Well, Ivanka gets a pass, then so does the rest of the WH, even those from the past. But if Ivanka willing to go to prison for benign emails, then may you might have legal case.

The right people are clearly in prison.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ivanka-trump-used-a-personal-email-account-to-send-hundreds-of-emails-about-government-business-last-year

Ivanka Trump sent hundreds of emails last year to White House aides, Cabinet officials and her assistants using a personal account, many of them in violation of federal records rules, according to people familiar with a White House examination of her correspondence.

White House ethics officials learned of Trump’s repeated use of personal email when reviewing emails gathered last fall by five Cabinet agencies to respond to a public records lawsuit. That review revealed that throughout much of 2017, she often discussed or relayed official White House business using a private email account with a domain that she shares with her husband, Jared Kushner.

The discovery alarmed some advisers to President Trump, who feared that his daughter’s prac­tices bore similarities to the personal email use of Hillary Clinton, an issue he made a focus of his 2016 campaign. He attacked his Democratic challenger as untrustworthy and dubbed her “Crooked Hillary” for using a personal email account as secretary of state.

Some aides were startled by the volume of Ivanka Trump’s personal emails — and taken aback by her response when questioned about the practice. She said she was not familiar with some details of the rules, according to people with knowledge of her reaction.

The White House referred requests for comment to Ivanka Trump’s attorney and ethics counsel, Abbe Lowell.

In a statement, Peter Mirijanian, a spokesman for Lowell, acknowledged that the president’s daughter occasionally used her private email before she was briefed on the rules, but he said none of her messages contained classified information.

...same explanation that the FBI offered and Hillary offered when she was investigated.

Yo, trash talk:

The right people are clearly in prison.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ivanka-trump-used-a-personal-email-account-to-send-hundreds-of-emails-about-government-business-last-year

Ivanka Trump sent hundreds of emails last year to White House aides, Cabinet officials and her assistants using a personal account, many of them in violation of federal records rules, according to people familiar with a White House examination of her correspondence.

White House ethics officials learned of Trump’s repeated use of personal email when reviewing emails gathered last fall by five Cabinet agencies to respond to a public records lawsuit. That review revealed that throughout much of 2017, she often discussed or relayed official White House business using a private email account with a domain that she shares with her husband, Jared Kushner.

The discovery alarmed some advisers to President Trump, who feared that his daughter’s prac­tices bore similarities to the personal email use of Hillary Clinton, an issue he made a focus of his 2016 campaign. He attacked his Democratic challenger as untrustworthy and dubbed her “Crooked Hillary” for using a personal email account as secretary of state.

ADVERTISING

Some aides were startled by the volume of Ivanka Trump’s personal emails — and taken aback by her response when questioned about the practice. She said she was not familiar with some details of the rules, according to people with knowledge of her reaction.

The White House referred requests for comment to Ivanka Trump’s attorney and ethics counsel, Abbe Lowell.

In a statement, Peter Mirijanian, a spokesman for Lowell, acknowledged that the president’s daughter occasionally used her private email before she was briefed on the rules, but he said none of her messages contained classified information.

...same explanation that the FBI offered and Hillary offered when she was investigated.

https://f**gandcross.com/trump-vows-to-investigate-hillary-clintons-big-ties-to-the-ukraine/

Trump Vows to Investigate Hillary Clinton’s ‘Big’ Ties to The Ukraine
President Trump believes that two can play this investigatory game.

Published 1 day ago on April 26, 2019, By Andrew West Hillary Clinton
ShareTweetFlip


US President Donald Trump doesn’t mince his words – a particularly American trait dating back to the birth of our very nation.

His bombastic and often raucous retorts have molded the landscape of American politics in ways that many of us never believed that we would see in our lifetime. His outsider status in Washington DC, combined with his “drain the swamp” ethos, have given Trump an air of authenticity that resonates with We The People, who have long been fed up with the Beltway bozos on Capitol Hill.

Now, after what the President has repeatedly referred to as a “c**p” by Robert Mueller and “18 angry democrats”, Trump is vowing to fight back.


Trending: BOMBSHELL: New Report to Show Obama Interfered MORE Than Putin In 2016 E******n

His first target, in typical Trump fashion, is a doozy.

President Trump told Fox News’ “Hannity” in a wide-ranging interview Thursday night that Attorney General Bill Barr is handling the “incredible” and “big” new revelations that Ukrainian actors apparently leaked damaging information about then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort to help Hillary Clinton‘s campaign.

Last month, Ukraine Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko opened a probe into the so-called “black ledger” files that led to Manafort’s abrupt departure from the Trump campaign. The investigation commenced after an unearthed audio recording showed that a senior Ukrainian anticorruption official apparently admitted to leaking Manafort’s financial information in 2016 — including his ties to pro-Russian actors in Ukraine — to benefit Clinton.


The move comes as Ukrainian officials have been attempting to sound the alarm on Clinton’s ties to the region to no avail.

