One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PeterS
Page: <<prev 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 2669 next>>
Mar 20, 2024 02:15:29   #
When Trump had no problem securing a bond for the 91 million bond for Carroll Trump had to be thinking that surely someone would step up and give him the 450 Million he needed to satisfy the state of New York. But no takers and what has to be salt in the wound it seems Mar-a-largo is the only Trump property that has enough value to come close to satisfying the bond. I'm sure though, he would let go of everything in Manhattan before he would let go of home in Florida, and all because his ego demanded that he inflate his world to be worth more than it really was. Let this be a lesson, if you can't pay the check that your mouth is writing...maybe you should shut your mouth so you don't have to write the check.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/it-s-so-crazy-how-no-one-wants-to-help-trump-with-his-bond/ar-BB1kb0Nc?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=c36e70ec3643469df4830e8ddddd2997&ei=5
Go to
Mar 20, 2024 01:47:43   #
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/former-rep-joe-walsh-says-mike-pence-k**led-his-gop-career-with-trump-criticisms.htm?utm_source=DC&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=DC5&utm_content=DC3

He would have been better off if the heroes of J** 6th had hung him.
Go to
Mar 19, 2024 00:55:20   #
JFlorio wrote:
It’s right there in front of you. The IRS put it out. You clowns love the IRS. I was actually against the tax cuts because they didn’t include reductions in spending. I imagine the guy making a $100,000/yr is worth more to the employer than the knuckle d**gger. I think taxes are still to high. I’m self-employed and they’re one of my biggest expenses. I’m not a CPA. I’m a Fiduciary. I know my clients (most working middle class) do better when taxes are lowered and their 401k’s do better when the company they work for does better. Better match, better benefits, etc.
What is someone’s fair share? All you clowns do is whine but never give a solution.
I will get with my funds manager tomorrow and get your answer if you really want it.
It’s right there in front of you. The IRS put it o... (show quote)

Oh bulls**t. You don't have to be a CPA to understand this. This is basic math...adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing...plus percentages.

1) This article is talking about AGI and lowering it, not the actual tax cut. You said you read the article and agree with it. Well go back and read it then think about what it's saying. The percentages cited have nothing to do with the actual tax cut! I mean no one's taxes were ever cut 15% to 26%.
2) The standard deduction doubled yes? So that means that a big chunk of your 26% wasn't part of the tax cut. How much was it...40%, 50%? It doesn't figure into the tax cut so it shouldn't be used at all...
3)And I take it back, this article isn't bulls**t just how you are using it.

Lastly, you've run around here like you are a financial/economic guru...and now I don't even think you can use a calculator. If you tell one of your clients that they will get a 15 to 26% return and they get back between three and five percent...are you going to say, I was talking about AGI? You should be careful when you say you agree with something especially when it turns out what you agree with is just more conservative bulls**t...
Go to
Mar 18, 2024 22:42:57   #
JFlorio wrote:
I believe the decrease from $2000 to $1600 was a budgetary regulation. Will find out for sure.

A budgetary regulation? And read my response to Lilly. The article is talking about the amount AGI is lowered, not the Trump tax cut and it also doesn't differentiate between what AGI would have been lowered before the change to the standard deduction...not the full 26% that the article is citing...or are you going to stand by the 26% ($13,000) number my knuckle-d**gging cousin thinks her tax cut was...
Go to
Mar 18, 2024 22:32:15   #
Lily wrote:
Again, per the IRS
The TCJA also caused millions of Americans to see an increased child tax credit, and millions more qualified for this tax cut for the first time. The TCJA expanded the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 and raised the income thresholds so millions of families could take the credit.

RIF= Reading is Fundamental. Try it sometime i***t! You’re moving into the Kevy dumber than rocks category.

Oh, Lilly, you are one of the last people to be saying that...you don't even know the difference between a tax cut and lowering your AGI
Go to
Mar 18, 2024 22:30:11   #
Lily wrote:
It took about 20 seconds to find the answer. Obviously, you did it want the answer or you’d have found it. Twitbrain!

