We may as well give up, we're beaten. Carol Kelly, I'm going to assume(which I h**e to do) you are being sarcastic. As John Paul Jones said, I(We) have just begun to fight! No way Carol are we giving up. The fight has begun with the e******n of President Trump but there many battles to be fought and won or lose to this war. There is no guarantee we will win it, in fact the odds are against us because we let the worm dig too deep. The Evil is in one third of the people, the good is in another third and the last third is up for grabs which is scary. Our govt. is for the most part in the first one third that is Evil, not all, but most of them. That being said, and it's just my humble opinion, Now, it's more important than it has ever been the time to fight like you and your families lives depend on it, because they do as do mine and all on OPP and else where.

People are worried about NOKO. Screw that. We personally have no control over that. Have to trust who we elected Commander in Chief. To lose sleep over that is a waste of our time. What will be will be. The Lord has our lives already written in his book( some call it fate). Do what you know is right, follow his orders as you see them and you will be fine. Our job is to get our Country back on track, neighborhood by neighborhood. Mike

Theo; here is a history lesson just for you:
C*******m is always a loser for those not on the inside;

It took the Russians 100 years to throw out the oligarchs/Bolsheviks.


BEHIND C*******M
by Frank L Britton. Probably published in 1952.
https://archive.org/details/BehindC*******m_201502

( The whole booklet is downloadable for free) Behind C*******m By Frank L. Britton : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
******* (I make one qualification to 'Behind C*******m'. Frank Britton does not differentiate the different factions of Jews/Judah, including the non-Hebrews, or Torah followers and Talmudic followers) *******

The text is complete and unaltered (apart from tiny but irritating errors, which we have tried to correct, book titles, which are italicized, and the full cover blurb. Where pictures are omitted, also omitted are their captions). Britton's 96-page booklet is undated, but, judging by internal evidence—Korean War, but Stalin still alive—was published about 1952, in the USA (The Americanised English spelling has been left unchanged). Britton gives no autobiographical information, and we know nothing about him, not even whether Britton was his actual name. (Could he have been a frank Briton?) His booklet is not very well produced, with spelling errors, slightly inept typography, and badly-reproduced monochrome illustrations.
There are 120 or so of these, including a few maps
and pictures relating to pre-20th century times, some photos from the Revolution, and many 'mug shots' of contemporary American Jews. All are uncredited, but appear to be from encyclopediasand newspapers. Just a few of these pictures are scanned in, and two h
ave been added from other sources. His blurb says: '... Unfortunately, any deep-
down discussion of c*******m and Marxism involves the Jewish question. We cannot honestly discuss the subject without revealing—and commenting on—the fact that the founders of Russian c*******m were Jewish. Neither can we ignore the fact that all but a few top
leadership of the American c*******t party—including the recently convicted spys [sic]—are of the same race. ... Historical writers have been understandably reluctant to hold forth on the subject for fear of marking themselves as "race h**ers" and bigots." [sic] For this reason the entire subject has been placed beyond the pale of discussion. One simply does not use the word [sic] "Jew" and "C*******m" together.
The result is, of course, censorship. ...'
This booklet deals mostly with Russia and the Russian Revolution, then the USA of about 1950; there's a huge gap, missing the entire period of the 1930s and Second World War. Possibly Britton had the main part of his text ready before the 1930s, and tacked on the final part, on Iron Curtain dictators, atom spies and Hollywood, later.

Contents:
THE PERSECUTION MYTH
RETURN TO THE EAST
THE RENAISSANCE
THE TERROR SECTION
HISTORY OF BOLSHEVISM
STALIN'S PAST

THE PERSECUTION MYTH:

With Shrill Insistence
We cannot undertake even this brief history of the modern Jew without taking note of a phenomenon which has confounded gentile societies for twenty centuries. This is the ability of the Jewish people to collectively retain
their identity despite centuries of exposure to Christian civilization. To any student of Judaism, or to the Jews themselves, this phenomenon is partly explained by the fact that Judaism is neither mainly a religion nor mainly a racial matter, nor yet is it simply a matter of nationality. Rather it is all three; it is a kind of trinity. Judaism is best described as a nationality built on the twin pillars of race and religion. All this is closely related to another aspectof Judaism, namely, the persecution myth.
Since first appearing in history we find the Jews propagating the idea that they are an abused and persecuted people, and this idea is, and has always been, central in Jewish thinking. The myth of persecution is the adhesive and cement of Judaism; without it Jews would have long since ceased to exist, their racial -religious nationality notwithstanding. Jews do not always agree among themselves, and it is only in the presence of their enemies—real or imagined—that Jewish thinking crystallizes into unanimity. In this respect they differ not at all from other peoples:
Adolph Hitler solidified German opinion around the idea that Germany was wronged at Versailles, that the German people were abused and victimized by the Allies, and that only by holding together could they prevail against the overwhelming might of their enemies ...
For twenty-five centuries the Jewish mind has
been conditioned by the same appeal. Through all Jewish thinking and all Jewish history the refrain of persecution has sounded with shrill insistence. Thus we find every accident of fortune being chronicled, enhanced, and passed on to succeeding generations as another example of gentile cruelty to the chosen race. And almost inevitably we find opposition to Jewish aspirations and ambitions being t***slated into these same terms of persecution, and all Jewish shortcomings being excused on the same basis.
Now it is a fact that the Jewish people have suffered numerous hardships in the course of their history, but this is true of other peoples too. The chief difference is that the Jews have kept score—they have made a tradition of persecution. A casual slaughter of Christians is remembered by no one in 50 years, but a disability visited upon a few Jews
is preserved forever in Jewish histories. And they tell their woes not only to themselves, but to a sympathetic world as well ...
THE JEW IN EUROPE
Even The Coins Were Jewish. We find the first Jews filtering into Europe some time before the Christian era, particularly in the region of Greece. The ancient Greeks spoke of these Asiatic invaders with considerable bitterness. Very quickly they spread throughout the Roman Empire and into Europe proper. The Jewish merchant, artisan, and s***e trader appear on the Roman scene with increasing frequency after the second century A.D. and there can be no doubt that their position in the Roman world was one of growing importance even as the
Empire drifted to destruction. Under Justinian, says the Jewish Encyclopedia
"They enjoyed full religious liberty, in return for which they assumed all a citizen's duty toward the state; minor offices were also open to them. Only the synagogues were exempt from the duty of quartering soldiers. The trade in s***es constituted the main source of livelihood for the Roman Jews, and decrees against this traffic were issued in 335, 336, 339, 384, etc."
[Funk & Wagnall's Jewish Encyclopedia, page 460, vol. 10]

". . . there was an inevitable tendency for him to specialize in commerce, for which his acumen and ubiquity gave him special qualifications. In the dark ages the commerce of western Europe was largely in his hands, in particular the s***e trade. and in Carolingian cartularies Jew and merchant are used as almost interchangeable terms."
[Encyclopedia Britannica, page 57, vol. 13—1947.] This hold over European commerce finally became so utterly complete that few gentiles engaged in trade at all; it had become almost entirely a Jewish monopoly. In Poland and Hungary, the coins bore Jewish inscriptions ...
Throughout the Medieval period, ["Dark Ages,"
"Medieval Period," and "Middle Ages" are synonymous terms used to describe the period of decline which characterized western civilization between 500-1300 A.D.] which lasted from 500 A.D. to 1300 A.D., the Jew merchant was dominant all over Europe (except Scandinavia, where he was never permitted to enter) and this dominance included control over the eastern trade routes to the Levant. There was to be no relief from this situation until the Jews were evicted from Europe in the century directly preceding the Renaissance....


England, ironically enough, was the last country to be invaded by the Jews and the first to evict them. After the Fourth Lateran Council the Jews had become increasingly difficult to deal with and there were a number of anti-Jewish r**ts. Perplexed by the problem posed by this alien minority which seemed well on its way to corralling the kingdom's wealth, and failing in an attempt to force its assimilation. Edward I confiscated all Jewish wealth and evicted them permanently in 1290….
France
In France too the Jews were dominant in trade and finance and had been since before Charlemagne's time. Under Philip the Fair (1285-1314) one of the last, and certainly one of the greatest of the Capetian line, France had become the greatest power in Europe.

RETURN TO THE EAST
The Evictions
Space does not permit a detailed discussion of the other evictions which followed and which resulted in the banishment of the Jews from virtually every country in Western Europe in the succeeding centuries but here in chronological order is a list of the evictions:
ENGLAND: Jews expelled in 1290 by Edward I. Not permitted to re-enter till 1655.
FRANCE: Expelled in 1306 by Philip the Fair..
SAXONY: Expelled in 1349.
HUNGARY: By 1092 the Jews were in control of Hungary's tax collections. In 1360 they were expelled but later returned. In 1582 they were again expelled from the Christian part of Hungary.
BELGIUM: Expelled in 1370. A few settled there again in 1450
SLOVAKIA: Ousted from Prague in 1380. Many settled there again after 1562. In 1744 Marie Theresa expelled them again.
By 1500 all of Western Europe except northern Italy….