Ukrainian law enforcement officials said earlier this month they have a slew of evidence of collusion and wrongdoing by Democrats, and that they have been trying to share this information with U.S. officials in the Justice Department. A Ukrainian court recently ruled that the Manafort leak amounted to illegal interference in the U.S. e******n.

Hillary Clinton has long been seen as a central figure to the “RussiaGate” conspiracy theory, having introduced the idea during several televised debates between Donald Trump and herself during the 2016 p**********l e******n.

--------------

Freedom News Report
Home

About

Latest News

Contact
Latest-News
FBI Found Hillary’s Emails in Obama White House

231
Shares
136 27 3 65
A top FBI official has begrudgingly revealed both Hillary Clinton and former president Barack Obama lied about not knowing Clinton’s emails were being sent “illegally” through a home server. The agent claims a “large repository” of Clinton’s emails were obtained by the Obama White House.

The conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch, was allowed to interview Bill Priestap, the assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, as part of the discovery process for their court case against the DOJ’s decision NOT to prosecute Hillary Clinton for using an illegal home server to send classified emails while she was Secretary of State.

Priestap, played a significant role in the agency’s investigation of Clinton’s private email server and her handling of classified information. He also was directly involved in the FBI’s investigation of allegations that the Trump campaign and President Trump colluded with the Russian government.

Judicial Watch asked Priestap to identify persons named in the FBI’s action to obtain Clinton’s emails. His partial list included: former Clinton aides Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, Jacob Sullivan, and Justin Cooper; former Clinton information technology staffer Bryan Pagliano, the Secret Service, the State Department, and Washington-based law firm Williams and Connolly.

“This astonishing confirmation, made under oath by the FBI, shows that the Obama FBI had to go to President Obama’s White House office to find emails that Hillary Clinton tried to destroy or hide from the American people,” said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton in his announcement of Priestap’s revelations.

“No wonder Hillary Clinton has thus far skated — Barack Obama is implicated in her email scheme,” added Fitton.

Barack Obama has repeatedly claimed he had no knowledge of Clinton’s illegal email server. In 2015 Obama gave an interview to CBS News in which he claimed he only learned of Clinton’s homemade email server “the same time everybody else learned it through news reports.”

Obama then repeated the narrative the mainstream media has since been more than willing to accept as fact. He said, “The policy of my administration is to encourage t***sparency, which is why my emails, the BlackBerry I carry around, all those records are available and archived. I’m glad that Hillary’s instructed that those emails about official business need to be disclosed.”

U.S District Court Judge Royce Lamberth ordered Priestap, Obama administration senior State Department officials, and Clinton aids to be deposed or answer written questions under oath as part of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit.

In his ruling, Judge Lamberth turned his attention to Obama and his State Department in particular. He wrote:

[President Barack Obama’s] State and Justice Departments fell … so far short that the court questions … whether they are acting in good faith. Did Hillary Clinton use her private email as Secretary of State to thwart this lofty goal [Obama announced standard for t***sparency]? Was the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 an effort to avoid searching – and disclosing the existence of – Clinton’s missing emails?

“At worst,” said Judge Lamberth, “career employees in the State and Justice Departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court.”

Perhaps no court has offered a more direct rebuke than Lamberth’s. It found the existence and handling of Clinton’s emails, “one of the gravest modern offenses to government t***sparency.”

There should be no doubt now that the Obama administration not only knew about Clinton’s server crimes but was complicit in it. The Executive Officer of this country and the agencies supposedly seeking to root out illegal—and treasonous—actions were aiding the cover-up of the dirty deeds.

Following the investigation into the 2012 B******i debacle, the House Select Committee issued a subpoena of Clinton’s private emails. P**********l candidate Clinton tweeted, “I want the public to see my email.”

So Clinton wanted the House to see emails that Obama claimed he knew nothing about and many of those emails found a hiding place in the White House.

The public would know nothing about the depth of Hillary and Obama’s misdeeds if all it had was the mainstream media to depend upon.

Why are smaller states more important than larger states? And I am guessing you meant states with less population as opposed to states with more population. Who selects how many e*******l v**es a state gets to contribute to the e*******l college? Do you know?
“The E*******l College is also part of compromises made at the convention to satisfy the small states. Under the system of the E*******l College, each state had the same number of e*******l v**es as they have a representative in Congress. Thus no state could have less than 3. The result of this system is that in this e******n the state of Wyoming cast about 210,000 v**es, and thus each e*****r represented 70,000 v**es, while in California approximately 9,700,000 v**es were cast for 54 v**es, thus representing 179,000 v**es per e*****rate. This creates an unfair advantage to v**ers in the small states whose v**es count more than those people living in medium and large states.”


https://www.historycentral.com/e******ns/E*******lcollgewhy.html

Also a very important analysis from the above link...”The founders also believed that the E*******l College had the advantage of being a group that met only once and thus could not be manipulated over time by foreign governments or others(and v**ed their conscience and not their bank account).” Times change, just sayin.

From Wiki
Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the process whereby the Constitution, the nation's frame of government, may be altered. Under Article V, the process to alter the Constitution consists of proposing an amendment or amendments, and subsequent ratification