IRS Data: Middle Class Americans Saw Significant Tax Reduction from Trump Tax Cuts

As the data notes, Americans with incomes between $50,000 and $100,000 saw a substantial decline in their tax liability:
* Americans with adjusted gross income (AGI) between $50,000 and $74,999 saw a 15.2 percent reduction in average tax liabilities between 2017 and 2019.  
* Americans with AGI of between $75,000 and $99,999 saw a 15.6 percent reduction in average federal tax liability between 2017 and 2019. 
Middle-class Americans in key states were delivered significant tax cuts:
* Floridians with AGI between $50,000 and $74,999 saw a 19.6% reduction. Floridians with AGI between $75,000 and $99,999 saw a 17.2% reduction. 
* New Yorkers with AGI between $50,000 and $74,999 saw a 18.9% reduction. New Yorkers with AGI between $75,000 and $99,999 saw a 12.4% reduction. 
* Californians with AGI between $50,000 and $74,999 saw a 18.4% reduction. Californians with AGI between $75,000 and $99,999 saw a 14% reduction. 
*
The TCJA also caused millions of Americans to see an increased child tax credit, and millions more qualified for this tax cut for the first time. The TCJA expanded the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 and raised the income thresholds so millions of families could take the credit.
It took about 20 seconds to find the answer. Obvio... (show quote)

I knew I saw this someplace before. And yes, the article is somewhat true but a % of AGI isn't a tax refund. Now this article says that someone earning 50K would have a 15 to 26% reduction. In AGI yes but AGI isn't a tax cut. By using AGI this article is saying that someone earning 50K will lower their AGI by 7,500 to 13,000 not see a refund of 7,500 to 13,000. Also, there were provisions to lower AGI before the Trump tax cut so only part of that number would be due to the Trump tax cut and your article didn't separate out the two....
Go to
Mar 18, 2024 21:39:13   #
JFlorio wrote:
Explains it pretty good.

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/584190-irs-data-prove-trump-tax-cuts-benefited-middle-working-class-americans-most/

So my wife's knuckle-d**gging cousin saw her take-home pay go up by $14,040 per year and someone making 100K saw their take-home pay go up by $17,000 a year? You said you read it and agreed with what it said. This is absolute bulls**t. This is built on averages that aren't average.

And what does this mean: Under the Trump tax plan, the Child Tax Credit (CTC) increased to $2,000 per child under 17. The credit used to be $1,000. For tax year 2024, the first $1,700 of the credit is refundable. For tax year 2023, the first $1,600 is refundable.

If it increased to 2000 why is only worth $1,700 or $1,600? So why are you cons saying it's worth $2,000?
Go to
Mar 18, 2024 20:00:28   #
JFlorio wrote:
Bingo. So you’re admitting the middle class received a tax cut.

So how much did the working man get? You're the one running around saying that Trump targeted the good ole boy working man.

How about a CEO who made 22 million a year versus a single-parent household, with one child over 18 making 54 K as a teacher in Avery Texas...BTW the teacher in Avery Texas is a real person, my wife's cousin, got C***d--twice--and still refused to get the "JAB"!~

Oh, and the single-parent rents and has no itemized deductions. The CEO has a slew of deductions but let's just list the 870K that can be legally itemized that he pays in combined interest on his two houses (they are both new mortgages) Most of his cars and his two jets are paid for by his Company...

Show us how the Trump tax cut targets the teacher and not the CEO. I'm assuming you think the benefit is as a percentage of income and not actual money in his pocket. So let's see how it's the single-parent household who should be dancing the jig and not the CEO...
Go to
Mar 18, 2024 19:07:01   #
JFlorio wrote:
The Trump tax cuts sunset in 2025. Democrats whine his cuts were for the rich, so why do they care if they sunset? After all, they're always crying; the rich don’t pay their fair share.
Because the few with an accounting degree know that the majority of the cuts and deductions went to the working class.