THE RENAISSANCE
As the Jew Departed ...
The period marked by the evictions—1300 to 1650—also marks the period of the Renaissance which broke over Europe as the Jews departed. Starting at first in the trading cities of northern Italy in about 1300, there begana great rebirth of culture and learning which at first was based almost entirely on the writings of the ancient Greeks and Romans. Very quickly this renascent culture spread over Europe and when the age had... ( The whole booklet is downloadable)

To Robmull,
President Trump , according to the liberal, progressive media has 40% hardcore supporters.
They like to spin that into not enough to re-elect Trump. Heck, that's a real solid base that viscerally comprehends Trump's message in spite of the constant turmoil to Trump's presidency. All he needs is a mere 11% to win again. That will be an easy win for Trump as the Democrats still can't find the message that resonates with middle America. Their crazy social issues such as t*********r bathrooms, late term a******ns, open borders, etc are k*****g them at the polls. The RINOs are an internal problem. Hopefully, a few of them will see the light. Trump will win over the 11% he needs of the middle of the ground v**ers, andTrump will never lose his core. Just like Obama will never lose his core base.
Thank God, We Won. America Won. Keep praying for President Trump and for American values. America is the LAST country left trying to hold back the barbarians at the gate.

Theotts is back from vacation. Back on the clock.
Should we give her a big welcome?
Of course

Obama’s F**e SS#
The ‘F**e News’ Con: A Case Study

\http://lewrockwell.us7.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6ad24f4cd1574f1f7b8a0a03a&id=6b871b26bc&e=ac767b1a94
The media have found a creative new way to explain away Hillary’s Clinton’s crushing defeat and their own humiliation. They have dubbed the agent of their mutual undoing “f**e news” and talk about the phenomenon as though it made real sense.
In an all too typical New York Times opinion piece this week Michael Lynch defines “f**e news” as “pure fiction masquerading as t***h” and presents it exclusively as a “right wing” phenomenon. Like many of his colleagues, Lynch suggests the Russian government was involved in planting f**e news items and believes that such items, regardless of source, may have cost Hillary Clinton the e******n.
To test Lynch’s thesis, we might profitably select a presumed “f**e news” item and follow its course through what the Clintons once called the “communication stream of conspiracy commerce.” In August 2010, the Times identified a news item simple enough and seemingly f**e enough, “Obama uses a phony Social Security number,” to makes a useful case study.
Tracking this story, one finds its source not in Russia, but in Ohio. The person responsible for surfacing the number is a licensed private investigator named Susan Daniel. In 2009, troubled by the drift of the country under Barack Obama, she and fellow investigator Neil Sankey began to plow through proprietary databases and investigate Obama on their own time. What they discovered is that from 1986 on Barack Obama has been using a Social Security number that seemed to originate in Connecticut.

In the August 2010 article — “In Defining Obama, Misperceptions Stick” — the Times led with the SSN accusation not to explore it but to dismiss it. They simply presumed this question, like more involved questions about Obama’s faith or family origins, to be “misperceptions” unworthy of exploration.
The major media leave the dirty work of debunking to fact-checking sites, most notoriously Snopes.com. In an analysis that has been updated through 2016, Snopes leads with this accusation, “Barack Obama appropriated the Social Security number of a dead man born in 1890 and used it as his own.” In large red letters, Snopes rejects the accusation as “FALSE.”
This approach is classic Snopes. Its editors elaborate this bizarre story about a Frenchman named Jean Paul Ludwig who dies in Hawaii and whose SSN is appropriated by Obama’s grandmother. They then reject this particular story as false — as Daniel and others had already done — and ignore the larger t***h. That t***h, as Snopes admits in the fine print, is that Obama’s SSN, 042-68-4425, is “something of a curiosity.”
Daniel believes that the number is more than a curiosity. She believes the number was stolen. When Obama applied, numbers were assigned based on where the applicant received mail. As Daniel notes, and Snopes grudgingly concedes, numbers starting with 042 were for the exclusive use of those applying from Connecticut. Obama’s half-sister Maya, by contrast, has an SSN that starts with 576, as do other Hawaiians her age.
Daniel’s theory got lively play on the outer reaches of the Internet — “an open sewer of untreated, unfiltered information,” according to the Times’ Thomas Friedman — but could not get past the respectable conservative media firewall surrounding the Obama White House. Bill O’Reilly of Fox News did raise the issue only to dismiss it, arguing that Obama got the number from his father then living in Connecticut. In reality, Obama Sr. never lived in Connecticut and left the United States more than a decade before the number was issued in May 1977.
Snopes took another tack. “The most likely explanation for the discrepancy is a simple clerical or typographical error,” its editors insisted. Certain Danbury, Connecticut zip codes do begin in 068 while those in Hawaii begin with 968 — one easy keystroke away. In her research, however, Daniel discovered that Obama lived in only three different Hawaii zip codes. In checking with the Danbury Post Office, she discovered that two of the corollary zip codes never existed and the third was issued only in 1992, fifteen years after the number was assigned.