One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: EmilyD
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 next>>
May 27, 2018 19:30:30   #
son of witless wrote:
Ditzy Debbie means that if they attack the bullets they k**l the second amendment. If you cannot get bullets you are Schultz out of luck. If you then cannot get bullet tips, powder, or primers even the reloaders will be Schultz of of luck.


I think she's forgetting about the people who make their own bullets. That would become an industry in and of itself if her preposterous idea ever came to fruition. I just googled "how to make your own bullets" and it shows that more people than I imagined make their own bullets now. It's cheaper, too!
Go to
May 27, 2018 19:06:16   #
Homestead wrote:
I don't remember John Wayne ever saying lock and load.

That came from the Vietnam era, as troops were pulled out of one hot zone and dumped into another.

That's usually all the time they had was to reload, before they were dropped off again into another hot zone.

John Wayne did do one Vietnam era movie about the Green Berets in Vietnam, but, even then, I don't remember that particular phrase being uttered in it.

I suppose you lefties have your own favourite phrases that your partial to.

Such as:

Run and hide in your safe place!

Quit before you succeed!

Cover your ears and say "nan nan na nan ya" real loud, so you don't hear something that might offend you.

Yell to your buddies and say, "Drop your guns" and then run away, screaming like a bunch of little French girls.

Or maybe you prefer Monty Pythons, "Run away, run away."
I don't remember John Wayne ever saying lock and l... (show quote)


Or no words at all - just looking up at the sky and screaming AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Go to
May 27, 2018 17:18:26   #
Airforceone wrote:
No l*****t heads are exploding why not wait till this summit occurs. But don’t forget the Trump quote he will not negotiate with North Korea unless they agree to total denuclearization so let’s wait and see.

North Korea has done this in the past 4 times and reneged on every agreement they have made.
(SO JUST WAIT AND SEE)


You're right. We can't do anything but wait and see. BUT....Trump is not the same old boss.
Go to
May 27, 2018 16:15:18   #
....Trump just tweeted this 5 minutes ago:


Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
4m4 minutes ago

Our United States team has arrived in North Korea to make arrangements for the Summit between Kim Jong Un and myself. I truly believe North Korea has brilliant potential and will be a great economic and financial Nation one day. Kim Jong Un agrees with me on this. It will happen!
Go to
May 27, 2018 16:06:57   #
no propaganda please wrote:
And what background check is appropriate for the bullets that many people cast for themselves. Do we need to put some of our DNA on the surface of each bullet and how would this be done to survive the heat involved? Pathetic little whiny fools aren't the progressives?


I guess there would have to be a check on the quality of the lead that is used to make the bullet, and that it is not made in countries that support ISIS, and to make sure the copper they use in the plating is not supplied to the bullet manufacturer by corrupt, drug-cartel related companies. The bullets must be free of crime, and be mentally stable.
Go to
May 27, 2018 13:38:06   #
son of witless wrote:
It is so nice to see Dumkopf Debbie fresh off of her debacle as Chair of the DNC, finding her way back into the hearts of the Marxist-Left in America. The fact that this stupidity has been tried before and failed is no reason not to bring it back up.


http://www.newsmax.com/politics/debbie-wasserman-schultz-ammunition-background-checks/2018/03/26/id/850820/


Here are two quotes from your article that astound me!!

"You do not have the right to bear bullets," Wasserman Schultz said.

"If we can attack the bullets, we can stop how many people who can get shot with high-capacity magazines," she said.
Go to
May 27, 2018 12:56:30   #
Hogback wrote:
First, the Dems absolutely denied that a spy was embedded into the Trump campaign then Clapper said there was a person (he didn't like to use the word "spy") but the embedded person was there to monitor the Russians and that Trump should actually be glad that he was there! That's like Trump saying that his phones were being tapped which was denied. Then we discover that they were being monitored. We still don't know why the warrant was issued. There should have been a crime first then the phone monitoring but here it seems the opposite is true. Why haven't the judges who signed the initial request speak out? Are they also a part of the conspiracy?
First, the Dems absolutely denied that a spy was e... (show quote)


Clapper said Trump should be happy that an "informant" was "monitoring" his campaign....so the question remains, why wasn't Trump told about this informant, if it was so good for him? And also, did the FBI send an informant to monitor Hillary's campaign?
Go to
May 27, 2018 12:32:07   #
vernon wrote:
Trump has at least 25 world class restaurants.Do you think he would go to a greasy spoon,I don't think so.


