One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Ranger7374
Page: <<prev 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 505 next>>
Nov 4, 2022 15:01:52   #
eagleye13 wrote:
https://www.ethanallen.org/45_c*******t_goals_from_58_years_ago

On the founding of our nation’s 245th birthday, it would be nice to set our eyes on the window displaying blue skies. But out on another window displays storm clouds. Montpelier’s decision to cancel any meaningful Fourth-of-July recognition along with our schools and our very own government promoting Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Black L***s M****r (B*M) tells us all we need to know about these ominous clouds. Both these movements are Marxist in origin. With CRT being a derivative of the German Marxist Frankfurt School and member Max Horkheimer’s 1937 essay titled ‘Traditional and Critical Theory’ and one B*M founder on record stating that they are trained Marxists.

C*******m’s 45 goals were read into the Congressional Record by Congressman Albert S. Herlong Jr., (D-Florida), in 1963. These goals were gleaned from the testimony given to Congress by scholars and from the writings of current or former C*******ts.

Socialism is seen as the bridge between Capitalism and C*******m. The major difference between Socialism and C*******m is in the method of takeover. Socialism (and Progressivism) believes that it can centralize all control of the individual, land and industry by peaceful, but gradual, legislation; whereas C*******m seeks a violent and final confrontation to eliminate all dissension to achieve its Utopian goal of a Stateless and Classless society.

But make no mistake; what is the same in all three ideologies is the desire to seize monolithic control of society. Mussolini termed this the Totalitarian Society: “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.”

In order to get a better understanding of our storm clouds, let’s exam a few of the 45 C*******t, and by extension Socialist and Progressive, goals that have been read into our Congressional Record:

Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
Get control of the schools and teachers’ associations. Soften the curriculum.
Gain control of all student newspapers.
Infiltrate the press.
Gain control of key positions in radio, TV and pictures.
Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and press.
Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in the media.
Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, and healthy.” 9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion.
Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principal of “separation of church and state.”
Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate and old-fashioned.
Discredit the American founding fathers as selfish aristocrats [and r****ts].
Belittle American culture and discourage the teaching of American history.
Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
Infiltrate and gain control of big business and unions.
T***sfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as mental health or social problems.
Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents.
Repeal the Connally Reservation, allowing the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.
The Ethan Allen Institute’s John McClaughry and Rob Roper recently wrote of the means employed by the State of Vermont to achieve these socialist ends.

Woodrow Wilson, the only President ever to possess a PhD, wrote of “separating politics from administration.” Wilson saw politics as dirty and corrupting and saw administration as pure and scientific. “Administration” and more specifically, centralized bureaucratic boards and agencies operating outside the purview of the legislative body, is clearly Vermont’s means to its socialist ends.

To wit, Mr. McClaughry writes of the Vermont Council on Rural Development’s recently released “The Vermont Proposition” as follows: “Finally, the vision exhibits a glaring disparity between its enthusiasm for “democracy”, and its even greater enthusiasm for creating utterly undemocratic regional administrative bodies directed by an all-powerful State Planning Office that “would be responsible for the statewide community and economic development and land use plans on a five year cycle.” Presumably you could still v**e for governor, but that scheme looks to me more like replacing local democracy with a hugely expanded and unaccountable administrative state.”

Mr. Roper writes of the recently passed Vermont legislation calling for a major expansion of state-subsidized childcare from birth to five-year-olds titled ‘Let’s Grow Kids’. In a nutshell, it seeks to replace parenting with unionized daycare directed by an enlarged centralized state bureaucracy.

Finally, the recently passed G****l W*****g Solutions Act sets up an unelected and unaccountable Vermont Climate Council to produce edicts which do not have to be v**ed on by Vermont’s legislators.

Think of a construction scaffold covering a large building, that building representing our democracy or specifically our Constitutional Republic. What they are doing behind that covered scaffold is constructing a “new” regime. That regime allied far more closely with the 45 C*******t goals than with the goals outlined in our Declaration of Independence some 245 years ago. God Bless the United States of America… as founded....