The majority of the cuts went to the working class. So list all the cuts and show us how they went to the working class. Aren't you a brainiac with a finance degree? It should be a piece of cake for you.
Go to
Mar 18, 2024 01:19:46   #
Here's my question, who are you MAGA morons going to shoot? You can't shoot white people because you don't know if they are Democrats or Republicans so that leaves people of color because even if they are Republican they only make up 10% of your party so it's no great loss. So it will be a bloodbath for B****s, Hispanics, and Asians but how will this win you the e******n? The same apparatus that put Biden in the White House in 2020 is still there to put him in the WH in 2024. So other than k*****g a bunch of minorities proving you really are the party of r****m what else will you prove???
Go to
Mar 17, 2024 15:16:52   #
Milosia2 wrote:
Trump will never again mention pence.
He tried to have him k**led.
He doesn’t want that brought up ever again .
Pence is dead to him.
Trump is an angry , distraught , deranged man ,
Heading up
A minority with zero chance winning anything without lying , c***ting or stealing.
Not by winning the hearts and minds of Americans ,
But by stealing their v**es
and giving them to trump !!.

“If I don’t win
There will be a bloodbath. !!!!”
His bunions are still willing
to Die for for a Lie. !
They don’t know any better .
They don’t even know why. !!!
Trump will never again mention pence. br He tried ... (show quote)

I've been asking conservatives what they are going to do if Trump loses...and this was before his bloodbath comment and they are acting like deer in the headlights as if the question hasn't been able to register. I don't think that they fully understand that they are pawns and there to be used by Trump however he sees fit...and if it's another loss what he sees fit will be a civil war.
Go to
Mar 15, 2024 23:00:09   #
AuntiE wrote:
Biden's Proposed Corporate Tax Hike Will Punish the Average American


The president wants to raise the rate from 21 percent to 28 percent, despite it being well-established that this is the most economically-destructive method to raise government funds.

Veronique de Rugy3.14.2024
In the latest volley of policy proposals that seem more rooted in populist rhetoric than economic knowledge, President Joe Biden's budget plan to hike the corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent strikes me as particularly misguided. This move, ostensibly aimed at ensuring a "fair share" of contributions from corporate America, is a glaring testament to a simplistic and all-too-common type of economic thinking that already hamstrings our nation's competitiveness, stifles innovation, and ultimately penalizes the average American worker and consumer.

Beyond the president's class warfare rhetoric, the lure of putting his hands on more revenue is one of the factors behind the proposal. Biden likes to pretend he is some sort of deficit cutter, but his administration is the mother of all big spenders. He's seeking $7.3 trillion for next year without acknowledging the insolvency of Social Security coming our way or addressing what happens when Congress makes the Republican tax cut permanent in 2025 for people earning less than $400,000 a year.

Unfortunately, no fiscally irresponsible budget is complete without soothing individual taxpayers by promising to tax corporations. Never mind that the burden of corporate income tax hikes isn't shouldered by corporations. Yes, corporations do write the checks to the IRS, but the economic weight will be partially or fully shifted to others, such as workers through lower wages, consumers through higher prices, or shareholders through lower returns on investment. That means that many taxpayers making less than that $400,000 will be shouldering the cost of the corporate tax hike.

It is worth expanding on the fact that much of a corporate tax increase will be shouldered specifically by workers. A recent Tax Foundation article, for instance, explained that "a study of corporate taxes in Germany found that workers bear about half of the tax burden in the form of lower wages, with low-sk**led, young, and female employees disproportionately harmed."

Biden's planned tax hike would raise revenue for sure. Kyle Pomerleau at the American Enterprise Institute told me that it would raise roughly $1 trillion over a decade. However, it will do it in the most damaging way possible.

Indeed, it is well-established by the economic literature that increasing corporate taxes is the most economically-destructive method due to its impact on incentives to invest. Investments that were previously feasible at the lowest rate of capital are now out of reach. Firms forgo machinery, factories, and other equipment, reducing their capital stock. That in turn reduces productivity, output, and overtime wages.

The good news is that the reverse is also true. That's what the Republicans did in 2017 when they cut the federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent while broadening the tax base. Chris Edwards at the Cato Institute recently noted that the move increased investments and wages as one would hope—and it also managed to boost federal corporate tax collections from $297 billion in 2017 to a projected $569 billion in 2024.

