruction reign. The long shadow of ISIS spreads across the Middle East. Iran marshals its strength and hatches plots. Civil war rages in Syria, chaos rules in Iraq and Libya. America has abandoned her allies. Her name has become a byword among the nations.[/b]
But there is hope. A great man, wealthy and wise, has pledged to save us. He alone will ensure that “the powerful can no longer beat up on people that cannot defend themselves.” He alone will bring back our jobs, take care of our veterans, and destroy our enemies. He has promised to be our voice, to make us strong and proud and safe again. To make America great again.

That’s the picture Donald Trump painted in his acceptance speech Thursday night at the Republican National Convention. It was cartoonish and Nixonian, and it will likely be remembered as a kind of eulogy for the GOP.

But for the occasion of his c****ation as leader of a doomed political party, it was entirely appropriate. After all, Trump has tapped into the anger and frustration of so many Americans in part by exaggerating their problems and the troubles facing America.

His acceptance speech, like much of his primary campaign, was an extended warning of the terrors and deprivations to come if Hillary Clinton wins the White House. On immigration, America will see “mass amnesty, mass immigration, and mass lawlessness” under Clinton. “Her plan will overwhelm your schools and hospitals, further reduce your jobs and wages, and make it harder for recent immigrants to escape from poverty,” he said. On trade and foreign policy, Clinton will bring “death, destruction and weakness.”

Especially on trade, to listen to Trump one would think globalization had laid waste the American economy. That NAFTA was “one of the worst economic deals ever made by our country.” That the T***s-Pacific Partnership “will not only destroy our manufacturing, but it will make America subject to the rulings of foreign governments.”

In his speech, Trump boasted of his VP pick, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, promising to bring “the same economic success to America that Mike brought to Indiana.” The irony of course is that Indiana owes much of its recent economic success to free trade. What Indiana in particular doesn’t need are protectionist trade policies that will hurt its manufacturing and exports.

But those are just details, and not everyone pays attention to them. But most Americans do sense that their country has problems. At home and abroad, eight years of the Obama administration have stunted economic growth, eroded the rule of law, and made the world more dangerous and less stable.

Many people feel they’re worse off now than they were a decade ago, even if they’re not. So when Trump says, as he did Thursday night, that “decades of record immigration have produced lower wages and higher unemployment for our citizens, especially for African-American and Latino workers,” it feels true, even though it’s not.

But when Trump says we face “poverty and violence at home, war and destruction abroad,” it resonates. When he claims “Not only have our citizens endured domestic disaster, but they have lived through one international humiliation after another,” that also rings kind of true.

The question for the country is, what do we do about it? What principles will guide us? What policies should we adopt? More to the point: who will lead us, who can unite us, and who can we trust?

Can we trust Trump? His speech Thursday night was riddled with errors of fact —a speech that promised to “present the facts plainly and honestly.”

Can Trump unite us? The GOP convention this week was marked above all by schism and heavy-handed attempts to crush dissent among conservative delegates.

As for who will lead the Republican Party, that’s been decided. At one point Thursday night, Trump said to scattered laughter, “No one knows the system better than me, which is why I alone can fix it.” But he wasn’t kidding.

And now, neither is the GOP.

http://centurylink.net/news/read/article/the_associated_press-in_a_bumpy_c****ation_trump_wins_the_crown-ap




Mr. Cruz. I must in all honestly ask you, why did you not endorse Mr. Trump?

Do you not understand this e******n, is the most important in the history of our country?

Do you not know, or understand, you have given the democrats fuel, to fire the flames of discourse in this country?

Do you know, that what you did not do tonight, is keep a pledge you made at the start of the republican race for the president. You said you would support, the candidate that receives the nomination of the republican party. That candidate is Mr. Trump. Yet you refused to endorse him.


You have disgraced us all. Are you so petty you could not set your differences aside for one hour and help solidify the party unity for the good of our country. You claim to all you and your father love this country that has given you so much.
Yet in a space of 15 minutes, you managed to slap right in the face, every one that wants to see our country great again.
Including your father.

What you did tonight, to your core supporter's, is one of the most despicable selfish acts, I have witnessed from a sitting senator in my life time. Please don't ever again say you love this country. For you have demonstrated, you are what Mr. Trump said of you, laying Ted. I withdraw my support from you, as well as any financial support I would have given you.

RETW

Dan Calabrese ~ July 20, 2016
And why telling the t***h about her sounds like h**e . . . because there's a lot to h**e about the t***h

We’re hearing today from the political media - and even a few weak-kneed pastors - that it was “h**e” for Ben Carson to associate Hillary with Lucifer via Saul Alinsky, as he did last night. This is partly because the political class and their media stenographers have no idea what to do with serious discussions of God, faith and the spiritual world as it really is. But it’s also the result of another phenomenon that’s unique to Hillary.