Great link

More Americans need to be aware of what the Left is planning.
https://www.ethanallen.org/45_c*******t_goals_from... (show quote)

Great post. 👍
Go to
Nov 4, 2022 14:58:24   #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
COEXIST, lefty, COEXIST. 😅🤣


He don't want to.... 😆
Go to
Nov 4, 2022 13:45:49   #
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
So--Democrats make it easier to use your constitutional right to v**e-no matter your political preferences. Republicans make it harder every chance they get-=


Not true.
Go to
Nov 4, 2022 13:43:44   #
pegw wrote:
Maybe the right wing Christains don't like the immigrants are mostly Catholic and go to church.


That's really unfair to say. Christians and Catholics, Protestants, Baptists, Anglo-Saxon Protestants, Methodists, and Mormons are all Christians.

Good Catholics, have a conscience and try to follow the rules of the authorities. Same holds true for all Christians. A constitution was first established as a form of self government, was first done by the Apostles. The Catholic Church and church teachings, was formed by the first christians and has evolved through the centuries to establish Christianity or by definition followers of the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth.

With that being said, our Constitution is based upon the Catholic Constitution as formed by the doctors of the Church, specifically St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine of Hippo, and St. Jerome.

St. Thomas of Aquinas established the principles behind a just law and an unjust law. He wrote the law must apply to all, and any unjust law is like no law at all.

To claim that i*****l a***ns are Catholic, is unjust and unfair where Muslim terrorists on the terror watch list are not the go to church Catholics. Yet among the i*****l i*******ts these people were found.

Go to church Catholics, and truly faithful Catholics, let alone truly faithful Christians, and active, going to church Christians, Mormons and all Protestants included, will not enter this country illegally. That is a fact.

Fooled christians, or christians who are desperate for food, shelter, and a job may be duped into coming into this country illegally, and when they find themselves in that situation they seek forgiveness, because ignorance of the law is no excuse----per St. Thomas Aquinas.

Therefore, one group of religious people, that have proven they can self-govern themselves is the whole of Christianity.

But since Christians, all Christians, who are those who follow the teaching of Christ, are also human and make mistakes. However we, christians, suffer from a blessing and a curse. Faithful Christians will try to follow Christ and the rules and laws of any country we reside in. Render on to Caesar what is Caesar's, render on to God what is God's.

Unfaithful Christians will do the opposite. Therefore like the Jews, God's chosen people, being a Christian is a blessing and a curse.

As a Roman Catholic, our consciences will not allow us to violate the law. However, those who fall away from the teachings of Christ, and are seduced by p***e, lust, greed, and the lust for power and money, will try every trick in the book, to justify thier conscience, where St Thomas says they have no conscience. For they deny Christ's teaching.

In the end, and in conclusion, all Christians, from the Catholic Church to the Mormons and every Christian in between, would not through faith be an i*****l a***ns. For all Christians do not compromise the teachings of Christ.
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 23:06:11   #
microphor wrote:
I have plenty of empathy for an 82 yr old being attacked, as I did when those Asian women were being assaulted on train platforms and walking down the street, as I did when that guy came up behind that old lady and knocked her to the ground, as I did for all those people's whose businesses were burnt to the ground, as I did when a soft ball game was shot up,ect.
That still don't make the guy a Trump supporter, as a matter of fact his neighbor says he's a lefty!


The fact that some Democrats are using "Trump supporters" as meaning anyone who disrupts the status quo, by any means, is really sick and d********g. It's just another invented meaning to spread propaganda. That's all it is. David is not, nor has he ever been a Trump supporter.

But then it leans credit to the question who is he?

Lots of rumors but only one t***h, we must choose to believe the t***h. Which follows, "What is the t***h?"
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 22:59:41   #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
The amount of stamps you go through mailing all those kommiecrat b****ts. Does the kommiecrat party reimburse you for all that postage?


Mail-in v****g is not problematic when it requires a signature and a return address. Postage is paid for by the government. A problem arises if the b****t is not secured with in the envelope and is not signed. Signature matching then takes place. But that happens here in Arizona, don't know how it works in Oregon.
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 22:56:13   #
manning5 wrote:
==================

So, we have something to propose, but we are still far away from getting a lawmaker in congress to initiate the package. Yes, we have had a good exchange. Be safe!