While this spike was attributed to temporary factors—the revenue is anticipated to decrease to $494 billion in 2025—it also reduced tax avoidance from firms who repatriated much of the revenue they used to keep abroad. Instead of avoiding higher tax rates, they invested more in America and boosted wages along the way.

In addition, for all the concerns about fairness expressed by the administration to justify its tax hike, the corporate tax is quite unfair. Profits are already subject to taxation at the individual level when distributed as dividends or realized as capital gains. Increasing the corporate tax rate will exacerbate the issue of double taxation, distorting investment decisions and reducing economic efficiency, not to mention encouraging aggressive planning for more tax avoidance.

Last, the administration's plan ignores one of its usual priorities: the fact that many U.S. companies must compete on the international stage. Raising the corporate income tax at home makes them less competitive abroad. According to the Cato Institute's Adam Michel, if Biden is successful in raising the corporate income tax to 28 percent, the U.S. would have the second-highest such rate among the market-oriented democracies that make up the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. America would instantly become less attractive for multinational corporations and mobile capital.

In an era where economic literacy should guide policymaking, reverting to such tax hikes is a step backward—a misstep we can ill afford amid the delicate dance of post-p******c recovery and an increasingly competitive global economy.

COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM.




Biden's proposed corporate tax hike will punish the average American
reason.com
b Biden's Proposed Corporate Tax Hike Will Punish... (show quote)


Unfortunately, no fiscally irresponsible budget is complete without soothing individual taxpayers by promising to tax corporations. Never mind that the burden of corporate income tax hikes isn't shouldered by corporations. Yes, corporations do write the checks to the IRS, but the economic weight will be partially or fully shifted to others, such as workers through lower wages, consumers through higher prices, or shareholders through lower returns on investment. That means that many taxpayers making less than that $400,000 will be shouldering the cost of the corporate tax hike.

Here's the problem with this kind of thinking. If you raise the price of your goods and services you will sell fewer goods and services. No CEO keeps his job by doing that. If you lower your wages you will get disgruntled workers or worse, attract workers who aren't worth the lower wages you are paying them. Not a smart thing to do when quality workers are hard to retain as it is and your competitors will exploit any weakness you show. So yes, shareholders will take a hit as will the bonuses for upper management. Fewer Ferrias sold to people with more money than they know what to do with will not sink the economy. In fact, if you look at the history of tax hikes the economy does just fine...
Go to
Mar 15, 2024 22:38:01   #
permafrost wrote:
Well, I did a 30 second search and found nothing worthwhile, only that Coons did do a fox interview..

seem feuding on opp is a little beyond my interests right now.. try again tomorrow..

you also have a good one..

There's this from Fox. I don't think it's a poll though just a prediction that Trump is going to lose...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-loses-fox-news-v**er-analysis-predicts-disastrous-defeat/vi-BB1jSoIt?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=ffc576534fa447239066e5694e720aea&ei=22
Go to
Mar 15, 2024 22:27:59   #
proud republican wrote:
And if desired outcome doesn't work and he actually wins in November, you don't think democrats won't try anything more drastic? They're already planning to ban him from White House if he wins an e******n..E******N I**********E Forget about what American people want! I guess we don't count, right? There will be r**ts, but not from MAGA Americans, from Rats!!!


And if he loses he will claim c***ting again and you will believe him and there will be r**ts by you MAGA RATS...

Stop acting like your s**t doesn't stink PR. Trump almost lies us into an i**********n once...don't you think he will try it again??? What the people wanted didn't mean s**t to you MAGA morons once and it won't mean anything to you again!
Go to
Mar 15, 2024 18:19:18   #
Darling Mary wrote:
My concern is the raping & pillaging of young children by homosexuals,and forcing there agenda upon moral society!

And the raping and pillaging of children by priests and youth pastors is okay because they are moral? I'm willing to bet there are more youth pastors, pastors, and priests who 'force' their agenda on children than homosexuals. Oh, and if your child is a homosexual then that has nothing to do with homosexual 'agenda' and everything to do with nature making another f*g...
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 2669 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.