You are mistaken. It's not that we think God did it, because we can't explain it. It is simply that our current understanding says that it's impossible. There is a difference. Can you explain how proteins can exist without DNA? The information required for proteins is encoded in DNA. DNA requires the error checking and correction abilities of proteins in order to exist. This is what's known as a catch 22. One cannot exist without the other. This is the reality of things. The only way they could possibly exist is if they were created at the same time, along with all of the thousands of other amazing micro-machines that exist in every cell. There is no conceivable way that all the different parts of a cell can evolve separately, since they require each other in order to function. And if one is missing, none of the others can do their jobs. Do some research on how cells function. You'll see what I mean. It is a complex dance, with thousands of components, each doing a specific task. Look at how many different proteins there are. Each one is a sequence of amino acids that is folded in three dimensions. If just one fold is incorrect, it does not function. And did you know that there are protein chaperons that help proteins fold properly and correct any mistakes? That's another catch 22. Proteins cannot fold properly without the chaperons. The chaperons, in turn, are also proteins. How is it that the chaperons could exist without proteins? And the proteins cannot exist without the chaperons. For that matter, how do the chaperons know how to do their job in the first place? How can you look at the miracle that is life, and not see a Creator? You can't look at a computer and believe that it is not made by a person. So how can you look at something as complex as the inner workings of a cell and believe that it is the result of chance?

The “REAL” Melania Trump
http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/the-real-melania-trump/

Some will NOT read this. Some will discount it as Trump campaign blather. Some will simply not care .
My old goat’s advice……..
at least look at the pictures!
Melania is widely recognized as Donald Trump’s “Trophy Wife.” But there’s a side of Mrs. Trump most people have yet to see – until now.
Despite being married to the most controversial p**********l candidate in American history, Melania Trump remains an enigma.
The mystery that comes with her reserved personality makes Melania an easy target for liberals as articles labeling her as a “mannequin” and condemning her silence are published daily.
Although the famous former model seems to have it all, Melania’s testimony tells the story of someone who’s struggled against all odds – and overcame….

If you're old enough to remember...Paul Harvey, page 2...

Donald Trump & RNC Top Hillary Clinton & Final Night Of DNC In Viewers

Dominic Patten ~ July 29, 2016
AP (UPDATED WITH FINAL NUMBERS): It looks like Donald Trump is going to take the lead over Hillary Clinton this e******n – at least when it comes to how many people watched the last night of the Republican National Convention and how many watched the last night of the Democratic National Convention.

With figures in from NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News Channel and MSNBC, the ex-Secretary of State’s historic acceptance speech as the first woman to be the P**********l nominee for a major American political party drew 27.8 million viewers. That 10 PM – 11:40 PM ET coverage is down 2.4 million from what Trump and the RNC got on the same outlets on July 21 from 10 – 11:45 PM ET.

Or to put that in percentile perspective, last night’s DNC numbers on the broadcasters and top cable news outlets saw an 8 percent dip in total viewers from what the RNC snagged the week before.

When you add the coverage on Fox Business Network, CNBC, Univision and NBC Universo, the RNC figure goes up to 32.2 million. With all the numbers in from all the outlets, including PBS, the last night of the 2016 DNC had 33.3 million viewers to the RNC closing night’s 34.9 million. Which means Donald Trump’s speech of July 21 beat Hillary Clinton’s of last night by 5 percent in total eyeballs)

Now all those numbers are likely to look like small change when Clinton and Trump face off in their first head-to-head debate of the e******n on September 26 at Hofstra University. The two will meet up two more times on October 9 in St. Louis and on October 19 in Las Vegas. I’m not much of a betting man, but with ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, FNC and MSNBC, not to mention the always reliable C-SPAN, covering the encounters, expect the ratings bank to break.

Richard Nixon committed political suicide. He bugged the DNC at the Watergate Hotel and was caught. He then tried to erase phone records from the White House proving he was involved. Republicans at the time recognized it for what it was. I'm sure they said something like "tricky Dickie you resign and will put Ford in there."
Fast forward to today. Mrs. Clinton has state secrets on her unsecured computer. She deletes 30,000 emails after they were subpoenaed. And she lies to investigators during the investigation. The Democrats of today don't see that as political suicide. Interesting how things have changed.

1. Guns Don’t K**l People, People K**l People

2. Criminals Don’t Obey Gun Laws, Only Law-Abiding Citizens Do

3. Any Gun Control Is a Slippery Slope to Confiscation

Your mission, should you accept, is to show how truly vacuous (dumb) these arguments are. If those arguments are part or center to your arguments for guns, do a little Devil's Advocate on your beliefs, truly test them, by probing thought and research that counters these assumptions. However, if you are not inclined in the least to question your support of guns that partially or completely rest on the above three points, for wh**ever reason (such as, a liberal trick meant to undermine the 2nd Amendment), you are not being honest. T***h demands inquiry and fearless inquiry. To question deeply and open-mindedly is the love of t***h, and freedom as well. It is not being disloyal. It is not being rebellious. It is not even being doubtful. Wonder and curiosity in every part of our lives should be welcomed. We look and we look deeper and we look deeper. We need not fear what we find in such a search but rejoice in wh**ever is thus discovered.