Wildo, I might adopt your plan in my campaign against Sinema when her term expires. I like it.
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 22:52:15   #
microphor wrote:


The trick with term limits is where is the sweet spot where you get the most productivity of your elected official? Two years, four years, six years, eight years or ten years? Anything over ten years should definitely be banned.
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 20:17:09   #
zillaorange wrote:
Friends?


Possibly, according to statistics, it is more than likely that Paul and Dave knew each other, since both were in their underwear before the assault. Staged? Maybe?
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 20:14:22   #
manning5 wrote:
======================
On 7. I would go with at least two clips, plus...maybe a third. In the heat of the encounter, you do not know that you can deliver one-shot-one k**l, or at least the average guy doesn't. And there may be more than one target also. Sk**led police have run through an entire clip without a hit.

On 9. I can envision a situation where I might be hauling both my guns and my buddy's guns to a rendezvous point to go hunting, say, 5, 10 or 25 miles out. Would an officer let me go? Possibly.

On 14. I would want there to be time on the outside for the felon to become better adjusted and capable of being trusted, before allowing him to possess a firearm. Renewed citizenship is a good marker, but insufficient, I believe. Perhaps a "clean" year would do.
====================== br On 7. I would go with a... (show quote)

Awesome rebuttal and I can agree with you on most of it. Good job...I like that.
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 15:04:29   #
Gatsby wrote:
That idea is so nutty that it could only come from a Democrat.
That idea is so nutty that it could only come from... (show quote)


The idea is hard work pays off, you have to work to get out of homelessness it is possible for the willing
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 15:00:38   #
zillaorange wrote:
I'd still like to know how he got past security!


That's easy Paul let him in.
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 00:58:57   #
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
not a bad idea if someone has the willingness to work


The incentive would be giving a job plus a home, to the homeless. It might work. But again and like always it is their choice.
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 00:57:28   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Screw the laws, how about just the 2nd amendment as it is written and as it is intended?


I agree but federal law does not.....lol
Go to
Nov 3, 2022 00:53:37   #
PeterS wrote:
...plus the babies of illegal pregnant women, plus the babies i******s have already given birth to? Where in the bible are such claims made?


Well, PeterS, either you are being like St. Peter talking with Christ or you just got drunk on the Koolaide of the far left.

By the comments I read on this thread, it seems that you didn't read the Bible for understanding but rather picked out something to troll about.

But if you want some wisdom about the situation you bring up, here goes:

A human being is a human being. And all human beings belong to the great family of humanity. Now that's as simple as it gets, now when a person enters into a country against the authority of that country, and they do it in a chaotic fashion, breaking that country's laws of order, then we call that person illegal, because instead of following the proper order, that was passed by Congress, and agreed to by the people of that country, about the orderly fashion of entry, that person then insults and defies the laws of the host country(this country).

Try to do that in Russia, Ukraine, Iran or China, and you would probably be k**led on site, especially if they find out you are an American citizen.

Now, if the immigrant does it by the proper channels then, all is good and they may stay.

But then if millions are invading the southwest, the only fair solution is to keep them out, while processing them. Stay in Mexico, policy for example. Once the government approved the immigrant they are welcomed.

None of what I said herein is against Christianity or the natural law. The entrance and survival of any community must be done orderly.

Since stay in Mexico, was undermined, and if you are in California, Arizona, New Mexico or Texas, where do you put the overflow?

Ron Desantis tried to send them to Martha's Vineyard, and they, with in 24 hours, deported 50 i*****l i*******ts. So if it works for that community, it should in theory work for all communities, that is if we abide by biblical teaching.

This little op-ed destroys the premise of your analogy. Since the constitution was based on biblical teaching but is not biblical, then the constitution contains mistakes where the bible and the teachings of Christ do not.

Therefore the response from Christ probably would be to admonish the hypothetical analogy because the analogy is a sin against thy neighbor.

Look at it this way, consider your house as a country. Would you allow uninvited guests and strangers into your home, with your children and wife and rest of your family present? Not knowing the character of the uninvited guest or stranger? Wouldn't you at least vet such a guest? For the safety of your family?

Same applies to the immigrant.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 505 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.