One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Blade_Runner
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 ... 3247 next>>
Aug 18, 2019 20:39:48   #
Lonewolf wrote:
So why is Trump terrified of her why is Trump afrade of the squad f4 women have him tweeting day and night. President of the united states in a constant pissing contest with anyone dare challenge him! Guess he has time hrs done little you could stack all his look good behind legislation on the head of a pin
Yo, Section 8, AOC has one person getting in her face, President Trump.
OTH, President Trump has every l*****t asshole in the world attacking him, and everyone and everything in his life.
Put another way, it's Trump vs AOC, one on one, Trump has a pugil stick, AOC has a tube of lipstick.

As for the rest of your post, who the hell could unpack that babble?
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 18:56:10   #
GmanTerry wrote:
H**e to break it to you but, Snopes is a far left site. This, everything liberal is Ok, but conservative is always a lie. They are as biased as CNN.

Semper Fi
If Snopes is that bad, why did they completely debunk the rape allegations filed against president Trump by an anonymous woman who claimed he raped her when she was 13?.
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 18:51:59   #
Rose42 wrote:
Its a very similar writing style and pattern of posting. Plus this wouldn’t be his first re-emergence.
Not even close. Bad Bob didn't have a writing style and his posts were invariably graphic memes. He rarely, if ever, posted a hot link. BB was a troll, for sure, but he was an infant compared to F-n-F, who, BTW, is a female.
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 18:46:03   #
Lonewolf wrote:
Trump fears her she is young and intelligent and is fearless and not afraid to speak out against his crazy policies. Trump cannot take any criticism from anyone he has the republicans in Congress so scared their afraid. To open their mouths
His constant attacks and the use of is power of office to attack fellow Americans it's just more proof he's unfit forthe office
And, you had us convinced that you were a United States Marine.

You see, Marines know what to do when they are under attack. They fight back. They kick ass. They k**l people and blow s**t up. And they surely would not allow a featherweight female bartender who hasn't got two brain cells to rub together to walk over them. They'd blow her ass away in a New York minute.
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 18:33:45   #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
No doubt about that.
The more puzzling question is how they get away with it.
Yeah, that is the question, isn't it?
How many people had to be involved in this conspiracy? Did they all swear an oath to secrecy under threat? How many people can keep a secret? People talk. People can't keep their mouths shut.

Three people can keep a secret only if two of them are dead.
BF

Not a peep, where are the whistle blowers? The bean spillers?

Why did Monica Lewinsky, Jennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and Paula Jones escape this lethal net?

The Psychology of Extraordinary Beliefs.

Who Shot Ya? – The Clinton Body Count List
April 1, 2019 at 12:17am: OSU.EDU

Since the Clinton’s rise to political fame in the 1990s, various rumors surrounding their connections to mysterious deaths have been circulated. These claims assert that both Bill and Hillary Clinton have orchestrated the deaths of several acquaintances who supposedly had “dirt” on the family (Emery). The belief is mostly held by those of the opposing conservative party in efforts to further tarnish the family’s reputation. The conspiracy theory was brought up during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 and 2016 p**********l campaigns. The original body count list is attributed Linda Thompson, a lawyer and conspiracy theorist of the American Justice Federation, an organization which has made its name by fabricating antigovernment stories (Weiss). Since its initial debut, the theory has been promoted through chain emails, novels, and documentaries.

The Clinton body count list draws ties to several suspicious deaths of the family’s allies and government officials. One of the most notable was the death of Vince Foster, former White House Counsel and colleague of Hillary at a Little Rock law firm. Foster’s death by a gunshot wound to the head was determined a suicide. Another death of longtime friend and business partner of the Clinton’s, James McDougal, raised eyebrows. McDougal suffered from a heart attack while in solitary confinement. When Ron Brown, Commerce Secretary, died in a random plane crash, theorists alleged that x-rays of Brown’s skull reveal bullet fragments. More tales follow similar formats, of those close to the Clintons dying in strange accidents. The timing of these accidents along with the vast and often veiled resources afforded to those in the executive branch makes it possible the Clintons were behind these events.

