Mpls p***es itself on diversity of culture. As most people have heard about the somali cop that k**led the australian woman, where does the k*****g end? I support LE fully, I even have a cousin who is a Sgt in the 4th precinct downtown Mpls. Now the cops are saying they feared an ambush-by who? A woman in pajamas with a cell phone? This does not add up, and the fact that a somali officer who did NOT go thru the academy k**led her makes me wonder. I am not in favor of the police chief who is a lesbian, just wondering how much does diversity cost and at who's expense, apparently Mpls, after the Castillo shooting last year doesn't get it.

NO! WE DON’T HAVE TOO MUCH FEDERAL DEBT !


Now (January, 2017), foreigners own about half of our $14.3 trillion publicly-owned US debt. With their trade surplus, foreign exporters accumulate US dollars and buy US debt for trade collateral. Their US bonds provide some protection against inflation and eliminate currency exchange fluctuation and costs. Foreigners will hold our debt until they find a safer refuge; none is now in sight. They will want to keep earning and holding our dollars unless the US goods that our dollars would buy are not competitive. It’s the job of Congress to keep us competitive by giving us the world’s best infrastructure.

Our debt/GDP ratio is now about 70%. It was over 120% during World War II, which was followed by 35 years of prosperity. Prosperous Japan’s ratio is now over 200%. We have no federal debt crisis!

Federal budget deficits are necessary for prosperity. Just as an individual judges her financial success by her after-tax earnings, so should the public relish the after-tax savings and cheap foreign goods provided by Congress’ spending deficits, which can only exit circulation into savings accounts or imported goods.

Deficit spending should not be large enough to cause harmful inflation but the budget deficit should exceed our trade deficit. Otherwise, we are exporting our savings to import foreign goods. Instead of cutting spending, we should be reducing our trade deficit by spending as much as possible on infrastructure that would lower industry’s costs, raise its exports, and reduce our trade deficit.

Will our debt always find buyers? Designated “primary” dealers are required to bid without collusion and the Fed can always buy their debt without limit, collect the interest, and return 94% of its annual profit to the Treasury, as law requires. And Congress has already and can again seize the Fed’s reserve.

The entire debt, as collateral, could be converted by bankers into dollars that would be added to a similar amount already in the money supply (M2). So, re-phrasing our question: would $29 trillion be too many dollars chasing too few goods and services, thereby causing inflation? If the few individuals owning most of those dollars increased their buying, what would rise in price, other than financial assets? Not food or other essentials! It is difficult now to see inflation being caused by federal debt.

But what about the future? Every year sees a large and growing federal budget deficit with an associated interest burden. Is that sustainable? The answer, according to the math at http://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/?docid=1379, is that growing deficits are sustainable provided that the rate of GDP growth exceeds the debt interest rate. That implies that our economy must always be competitive, which implies that our infrastructure must be among the best. Our future will not be secure unless we invest in it. Yes, Congress can fund any unfunded liability!

If v**ers really want to reduce the US debt held by the public, their Congress can easily provide steeply progressive estate tax brackets that will, over time, destroy much of the domestically-held debt. We certainly do not need a hereditary aristocracy with rich kids growing up with enough money to buy a Congressional v**e to cut spending on education while our kids are drowning in school debt.

So, how should Congress spend and tax? To maximize infrastructure, Congress should spend almost enough to cause inflation and should tax little enough to almost cause inflation. Ideally, always on the verge of inflation, everybody and every resource would be employed and every material would be in adequate supply or rationed to suit our national priorities, as if we were at war.

When small government nuts cut spending to cut taxes, they also reduce needed infrastructure. The spending scolds are depressing our economy, c***ting our grandchildren out of infrastructure, and weakening our defense, which depends on bridges and dams as well as on arms.

Shun the deficit hawks!
© 2017 Marvin Sussman, All rights reserved.

>>>>>>

Noted and you have many valid points but there is NO negotiating with Islam PERIOD !

Those of us who are now bound by a different covenant have moved on from the usual narrative you placed here.

Muslims are not allowed in this Republic and have been banned twice see below:


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Muslims Not Allowed!!

Islam Banned From the USA in 1952.

No Muslims Allowed:
Nationality Act June 27, 1952

ISLAM WAS BANNED from the USA in "1952"..

But Obama doesn't want you to know that nor does he respect or uphold US law. The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to Immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States.

That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today" Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs "to any organization seeking to o*******w the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means."

This, by it's very definition. rules out Islamic Immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House, Islamic Immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic.

All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government.

Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam
is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the o*******w of our government are prohibited"

ISLAM:
" A Doctrine masquerading as a Religion for millennia based upon Laws ( Shari'a) , a Constitution ( the Qur'an) and an ideology that DEMANDS the death of ALL Jews, Christians and other infidels and is the most misogynistic society in the history of the world"- author unknown

It is time for the government to uphold it's written laws.

Muslims Were Banned From the Americas as Early as the 16th Century, Long before today’s anxiety about terror attacks, Spain and England feared that ens***ed Africans would be more susceptible to revolt if they were Muslim.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Since 9/11 over 3,000 Mosque's have been built in the U.S. Mostly funded with Saudi and Qatari Royal funds.

If one took the time to study the Hijrah methodology one would come to a sudden conclusion, but apparently it's working as planned since most of the American populace is still asleep, stupid, complacent or afraid to take actions.

They don't belong here, never did and they'll be leaving soon Dead or Alive I no longer care.

My job is to stop and reverse the damages to restore this Republic to the founders intent... and that picture does not include Muslims, Border hoppers, T*****rs, Aiders n abetters ... all who have either forgotten or fail to uphold our laws and enforce the ethos of our constitution.

You place too much faith in your govt which is factually hijacked.

I no longer care what our
Officials,
SCOTUS,
district activist judges,
FED authorities, agencies

or any other Muslim Sympathizers say about this stealth Occupation-t***sformation-repopulation-refugee-t***splantation scheme.

Sell it to someone else, I'm not a buyer.

From here we escalate further actions to take the fight to the enemy.
This will accelerate the divisions between Patriot groups and the FED who are now considered an opposition flank.

The rest I can't state here or they'll come for me.

GAME OVER !