I'm waiting for Trump's tweet on this one!!
Go to
May 27, 2018 12:22:07   #
bahmer wrote:
We should be keeping all Muslims out of our politics as their laws are such that they will lie to us to gain a seat in out congress or senate and before long they will be advocating for sharia law and other things for the Muslim people.


They do not and WILL NOT assimilate into the American culture.

Dearborn, Michigan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5oLoW9jZJc
Go to
May 26, 2018 20:50:02   #
vernon wrote:
Did they have an informant in the hillery camp.I have to say if they didn't he was a spy.


That's a very interesting question... if not, why not?
Go to
May 26, 2018 19:12:06   #
PeterS wrote:
I still don't understand what you are getting at. If you are referring to the "Spy," the informant was placed in the Trump camp because of contacts they had made with the Russians. This had nothing to do with Obama taking care of Hillary and everything to do with the FBI doing their fricking jobs. There were no fewer then 8 Trump associates who had contacts with the Russians. This is why an informant was inserted in Trumps camp and why there is an investigation into collusion and obstruction now...
I still don't understand what you are getting at. ... (show quote)


Stefan Halper has a long history involving spying - even a scandal during the Regan campaign - so he has been a spy before. He was sent to contact Trump campaign advisers Carter Page, Sam Clovis, and George Papadopoulos. Who sent Halper? What did these three advisers tell him, and what did he in turn tell his FBI/CIA handlers? The FBI is trying to spin it like you say - informants doing their jobs. In my opinion, the core issue here is what information was gathered, who ordered it and what information changed hands between the advisers and the FBI. Most likely, we will never know the real answers...
Go to
May 26, 2018 15:43:00   #
debeda wrote:
Yes they refuse to use the word spy. Typical semantics game. Nonetheless he was there and reported back to the fbi. So I guess we'll call him a rose.


FBI’s various media spokespeople did not deny the core accusation, but quibbled with the language the FBI said it was an “informant,” not a “spy”
Go to
May 26, 2018 15:32:52   #
Big dog wrote:
And you know this how ?


https://theintercept.com/2018/05/19/the-fbi-informant-who-monitored-the-trump-campaign-stefan-halper-oversaw-a-cia-spying-operation-in-the-1980-p**********l-e******n/

http://dailycaller.com/2018/05/26/important-questions-about-spygate/
Go to
May 26, 2018 14:16:59   #
There are five things to understand about FBI’s SPYGATE:

1. There was no FBI spy in the Trump campaign
2. The FBI spying that DID NOT happen was totally justified
3. It would be bad for national security to identify the FBI spy who doesn’t exist
4. The FBI spy was sent there to protect Trump against the Russians
5. His name is Stefan Halper and he was paid $411,575 in 2016 & 2017 by the FBI
Go to
May 26, 2018 13:48:27   #
debeda wrote:
Very true. Force is different than coercion. Force is what happened to you. Coercion was mostly Harvey's thing, i.e. "You do me and I'll set you up in the biz". Force has no choice. Coercion does.


That is what I was thinking about when I read about the woman who was forced to do it as a girl. Coercion most likely happened a lot with Harvey and other "casting couch" movie men, but I also believe that the argument that some of the women enticed the men so they could "get the part" happened more often than we know. Those women where allowed themselves to be coerced and those that went along willingly are not going to own up to their behavior. The fact that they jumped on the bandwagon 10 years or so later is very telling in this respect.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.