On the other hand, many argue that these systematic deaths are not systematic at all. For instance, the strange accidental manners of the death are not strange at all, since most deaths are accidental. In the case of Foster, his depression had been noted previously and therefore the suicide is not quite thatmysterious. There is also an argument made that a family as prominent as the Clintons have wide social circles, and therefore it increases the odds they will have some ties to the deceased person. Maybe the best argument against these claims is the question raised that if the Clinton’s could orchestrate a mass cover-up of these murders, why couldn’t they do the same of the Monica Lewinsky scandal that nearly ended Bill’s presidency?

A cognitive factor that may contribute to this belief is confirmation bias. This bias allows ambiguous evidence to be seen as supporting one’s prior beliefs. Those holding conservative values tend to distrust members on the opposing liberal side. These individuals will be more likely to perceive information that the Clintons are involved in a violent crime ring as true. Additionally, those who believe it are not only misinterpreting these events due to previous biases against the Clinton administration and Democratic party, but they are also misinformed by a distortion of the event facts. Several details of the suspicious deaths that have been circulated have failed to be corroborated.

The Clinton body count rumor mill began turning in the 1990s with the aid of those who opposed the administration and overall government. The power of opposition was also a determining factor in the theory’s revival during Hillary’s p**********l campaign. With our country’s rising levels of party polarization, the public no longer attacks the policy practices of politicians, but also their character. The morality of Hillary Clinton was an important topic during her campaign. Focus on the use of her private email server and her decisions in B******i dominated her media coverage (Murphy). Under these social influences, accompanying rumors of a crime conspiracy could flourish.

It is no secret that our government keeps certain information hidden from its citizens. However, the notion that the Clinton administration engaged in the systematic murders of their political enemies is unlikely. The increasing party polarization of politics and internalized ill-will aimed at both Bill and Hillary Clinton is likely the culprit responsible for the conception and procreation of this conspiracy theory. Confirmation bias is a psychological tool that has also been used to place the vague pieces of information into an inaccurate puzzle. Thus, believers arrive at the conclusion that the Clintons must be behind the deaths of their acquaintances. But like the birther rumor that followed President Obama and suggestions that President Bush arranged 9/11, the Clinton body count list may just be another display of mistrust in powerful public figures.
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 16:56:28   #
Liberty Tree wrote:
I do not care about him. I just h**e the thought of the perverts who had him wacked getting away scott free.


Personally, I'm going with the NY ME on this, Dr Sampson has an impressive resume in forensic pathology and a hell of a lot to lose if she f**ed an autopsy on such a high profile subject.

Epstein offed himself. When you eliminate the politics, the "he said/she said", the minutiae and the myths, the rumors and the ranting, the conspiracy theories and conjecture and just focus on the mental and emotional pathology of a truly corrupt and godless human being, it isn't difficult to believe old Jeffery just threw in the towel.

Epstein was all alone in that cell. he was alone in the world. His only visitors were his lawyers who had him convinced they would win the "double jeopardy" motion, they had him hoping he would get bail on appeal. His optimism behind bars — expressed during daily visits with his lawyers that lasted up to 12 hours each — was so great that it struck some observers as “delusional.” His lawyer was the last person he spoke to. "I'll see you Sunday", he said. And even his lawyer felt that they had deluded him.

Everyone else associated with him was running for cover, or lawyering up to cover their asses--his former friend and lover, Ghislaine Maxwell, was chilling in LA scarfing burgers and reading a book about the lives and deaths of CIA operatives. his co-conspirators, his bodyguards, his partners and pilots had abandoned him. He was all alone, and I think he knew it.