You might recall, if you ever took a history class or if you’re really old, that Harry Truman was nicknamed Give ‘Em Hell Harry - based on the bluntness of his expressions about any number of things. Asked about it once, Truman said, “I don’t give ‘em hell. I just tell the t***h and they think it’s hell.”
Special: Melissa McCarthy Uses New Skinny Pill to Drop 50lbs in 35 Days

That’s sort of how it is with Hillary. It may sound like h**e when someone is accurately describing her, but in fact the objective t***h about Hillary is so awful, there’s no way to accurately describe it without sounding h**eful. We don’t h**e. We just tell the t***h about Hillary and you think it sounds like h**e.

So when Carson told the t***h about Hillary last night, a lot of people were aghast. Surely he can’t be claiming she is in league with Lucifer!

But yes. He was.

http://youtu.be/SS5NtI-PLb0

Now think about this: Some months back, the w***e s*********t r****t clod David Duke said he was for Donald Trump. Trump at no point expressed any positive feelings toward Duke, and in fact renounced his support on many occasions. Yet because Duke said he liked Trump, Trump was treated as guilty by association of everything awful about David Duke.

Now let’s consider the Hillary/Alinsky nexus. Hillary was not an unwitting recipient of Saul Alinsky’s praise, although there are reports that he knew about her and liked her. Hillary openly expressed her fondness for Alinsky and called him a mentor. And she has never renounced this statement. What’s more, it would be absurd for her to do so because her entire political career is a case study of someone who memorized Rules for Radicals and employed its principles for her own personal benefit.

So there is no way to claim that Hillary is not really an Alinsky follower. Of course she is. She’s said it herself, and never renounced it, and everything she’s ever done gives credence to her own declaration that the guy is her mentor.

Now, can Hillary be let off the hook for admiring someone who professed admiration for Lucifer? Can you argue that she “only likes his good points” or something else along those lines? Sort of like Marge Schott saying that Hitler was good in the beginning? No, you cannot, because Alinsky not only went out of his way to mention Lucifer as a role model of his own, but he unapologetically used the example of Lucifer to establish the methods contained in Rules for Radicals.

And there’s another reason you can’t let Hillary off the hook for this. In today’s modern culture, the secular left is doing everything it can to marginalize God and people of faith. Through advocacy of a******n. Through advocacy of gay marriage. Through advocacy of “t*********rism.” By sicking the IRS on pastors who dare to express political opinions (unless they’re liberal opinions, of course). And Hillary supports every one of these agendas without reservation. She even declared that longstanding religious beliefs will have to change to accommodate a******n.

Add that to her personal behavior of lying, constantly dissembling and abusing her access to governmental power for her own enrichment, and the picture couldn’t be more clear.

What Lucifer wants you to do is abandon your trust in God and His principles - including honesty, integrity, forthrightness and all forms of godly humility - and to become self-seeking and self-glorifying. What Lucifer knows is what you don’t, which is that traveling this path is nothing but darkness and spiritual destruction. But that’s the whole point. If he can deceive you to the point where you’ll travel down this path, he owns you.

If you can think of a human being that fits that description more completely than Hillary Clinton, I can’t imagine who that could be. And it should be no surprise at all. The man she calls a mentor admired Lucifer’s deception. Hillary learned from both of them and applied the things she learned to be come rich, famous and powerful. And yet it’s still not enough for her. She still craves more power.

If you don’t understand that Ben Carson is right about this, the problem is that you’re unwilling to see it. It’s as plain as day for anyone with open eyes.

TRUMP, the one to make this Nation Whole again. The entire convention was spot on. I loved the black Pastors they fired t***h up for TRUMP as well. TRUMP has held my attention from day one when He said things only we were saying to ourselves in our homes then He said He was paying for his primary.
I listened followed and completely dev**ed. Anyone v****g for Clinton partakes in every scandals, and crime she EVER committed. If you really want to see Clinton brought brought to the justice she deserves
Never elect her she COVETS I mean COVETS the office in the WH make sure it's just a memory.

Tonight I am proud of our nominee.

All republicans and independents should be proud.
For tonight, we witnessed the true Donald Trump. And I am completely surprised.

Mr. Trump Gave one of the best acceptance speeches I have heard,

It truly rivals any speech Regan ever gave.

What Trump told the nation tonight,
was a blue print of what to expect in the next four years.

Busy, yes. Needed, also yes. Doable, yes. Confident, yes. Compassionate, yes.
Strong, yes.
These are but a sampling of what Hillary Clinton is not. What a stark contrast.

I truly believe Trump summed it up at the end of his speech, when he said of Clinton, wanting the people to join her, while Trump wants to join the American people and fight for all of us.

My conviction is to Mr. Trump, and his willingness to put our country first again.

Go Trump

RETW