He'd had a good run, amassed billions of bucks, mansions and maidens, a Caribbean paradise, had more young pussy than the Turkish navy. He lived large the whole way, burned the candle at both ends and in the middle, filled the unforgiving minute with sixty seconds of distance run. And, he came up empty. He was looking into the abyss.

“Meaninglessness does not come from weariness with pain. Meaningless comes from weariness with pleasure…. No one is more fed up with life than one who has exhausted pleasure. Some of the loneliest people in the world are those who have lived indulgent lives and emotionally and physically driven themselves to impotence.”
Sense and Sensuality: Jesus Talks with Oscar Wilde, by Ravi Zacharias

It isn't difficult to believe that Epstein was at the end of his rope. (no pun intended)
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 15:32:51   #
Liberty Tree wrote:
I do not care about him. I just h**e the thought of the perverts who had him wacked getting away scott free.
What makes you think they are getting away? The game ain't over yet.
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 15:31:19   #
PeterS wrote:
So am I to believe that Conservative Nationalism embraces r****ts of all stripes? Go figure..

Nazi Queers? What willl the progs think of next?

Go to
Aug 18, 2019 15:22:22   #
MR Mister wrote:
Jeffrey Epstein…Suicide or Suicided?

http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-suicide-or-suicided/?fbclid=IwAR3Xp8VXTrAHOf017Au79d4WcG1SBNnRCR5VsAzfRxdEneFO0K_jcG3gazU


The pervert is dead, who gives a s**t how he got that way?
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 15:20:21   #
Richard94611 wrote:
NRA members, what do you think about recent revelations concerning where your dues go ? Is it OK with you that NRA's president spends huge amounts on clothing, his wife's hairdressers, luxury hotels, and travel expenses, and that this money comes out of membership dues? The NRS is a corrupt organization. I am wondering what we're going to learn about NRA-Russia connections. We will see what we will see.
There are 80 million of us out here who keep and bear arms, 5.5 million are members of NRA, I'm not one of them.

The NRA/Russia connection was pretty simple. The leader of a pro-gun movement in Russia got in touch with leaders of the NRA to get some ideas on how to progress.
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 15:09:17   #
byronglimish wrote:
And you tried to chastise me for calling Moldy a troll.

I'm beginning to see your game.
Moldy IS a troll.
Moldy called you a troll.
Lots of trolls here.
You're not a troll.
I'm not a troll.

You believe the Arkancide myth.
I don't.
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 15:03:55   #
woodguru wrote:
They believe polls that show what they already believe, that's the way believers roll, everything they disagree with is f**e news and lies.


HuffPo: Severe Flaws in Polls

The basic problem with polls is that public sentiment is quite like our body temperature; it goes up and down, somewhat randomly, and taking action too quickly in response to changes can lead to serious unintended consequences.
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 05:17:16   #
PeterS wrote:
Okay, so you're saying that the Prefatory clause states the purpose of the Operative clause. That means the purpose of the operative clause is to provide (I'm assuming arms) for a well-regulated m*****a, as they [the m*****a] are necessary for the security of a free state. Now, are you happy and how did what I say change?
Yep, and a well-regulated m*****a is made up of individual American citizens sk**led with firearms. A well-regulated m*****a IS NOT the National Guard nor is it a body of armed men subject to command and control by the federal government.

You are obviously unable to grasp the concept of Federalism. Maybe you should actually study the Constitution of the United States.

Quote:
Tic Toc Blade. The time is running out and your precious semi-auto will soon be gone...


Go to
Aug 18, 2019 04:28:26   #
debeda wrote:
In the WHAT


Make Alexandria a Bartender Again In a Turkish Whorehouse.
Go to
Aug 18, 2019 03:06:59   #
PeterS wrote:
That's true. Once again AOC is spot on. Almost to a man conservatives run around claiming that r****m isn't r****m or if there is r****m it's those e-vile liberals who are r****t not us sweet-smelling conservatives. So thumbs up to AOC...once again she is spotlighting the world of the conservative...


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 ... 3247 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.